Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12 APPROVE THE ANNUAL OC GO (MEASURE M2) ELIGIBILITYDocusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC MEETING DATE TO FROM Agenda Item 12 Inival AGENDA REPORT Reviewed: a`�S City Manager Finance Director 9 JUNE 17, 2025 ALDO E. SCHINDLER, CITY MANAGER MICHAEL GRISSO, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: APPROVE THE ANNUAL OC GO (MEASURE M2) ELIGIBILITY SUBMITTAL PACKAGE, FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026 SUMMARY: To maintain eligibility to receive OC Go (also known as Orange County Measure M2 Program) funding, the City is required to annually submit a compliance package to the Orange County Transportation Authority. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions: Adopt the attached Measure M2 Seven -Year Capital Improvement Program (Fiscal Year 2025-2026 through Fiscal Year 2031-2032, Attachment "B" of the M2 Eligibility Package); and 2. Approve Resolution No. 25-47 informing the Orange County Transportation Authority that the City updated a Pavement Management Plan that is in conformance with their format; and 3. Approve Resolution No. 25-48 informing the Orange County Transportation Authority that there have been no changes to the City's Circulation Element of the General Plan and that it is consistent with the Master Plan of Arterial Highways and that the City concurs with the Mitigation Fee Program for new development; and 4. Authorize the Director of Public Works to submit the City of Tustin's Measure M2 eligibility package to the Orange County Transportation Authority. FISCAL IMPACT: The City has successfully secured Comprehensive Transportation Funding Program competitive funds under the current Measure M2 Program and met required match funding contributions towards various projects over the years. The City's annual local jurisdiction apportionment, known as "Local Fair Share," under Measure M2, is estimated at $2.25M Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City Council Agenda Report FY 2025-26 Measure M2 Eligibility Submittal June 17, 2025 Page 2 for Fiscal Year 2025-2026. Since 2011, the City has received approximately $46M from the Measure M2, including $22.3M in Local Fair Share funds. These funds have supported numerous City projects including the Tustin Ranch Road Extension, Warner Avenue Extension, Tier 1/II Environmental Water Quality, Senior Mobility Program, Red Hill Avenue Widening and Raised Median Improvements, and traffic signal synchronization projects along Tustin Ranch Road, Red Hill Avenue, Seventeenth Street, First Street, Tustin Avenue and Edinger Avenue corridors as well as the City's annual roadway and public infrastructure maintenance program. CORRELATION TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN: Maintaining eligibility for funding under Measure M2 and use of that funding to improve transportation infrastructure contributes to the fulfillment of the City's Strategic Plan Goal B: Public Safety and Protection of Assets. Specifically, the project implements Strategy #1, which, among other items, is to ensure continuous maintenance and improvement of public transportation facilities. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: Since the inception of Measure M in 1991, the City has submitted annual documentation to the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to maintain eligibility for competitive and Local Fair Share (LFS) funding. The original 20-year Measure M program, which established a one-half (1/2) cent sales tax for local and regional transportation improvements throughout Orange County expired. In November 2006, the voters of Orange County approved renewing the program (commonly referred to as Measure M2) for an additional 30 years. The Measure M2 program provides funding for a new slate of projects and planned programs. These include improvements to the Orange County freeway system and road network, expansion of the Metrolink system, enhanced transit services for seniors and those with disabilities, funding for protection and cleanup of roadway stormwater runoff, and funding for local traffic signal synchronization programs. The Measure M2 funds have enabled the City to undertake significant capital projects that improve the transportation and circulation system in Tustin. This year's Measure M2 eligibility package includes the following documentation: • Attachment "A" - Measure M2 Eligibility Checklist (OCTA APPENDIX D). • Attachment "B" - The City's Measure M2 Seven -Year Capital Improvement Program Seven -Year Plan (CIP), OCTA's "OC Fundtracker" CIP report, for Fiscal Year 2025- 2026 through Fiscal Year 2031-2032 is attached. Attachment "C" — Excerpts from the City's 2025-2032 CIP Seven -Year Plan as it relates to Measure M2 funding. Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City Council Agenda Report FY 2025-26 Measure M2 Eligibility Submittal June 17, 2025 Page 3 • Attachment "D" - Congestion Management Program (CMP) Checklist (OCTA APPENDIX C) is attached. The City is required every two years to submit this checklist to demonstrate compliance with its CMP. Attachment "E" - City Resolutions for the Measure M2 Program (OCTA APPENDIX E): o Resolution No. 25-47 - Status and Update of the Pavement Management Plan o Resolution No. 25-48 - Status and Update of the Circulation Element and Mitigation Fee Program. Attachment "F" — City's Pavement Management Plan (PMP) and PMP Certification Form (OCTA APPENDIX F) are attached. The PMP is a plan to manage the preservation, rehabilitation, and maintenance of paved roads by analyzing pavement life cycles, assessing overall system performance costs, and determining alternative strategies and costs necessary to improve paved roads. The City is required to adopt a PMP every two years that is consistent with the OCTA Measure M2 Ordinance and Countywide PMP Guidelines. • Attachment "G" - A copy of the Arterial Highway Plan Map of the City's Circulation Element is attached. Attachment "H" - Arterial Highway Mileage Change Report (OCTA APPENDIX H) is attached. Each jurisdiction is required to report changes in the Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH), arterial streets. The City is reporting that no changes have been made to its MPAH arterial streets. Attachment "I" - Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Reporting Form (OCTA APPENDIX 1) is attached, plus a statement certifying that the City of Tustin has budgeted and will meet its MOE benchmark requirement based on dollar value for Fiscal Year 2025- 26. Attachment "J" — City Mitigation Fee Program is attached. The Measure M2 Ordinance requires local agencies to assess the traffic impacts of new development and require new development to pay a fair share of necessary transportation improvements attributable to the new development. The City currently has a defined development impact mitigation fee program in place. The components of this program, including an associated nexus study, were previously submitted to the OCTA. The latest Transportation Corridor Agencies (TCA) Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fee Program is attached and satisfies this requirement. Attachment "K" — A Transit and Non -Motorized Transportation Land Use Strategies Letter is attached. The City, through its General Plan, considers land use planning Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City Council Agenda Report FY 2025-26 Measure M2 Eligibility Submittal June 17, 2025 Page 4 strategies that accommodate transit and non -motorized transportation. The attached letter documents these strategies. These items demonstrate to the OCTA that Tustin has been and will continue to fulfill its responsibility to implement the requirements of Measure M2. Moreover, compliance with the requirements of Measure M2 will ensure the City's continued eligibility for the Local Fair Share and competitive program funds. Michael Grisso Director of Public Works Attachments: 1. Resolution No. 25-47 - Pavement Management Plan 2. Resolution No. 25-48 - Circulation Element and Mitigation Fee Program 3. FY 2025-2026 Measure M2 Eligibility Package Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. 25-47 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC RESOLUTION NO. 25-47 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, CONCERNING THE STATUS AND UPDATE OF THE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE MEASURE M2 (M2) PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City is required to meet eligibility requirements and submit eligibility verification packages to the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to remain eligible to receive M2 funds; and WHEREAS, the City is required to adopt and update a Pavement Management Plan (PMP), using the required format, regarding the status of road pavement conditions and implementation of the PMP every two years; and WHEREAS, the City is required to provide a plan that manages the preservation, rehabilitation, and maintenance of paved roads by analyzing pavement life cycles, assessing overall system performance costs, and determining alternative strategies and costs necessary to improve paved roads. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council for the City of Tustin does hereby inform OCTA that: a) The PMP is in conformance with the PMP Submittal Template provided in the Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines. b) The City of Tustin hereby adopts a PMP and has provided an updated PMP report, using the required format, to OCTA. c) The Director of Public Works or designee is authorized to sign the PMP certification form. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tustin held on the 17t" day of June 2025. AUSTIN LUMBARD, Mayor ATTEST: ERICA N. YASUDA, City Clerk Resolution 25-47 Page 1 of 2 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC APPROVED AS TO FORM: DocuSigned by: DA $r3KSI'MiG, City Attorney /msd/ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, Erica N. Yasuda, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council is five; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 25-47 was duly and regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 17t" day of June, 2025 by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBER AYES: COUNCILMEMBER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER RECUSED: ERICA N. YASUDA, City Clerk Resolution 25-47 Page 2 of 2 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC ATTACHMENT 2 Resolution No. 25-48 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC RESOLUTION NO. 25-48 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, CONCERNING THE STATUS AND UPDATE OF THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT, AND MITIGATION FEE PROGRAM FOR THE MEASURE M (M2) PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City desires to maintain and improve the streets within its jurisdiction, including those arterials contained in the Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH); and WHEREAS, the City has endorsed a definition of and process for, determining consistency of the City's Traffic Circulation Plan with the MPAH; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted a General Plan Circulation Element which does not preclude implementation of the MPAH within its jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, the City is required to adopt a resolution biennially informing the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) that the City's Circulation Element is in conformance with the MPAH and whether any changes to any arterial highways of said Circulation Element have been adopted by the City during Fiscal Years (FY) 2023-24 and FY 2024-25; and WHEREAS, the City is required to send biennially to the OCTA all recommended changes to the City Circulation Element and the MPAH for the purposes of re -qualifying for participation in the Comprehensive Transportation Funding Programs; and WHEREAS, the City is required to adopt a resolution biennially certifying that the City has an existing Mitigation Fee Program that assesses traffic impacts of new development and requires new development to pay a fair share of necessary transportation improvements attributable to the new development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council for the City of Tustin does hereby inform the OCTA that: a) The arterial highway portion of the Circulation Element of the City of Tustin is in conformance with the MPAH. b) The City of Tustin attests that no unilateral reduction in through lanes has been made on any MPAH arterials during FY 2023-24 and FY 2024-25. c) The City of Tustin affirms that it will bring forward requests to amend the MPAH, when necessary, to ensure that the MPAH and the General Plan Circulation Element remain consistent. d) The City of Tustin reaffirms that the existing Mitigation Fee Program is in effect. Resolution 25-48 Page 1 of 2 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tustin held on the 17th day of June 2025. AUSTIN LUMBARD, Mayor ATTEST: ERICA N. YASUDA, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: DocuSigned by: DA $�.TEENbIG, City Attorney /msd/ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, Erica N. Yasuda, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council is five; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 25-48 was duly and regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 17th day of June, 2025 by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBER AYES: COUNCILMEMBER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER RECUSED: ERICA N. YASUDA, City Clerk Resolution 25-47 Page 2 of 2 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC ATTACHMENT 3 FY 2025-2026 Measure M2 Eligibility Package Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Remembering what connects us. June 18, 2025 Ms. Charvalen Alacar Section Manager, Measure M - Local Programs Orange County Transportation Authority 600 S. Main Street Orange, CA 92868 Subject: Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Measure M2 Eligibility Package Submittal Dear Ms. Alacar: The City of Tustin is pleased to submit the OC Go (also known as the Renewed Measure M (M2) Program) Eligibility Review package for Fiscal Year 2025-2026. Included in the submittal are the following: 1. Attachment "A" -Measure M2 Eligibility Checklist (OCTA APPENDIX D) 2. Attachment "B" - City's Measure M2 Seven -Year CIP, OCTA's "OC Funcitracker" CIP Report, for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 through Fiscal Year 2031-2032. 3. Attachment "C" -A copy of the City's 2025-2032 Capital Improvement Program Seven -Year Plan Budget sections, as it relates to Measure M2 funding. 4. Attachment "D" -Congestion Management Program (CMP) Checklist (OCTA APPENDIX C) 5. Attachment "E" -City Resolutions for the Measure M2 Program (OCTA APPENDIX E) a. Resolution No. 47 —Status and Update of the Pavement Management Plan b. Resolution No. 48 - Status and Update of the Circulation Element and Mitigation Fee Program 6. Attachment "F" - City's Pavement Management Plan and PMP Certification Form (OCTA APPENDIX F) 7. Attachment "G" - City's Circulation Element Exhibit (Map) 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA 92780 • 714-573-3000 • tustinca.org Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC 8. Attachment "H" - Arterial Highway Mileage Change Report (OCTA APPENDIX H) 9. Attachment "I" - Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Reporting Form (OCTA APPENDIX 1) 10. Attachment "J" - City Mitigation Fee Program 11. Attachment "K" - Transit and Non -Motorized Transportation Land Use Strategies Letter Please do not hesitate to contact me at 714-573-3157 or ktnguyen _tustinca.org if you have any questions regarding the City of Tustin's eligibility package. Sincerely, A' �Kenny Nguyen, P.E. Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer Attachment(s): 1. FY 2025-26 Measure M2 Eligibility Package CC: Michael Grisso, Director of Public Works Jennifer King, Director of Finance Stacey Cuevas, Assistant Director of Public Works DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA 92780 • 714-573-3000 • tustinca.org Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC CITY OF TUSTIN i 1- A-0.0"m � �Lj ST N ANNUAL OC GO (MEASURE M2) ELIGIBILITY PACKAGE FY 2025-26 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin LIST OF ATTACHMENTS A. Measure M2 Eligibility Checklist (OCTA APPENDIX D) B. City's Measure M2 Seven -Year CIP (OC Fundtracker CIP Report) C. Excerpts from the City's 2025-2032 Capital Improvement Program Seven -Year Plan D. Congestion Management Program (CMP) Checklist (OCTA APPENDIX C) E. City Resolutions for the Measure M2 Program (OCTA APPENDIX E) a. Resolution No. 47 - Status and Update of the Pavement Management Plan b. Resolution No. 48 - Status and Update of the Circulation Element and Mitigation Fee Program F. City's Pavement Management Plan and PMP Certification Form (OCTA APPENDIX F) G. City's Circulation Element Exhibit (MAP) H. Arterial Highway Mileage Change Report (OCTA APPENDIX H) I. Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Reporting Form (OCTA APPENDIX 1) J. City Mitigation Fee Program K. Transit/ Non -Motorized Transportation Land Use Planning Strategies Letter Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Attachment "A" Measure M2 Eligibility Checklist Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC M)> OCTA (XG0 Local Tax Dollars at Work Jurisdiction: City Of Tustin APPENDIX D Eligibility Checklist Capital Improvement Program (CIP) YES NO 1. Did you submit your draft or adopted M2 seven-year CIP to OCTA by June 30? a. Did you utilize the required OCTA OCFundtracker CIP database? b. Have you included projects required to demonstrate compliance with signal synchronization, pavement maintenance, the Congestion Management Program, and environmental clean-up commitments? c. Are there any non -transportation related projects included in your M2 CIP? Note: Projects funded through ECP are considered trans ortation-related d. Did you include all projects that are partially, fully, or potentially funded by M2 Net Revenues? e. The City Council/Board of Supervisors approval date` to adopt the final 7-Year CIP is: 06/17/2025 'Must be prior to July 31 Maintenance of Effort (MOE) YES NO 2. Did you submit the MOE certification form (Appendix I) to OCTA by June 30? a. Did you provide supporting budget documentation? b. Has the MOE Reporting form been signed by the Finance Director or appropriate designee? Pavement Management Plan (PMP) YES NO 3. Are you required to submit a PMP update to OCTA for this eligibility cycle? Refer to Exhibit 3 for PMP submittal schedule. a. If yes, did you use the current PMP Submittal Template (Appendix F)? b. If yes, is the adopted PMP consistent with the OCTA Countywide Pavement Management Plan? 4. If you answered "no" to question 3, did you submit a PMP update to OCTA through the previous eligibility cycle by the required deadline? Resolution of MPAH Consistency YES NO 5. Did you submit a resolution indicating conformance with the MPAH? a. Have you enclosed an exhibit showing roadway designations that represent your most❑ current circulation element? ❑ Local Signal Synchronization Plan (LSSP) YES NO 6. Did you adopt and submit an update to the LSSP as part of the current cycle? N/A N/A a. Is your LSSP consistent with the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan? N/A N/A Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC M)a OCTA (XGO Local Tax Dollars at Work APPENDIX D Eligibility Checklist Time Limits for Use of Net Revenues YES NO 7. Has your jurisdiction complied with the three-year time limit for the use of Net Revenues over the last year per the requirements outlined in the Ordinance? a. If no, has a time extension been requested through the CTFP semi-annual review process for funds subject to expiration? Supplanting of Developer Commitments YES NO 8. Has your jurisdiction ensured they have not supplanted developer commitments for transportation projects and funding with M2 funds? Mitigation Fee Program (MFP) YES NO 9. Does your jurisdiction currently have a defined development impact MFP in place? 10. Has an update to the MFP occurred since the last reporting period? 11. If yes to 10, has your jurisdiction submitted one or more of the supporting documents outlined in chapter 2.7 of the Eligibility Guidelines? Planning Strategies YES NO 12. Does your jurisdiction consider as part of its General Plan, land use planning strategies that accommodate transit and non -motorized transportation? 13. Have you provided a letter identifying land use planning strategies that accommodate transit and non -motorized transportation consideration in the General Plan? Traffic Forums YES NO 14. Did representatives of your jurisdiction participate in the regional traffic forum(s)? a. If you answered yes, provide date(s) of attendance: 10/01/24 and 02/04/25 Congestion Management Program (CMP) YES NO 15. Has your jurisdiction completed the required CMP checklist? (Appendix C) ❑� Kenny Nguyen, Deputy Director/City Engineer Name (Print) si 06/04/2025 Date Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Attachment "B" City's Measure M2 Seven -Year CIP (OC Fundtracker CIP Report) Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Orange County Transportation Authority FY 2025/26 - FY 2031/32 Capital Improvement Program Local Project Number: Additional Project IDs: Type of Work: Transportation Planning Type of Work Description: Transportation Planning - Studies Limits Citywide Project Notes Local Project Number: Additional Project IDs: Type of Work: Road Maintenance Type of Work Description: Road Maintenance - Rehabilitation of roadway Limits Citywide - Various locations Project Notes City of Tustin 24/25: Planned Annual Pavement Maintenance and Sidewalk Repair Project. City of Tustin 25/26: Annual Pavement Maintenance and Sidewalk Repair Project. Added construction budget for FY 25-26 Local Project Number: Additional Project IDs: Type of Work: Road Maintenance Type of Work Description: Road Maintenance - Rehabilitation of roadway Limits Citywide - Various locations Project Notes City of Tustin 24/25: Planned Annual Pavement Maintenance and Sidewalk Repair Project. City of Tustin 25/26: Annual Pavement Maintenance and Sidewalk Repair Project. Added construction budget for FY 25-26 Project Title Active Transportation Plan (CIP Project No. 40096) Project Description The project will develop a Tustin Citywide Active Transportation Plan (CATP) with Safe Routes to School (SRTS) elements. FISCAL TOTAL YEAR FUND TYPE ENG ROW CON/IMP O&M TOTAL ESCALATED 2026 Measure M2 Local $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $75,000 Fairshare Totals: $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $75,000 Total Programmed: $75,000 Project Title Annual Pavement Maintenance and Sidewalk Repair Project (City CIP No. 70024) Project Description Annual maintenance of roadways, public alleys, and public infrastructure at various citywide locations, including pavement rehabilitation measures such as crack sealing, slurry seal, AC overlay, sidewalk repairs, signing and striping. [Zone 6] FISCAL TOTAL FUND TYPE ENG ROW CON/IMP O&M TOTAL YEAR ESCALATED 2026 General Fund $0 $0 $406,513 $0 $406,513 $416,676 2026 Measure M2 Local $0 $0 $1,800,000 $0 $1,800,000 $1,845,000 Fairshare 2026 Gas Tax $0 $0 $54,009 $0 $54,009 $55,359 2026 Gas Tax $0 $0 $54,009 $0 $54,009 $55,359 2026 Measure M2 Local $0 $0 $1,800,000 $0 $1,800,000 $1,845,000 Fairshare 2026 General Fund $0 $0 $406,513 $0 $406,513 $416,676 Totals: $0 $0 $4,521,044 $0 $4,521,044 $4,634,070 Total Programmed: $4,521,044 Project Title Annual Pavement Maintenance and Sidewalk Repair Project (City CIP No. 70024) Project Description Annual maintenance of roadways, public alleys, and public infrastructure at various citywide locations, including pavement rehabilitation measures such as crack sealing, slurry seal, AC overlay, sidewalk repairs, signing and striping. [Zone 6] FISCAL TOTAL YEAR FUND TYPE ENG ROW CON/IMP O&M TOTAL ESCALATED 2026 Gas Tax $0 $0 $54,009 $0 $54,009 $55,359 2026 Measure M2 Local $0 $0 $1,800,000 $0 $1,800,000 $1,845,000 Fairshare 2026 General Fund $0 $0 $406,513 $0 $406,513 $416,676 Totals: $0 $0 $2,260,522 $0 $2,260,522 $2,317,035 Total Programmed: $2,260,522 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Local Project Number: 21-SNTA-TSP-4002 Additional Project IDs: Type of Work: Traffic Signals Type of Work Description: Traffic Signals - Coordinate signals within project limits Limits First Street from Tustin Avenue to Newport Avenue [Project limits within the City of Tustin] Project Notes Regional RTSSP project in collaboration with Cities of Santa Ana, Huntington Beach, Westminster, and County of Orange. City of Tustin's M2 LFS budget to cover City share of 20% O&M Local Match. M2-LFS: Anticipated O&M expenditures till 06/30/2022 $615- M2-LFS: FY 2022/23 O&M budget $200,000- [includes $50k new + $150k CO from prior yr.] M2-LFS: FY 2023/24 O&M budget $95,280- CO from prior yrs. M2-LFS: O&M expenditures all 06/30/2024 $48,915-, FY 2024-25 O&M budget $156,624- CO from prior yrs. City of Tustin FY 25/26: Included FY 24-25 forecasted expenditures and budget for FY 25-26 Local Project Number: Additional Project IDs: Type of Work: Traffic Signals Type of Work Description: Traffic Signals - Interconnect traffic signals to improve coordination and communications Limits Irvine Boulevard Project Notes City of Tustin 25/26: Planned RSSP project for FY 26-27 Local Project Number: N/A Additional Project IDs: Type of Work: Safety Type of Work Description: Safety - Install guard rails, curbs or other safety barriers along road Limits Main Street between Newport Ave and Prospect Ave. Project Notes AB2766 (AQMD): 2018/19 $198k Includes prior Yr PE phase expenditures, sub -total project expenditures till 06/30/2019. M2 LFS: 2018/19 $188,393- includes prior yr expenditures, sub -total project expenditures till 06/30/2019. Other funding: Previously CMAQ & Matching M2-LFS funds. Other Funding: Local - MCAS Land sale proceeds, FY 2023/24 budget of $3.9M CO from prior yrs. [or City GFs} CO to FY24/25. M2-LFS: 2023/24 budget of $26,860- CO from prior yrs. FY24/25 Other: MCAS Land Sale Proceeds. FY 25-26 Updates: Other: MCAS Land Sale Proceeds M2 Local Fairshare funds is projected CO from FY 24/25 Project Title First Street / Bolsa Avenue Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (City CIP No. 40094) Project Description Traffic studies, install new signal equipment and implement new timing to synchronize signals along First Street and Bolsa Avenue. Regional RTSSP project managed by OCTA. FISCAL TOTAL YEAR FUND TYPE ENG ROW CON/IMP O&M TOTAL ESCALATED 2026 Measure M2 Local $0 $0 $0 $111,085 $111,085 $111,085 Fairshare Totals: $0 $0 $0 $111,085 $111,085 $111,085 Total Programmed: $111,085 Project Title Irvine Boulevard Signal Synchonization Project Description City is applying for OCTA funding under the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (Project P). The goal of Project P is to enhance traffic flow and reduce congestion and delay on arterial roadways. The project aimes to provid FISCAL TOTAL FUND TYPE ENG ROW CON/IMP O&M TOTAL YEAR ESCALATED 2027 Measure M2 Local $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $300,000 $315,188 Fairshare Totals: $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $300,000 $315,188 Total Programmed: $300,000 Project Title Main Street Improvements (City CIP No. 40087) Project Description Street improvements on Main Street between Newport Avenue and Prospect Avenue including installation of raised landscaped medians, narrowing of curb -to -curb street width, traffic striping with addition of buffered Class II bike lanes and sharrows, en FISCAL TOTAL FUND TYPE ENG ROW CON/IMP O&M TOTAL YEAR ESCALATED 2026 Local Streets and Roads $0 $0 $1,179,000 $0 $1,179,000 $1,208,475 apportionments 2026 General Fund $0 $0 $730,000 $0 $730,000 $748,250 2026 Other $0 $0 $1,600,000 $0 $1,600,000 $1,640,000 2026 Air Quality Management $0 $0 $321,000 $0 $321,000 $329,025 District Community 2026 Development Block $0 $0 $3,170,000 $0 $3,170,000 $3,249,250 Grant 2026 Measure M2 Local $253,393 $0 $0 $0 $253,393 $253,393 Fairshare Totals: $253,393 $0 $7,000,000 $0 $7,253,393 $7,428,393 Total Programmed: $7,253,393 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Local Project Number: Additional Project IDs: Type of Work: Other Type of Work Description: Other - Other Limits Various Locations - City of Tustin Old Town Area Project Notes Other Funds FY 2021/22 - MCAS Land Sale Proceeds, Construction funds of $735,000- CO to FY 2022/23. Potential other funds: Federal, State, M2-LFS, SB1, GT and/or City funds. Other Funds FY 2024/25 - City Fund 189, MCAS Land Sale Proceeds & CO funding from prior years. Expenditures till 06/30/2024: $251,773- City of Tustin 25/26: Other Funds is City Fund 189, MCAS Land Sale Proceeds & includes CO funding from prior years. Local Project Number: 19-OCTA-TSP-3939 Additional Project IDs: Type of Work: Traffic Signals Type of Work Description: Traffic Signals - Interconnect traffic signals to improve coordination and communications Limits Multi agency project - City of Tustin Segment Limits from Bryan Ave to Carnegie Ave. Project Notes City of Tustin: 20% City match for TSSP Improvements within City Limits - M2-LFS FY 2021 funds CO from prior Yr M2 TSSP: 2019 M2 RTSSP Call Primay Implementation Funds [OCTA Allocation No. 19-OCTA-TSP-3939] M2 TSSP: 2019 M2 RTSSP Call O&M funds City of Tustin O&M match M2-LFS: $40,504- expenditures anticipated till 06/30/2022, CO Balance of $214,496- to FY 2022/23. City of Tustin 23/24 O&M match M2-LFS: budget of 61,886- CO from prior yrs City of Tustin 24/25 O&M match M2-LFS budget $75k CO from prior yrs. City of Tustin 25/26: O&M match M2-LFS budget of $67,454 Local Project Number: Additional Project IDs: Type of Work: Safety Type of Work Description: Safety - Install curb median Limits Red Hill Avenue south of San Juan Street Project Notes City of Tustin 25/26: The project costs to be split 50/50 between the Compass at Red Hill private development and the City. City will use M2 LFS for its cost -share. Project Title Old Town Improvements (City CIP No. 70254) Project Description Design and Construct enhancements to improve outdoor connectivity, mobility, walkability, traffic calming and way finding within the public right-of-way, with emphasis on safety and circulation. FISCAL TOTAL FUND TYPE ENG ROW CON/IMP O&M TOTAL YEAR ESCALATED 2026 Community Development $0 $0 $411,000 $0 $411,000 $421,275 Block Grant 2026 Other $0 $0 $3,582,471 $0 $3,582,471 $3,672,033 Totals: $0 $0 $3,993,471 $0 $3,993,471 $4,093,308 Total Programmed: $3,993,471 Project Title Red Hill Avenue Corridor TSSP (City CIP No. 40093) Project Description Provide timing analysis studies, install new signal equipment and synchronization. Project Managed by OCTA as lead agency. City of Tustin to provide match for project within it's City limits. FISCAL TOTAL YEAR FUND TYPE ENG ROW CON/IMP O&M TOTAL ESCALATED 2026 Measure M2 Local $0 $0 $0 $67,454 $67,454 $67,454 Fairshare Totals: $0 $0 $0 $67,454 $67,454 $67,454 Total Programmed: $67,454 Project Title The Compass At Red Hill Median Project Description Installation of raised medians on Red Hill Avenue near San Juan Street FISCAL TOTAL FUND TYPE ENG ROW CON/IMP O&M TOTAL YEAR ESCALATED 2026 Measure M2 Local $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $100,000 $102,500 Fairshare Totals: $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $100,000 $102,500 Total Programmed: $100,000 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Local Project Number: Project Title Additional Project IDs: Traffic Signal Installation El Camino Real & Auto Center Drive Type of Work: Traffic Signals Project Description Type of Work Description: Traffic Signals- Modify traffic signals on El Camino Real at Auto Center Dr. Replace and upgrade traffic signals and equipment Limits FISCAL TOTAL El Camino Real at Auto Center Drive YEAR FUND TYPE ENG ROW CON/IMP O&M TOTAL ESCALATED Project Notes 2026 Measure M2 Local $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $100,000 $102,500 Fairshare City of Tustin 25/26: The City will collaborate with the adjacent Costco development for 50/50 split since this development modifies the ingress/egress of this intersection. Totals: $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $100,000 $102,500 Total Programmed: $100,000 Local Project Number: Project Title Additional Project IDs: Traffic Signal Installation San Juan Street & Red Hill Avenue Type of Work: Traffic Signals Project Description Type of Work Description: Traffic Signals - Install Installation of traffic signals on Red Hill Avenue between San Juan Street and El Camino Real new traffic signals and equipment Limits FISCAL TOTAL FUND TYPE ENG ROW CON/IMP O&M TOTAL San Juan Street & Red Hill Avenue YEAR ESCALATED Project Notes 2026 Measure M2 Local $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $300,000 $307,500 Fairshare City of Tustin 25/26: The project costs to be split 50/50 between the Compass at Red Hill private development and the City. City will use M2 LFS for its cost -share. Totals: $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $300,000 $307,500 Local Project Number: 20-ORNG-TSP-3976 Additional Project IDs: Type of Work: Traffic Signals Type of Work Description: Traffic Signals - Interconnect traffic signals to improve coordination and communications Limits Tustin Avenue - Rose Drive from 1 st Street to Wabash Avenue Project Notes M2-LFS: City of Tustin 20% match share for their portion of the RTSSP project - 2022/23 budget $45,000- CO from prior yr. Map shows project limits in the City of Tustin only. [City of Tustin CIP No. 40095 - Tustin Avenue Signal Synchronization]. M2-LFS: City of Tustin O&M Match 2023/24 budget of $13,186- CO from prior yrs. M2 RTSSP funds [IMP $2,663,153- in FY2020/21 and O&M $103,680- in FY 2021/22] allocated to the City of Orange as lead agency. M2-LFS: City of Tustin O&M match 2024/25 budget of $2,405- CO from prior yrs City of Tustin 25/26: O&M Match Budget of $20,000 for FY 25-26 Total Programmed: $300,000 Project Title Tustin Avenue - Rose Drive RTSSP (City CIP No. 40095) Project Description Design & implement traffic signal coordination along Tustin Avenue. Part of multi -jurisdictional RTSSP project managed by the City of Orange as lead agency. Overall project limits - Tustin Avenue from 1st Street to Wabash Avenue. FISCAL TOTAL FUND TYPE ENG ROW CON/IMP O&M TOTAL YEAR ESCALATED 2026 Measure M2 Local $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 Fairshare Totals: $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 Total Programmed: $20,000 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Local Project Number: Project Title Additional Project IDs: Valencia Avenue Widening Type of Work: Smart Streets Project Description Type of Work Description: Smart Streets - Roadway widening and intersection improvements, including acquisition of right-of-way to facilitate Widen roadway, coordinate traffic signals, add widening to augmented primary arterial status. Valencia Avenue was restriped to 4 lanes with the turning lanes at intersections, add bus turnouts Newport Avenue/SR55 Ramp Reconfiguration Project (CIP Limits FISCAL TOTAL FUND TYPE ENG ROW CON/IMP O&M TOTAL YEAR ESCALATED Newport and Red Hill Avenue Project Notes 2027 Measure M2 Local $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 City of Tustin FY 25/26: Planned road widening Fairshare project Measure M2 Local 2030 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000 Fairshare 2031 Measure M2 Local $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $2,319,387 Fairshare 2032 Measure M2 Local $0 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $3,000,000 $3,566,057 Fairshare Totals: $600,000 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $59600,000 $63485,444 Total Programmed: $5,600,000 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Attachment "C" Excerpts from City's 2025-2032 Capital Improvement Program Seven -Year Plan Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin I UJI 2025-27 Biennial Fiscal Operating & Capital Improvement Program Budget I 11Jl 2025-2026 Capital Improvement Program - Projects & Funding Proposed Fund 131 Fund 132 Fund 187 Fund 189 Proj # Project Name CIP Budget Park Dev MCAS PFund 200 Other roceeds of 2025-26 Park Dev Grants Ba ckbo Fee ne Land Sale GF-CIP Funds Flood Control Projects TBD Storm Drain Master Plan 500,000 - - - - - 500,000 Total Flood Control Projects 500,000 - - - - - 500,000 Park Facilities Projects 20054 Annual Major Park Maintenance 605,808 605,808 - 20062 Tustin Sports Park Diamonds 1 8: 3 Renovation 500,000 500,000 20089 Heideman School Park 5,150,000 5,150,000 TBD Camino Real Park Playground Renovation 500,000 500,000 20094 Tustin Legacy Park Improvements 720,000 720,000 20093 Tustin Sports Park Turf Renovation 664,079 664,079 - Total Park Facilities Projects 8,139,887 2,269,887 5,870,000 - - - - Public Facilities Projects 10032 Annual Major Building Maintenance 501,099 501,099 10069 Civic Center Alternate Power Source Improvements 800,000 800,000 10086 Police Department Improvements 2,000,000 2,000,000 10088 Columbus Tustin Gym HVAC Replacement 2,020,000 2,020,000 TBD Tustin Area Senior Center Expansion 500,000 500,000 TBD Tustin Family It Youth Center Playground 500,000 500,000 Total Public Facilities Projects 6,321,099 500,000 - 5,321,099 500,000 Traffic Control Projects 40080 Traffic Signal Equipment Upgrades Ex Replacement 210,000 210,000 40087 Main Street Improvements 7,000,000 1,600,000 3,900,000 1,500,000 40093 Red Hill Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization Project 67,454 67,454 40094 First Street Signal Synchronization 111,085 111,085 40095 Tustin Ave Signal Synchronization 20,000 20,000 40096 Active Transportation Master Plan 75,000 75,000 TBD Traffic Signal Installation the Compass at Red Hill 300,000 300,000 TBD Traffic Signal Improvement EL Camino Real / Auto 100,000 100,000 Center Drive Total Traffic Control Projects 7,883,539 1,600,000 3,900,000 2,383,539 Transportation Maintenance Projects 70024 Annual Roadway Et Public Infrastructure Maintenance 2,260,522 406,513 1,854,009 Program (MOE)2024-2025 70025 Annual Roadway 8t Public Infrastructure Maintenance 700,000 700,000 Program (MOE)2025-2026 70254 Old Town Improvements 3,993,741 3,582,741 411,000 70255 Red Hill Ave Utility Undergrounding between El Camino 821 821 Real V30' N of San Juan TBD The Compass at Red Hill Median Improvements 100,000 100,000 TBD Jamboree Road Rehabilitation between Barranca 600,000 600,000 Parkway arkwa and OCTA/SCRRA Total Transportation Maintenance Projects 7,655,084 - - 3,582,741 406,513 3,665,830 Tustin Legacy Projects 20083 Tustin Legacy Linear Park Between Armstrong Avenue 14,014,206 6,402,454 7,611,752 and Warner Avenue 70256 Neighborhood D South Phase 2 2,000,000 2,000,000 70257 Armstrong Avenue Pedestrian Bridge 6,253,700 2,333,700 3,920,000 70262 Cornerstone llInfrastructure 250,000 250,000 70258 Neighborhood G Phase 1 3,312,154 3,312,154 Total Tustin Legacy Projects 25,830,060 8,736,154 17,093,906 1481Page Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin N 2025-27 Biennial Fiscal Operating & Capital Improvement Program Budget Il1Jl Proposed Fund 132 Fund 189 Fund ev Fund 187 MCAS Fund 200 Other Proj # Project Name CIP Budget Park Dev Proceeds of 2025-26 Park Dev Grants Backbone Fee ne Land Sale GF-CIP Funds 3ter Distribution Projects 60178 El Camino Real Water Line Relocation 423,747 423,747 Total Water Distribution Projects 423,742 - - - - - 423,742 Water Production Projects 60177 Well Rehabilitation Program 750,000 750,000 60179 17th Street Treatment Facility Electrical Replacement 300,000 300,000 Total Water Production Projects 1,050,000 1,050,000 TOTAL ALL PROJECTS 57,803,411 2,769,887 5,870,000 8,736,154 22,276,647 9,627,612 8,523,111 1491Page Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin-- _ 2025-27 Biennial Fiscal Operating & Capital Improvement Program Budget 2025-2032 Capital Improvement Program Seven -Year Schedule Project Type Proj. # Project Name Project Total To Date 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Requested Requested Planned Flood Control Facilities �.,., �L.... I .a ..,.,- ... ., , .. ., TBA Irvine Blvd. Storm Drain Phase 1 3,900,000 TBA *Irvine Blvd. Storm Drain Phase 2 3,900,000 TBA * Yorba Street Storm Drain 75,000 75,000 TBA "Tustin Village Way Storm Drain 75,000 75,000 TBA "San Juan Street Storm Drain 75,000 75,000 Total Flood Control Facilities 8,525,000 - 500,000 - 225,000 Park Facilities 20054 Annual Major Park Maintenance 4,194,518 3,148,710 605,808 440,000 20062 Tustin Sports Park Softball Field Diamonds 1 8, 3 1,000,000 500,000 500,000 20089 Heideman School Park 5,488,165 338,165 5,150,000 20093 Tustin Sports Park Turf Renovation 719,371 55,292 664,079 20094 Tustin Legacy Park Improvements 750,000 30,000 720,000 TBA Laurel Glen Park and Magnolia Park Playground 700,000 700,000 Renovations TBA Southwest Park Site Acquisition 700,000 TBA * Columbus Tustin Park Playground Renovation 400,000 TBA Camino Real Playground Renovation 500,000 500,000 TBA * Fitness Courts at Tustin Sports Park 200,000 200,000 TBA * Centennial Park Middle Playground Renovation 300,000 TBA * Citrus Ranch Park Playground Renovation 450,000 450,000 Total Park Facilities 15,402,054 3,572,167 8,139,887 1,840,000 450,000 Public Facilities 1D032 Annual Major Building Maintenance 9,708,064 7,506,965 501,099 1,700,000 10069 Civic Center Alternate Power Source 4,800,461 4,000,461 800,000 1D086 Police Department Improvements 2,896,162 896,162 2,000,000 10088 Columbus Tustin Gym HVAC 2,140,000 120,000 2,020,000 TBA Tustin Family Bt Youth Center Playground 500,000 500,000 Renovation TBA * Tustin Area Senior Center Expansion 5,500,000 500,000 TBA * Tustin Family 8 Youth Center Expansion 850,000 Total Public 26,394,687 12,523,588 6,321,099 1,700,000 Facilities Traffic Control Projects 40080 Traffic Signal Equipment Replacement 2,427,375 957,375 210,000 210,000 210,000 40087 Main Street Improvements 7,452,089 452,089 7,000,000 40093 Red Hill Avenue Signal Synchronization 507,144 439,690 67,454 40094 First Street Signal Synchronization 359,539 248,454 111,085 40095 Tustin Avenue Signal Synchronization 50,000 30,000 20,000 40096 Active Transportation Master Plan 75,000 75,000 TBA Irvine Boulevard Signal Synchronization 300,000 300,000 TBA Traffic Signal Installation San Juan Street and 300,000 300,000 Red Hill Avenue TBA Traffic Signal Installation El Camino Real and 100,000 100,000 Auto Center Drive Total Traffic Control 11,571,147 2,127,608 7,883,539 510,000 210,000 Projects Transportation Annual Pavement Maintenance and Sidewalk Maintenance 70024 Repair Project 2024-2025 Projects 70025 Annual Pavement Maintenance and Sidewalk Repair Project 2025-2026 70254 Old Town Improvements 70255 Red Hill Utility Undergrounding TBA The Compass at Red Hill Median 3,205,522 945,000 2,260,522 1,700,000 700,000 1,000,000 4,401,366 407,625 3,993,741 13,933 13,112 821 100,000 100,000 1501 Page Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin-- _ 2025-27 Biennial Fiscal Operating & Capital Improvement Program Budget Project Type Proj. # Project Name Project Total To Date 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Requested Requested Planned Jamboree Road Rehabilitation Barranca to I- OCTA/SCRRA I' TBA Jamboree Road Rehabilitation 1-5 to Portola 10,600,000 10,600,000 Parkway TBA Tustin Ranch Road Rehabilitation Park Avenue 10,600,000 to Walnut Avenue TBA * Red Hill Avenue Rehabilitation Sycamore 10,120,000 79,150 10,040,850 Avenue to Bryan Avenue Total Transportation 43,340,821 1,444,887 7,655,084 13,600,000 10,040,850 Maintenance Projects Transportation 70131 Newport Avenue Extension - Phase II 55,700,493 4,700,493 Capacity Projects 70196 Red Hill Avenue Widening 1,100,000 TBA * Valencia Avenue Widening 5,500,000 TBA Jamboree Road Widening 2,800,000 Total Transportation 65,100,493 4,700,493 - - - Capacity Projects Water Distribution 60160 Mardick Road Main Line Replacement from Red 1,700,000 200,000 Hill Avenue to Beverly Glen Drive 60172 Water Main Replacement Browning Ave - 4,160,000 416,000 3,744,000 Beverly Glen to La Colina 60178 El Camino Real Main Line Relocation 540,000 116,258 423,742 TBA * Water Main Replacement Across Service Area 6,000,000 100,000 1,900,000 Total Water Distribution 12,400,000 116,258 423,742 516,000 5,844,000 Water Production 60177 Well Rehabilitation Program 2,679,877 29,877 750,000 1,150,000 750,000 60179 17th Street Treatment Facility Electrical 3,300,000 300,000 3,000,000 Re Lacement Total Water Production 5,979,877 29,877 1,050,000 4,150,000 750,000 Tustin Legacy Projects 20083 Tustin Legacy Linear Park 14,900,301 886,095 14,014,206 70243 Tustin Ranch Road Pedestrian Bridge 17,330,703 1,529,211 500,000 15,301,492 70256 Neighborhood D South Phase 2 10,511,202 7,426,202 2,000,000 1,085,000 70257 Armstrong Avenue Pedestrian Bridge 8,868,455 2,614,755 6,253,700 70262 Cornerstone11 12,400,000 150,000 250,000 12,000,000 70258 * Neighborhood G Infrastructure Tustin Ranch 77,072,244 442,346 3,312,154 41,317,744 Road / Edinger Avenue TBA * Legacy Park 58,190,000 7,590,000 TBA * Neighborhood G Phase 2 97,500,000 7,500,000 TBA * Army Reserve Infrastructure 28,750,000 Total Tustin Legacy Projects 325,522,905 13,048,609 25,830,060 9,175,000 76,119,236 Total Project J 514,236,984 37,563,487 57,803,411 31,491,000 93,639,086 A funding source has not been identified for all or a portion of the project at this time 1511 Page Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin-- _ 2025-27 Biennial Fiscal Operating & Capital Improvement Program Budget Proj. 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2031-32 Project Type # Project Name Project Total Planned Planned Planned Planned Total Flood Control TBA Storm Drain Master Plan 500,000 500,000 Facilities TBA Irvine Blvd. Storm Drain Phase 1 3,900,000 300,000 3,600,000 3,900,000 TBA Irvine Blvd. Storm Drain Phase 2 3,900,000 300,000 3,600,000 3,900,000 TBA Yorba Street Storm Drain 75,000 75,000 TBA Tustin Village Way Storm Drain 75,000 75,000 TBA San Juan Street Storm Drain 75,000 75,000 Total Flood Control Facilities 8,525,000 300,000 3,900,000 - 3,600,000 8,525,000 Park Facilities 20054 Annual Major Park Maintenance 4,194,518 4,194,518 20062 Tustin Sports Park Softball Field 1,000,000 1,000,000 Diamonds 1 Et 3 20089 Heideman School Park 5,488,165 5,488,165 20093 Tustin Sports Park Turf Renovation 719,371 719,371 20094 Tustin Legacy Park Improvements 750,000 750,000 TBA Laurel Glen Park and Magnolia Park 700,000 700,000 Playground Renovations _ TBA Southwest Park Site Acquisition 700,000 700,000 700,000 TBA * Columbus Tustin Park Playground 400,000 400,000 400,000 Renovation TBA Camino Real Playground Renovation 500,000 500,000 TBA * Fitness Courts at Tustin Sports Park 200,000 200,000 TBA Centennial Park Middle Playground 300,000 300,000 300,000 Renovation TBA * Citrus Ranch Park Playground 450,000 450,000 Renovation Total Park 15,402,054 00,000 - - 15,402,054 Facilities Public Facilities 10032 Annual Major Building Maintenance 9,708,064 9,708,064 10069 Civic Center Alternate Power Source 4,800,461 4,800,461 10086 Police Department Improvements 2,896,162 2,896,162 TBA Columbus Tustin Gym HVAC 2,140,000 2,140,000 TBA Tustin Family 8: Youth Center 500,000 500,000 Playground Renovation TBA * Tustin Area Senior Center Expansion 5,500,000 5,000,000 5,500,000 TBA * Tustin Family It Youth Center 850,000 850,000 850,000 Ex ansion Total Public 26,394,687 5,000,000 850,000 26,394,687 Facilities 3 Traffic Control 40080 Traffic Signal Equipment 2,427,375 210,000 210,000 210,000 210,000 2,427,375 Projects Replacement 40087 Main Street Improvements 7,452,089 7,452,089 40093 Red Hill Avenue Signal 507,144 507,144 Synchronization 40094 First Street Signal Synchronization 359,539 359,539 40095 Tustin Avenue SignaL Synchronization 50,000 50,000 40096 Active Transportation Master Plan 75,000 75,000 TBA Irvine Boulevard Signal 300,000 300,000 Synchronization TBA Traffic Signal Installation San Juan 300,000 300,000 Street and Red Hill Avenue TBA Traffic Signal Installation El Camino 100,000 100,000 Real and Auto Center Drive Total Traffic Control Projects ' 11,571,147 210,000 210,000 210,000 210,000 11,571,147 Transportation Maintenance 70024 Annual Pavement Maintenance and 3,205,522 3,205,522 Projects Sidewalk Repair Project 2024-2025 70025 Annual Pavement Maintenance and 1,700,000 1,700,000 Sidewalk Repair Project 2025-2026 70254 Old Town Improvements 4,401,366 4,401,366 70255 Red Hill Utility Undergrounding 13,933 13,933 TBA The Compass at Red Hill Median 100,000 100,000 1521 Page Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin-- _ 2025-27 Biennial Fiscal Operating & Capital Improvement Program Budget Proj. 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2031-32 Project Type # Project Name Project Total Planned Planned Planned Planned Total Jamboree Road Rehabilitation I- Barranca to OCTA/SCRRA I I I' TBA Jamboree Road Rehabilitation 1-5 to 10,600,000 10,600,000 Portola Parkway TBA Tustin Ranch Road Rehabilitation 10,600,000 10,600,000 10,600,000 Park Avenue to Walnut Avenue TBA *Red Hill Avenue Rehabilitation 10,120,000 10,120,000 S camore Avenue to Bryan Avenue Total Transportation 43,340,821 - 10,600,000 - 43,340,821 Maintenance Projects Transportation 70131 Newport Avenue Extension -Phase 55,700,493 1,000,000 50,000,000 55,700,493 Capacity Projects II 70196 * Red Hill Avenue Widening 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 TBA Valencia Avenue Widening 5,500,000 500,000 5,000,000 5,500,000 TBA Jamboree Road Widening 2,800,000 2,800,000 2,800,000 Total Transportation Capacity Projects 65,100,493 - 1,500,000 - 58,900,000 65,100,493 Mardick Road Main Line Water Distribution 60160 Replacement from Red Hill Avenue to 1,700,000 1,500,000 1,700,000 Beverly Glen Drive 60172 * Water Main Replacement Browning q,160,000 4,160,000 Ave - Beverly Glen to La Colina 60178 El Camino Real Main Line Relocation 540,000 540,000 TBA * Water Main Replacement Across 6,000,000 2,100,000 900,000 1,000,000 6,000,000 Service Area Total Water Distribution 12,400,000 3,600,000 900,000 1,000,000 - 12,400,000 Water Production 60177 Well Rehabilitation Program 2,679,877 2,679,877 60179 17th Street Treatment Facility 3,300,000 3,300,000 Electrical Replacement Total Water 5,979,877 - - - - 5,979,877 Production Tustin Legacy 20083 Tustin Legacy Linear Park 14,900,301 14,900,301 Projects 70243 Tustin Ranch Road Pedestrian Bridge 17,330,703 17,330,703 70256 Neighborhood D South Phase 2 10,511,202 10,511,202 70257 Armstrong Avenue Pedestrian Bridge 8,868,455 8,868,455 70262 Cornerstone11 12,400,000 12,400,000 70258 Tustin Ranch Road / Edinger Avenue TBA Legacy Park 58,190,000 50,600,000 58,190,000 TBA Neighborhood G Phase 2 97,500,000 50,000,000 40,000,000 97,500,000 TBA Army Reserve Infrastructure 28,750,000 28,750,000 28,750,000 Total Tustin Legacy Projects 325,522,905 132,600,000 40,000,000 - 28,750,000 325,522,905 Total Projects 514,236,984 142,010,000 58,660,000 1,210,000 91,460,000 514,236,984 * A funding source has not been identified for all or a portion of the project at this time 1531 Page Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin r- _ 2025-27 Biennial Fiscal Operating & Capital Improvement Program Budget IU�IIN 2025-2027 CIP Project Detail by Project Type -Traffic Control Projects TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PROJECT CATEGORY Traffic Control PROJECT NUMBER 40080 PROJECT NAME Traffic Signal Equipment Replacement TOTAL PROJECT COST 2,427,375 PROJECT MANAGER Kyra Tao FUNDING SOURCE 139 Measure LOCATION Various M2 Fairshare Other Description Upgrades or replacement of aging traffic signal equipment at various locations throughout the city. Expenses to FY25-26 FY26-27 FY27-28 FY28-29 FY29-30 FY30-32 Total Project Funding Source 6/30/2025 Requested Requested Planned Planned Planned Planned Cost 139 M2 Fairshare 859,612 210,000 210,000 210,000 210,000 210,000 420,000 2,329,612 Other 97,763 97,763 Total 957,375 210,000 210,000 210,000 210,000 210,000 420,000 2,427,375 Expenditure Construction 957,375 210,000 210,000 210,000 210,000 210,000 420,000 2,427,375 Total 957,375 210,000 210,000 210,000 210,000 210,000 420,000 2,427,375 COST BY YEAR 1,000,000 900,000 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 00,000 100,000 EXPENSES FY25-26 FY26-27 FY27-28 FY28-29 FY29-30 FY30-32 TO REQUESTED REQUESTED PLANNED PLANNED PLANNED PLANNED 6/30/2025 ■ Construction 1691 Page Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin r— _ 2025-27 Biennial Fiscal Operating & Capital Improvement Program Budget IU�IIN MAIN STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT CATEGORY Traffic Control PROJECT NUMBER 40087 PROJECT NAME Main Street Improvements TOTAL PROJECT COST 7,452,089 PROJECT MANAGER Eric Johnson FUNDING SOURCE 100 GF LOCATION Main Street and El Camino Real 133 AB2766/139 M2 Fairshare/140 SB1 189 MCAS Land Sale Description 200 General Fund/Grant CIP Public improvements on Main Street between Newport Avenue and Prospect Avenue including installation of raised landscaped medians, narrowing of curb -to -curb street width, traffic striping with addition of buffered Class II bike lanes and sharrows, enhanced parkway landscaping, widening of sidewalks, reconstruction of library driveway to align with Tustin Plaza driveway, installation of street furniture, and installation of a gateway arch sign spanning the street. In -pavement lighted crosswalk to be installed on Main Street at library driveway. Expenses to FY25-26 FY26-27 FY27-28 FY28-29 FY29-30 FY30-31 Total Project Funding Source 6/30/2025 Requested Requested Planned Planned Planned Planned Cost 100 General Fund 696 696 133 AB2766 198,000 321,000 519,000 139 M2 Fairshare 253,393 253,393 140 S131 - 1,179,000 1,179,000 189 MCAS Land Sale 1,600,000 1,600,000 200 General Fund CIP 730,000 730,000 200 Grant CIP - 3,170,000 3,170,000 Total 452,089 7,000,000 7,452,089 Expenditure Design 449,726 449,726 Construction 2,363 7,000,000 7,002,363 Total 452,089 7,000,000 7,452,089 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 449,726 EXPENSES TO 6/30/2025 COST BY YEAR FY25-26 REQUESTED ■ Construction ■ Design 1701 Page Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin r— _ 2025-27 Biennial Fiscal Operating & Capital Improvement Program Budget IU�IIN RED HILL AVENUE SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CATEGORY Traffic Control PROJECT NUMBER 40093 PROJECT NAME Red Hill Avenue Signal Synchronization TOTAL PROJECT COST 507,144 PROJECT MANAGER Kyra Tao FUNDING SOURCE 139 Measure LOCATION Red Hill Avenue M2 Fairshare 200 General Fund Description Project submitted to OCTA under the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (Project P). The goal of Project P is to enhance traffic flow and reduce congestion and delay on arterial roadways. Provide studies, install new signal equipment, and implement new timing to synchronize signals on Red Hill Avenue. Expenses to FY25-26 FY26-27 FY27-28 FY28-29 FY29-30 FY30-31 Total Project Funding Source 6/30/2025 Requested Requested Planned Planned Planned Planned Cost 139 M2 Fairshare 88,430 67,454 155,884 200 General Fund CIP 351,260 351,260 Total 439,690 67,454 507,144 Expenditure Design 83,430 83,430 Construction 356,260 67,454 423,714 Total 439,690 67,454 507,144 COST BY YEAR 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 EXPENSES TO 6/30/2025 A . 11 FY25-26 REQUESTED ■ Design ■ Construction 1711 Page Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin 2025-27 Biennial Fiscal Operating & Capital Improvement Program Budget IU,IIN FIRST STREET SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CATEGORY Traffic Control PROJECT NUMBER 40094 PROJECT NAME First Street Signal Synchronization TOTAL PROJECT COST 359,539 PROJECT MANAGER Kyra Tao FUNDING SOURCE 139 Measure LOCATION First Street M2 Fairshare Description This project was developed in collaboration with the Cities of Huntington Beach, Westminster, and Santa Ana and the County of Orange with OCTA leading due to the many jurisdictions involved. Project was approved by OCTA Board in April 2021 under the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (Project P). The goal of Project P is to enhance traffic flow and reduce congestion and delay on arterial roadways. Project involves providing studies, installing new signal equipment including improved communications via fiber optic cable, and implementing new timing to synchronize signals on First Street between Tustin Avenue and Newport Avenue in Tustin. Expenses to FY25-26 FY26-27 FY27-28 FY28-29 FY29-30 FY30-31 Total Project Funding Source 6/30/2025 Requested Requested Planned Planned Planned Planned Cost 139 M2 Fairshare 248,454 111,085 359,539 Total 248,454 111,085 359,539 Expenditure Design 53,454 53,454 Construction 195,000 111,085 306,085 Total 248,454 111,085 359,539 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 COST BY YEAR 53,454 195,000 111,085 EXPENSES TO 6/30/2025 FY25-26 REQUESTED ■ Design ■ Construction 1721 Page Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin r- _ 2025-27 Biennial Fiscal Operating & Capital Improvement Program Budget IU�IIN TUSTIN AVENUE SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CATEGORY Traffic Control PROJECT NUMBER 40095 PROJECT NAME Tustin Avenue Signal Synchronization TOTAL PROJECT COST 50,000 PROJECT MANAGER Kyra Tao FUNDING SOURCE 139 Measure LOCATION Tustin Avenue M2 Fairshare Description This project is in collaboration with the Cities of Orange, Anaheim, Placentia, Santa Ana, and Yorba Linda with the City of Orange as the lead. Work will be performed under the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Competitive Measure M2 Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (Project P). Within the City of Tustin, the project includes the existing traffic signals on Tustin Avenue at First Street. Because of the proximity and the key role in optimal traffic flow along Tustin Avenue specifically at the Santa Ana intersection of Tustin Avenue and Fourth Street, the Fourth Street/Irvine Boulevard interchange with SR-55 Freeway (northbound ramps), has been identified as part of the project as well as the intersection of Yorba Street at Irvine Boulevard both of which are in the City of Tustin. Expenses to FY25-26 FY26-27 FY27-28 FY28-29 FY29-30 FY30-31 Total Project Funding Source 6/30/2025 Requested Requested Planned Planned Planned Planned Cost 139 M2 Fairshare 30,000 20,000 50,000 Total 30,000 20,000 50,000 Expenditure Design 6,814 6,814 Construction 23,186 20,000 43,186 Total 30,000 20,000 50,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 EXPENSESTO 6/30/2025 COST BY YEAR FY25-26 REQUESTED ■ Design ■ Construction 1731 Page Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin r— _ 2025-27 Biennial Fiscal Operating & Capital Improvement Program Budget IU�IIN ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN PROJECT CATEGORY Traffic Control PROJECT NUMBER 40096 PROJECT NAME Active Transportation Master Plan TOTAL PROJECT COST 75,000 PROJECT MANAGER Kyra Tao FUNDING SOURCE 139 Measure LOCATION Citywide M2 Fairshare Description Engineering has applied for a grant to create an Active Transportation Master Plan. The grant amount is $425,000 and requires a 15% match. Staff is recommending the match be funded through Measure M2 - Fairshare. Expenses to FY25-26 FY26-27 FY27-28 FY28-29 FY29-30 FY30-31 Total Project Funding Source 6/30/2025 Requested Requested Planned Planned Planned Planned Cost 139 M2 Fairshare 75,000 75,000 Total - 75,000 75,000 Expenditure Design 75,000 75,000 Total 75,000 75,000 COST BY YEAR 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 FY25-26 REQUESTED ■ Design 1741 Page Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin 2025-27 Biennial Fiscal Operating & Capital Improvement Program Budget IU,IIN IRVINE BOULEVARD SIGNAL SYNCHONIZATION PROJECT CATEGORY Traffic Control PROJECT NUMBER TBA PROJECT NAME Irvine Boulevard Signal Synchonization TOTAL PROJECT COST 300,000 PROJECT MANAGER Kyra Tao FUNDING SOURCE 139 Measure LOCATION Irvine Boulevard M2 Fairshare Description Staff is applying for OCTA funding under the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (Project P). The goal of Project P is to enhance traffic flow and reduce congestion and delay on arterial roadways. The project aimes to provide studies, install new signal equipment, and implement new timing to synchronize signals along Irvine Boulevard from Jamboree to west city limit. Funding Source Expenses to FY25-26 FY26-27 FY27-28 FY28-29 6/30/2025 Requested Requested Planned Planned FY29-30 FY30-31 Total Project Planned Planned Cost 139 M2 Fairshare 300,000 300,000 Total Expenditure - 300,000 300,000 Construction 300,000 300,000 Total 300,000 300,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 COST BY YEAR FY26-27 REQUESTED ■ Construction 1751 Page Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin 2025-27 Biennial Fiscal Operating & Capital Improvement Program Budget IU,IIN TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION SAN JUAN STREET It RED HILL AVENUE PROJECT CATEGORY Traffic Control PROJECT NUMBER TBA PROJECT NAME Traffic Signal Installation San Juan Street Et Red Hill Avenue TOTAL PROJECT COST 300,000 PROJECT MANAGER TBD FUNDING SOURCE 139 Measure LOCATION San Juan Street Et Red Hill Avenue M2 Fairshare Description Installation of traffic signals on Red Hill Avenue between San Juan Street and El Camino Real. The project costs to be split 50/50 between the Compass at Red Hill private development and the City. City's portion is to be reimbursed by Red Hill Plaza during future private improvements. Expenses to FY25-26 FY26-27 FY27-28 FY28-29 FY29-30 FY30-31 Total Project Funding Source 6/30/2025 Requested Requested Planned Planned Planned Planned Cost 139 M2 Fairshare 300,000 300,000 Total - 300,000 300,000 Expenditure Construction 300,000 300,000 Total - 300,000 300,000 F COST BY YEAR 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 FY25-26 REQUESTED ■ Construction 1761 Page Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin r— _ 2025-27 Biennial Fiscal Operating & Capital Improvement Program Budget IU�IIN TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION EL CAMINO REAL It AUTO CENTER DRIVE PROJECT CATEGORY Traffic Control PROJECT NUMBER TBA PROJECT NAME Traffic Signal Installation El Camino Real Et Auto Center Drive TOTAL PROJECT COST 100,000 PROJECT MANAGER Kyra Tao FUNDING SOURCE 139 Measure LOCATION El Camino Real Et Auto Center Drive M2 Fairshare Description Modify traffic signals on El Camino Real at Auto Center Dr. The City will collaborate with the adjacent Costco development for 50/50 split since this development modifies the ingress / egress of this intersection. Expenses to FY25-26 FY26-27 FY27-28 FY28-29 FY29-30 FY30-31 Total Project Funding Source 6/30/2025 Requested Requested Planned Planned Planned Planned Cost 139 M2 Fairshare 100,000 100,000 Total 100,000 100,000 Expenditure Construction 100,000 100,000 Total 100,000 100,000 F COST BY YEAR 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 FY25-26 REQUESTED ■ Construction 1771 Page Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin r— _ 2025-27 Biennial Fiscal Operating & Capital Improvement Program Budget IU�IIN 2025-2027 CIP Project Detail by Project Type — Transportation Maintenance Projects ANNUAL PAVEMENT MAINT. AND SIDEWALK REPAIR PROJECT (24/25) PROJECT CATEGORY Transportation Maintenance PROJECT NUMBER 70024 PROJECT NAME Annual Pavement Maint. And Sidewalk Repair Project (24/25) TOTAL PROJECT COST 3,205,522 PROJECT MANAGER Eric Johnson FUNDING SOURCE 130 Gas Tax LOCATION Pavement - Zone 6/Sidewalk Citywide 139 Measure M2 Fairshare 200 GF CIP Description The City is divided into seven pavement maintenance zones. Every year, street rehabilitation occurs in one zone. Through a rolling seven year cycle, this program maintains the integrity of City streets. The City maintains a Pavement Management System (PMS) for all MPAH roadways every two years and all non-MPAH roadways every six years. Project activities include: Pavement Rehabilitation and City-wide Sidewalk Repair Program, City-wide Street Striping and Markings Program, and the Street and Alley Repair Program. Expenses to FY25-26 FY26-27 FY27-28 FY28-29 FY29-30 FY30-31 Total Project Funding Source 6/30/2025 Requested Requested Planned Planned Planned Planned Cost 130 Gas Tax 500,000 54,009 554,009 139 M2 Fairshare 445,000 1,800,000 2,245,000 200 GF CIP 406,513 406,513 Total 945,000 2,260,522 3,205,522 Expenditure Design 100,000 100,000 Construction 845,000 2,260,522 3,105,522 Total 945,000 2,260,522 3,205,522 COST BY YEAR 2,500,000 2,000,000 ■ Construction 1,500,000 2,260,522 ■Design 1,000,000 845,000 500,000 100.000 EXPENSES TO 6/30/2025 FY25-26 REQUESTED 1781 Page Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin r— _ 2025-27 Biennial Fiscal Operating & Capital Improvement Program Budget IU�IIN OLD TOWN IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT CATEGORY Transportation Maintenance PROJECT NUMBER 70254 PROJECT NAME Old Town Improvements TOTAL PROJECT COST 4,401,366 PROJECT MANAGER Mark Khudadatov FUNDING SOURCE 200 General LOCATION El Camino Real It Main Street Fund CIP 120 CDBG Description 189 MCAS Land Sale Proceeds Utilizing the Downtown Community Core Specific Plan as a guide, design and construct enhancements to improve outdoor connectivity, mobility, walkability, traffic calming, and way finding within the public right-of-way, with emphasis on safety and circulation. Expenses to FY25-26 FY26-27 FY27-28 FY28-29 FY29-30 FY30-31 Total Project Funding Source 6/30/2025 Requested Requested Planned Planned Planned Planned Cost 200 General Fund CIP 201,366 201,366 120 CDBG 411,000 411,000 189 MCAS Land Sale 206,259 3,582,741 3,789,000 Total 407,625 3,993,741 Expenditure - 4,401,366 Design 207,625 207,625 Construction 200,000 3,993,741 4,193,741 Total 407,625 3,993,741 4,401,366 COST BY YEAR 4,000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 200,000 AA 500,000 207,625 EXPENSES TO 6/30/2025 FY25-26 REQUESTED ■ Construction ■ Design 1801 Page Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin r— _ 2025-27 Biennial Fiscal Operating & Capital Improvement Program Budget IU�IIN THE COMPASS AT RED HILL MEDIAN PROJECT CATEGORY Transportation Maintenance PROJECT NUMBER TBA PROJECT NAME The Compass At Red Hill Median TOTAL PROJECT COST 100,000 PROJECT MANAGER TBD FUNDING SOURCE 139 Measure LOCATION Red Hill Avenue south of San Juan Street M2 Fairshare Description Installation of raised medians on Red Hill Avenue near San Juan Street. Project cost to be split 50/50 between The Compass at Red Hill private development and the City. City's portion to be reimbursed by Red Hill Plaza during future private improvements. Expenses to FY25-26 FY26-27 FY27-28 FY28-29 FY29-30 FY30-31 Total Project Funding Source 6/30/2025 Requested Requested Planned Planned Planned Planned Cost 139 M2 Fairshare 100,000 100,000 Total - 100,000 100,000 Expenditure Construction 100,000 100,000 Total - 100,000 100,000 COST BY YEAR I 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 FY25-26 REQUESTED ■ Construction 1821 Page Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin r— _ 2025-27 Biennial Fiscal Operating & Capital Improvement Program Budget IU�IIN 2025-2027 CIP Project Detail by Project Type — Transportation Capacity Projects PROJECT CATEGORY Transportation Capacity PROJECT NAME Valencia Avenue Widening PROJECT MANAGER TBD LOCATION Between Newport and Red Hill Avenue VALENCIA AVENUE WIDENING PROJECT NUMBER TBA TOTAL PROJECT COST 2,200,000 FUNDING SOURCE 139 Measure M2 Fairshare Description Roadway widening and intersection improvements including acquisition of right-of-way to facilitate widening to augmented primary arterial status. Valencia Avenue was restriped to 4-lanes with the Newport Avenue/SR55 Ramp Reconfiguration Project (CIP No. 70130). This project will complete the widening on both the north and south side of Valencia Avenue and include a landscaped median and bicycle lanes. Project will include intersection improvements at Valencia/Red Hill to include northbound and southbound double left turn lanes and a separate southbound right turn lane. Expenses to FY25-26 FY26-27 FY27-28 FY28-29 FY29-30 FY30-32 Total Project Funding Source 6/30/2025 Requested Requested Planned Planned Planned Planned Cost 139 M2 Fairshare - 500,000 5,000,000 5,500,000 Total 500,000 5,000,000 5,500,000 Expenditure Design 500,000 500,000 Righ-of-Way 2,000,000 2,000,000 Construction 3,000,000 3,000,000 Total 500,000 5,000,000 5,500,000 F- COST BY YEAR 5,000,000 4,500,000 4,000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 FY26-27 FY27-28 FY28-29 FY29-30 REQUESTED PLANNED PLANNED PLANNED FY30-32 PLANNED ■ Construction ■ Righ-of-Way ■ Design 1851 Page Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Attachment "D" Congestion Management Program (CMP) Checklist (OCTA APPENDIX C) Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC M� aw OCTA (XGO Local Tax Dollars at Work Jurisdiction: APPENDIX C Congestion Management Program (CMP) CMP Monitoring Checklist: Level of Service (LOS) CMP Checklist YES NO N/A 1. Check "Yes" if either of the following apply: • There are no CMP intersections in your jurisdiction. • Factoring out statutorily -exempt activities', all CMP intersections within your jurisdiction are operating at LOS E (or the baseline level, if worse than E) or better. NOTE: ONLY THOSE AGENCIES THAT CHECKED "NO" FOR QUESTION 1 NEED TO ANSWER THE REMAINING QUESTIONS. 2. If any, please list those intersections that are not operating at the CMP LOS standards. ❑X 3. Will deficient intersections, if any, be improved by mitigation measures to be implemented in the next 18 months or improvements programmed in the first year of any recent funding program (i.e. local jurisdiction CIP, Measure M CIP)? a. If not, has a deficiency plan been developed for each intersection that will be operating below the CMP LOS standards? ❑X Additional Comments: 1 The following activities are statutorily -exempt from deficiency determinations: interregional travel, traffic generated by the provision of low and very low income housing, construction rehabilitation or maintenance of facilities that impact the system, freeway ramp metering, traffic signal coordination by the state or multi -jurisdictional agencies, traffic generated by high -density residential development within 1/4 mile of a fixed -rail passenger station, traffic generated by mixed -use residential development within 1/4 mile of a fixed -rail passenger station. Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC M(X)O-dOCTA Ga Local Tax Dollars at Work APPENDIX C Congestion Management Program (CMP) CMP Monitoring Checklist: Deficiency Plans CMP Checklist YES NO N/A 1. Check "Yes" if either of the following apply: ❑X ❑ • There are no CMP intersections in your jurisdiction. • Factoring out statutorily -exempt activitiesz, all CMP Highway System (CMPHS) intersections within your jurisdiction are operating at LOS E (or the baseline level, if worse than E) or better. NOTE: ONLY THOSE AGENCIES THAT CHECKED "NO" FOR QUESTION 1 NEED TO ANSWER THE REMAINING QUESTIONS. 2 If any, please list those intersections that are not operating at the CMP LOS standards. ❑X 3. Are there improvements to bring these intersections to the CMP LOS standard scheduled for completion during the next 18 months or programmed in the first year of the CIP? NOTE: ONLY THOSE AGENCIES THAT CHECKED "NO" FOR QUESTION 3 NEED TO ANSWER THE REMAINING QUESTIONS. 4. Has a deficiency plan or a schedule for preparing a deficiency plan been submitted to ❑ OCTA? 5. Does the deficiency plan fulfill the following statutory requirements: a. Include an analysis of the causes of the deficiency? ❑ ❑ ❑X b. Include a list of improvements necessary to maintain minimum LOS standards on the ❑ ❑ ❑X CMPHS and the estimated costs of the improvements? c. Include a list of improvements, programs, or actions and estimates of their costs, ❑ ❑X which will improve LOS on the CMPHS and improve air quality? i. Do the improvements, programs, or actions meet the criteria established by ❑ ❑ ❑X South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) (see the CMP Preparation Manual)? Z The following activities are statutorily -exempt from deficiency determinations: interregional travel, traffic generated by the provision of low and very low income housing, construction rehabilitation or maintenance of facilities that impact the system, freeway ramp metering, traffic signal coordination by the state or multi -jurisdictional agencies, traffic generated by high -density residential development within 1/4 mile of a fixed -rail passenger station, traffic generated by mixed -use residential development within 1/4 mile of a fixed -rail passenger station. Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC M(X)O-dOCTA Ga Local Tax Dollars at Work APPENDIX C Congestion Management Program (CMP) CMP Monitoring Checklist: Deficiency Plans (cont.) CMP Checklist YES NO N/A 6. Are the capital improvements identified in the deficiency plan programmed in your seven-year CIP? ❑ 7. Does the deficiency plan include a monitoring program that will ensure its implementation? ❑ 8. Does the deficiency plan include a process to allow some level of development to proceed pending correction of the deficiency? ❑ 9. Has necessary inter -jurisdictional coordination occurred? ❑ ❑X 10. Please describe any innovative programs, if any, included in the deficiency plan: ❑X Additional Comments: Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC M(X)O-dOCTA Ga Local Tax Dollars at Work APPENDIX C Congestion Management Program (CMP) CMP Monitoring Checklist: Land Use Coordination CMP Checklist YES NO N/A 1. Have you maintained the CMP traffic impact analysis (TIA) process you selected for the previous CMP? a. If not, have you submitted the revised TIA approach and methodology to OCTA for review and approval? 2. Did any development projects require a CMP TIA during this CMP cyclej3 NOTE: ONLY THOSE AGENCIES THAT CHECKED "YES" FOR QUESTION 2 NEED TO ANSWER THE REMAINING QUESTIONS. 3. If so, how many? 4. Please list any CMPHS links & intersections that were projected to not meet the CMP LOS standards (indicate whether any are outside of your jurisdiction). a. Were mitigation measures and costs identified for each and included in your seven- year CIP? b. If any impacted links & intersections were outside your jurisdiction, did your jurisdiction coordinate with other jurisdictions to develop a mitigation strategy? 5. If a local traffic model was/will be used, did you follow the data and modeling consistency requirements as described in the CMP Preparation Manual (available online at http://www.octa.net/pdf/cmipprepmanual.pdf)? Additional Comments: 3 Exemptions include: any development generating less than 2,400 daily trips, any development generating less than 1,600 daily trips (if it directly accesses a CMP highway), final tract and parcel maps, issuance of building permits, issuance of certificate of use and occupancy, and minor modifications to approved developments where the location and intensity of project uses have been approved through previous and separate local government actions prior to January 1, 1992. Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC M(X)O-dOCTA Ga Local Tax Dollars at Work APPENDIX C Congestion Management Program (CMP) CMP Monitoring Checklist: Capital Improvement Program (CIP) CMP Checklist YES NO N/A 1. Did you submit a seven-year CIP to OCTA by June 30? ❑X ❑ ❑ 2. Does the CIP include projects to maintain or improve the performance of the CMPHS (including capacity expansion, safety, maintenance, and rehabilitation)? ❑X ❑ ❑ 3. Is it consistent with air quality mitigation measures for transportation -related vehicle emissions? 4. Was the OCFundtracker CIP provided by OCTA used to prepare the CIP? Additional Comments: Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC � M(XGOat OCTA Local Tax Dollars at Work APPENDIX C Congestion Management Program (CMP) OPTIONAL - CMP Monitoring Checklist: Federal Congestion Management CMP Checklist YES NO N/A 1. Does any federally funded project in the CIP result in a significant increase in single occupant vehicle (SOV) capacity? ❑ 0 ❑ NOTE: ONLY THOSE AGENCIES THAT CHECKED "YES" FOR QUESTION 1 NEED TO ANSWER THE REMAINING QUESTION. 2. If so, was the project developed as part of the federal Congestion Management Process, in other words, was there an appropriate analysis of reasonable travel demand reduction and operational strategies? ❑ ❑ 0 Additional Comments: I certify that the information contained in this checklist is true. Kyra Tao Principal Transportation Engineer April 30, 25 Name (Print) Title Signature Date Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Attachment "E" City Resolutions Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC RESOLUTION NO. 25-47 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, CONCERNING THE STATUS AND UPDATE OF THE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE MEASURE M2 (M2) PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City is required to meet eligibility requirements and submit eligibility verification packages to the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) in order to remain eligible to receive M2 funds; and WHEREAS, the City is required to adopt and update a Pavement Management Plan (PMP), using the required format, regarding the status of road pavement conditions and implementation of the PMP on a biennial basis; and WHEREAS, the City is required to provide a plan that manages the preservation, rehabilitation, and maintenance of paved roads by analyzing pavement life cycles, assessing overall system performance costs, and determining alternative strategies and costs necessary to improve paved roads. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council for the City of Tustin does hereby inform OCTA that: a) The PMP is in conformance with the PMP Submittal Template provided in the Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines. b) The City of Tustin hereby adopts a PMP and has provided an updated PMP report, using the required format, to OCTA. c) The Director of Public Works or designee is authorized to sign the PMP certification form. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tustin held on the 17th day of June 2025. AUSTIN LUMBARD, Mayor ATTEST: ERICA N. YASUDA, City Clerk Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAVID E. KENDIG, City Attorney /msd/ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, Erica N. Yasuda, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council is five; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 25-47 was duly and regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 17t" day of June, 2025 by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBER AYES: COUNCILMEMBER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: ERICA N. YASUDA, City Clerk Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC RESOLUTION NO. 25-48 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, CONCERNING THE STATUS AND UPDATE OF THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT, AND MITIGATION FEE PROGRAM FOR THE MEASURE M (M2) PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City desires to maintain and improve the streets within its jurisdiction, including those arterials contained in the Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH); and WHEREAS, the City has endorsed a definition of and process for, determining consistency of the City's Traffic Circulation Plan with the MPAH; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted a General Plan Circulation Element which does not preclude implementation of the MPAH within its jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, the City is required to adopt a resolution biennially informing the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) that the City's Circulation Element is in conformance with the MPAH and whether any changes to any arterial highways of said Circulation Element have been adopted by the City during Fiscal Years (FY) 2023-24 and FY 2024-25; and WHEREAS, the City is required to send biennially to the OCTA all recommended changes to the City Circulation Element and the MPAH for the purposes of re -qualifying for participation in the Comprehensive Transportation Funding Programs; and WHEREAS, the City is required to adopt a resolution biennially certifying that the City has an existing Mitigation Fee Program that assesses traffic impacts of new development and requires new development to pay a fair share of necessary transportation improvements attributable to the new development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council for the City of Tustin does hereby inform OCTA that: a) The arterial highway portion of the Circulation Element of the City of Tustin is in conformance with the MPAH. b) The City of Tustin attests that no unilateral reduction in through lanes has been made on any MPAH arterials during FY 2023-24 and FY 2024-25. c) The City of Tustin affirms that it will bring forward requests to amend the MPAH, when necessary, in order to ensure that the MPAH and the General Plan Circulation Element remain consistent. d) The City of Tustin reaffirms that the existing Mitigation Fee Program is in effect. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tustin held on the 17th day of June 2025. Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC AUSTIN LUMBARD, Mayor ATTEST: ERICA N. YASUDA, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAVID E. KENDIG, City Attorney /msd/ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, Erica N. Yasuda, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council is five; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 25-48 was duly and regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 17t" day of June, 2025 by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBER AYES: COUNCILMEMBER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: ERICA N. YASUDA, City Clerk Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Attachment "V City's Pavement Management Plan (PMP) and PMP Certification Form Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC FINAL REPORT UPDATED CITYWIDE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2025-2032 TUSTIN HISi0R5 Submitted to: City of Tustin, CA April 30, 2025 ,(BUCKNAM Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC April 30, 2025 Mr. Eric Johnson Principal Engineer CITY OF TUSTIN 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92780 Subject: City of Tustin — OCTA Pavement Management Compliance Report 2025 Dear Eric: As part of the 2025 Update of the Pavement Management Plan (PMP) for the City of Tustin, Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. is pleased to submit the PMP reporting required by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). This data/report will be submitted to OCTA as part of the City's required biennial PMP prior to June 30, 2025. The information contained in this report was used to develop the recommended improvement program for the pavement network. The report covers the following categories: • Pavement Management Plan Certification • Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC) Plan • Pavement Management Data Files • Pavement Management Plan that includes the following: • Average Pavement Conditions For Each Segment in the Network (PCI Report) The Pavement Condition Index report shows the present condition of each street in the pavement network (MPAH and Locals). In addition, the report shows the basic geometry of each street segment. • Seven-year Projected PCI Under Existing Funding Levels This report identifies the projected PCI's based on the local agencies current funding programs. This report details the PCI projects for the entire network, MPAH roadways and Local streets. • Seven-year Plan for Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Forecast Maintenance & Rehabilitation (FMR) j� 354$SeOceanS de BN CAi92056 AW iNFRASTRUCTUREGROUP,I uckna)216-5529 W 4V4V, E}UC�{�181T1- Ill{ ,CDf71 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC The Forecast Maintenance & Rehabilitation (FMR) Report projects the street maintenance activities required for the next seven years, broken down to show maintenance levels for specific streets. This includes all scheduled projects provided by the City for fiscal years 2025 through 2032. • Alternative Funding Levels OCTA has requested two reports indicating the necessary funding to maintain the City's current weighted average PCI as well as the necessary funding to improve the weighted average PCI by one PCI point over the next seven years. • Backlog by Fiscal Year (re: unfunded restoration, rehabilitation and reconstruction) • Percentage of total network in each of the five condition categories based on centerline mileage • Local Match Reduction Reporting In order to be eligible for Local Match Reduction of 10%, the following must be submitted: o Measurable improvement of paved road conditions during the previous reporting period defined as an overall weighted (by area) average system improvement of one PCI point. o No reduction in the overall weighted (by area) average PCI in the MPAH or local street categories -or— o Have road pavement conditions, for the overall network, during the previous reporting period within the highest twenty (20%) of the scale for road pavement conditions in conformance with OCTA Ordinance No. 3, defined as a PCI of 75 or higher, otherwise defined as in "good condition". These reports will be submitted to the City of Tustin as part of the biennial Pavement Management Plan that is due prior to June 30, 2025. These reports will be packaged in a way that it will be easy for staff to review. All comments received from the City have been incorporated in the reports that follow. All of the City's issues and needs that were brought to our attention are included in the report. It has been a pleasure working with you and the City on updating your Pavement Management Plan. We look forward to the continued success of this project and future teamwork with City staff. Sincerely, Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. Peter J. Bucknam Project Manager Infrastructure Management — GIS Services Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin, CA Page i 2025 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 30, 2025 AGENCY SUBMITTAL TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Pavement Management Plan Certification..............................................................................2 II. Executive Summary................................................................................................................. 3 III. Background —Tustin PMP........................................................................................................4 IV. Current Pavement Conditions(PCI)......................................................................................... 7 V. Projected Pavement Conditions(PCI)...................................................................................... 8 VI. Alternative Funding Levels.......................................................................................................9 a. Maintain Existing Average Network PCI................................................................ 9 b. Improve Average Network PCI............................................................................... 9 VII. Current and Projected Backlog by Year of Pavement Maintenance Needs ............................ 9 Vill. Centerline Mileage................................................................................................................. 10 IX. Percentage of Network in Each of Five Condition Categories Based on Centerline mileage 10 X. Reduction in M2 Local Match................................................................................................ 11 XI. Appendix A — Seven -Year Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Based on Current or Expected Funding Level.............................................................................. 12 XII. Appendix B — Complete Street Listing Current Conditions....................................................13 XIII. Appendix C —GIS Digital Data................................................................................................ 14 XIV. Appendix D — Quality Assurance / Quality Control Plan........................................................15 • Introduction......................................................................................................... 15 • Objectives............................................................................................................15 • Structure of QA/QC Plan...................................................................................... 16 • Condition Survey Procedures...............................................................................16 • Accuracy Required for Data Collection................................................................ 17 • Random and Systematic Re-Inspections.............................................................. 17 • PCI Comparison with Past Surveys....................................................................... 18 • Experience of Inspectors......................................................................................18 • Safety Procedures................................................................................................18 XV. Appendix E — Pavement Management Data Files.............................................................19 XVI. Appendix F — GIS Maps — Current Conditions................................................................... 20 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin, CA Page 1 2025 Citywide Pavement Management Plan — OCTA Submittal Final Report — April 30, 2025 CITY OF TUSTIN PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN - part of - COUNTYWIDE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN GUIDELINES (OCTA Guideline — March 2025) Prepared by: Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. Submitted to OCTA: June 30, 2025 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin, CA Page 2 2025 Citywide Pavement Management Plan — OCTA Submittal Final Report — April 30, 2025 I. Pavement Management Plan Certification The City of Tustin, CA certifies that it has a Pavement Management Plan in conformance with the criteria stated in the Orange County Transportation Authority Ordinance No. 3. This ordinance requires that a Pavement Management Plan be in place and maintained to qualify for allocation of revenues generated from renewed Measure M (M2). The plan was developed by Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. using StreetSaver, a pavement management system conforming to American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard D6433, and contains, at a minimum, the following elements: • Inventory of MPAH and Local routes reviewed and updated biennially. The last update of the inventory was completed on April, 2025 for the Arterial (MPAH) and April, 2025 for portion of the Local streets; • Assessment of the pavement condition for all routes in the system, updated biennially. The last field review of the pavement condition was completed in April, 2025; • Percentage of all sections of pavement needing: o Preventive Maintenance = 41.7%; o Rehabilitation = 21.0%; o Reconstruction = 0.1% • Budget needs for preventive maintenance, rehabilitation and/or reconstruction of deficient sections of pavement for: o Current biennial period $20,206,400; o Following biennial period $12,980,900 • Funds budgeted or available for Preventive Maintenance, Rehabilitation and/or Reconstruction. o Current biennial period $20,206,400; o Following biennial period $12,980,900 • Backlog by year of unfunded rehabilitation, restoration and reconstruction needs (See page 10); • The Pavement Management Plan is consistent with countywide pavement condition assessment standards as described in the OCTA Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines adopted by the OCTA Board of Directors. *An electronic copy of the Pavement Management Plan (with StreetSaver compatible database) is available with the certification statement. A copy of this certification is being provided to the Orange County Transportation Authority. Submitted by: Mr. Kenny T. Nguyen, PE. QSD Name (Print) Signed Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer Title City of Tustin Jurisdiction May 30, 2025 Date Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin, CA Page 3 2025 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 30, 2025 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2025 UPDATE OF PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN (PMP) As the City of Tustin's infrastructure continues to mature Public Works priorities such as Local street maintenance and Arterial rehabilitation are key projects to City staff. With the City mostly built -out, wear and tear on the infrastructure will occur at an ever increasing rate. Pavement aging through annual weathering, dynamic and static vehicle loading, and increased usage, compounded with the increased cost of performing maintenance and rehabilitation, add to the yearly operational budget of the pavement network. System sustainability can only be achieved through proactive scheduling and the implementation of cost-efficient pavement applications. In the upcoming years, as the City continues to build upon this study through future inspections and maintenance work history tracking, Tustin PMP updates will continue to provide reliable, essential PMP solutions. This will enhance the PMP through detailed Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) OC Go funding analysis, City specific budgetary and level of service reporting. The Tustin PMP has been developed to assist City personnel by providing current data on the City's street network and to develop cost-effective maintenance strategies to maintain a desirable level of pavement performance on a network scale, while optimizing the expenditure of limited fiscal resources. The project consisted of analyzing the City's 2023 dataset for quality and usability. In doing this, we were tasked to generate an updated Capital Improvement Program report that identified recommendations and deficiencies in the current operating and maintenance efforts put forth by the City. We surveyed all designated arterial, collector (MPAH) and all Local routes this past spring to assist the City in being compliant with OCTA March 2025 guidelines. Additionally, we updated the City's unique Pavement Management — GIS layer that will continue to assist the City in analyzing pavement conditions and other attribute information through the use of MyRoads° and ESRI ArcMap. Bucknam Infrastructure Group reviewed the City's previous maintenance efforts, current 2024-25 and proposed FY 2025-26 projects. These street improvements for pertinent pavement information in order to generate a CIP report that identified recommendations and opportunities for improvement in the current operating and maintenance efforts put forth by the City. The result of these work efforts is this report. Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin, CA Page 4 2025 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 30, 2025 III. BACKGROUND - CITY OF TUSTIN PMP In late 1990, voters throughout Orange County approved a %-cent sales tax for transportation improvements known as OC Go, formerly known as Measure M2. Funding for streets and roads are included within the sales tax and are distributed to locals agencies through both formula and a competitive method. In late 2006, the renewal of OC Go was approved by voters that would continue the -cent sales tax for thirty additional years, starting in 2011. The primary of goal of this report is to comply with established guidelines from OCTA to ensure that field data collection and reporting efforts performed by outside consultants or local agency staff are consistent. This is required in order that funding allocations can be reviewed and based on agency comparable pavement conditions. Specifically, our findings and recommendations provide Public Works administrators, managers and field personnel with: * PMP report consistent with OCTA OC Go guidelines * the present condition status of the pavement network (arterial, collector, residential and industrial streets), as a whole and of any grouping or individual component within the City; * a ranked list of all streets, or segments of streets, by condition within the network; * rehabilitation/maintenance needs of each street segment by year; * an optimized priority maintenance and rehabilitation program based on cost/benefit analysis and various levels of funding; * optimum annual pavement expenditure levels for pavement maintenance for the next seven (7) years; * prediction of the life -cycle performance of the City's pavement network and each individual street section; and * pavement condition data and analysis presented in GIS through MyRoads° & ESRI ArcMap Pavement is a dynamic structure where deterioration is constantly occurring; thus the pavement management system needs to be updated on a regular basis to reflect these changes in pavement conditions, pavement maintenance histories, and maintenance strategies based upon budgetary constraints. In our approach to develop the City's forecasted maintenance recommendations we worked with Tustin Public Works/Engineering staff in identifying unit costs for all maintenance practices used on an annual basis. Currently, based upon the City's maintenance/rehabilitation practices and their associated unit costs per SF, the total replacement value of the Tustin pavement network is $1,272,665,600. This value clearly indicates that the City's pavement network is the most valuable and essential asset to Tustin. The City's use of slurry seal, AC Overlay and R&R practices are typically applied at a seven, fourteen and twenty-one year (for Locals) frequency respectively subject to funding availability. These frequencies are preferred but if not implemented the City may see increases in deterioration rates due to environmental, load and high average daily traffic (ADT) volumes. For example, high ADT volumes along one of Tustin's arterial streets will increase deterioration rates for a previously applied AC Overlay compared to a small local street. These deterioration rates are monitored through frequent inspections and functional class deterioration analysis within the City's PMP database. Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin, CA Page 5 2025 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 30, 2025 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Through our assessment of historical maintenance performed within the City, as well as the conditional data found across the network, clearly shows that continued, proactive funding processes have helped the City sustain one of the highest weighted PCI's in the County. Pavement management involves frequent preventive maintenance/rehabilitation; as pavement deteriorates through heavy traffic impacts, weathering and time, preventive maintenances (such as slurry seal, crack sealing, etc.) have limited benefits. Continued biennial reviews of the PMP network and its funding needs should continue to ensure the Tustin PMP success. Our study has shown, at a minimum, that key overlay projects will be needed over the next several years to maintain the network's level of condition. Currently, the City's two major streets networks (Arterial & Local) hold high weighted PCI values; it is our recommendation that a proactive, common sense overlay program be scheduled over the next several fiscal years. This will ensure that the citywide weighted PCI will be sustained and allow for routine slurry seal maintenance to continue. We have found and recommend the following detailed items which should be reviewed and considered for a proactive approach to the future management of the PMP: ARTERIAL / COLLECTOR (MPAH) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The actual workload requirements identified indicate that the Arterial (MPAH) street network is currently in "good" condition. To maintain this condition, it is essential that preventive maintenance and overlay activities are funded at the levels identified on page 9 to maintain a "good" network weighted average PCI value. Our MPAH findings for conditional data and recommendations for revenue expenditures are shown below: • The Arterial / Collector (MPAH) network has a weighted PCI of 80.5; • The MPAH network consists of 77.5 section miles and 19,116,273 SF of pavement; Currently, 48% of the MPAH network (37.5 centerline miles) qualify for slurry seal/stop gap maintenance; 5% of the Arterial network (4.1 centerline miles) qualify for rehabilitation/reconstruction maintenance; o With Arterial/Collector conditions showing approximately 4.1 miles of streets in need of major rehabilitation; a proactive Arterial/Collector CIP program needs to be reviewed and implemented; At a minimum, MPAH maintenance projects should focus on the maintaining the current PCI above a weighted average of 82 over the next 7 years; o Maintain Arterial PCI by providing revenues at an average level of $3,505,800 for the seven-year term of the CIP to generate the projects identified on page 9 (Maintain PCI Budget); • Increase funding and develop a proactive approach to identify MPAH overlay projects based on the deterioration modeling within StreetSaver; Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin, CA Page 6 2025 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 30, 2025 o Utilizing current funding levels will decrease the MPAH weighted PCI of 80.5 to 80.0; and will decrease the citywide backlog from $16.3 million to $13.4 million over the next seven years; • Perform pavement inspections on the MPAH network every two years to continue the City's solid planning model within StreetSaver to track PCI deterioration; also follows new OCTA guidelines for Measure M2. LOCAL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The actual workload requirements identified indicate that the Local street network is currently in "good" condition. To maintain this condition, it is essential that preventive maintenance and overlay activities are funded at the levels identified on page 9 to maintain a "good" network weighted average PCI value. Our Local network findings for conditional data and recommendations for revenue expenditures are shown below: • The Local network has a weighted PCI of 85.2; • The Local network consists of 66.7 section miles and 13,576,837 SF of pavement; • Currently, 35% of the Local network (23.3 centerline miles) qualifies for slurry seal/stop gap maintenance; 6% of the Local network (4.3 centerline miles) qualify for rehabilitation/reconstruction maintenance; o With Local conditions showing approximately four (4) miles of Local streets in need of major rehabilitation; a proactive Local CIP program needs to be sustained; • At a minimum, Local maintenance projects should focus on the maintaining the current PCI above a weighted average of 85 over the next 7 years; o Maintain Local PCI by providing revenues at an average level of $2,344,400 for the seven- year term of the CIP to generate the projects identified on page 9 (Maintain PCI Budget); • Increase funding and develop a proactive approach to identify Local overlay projects based on the deterioration modeling within StreetSaver; o Utilizing current funding levels will decrease the Local weighted PCI of 85.2 to 82.0 and the citywide backlog will decrease from $16.3 million to $13.4 million over the next seven years; • Perform pavement inspections on the Local network every year (following the City's maintenance zone schedule) to continue the City's solid planning model within StreetSaver to track PCI deterioration; also follows new OCTA guidelines for Measure M2; • Utilize Bucknam's MyRoads° PMP web -portal to enhance internal PMP discussions, perform general reporting and develop cost estimations for slurry, overlay and reconstruction projects Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin, CA Page 7 2025 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 30, 2025 IV. CURRENT PAVEMENT CONDITIONS (PCI) Very Good :: (96-100) GDDd ..................................................................... (75-95) Fair ................................... (6,0-74) .................................. Poor ................................... (41-59) .................................. Ver.,Poor f0-401 24-0 ......................... 32.0 ...................................... 16.1 39.9% 1 52.1% 30..-5 ....................... 29.1 ...................................... 1-7%................... .... .... 20A ......................... 6.3 ...................................... 26.7 ....................................... I 19.0% 12.3;% ........................................ ............................ 2-6 ......................... 0.2 ...................................... 2.3 ...................................... IL 2-0% 1-9% 0-0 0-1 0.1 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin, CA Page 8 2025 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 30, 2025 V. PROJECTED PAVEMENT CONDITIONS (CURRENT FUNDING LEVELS) Current PICI 82.5 90.5 95.2 2025-26 ................................................. $4,146,400 ................................................................. ................................................................. 94.0 80-0 .................................................................. 87-0 ....................................................... 2026-27 ................................................. $16,0601000 ................................................................. ................................................................. 96.0 94-0 .................................................................. 97-0 ....................................................... 2027-29 ................................................. $11,220,900 ................................................................. ................................................................. 95.0 85.0 .................................................................. 86.0 ....................................................... 2028-29 ................................................. $1,760,000 ................................................................. ................................................................. 85.0 85-0 .................................................................. 86-0 ....................................................... 2029-30 ................................................. $4,600,000 ................................................................. ................................................................. 94-0 94-0 .................................................................. 96-0 ....................................................... 2030-31 ................................................. $3,00),00) ................................................................. ................................................................. 82-0 83-0 .................................................................. 84-0 ....................................................... 2031-32 $3,400,000 81-0 90-0 82-0 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin, CA Page 9 2025 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 30, 2025 VI. ALTERNATIVE FUNDING LEVELS Maintain Existing Average Network PCI Current PCI 92.5 80.5 85.2 2025-26 $4.146.400 .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 84.0 80.0 87.0 2026-27 $16,060,000 ................................................. ................................................................. ;................................................................. 86.0 i.................................................................;....................................................... 94.0 87.0 2027-2B $11,220,100 .................................................................;..................................................................................................................................;....................................................... 35.0 95.0 96.0 2029-29 $1.760.000 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 35.0 35.0 96.0 2029-30 $4.600,000 .................................................................;................................................................. 84.0 i.................................................................;....................................................... 94.0 96.0 2030-31 $4,100,000 ................................................. ................................................................. ;................................................................. 84.0 ................................................................. 83.0 85.0 ;....................................................... 2031-32 $5,200,000 93.0 93.0 95.0 Improve Average Network PCI r-y Increase 11120 Fundfrig Entire Network Current PCI �PCI� 82.5 MPAH 80.5 Local 85.2 2025 26 $4,146,400 .................................................................;................................................................. 94.0 i.................................................................;....................................................... 80.0 87.0 2026-27 $16,060,000 .................................................................................................................. a.................................................................................................................................. 86.0 84.0 87.0 a....................................................... 2027-29 $11,220,100 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 35.0 35.0 96.0 2028-29 $1,760,000 ................................................. ................................................................. ;................................................................. 85.0 i.................................................................;....................................................... 85.0 96.0 2029-30 $4.940.000 ..................................................................................................................;..................................................................................................................................;....................................................... 35.0 84.0 87.0 2030-31 $4.660.000 ................................................. ................................................................. ;................................................................. 85.0 ................................................................. 94.0 97.0 ;....................................................... 2031-32 $5,470,000 84.0 94.0 86.0 VII. CURRENT AND PROJECTED BACKLOG BY YEAR OF PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE NEEDS DEFERRED MAINTENANCE Delaying repairs on streets where pavement conditions indicate a need generates deferred maintenance or "backlog". Deferred maintenance is work that is postponed to a future budget cycle, or until funds are available. As maintenance is deferred, the opportunity to apply preventive, life extending pavement treatments is forfeited and the ultimate cost of rehabilitation multiplies (i.e. slurry seal costs to overlay costs). By using the City's pavement maintenance applications and their associated unit costs, when a budgetary model is exercised within the PMP software the amount of deferred maintenance is calculated. Based upon the available budget applied to the model, deferred maintenance will increase or decrease. Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin, CA Page 10 2025 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 30, 2025 As maintenance is deferred, the opportunity to apply life extending preventive pavement applications is lost and the ultimate cost of rehabilitation multiples. In the case of Tustin, the City's current annual funding through FY 2031-32 will generate an increase in the amount of deferred maintenance/backlog on the network to $13.4 million level by FY 2032. Current 16,255A00 16,255,400 16,255,400 2025-26 ................................................. ................................................................. $13,607,700 $13,6D7,700 $13,607,700 ................................................................. 2026-27 ................................................. ................................................................. $11.359.100 $11.353.10-0 ................................................................. $11.359.100 ................................................................. 2027-29 ................................................. ................................................................. $10.652.400 $10.652.400 $10.652.400 ................................................................. 2028-29 ................................................. ................................................................. $11,936,300 $11,936,300 ................................................................. $11,936,300 ................................................................. 2029-30 ................................................. ................................................................. $16.155.100 $16.155.100 ................................................................. $15.951.200 ................................................................. 2030-31 ................................................. ................................................................. $17.799.500 $17.387.400 ................................................................. $17.253.300 ................................................................. 2031-32 $13.402.100 $11.919.500 $11.770.200 Vill. CENTERLINE MILEAGE IX. PERCENTAGE OF NETWORK IN EACH OF FIVE CONDITION CATEGORIES BASED ON CENTERLINE MILES Percent Area of Area of Pavement Percent Centerline Condition PCI Range Network Total Pavement (SF) Centerline M i. of Mileage of MRAH 17.9% 5,957,528 16.6% 24-.0 (86-100) .................................... .................................................... .................................................... .................................................... .................................................... Local 19.9% 6.503.045 22.2% 32.0 PAH MRAH 23.3% 7.602.444..............................21..1. % 30.5 Good(75-85) ..........M .................................................... ........................................ ....................... .................................................... Local 17.1% 5,595,997 19.5% 28.1 MFIAH 15.1% 4,935,248 14.1% 20.4 Fair (50-74) .................................... .................................................... .................................................... .................................................... .................................................... Local 4.3% 1.419.277 4.4% 6.3 MRAH 2.2% 721.053 1.8% 2.6 Poor(41-59) .................................... .................................................... .................................................... .................................................... .................................................... Local 0.196 32.390 0.196 0.2 MRAH ().()% 0-0 (G-40) ... ................ ....... .......... ........................... .................................................... .................................................... .................................................... Local 36.138 0-1% 0-1 32,65S3,110 MAU Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin, CA Page 11 2025 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 30, 2025 X. REDUCTION IN M2 LOCAL MATCH A local agency match reduction of 10% of the eligible cost for projects submitted for consideration of funding through the M2 Comprehensive Transportation Funding Programs (CTFP) call for projects is available if the local agency either: a. Shows measurable improvement of paved road conditions during the previous reporting period defined as an overall weighted (by area) average system improvement of one Pavement Condition Index (PCI) point with no reduction in the overall weighted (by area) average PCI in the Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) or local categories: or b. Have road pavement conditions during the previous reporting period, within the highest 20% of the scale for road pavement conditions in conformance with OCTA Ordinance No. 3, defined as a PCI of 75 or higher, otherwise defined as in "good condition". Road conditions found through our 2025 PMP management study shows that the City is eligible for Local Match Reduction based on the current network weighted PCI of 82.5. Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin, CA Page 12 2025 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 30, 2025 XI. APPENDIX A - SEVEN YEAR ROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION PLAN BASED ON CURRENT OR EXPECTED FUNDING LEVEL Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC r rrrr - - - - - - oo000o E E E E E E - ro - room - - - - r - - rrr - - - r'o - f r'or E = 2 F = o00000000' E F E F E F E E E E r'rr - 2 - - - r - - 6006 E E E f - r - - r - - r - r - - ro - E ror - E . - rrro - - . F - 8g8g8g��������&.a�8 :t:t�:�48�t &.a &.8 &.8 ����88&.8 &.8 8&. a9 a9<a a as & m�e Sm �S6S o S m N S S m 8 g a r S m m $ F m � aaa"aa«««««m � <S<S< as �"""""" « mSSSSSSSSSS m«a"��e SS<1SmS< m« mm«m«mmmSe.e a g m « m « m m m « « « « « « a a a a a a m m m « m « m « a aaa < < a « « m m «aaa > m « « « « «aaa a m « m « m « m « « « « « « « « « « « a e > e « = g's aaa ;oo ------000�E w F f F F -------------- ------- ------------ °a°a°a°a°a°aa f f f f f f f ---------- 00000zzozo f f f f f °a°a f f 000000 00000000000000 0...... ....... oso 00 0000000000 ore <a<----------- ------ ------------ p p ---------- 0000- -- -----�GGGGa =Q= =a - GGGGGG< < -- 223a333a223a°aoa f E f f f F f E F f f f f f '°aoa°a°a f f f °aoa f f f oa°aoa°aoa°aoa°aoa°aoa°a f F f f f f f f E f f f °a°a°a°a°a°a°a°a°a°a s s f s f s s s f s °2<fo -- z - _-_-_ f F�i:-i:- a: acaS a a a a a a -°�fssss a a a a a a a a a ap a a az° ac°az° ac°az° a f0 f0 f i E2< °°°°°a°°a°° za zas aafzaE aaSzE zaF aSzaF aaszs a _ a a a z aaaaaaaaaaaaa a. a_____o000 a�zE afz� 0000000° aEz� a�zE zE aaa aEaC 3¢ ° 9¢3 z°c°z°c° c ° o 0 00�i $a -- o sfFfsfFfFf << < c o _a aaa _a a B. a _a a _a a B. a a _a a _a a B. a a _a a B. a B. a _a a _a a B. a - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ aw _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ L _ _ A: L _ _ A: _ _ _ _ _ °i Y Y Y � o ¢ry 3 o� o 3G zg o- � t <o zo> °zw m z . a a F° p>>- ozz>o 3 _ Vu G 3 o o o Go3u� '3wi a SSfi FSs oo xx F 6� x ¢'3 '0-�5 rs ' ms w .`,>> zzGGw a -° ��a zz zz o GGG - ��W Gaon 3 too p z3� >��__ o <�z oz Egwfw55 SS��� G"'zGWBo FG m N zz_ -' �pG�a 5 a>EE�---��2< 2 S �-- 5'3tk99g8'� 3 ��� > g9m�??o GG�s <�zV�� z wtp_ 3 a o i " 3 3 E E z w S S m i" _ - ° a Q > c =55 g - w oG. 3 3 ffffffffffffff mS° °SS° Sm sfffE�f °S° o. - -- -- - - - - -- G G G G G G G G G G GGGtGGi Iz _______ \ W Gd Gd G W ol- G G G G G G G G G G G G G '¢ - 0 S 0 S 0 0 0 o 0 o o o 0 o o 0 o 0 0 0 o - - - - - - - - - - - - z z a _ a F Q------ a p c G 3 3 f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f dF W W W W mi mi mi a - a ts w °:gym SQ momm�a Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC i Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC C, Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC �I C, Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC C, Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC A¢g[ G� z z� Y 7 C, Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC i �i Ryg G� z z, Y V D mi Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin, CA Page 13 2025 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 30, 2025 XII. APPENDIX B -COMPLETE STREET LISTING CURRENT CONDITIONS Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC ....................... A A P R 93 A A P A 's 'S 5� 5� '51 S 5� S 5! 4 5i 1� I S1 'k 15 5 'k E I I I 'I I I I I 'k I I 1 5 'k 5 1 111, 4 4 g ts 9� w m m m m a _;I jj W" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Q I Q IQ I ul u� Q Q .1 Q Q 0I I I'I I I . . . . . . . . . . . g g g g R R t-2 t'2 R R �'2 �'2 g g g g g g g g g g g �'-c �c u u u u u u u u u o u o u o u u . . . . . . . . . o. 2 ------------ - . z,.oz,.,z,.oz,�ooz�oz�ozo.00..ozo.oz00000wo-ozo.ozzzzzz . . . . . . . . . z Rl .1 .1 .1 ooz.00z.00zo.ozo.ozo.2z�wo�oo=wo - - - - - - - - - - - R R 2 2 R R R 2 2 R 2 R 2 2 2 R 2 2 2 2 R 2 2 R R R 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 . . . . . . . . . . z . . . 0 . . 0 . . . o . o . . o o . . o o . . o o . . o o . . o o . . o o . . o o . . o . . o o . . o o . . o . . o o . . o o . . o . . o . o I I o o o o o o o o z o 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 R 2 2 2 R 2 R 2 R 2 R 2 R R 2 2 R 2 2 2 R 2 R 2 2 . . . . . . 2 R . . a R . . 2 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 . . . . . o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o' 0' 4 0 o o o � 4 1 1 < � 1 1 < 41 1 1 1 1 . I 01 I ol .1 8z S < < . . . . . . . . . . . . a . . a . . . . a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -- . . . -- - . . - - . . - - . . - - . . - - . . - ? . . - - . - - . . - - . . - - . . - - . - - - . . . . . . . . . . . < . . < . . < . . . . < . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . < . . < . < . . . . . . . . . . . < < < < < < o2 R R 2 2 t: 1w z < < d'. 'z '0 > t; S > LL Z' w 'zz '-OMMA, t; z w w z 0 2 z 2. z z 'z z z L L t: z Z zt; t2 2 z g�� Z M Z t Z' t; 'Z -wz 1 z z R -o ' 1 P 'o Im 6 6 z z z MH � Z' z z 1 � n Oz < - z Q o z 5 z o z z z � �< < z > z P �0! -0 zo ww '- z lu ti I 'Z' z t; i � '�; '- < , w o 0 '0 <0 z 'o z �; . o o z z o o� - - ; ; z z r 0, z Z 4 11 'z ;U; -o 6 � , '6 'z 'o z 9 z ZW z z z. z' z 1 R �§ 2 . z z z �O ZO z zs 0 0 1 o 2 2 P z R u < - . . . . . . . . . . 0 o o o o o o o o a o a o o . . . . . > > > 2s . . . . . . 2 2 . . 2 2 . . 2 2 . . 2 2 . . 2 2 . . 2 2 2 2 . 2 2 . . - � . . . . . . . - o 2 2� . . 2� . . z . . . . . . . z Z z� 4 4 4 7 4 7 1 1 7 7 1 4 7 - 1 1 7 . ' 4 7 7 1 4 7 7 1 7 7 ' 4 7 . '- 47 1 47 4 7 , 4 7 7 < 7 1 w . . . . . . . . . 0. 7 7 7 7 7 7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I z z z z z z z z z z z Z'. ZW z �. w z w z E w z z z z . z z z z 0 0 tw t2 t2 t2 t� t2 t� t2 t� t� t2 t ti t.t ti t.t t.2 z z - I- I- E I- I- 0. E . .0 . .0 0. . .0 . . .0 .0 . . .0 .0 . . .0 Om . . .0 Om . . .0 . . .0 .0 . . .0 Om . . .0 0 . . .0 0 . . 0 0 . . 0 0 0 0 0 z z z z z z z z z z . . 1 2 . . . . 1 1 . . -- �- o . . . 2 , . o 2 �: � . z . 2 � � z z 2 2 � � z z . 2 � � z z . 2 � � z z 2 z . z z z z z z z z z z z - . - - . . - - . . - - . . - - . . - - . . - - . 0 - - . . - - . . - - . . - - 0 . - - . . - - . . - - . . - - . . - - 0 . - 0 . - - . . - - . . - 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . 0 I tz tz; o o I . . . . . . . > z z z z z z z o o o o o o o o o o o o o o �� o o 0, � o R - o o - - o o - - o - - o o - - o o - - - o Z' z z 5 6 wo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o ci ci !i mi �i ci - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - zw z o z D ca Lill Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin, CA Page 14 2025 Citywide Pavement Management Plan — OCTA Submittal Final Report — April 30, 2025 XIII. APPENDIX C —GIS DIGITAL DATA Introduction The OCTA GIS Section maintains a spatial inventory of transportation infrastructure which mostly consists of major arterial streets, roads, and highways. A key component of road information is pavement condition. Maintaining an inventory of pavement condition will enhance OCTA's GIS visualization and analysis capabilities and assist in understanding the transportation investment needs throughout the region. Therefore, a GIS dataset in digital format should be included in this report. Structure of GIS Data The GIS dataset must consist of linear geographic features that represent road/street segments. All segments that are part of the report should be included in the GIS dataset. The attribute information of each segment should generally follow the format of the Complete Listing of Current Street Conditions in Appendix B above. The GIS data requirements are discussed below. Most commercial and open -source GIS software provide industry -standard tools to manage GIS data to meet these requirements. GIS Digital Data Format The GIS data must be submitted in either one of the following formats: • Esri Shapefile, or • Esri File Geodatabase Ma*ariata The GIS data are required to have associated metadata. The minimum metadata items required are: • Title of Dataset • Tags (A set of words that can be used by GIS to search for the resource. For example: "pavement", "transportation", "roads") • Summary (A brief purpose statement of the dataset) • Description (A brief narrative of the dataset's content) • Credits (A recognition of those who created or contributed to the resource) Spatial Geometry Type The spatial geometry of the segment features must be lines that represent the roadway centerline as accurately as possible. Projection The GIS data must have spatial reference information and have its coordinate system identified and Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41 B-AA32-41 EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin, CA Page 15 2025 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 30, 2025 embedded in or associated with the data file(s). All GIS data submitted to OCTA should be in the following projected coordinate system: • NAD 1983 State Plane California VI FIPS O406 (US Feet) - More information about this system can be found at: https://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/nad83-caIifornia-zone-6-ftus/ GIS Feature Attributes The required segment attributes are: • Street name • Unique segment identifier (Segment ID from original source if available) • Name of intersecting road at the beginning of a segment • Name of intersecting road at the end of the segment • Current pavement condition index (PCI) • Current PCI inspection date • Length of road segment in feet • Width of road segment in feet • Paved area of road segment in square feet or square yards • Projected PCI at end of Seven -Year Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Additional attributes such as number of through travel lanes, direction of travel and pavement surface type may be provided. XIV. APPENDIX D - QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL PLAN Introduction When performing data collection in any field, the need for quality control is paramount as it is essential for accurate planning, analysis and design. This is particularly true for collecting pavement distress data for a pavement management program. The Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC) Plan establishes minimum quality standards for performance and procedures for update of the pavement management program. Objectives This document constitutes a formal QA/QC Plan for the City of Tustin. It was prepared on March, 2023 and last revised in March, 2023. Specifically, it is intended for the 2025 Pavement Management Plan Update. The focus is on the collection of network -level pavement distress data (defined by National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Synthesis 401 Quality Management of Pavement Data Collection, as "Network -level data collection involves collection of large quantities of pavement condition data, which is often converted to individual condition indices or aggregated into composite condition indices". This document also addresses the QA/QC plan requirements of the Orange County Transportation Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin, CA Page 16 2025 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 30, 2025 Authority (OCTA)'s "Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines" (Section 2.4), adopted in May 2010. Structure of QA/QC Plan The following components are addressed in this QA/QC Plan: • Condition survey procedures used; • Accuracy required for data collection; • Inspector qualifications and experience; and • Safety. Condition Survey Procedures The governing document in performing condition surveys for the City of Tustin is ASTM D6433 "Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Surveys." Both asphalt concrete (AC) and Portland cement concrete (PCC) pavements are included in this protocol. The following distresses are collected for each pavement type: 1. A I I igato r (f atigu e) cra cki ng ...................................................................................................................................... 1. Blow- u p/Buckl i ng ...................................................................................................................................... 2. Bleeding ...................................................................................................................................... :2. Corner Breaks, ...................................................................................................................................... 3. Block Cracking ...................................................................................................................................... :3. Divided Slab ...................................................................................................................................... 4. Bumps and sags ...................................................................................................................................... :4. D u ra b i I ity (" D ") Cra cki ng ...................................................................................................................................... 5. Corrugation ...................................................................................................................................... :5. Faulting ...................................................................................................................................... 6. Depression ...................................................................................................................................... 6. Joint Seal damage ...................................................................................................................................... 7. Edge Cracking ...................................................................................................................................... :7. Lane/Shoulder Drop-off ...................................................................................................................................... S. Joint Reflection Cracking ...................................................................................................................................... ::8. Linear Cracking ...................................................................................................................................... 9. Lane/Shoulder Drop-off ...................................................................................................................................... :9. P atch i ng (I a rge) a n d Uti I ity Cuts ...................................................................................................................................... 10. Lo ngitu d i n a I & Tra n sve rse Cracki ng ...................................................................................................................................... 10. Patching (small) ...................................................................................................................................... 11. P atch i ng a n d Uti I ity Cut P atch i ng ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 11. Polished Aggregate 12. Polished aggregate ...................................................................................................................................... :12. Popouts ...................................................................................................................................... 13. Pothole5 ...................................................................................................................................... :13. Pumping ...................................................................................................................................... 14. Railroad Crossing ...................................................................................................................................... 114. Punchout ...................................................................................................................................... 15. Putting ...................................................................................................................................... :15. Railroad Crossing ...................................................................................................................................... 16. Shoving ...................................................................................................................................... 116. Scaling, map cracking and crazing ...................................................................................................................................... 17. Slippage Cracking ...................................................................................................................................... :17. Shrinkage Cracks ...................................................................................................................................... 19. Swell ...................................................................................................................................... 49. Spalling (corner) ...................................................................................................................................... 19. Weathering ...................................................................................................................................... :19. Spalling (joint) ...................................................................................................................................... 20. Raveling As required by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), the City of Tustin must prepare and implement a quality assurance / quality control (QA/QC) plan regarding pavement management inspection as they pertain to StreetSaver. For the purposes of this report, Bucknam has demonstrated below how our project team implemented QA/QC procedures during the project. Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin, CA Page 17 2025 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 30, 2025 Our QA/QC plan focuses on the how each pavement inspection is performed, what distresses are collected and ensures that it complies with the OCTA guidelines defined within the "Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines (CPMPG)". As shown within the OCTA (CPMPG), our staff followed and delivered on the requirements stated within Chapter 2, page 2-5 which require specific QA/QC data (Items A through G). Additionally, Chapter 3 requires numerous clata/deliverables from local agencies for OC Go eligibility. All general PCI budgetary report submittals will follow the Chapter 3 guidelines. In conjunction with the outlined items within the CPMPG Section 2 we have summarized our QA/QC procedures below: a. Descriptions of condition survey - Our staff follows the required Condition Survey Protocols (CPMPG, Chapter 2); our staff assesses each pavement section for the minimum distresses outlined within Chapter 2, page 2-1. Additionally, based on the pavement conditions found, we collect all Micro PAVE R/StreetSave r Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) distresses, if found within the sample sections; for example, if slippage cracking, potholes, etc. are found our survey technicians record the proper information. b. How data was collected - Our surveys follow the OCTA accepted walking requirements. All sections that our staff surveys are performed through the walking method, approximately 10% of all sections surveyed were complemented with windshield surveys based on unique conditions found. Our staff physically measures the width of every section as well as measure for any square footage adjustment that need to be added or taken away from a sections "true area" (i.e. cul-cle- sac, bus pads, street width variances, etc.). Samples taken always include a minimum of 2,500 SF coverage unless specific section limits prohibit this. Arterial section samples utilize a 3,500 SF sample size due to the larger section area (this is within the ASTM D6433 sample size calculation. Field crews typically include one individual for residential pavement sections while Arterial (MPAH) routes utilize a two -person crew for safety, traffic control and increases quality control. c. Accuracy required for data collection - We use a statistical sampling approach for measuring the quality of our field technician's work. In this manner, 10 percent of the original surveys are re- surveyed by a different survey crew than the original, supervised by a field supervisor, and the results are compared to the original surveys. Our QC process involves checking the field crews' work in a "blind study" fashion. Quality control checks are performed at the end of each survey week. This ensures that all field personnel are properly collecting section samples, distress types and distress severities for all street segments. When QA/QC issues are found, our staff documents the issues within StreetSaver's user interface. If distress types found are not within the 97% accuracy our QA/QC is expanded beyond our minimum 10% resurvey to 20% of the original survey d. Random and Systematic Re -Inspections —As described above our staff re -inspects, as a minimum, 10% of the original survey (OCTA only requires 5%). Per the agencies requests, our staff will submit PCI reports to the agency as project status reports for their review. Agencies will typically review specific pavement sections for PCI accuracy based on recent overlay or slurry seal maintenance; this serves as an initial accuracy check on our surveys (outside Bucknam QC efforts). Additionally, our staff performs "ride -a -long" surveys with local agency staff to build consensus on how our MicroPAVER /StreetSaver USACE surveys are performed, recorded and reported on. Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin, CA Page 18 2025 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 30, 2025 Random re -inspections will include a representative selection across the following categories: • Functional classed (i.e. MPAH, locals); • Surface types (e.g. AC or PCQ • Pavement conditions (e.g. good, fair, poor); • Inspectors; • Geographical areas, if applicable. For systematic re -inspections, this could be due to noticed trends such as specific treatment types (e.g. open -graded mixed), a specific inspector or geographical area. In these cases Bucknam continues to utilize a 10% re -inspection policy. e. PCI Comparison with Past Survey - if previous inspection data is available, new PCI's calculated through the most recent inspections will be compared to previous PCI's. If the variance in PCI is greater than +/- 10 PCI points, these sections will be flagged for further investigation and/or re - inspection (In the cases that a PCI increases or decreases by 10 points follows the established CPMPG guidelines; Appendix A, page A-18). f. Schedule of data submittal — Pending on the City's last major PMP submittal, Bucknam will assist the agency in submitting the following: Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) routes will be surveyed and reported on at least once every two years -.*- Local streets will be surveyed and reported on every six years Corresponding MPAH and local PCI reporting and budgetary reporting will be submitted every two years g. Experience of Inspectors — Bucknam staff have been trained on the use of StreetSaver and the USACE segment calibration and inspection practices. Mr. Peter Bucknam (Project Manager) and staff (see below) have completed the PMP Certification of Professional Development courses. Bucknam field technicians are trained using the USACE survey methodologies and have passed OCTA's prequalification testing. Bucknam Infrastructure Group inspectors have attended formal training on pavement condition distress surveys. This training was conducted prior to performing any work using the ASTM D6433 protocols, consistent with OCTA's requirements Aaron Cohodas ................................................................. ............................................................................................... 8/12/24 OC TA ..................................................... Nicko Bustarnante ................................................................. ................................................................................................ 8/12/24 OCTA ..................................................... Cade Bucknarn 9/12/24 OCTA h. Field data collection safety procedures — Bucknam field survey techniques utilize the following procedures: Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin, CA Page 19 2025 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 30, 2025 a. All vehicles are properly marked or flagged with appropriate sign markings indicating that a "PAVEMENT SURVEY IS IN PROGRESS" b. All vehicles have the proper flashing amber light beacons placed on the top of the vehicle to allow for proper visibility and line -of -site warning c. Large MPAH routes are surveyed using two field technicians to increase traffic control warning and safety d. While parking or stopping along the survey route, vehicles legally park within the right- of-way or use a parking lot e. All field technicians wear ANSI — 105 Class 11 safety vests XV. APPENDIX E - PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT DATA FILES The City of Tustin StreetSaver database is available online through MTC StreetSaver's website; to log in and review PIVIP data OCTA will need to obtain permission from Tustin staff and MTC. This data and the associated reporting data includes: • Street names and limits for the City's public streets • Street identifiers (Branch ID, Section ID) • Direction • Begin and end of section • Length, width and true areas • Functional Classification (MPAH, Local) • Number of travel lanes • Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and date of inspection • Type of recommended treatment • Cost of recommended treatment Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin, CA Page 20 2025 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 30, 2025 XVI. APPENDIX F - GIS MAPS / CURRENT CONDITIONS City of Tustin Pavement Condition 2025 lFvine 0 0.25 05 1 Miles Aw'UCKNAM 0 IN FIR ASTRUCTU RE GROUP. INC Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Attachment "G" City's Circulation Element Exhibit (Map) Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC �,VETA VETA AVE N GA DEN < ........... 000 GRO,/F FAIRHAVEN AVE 0 44 FOOTHILL BLVD SANTA CLARA DODGE AVE 17TH ST 0 see: % FIRST ST DC--4MAIN :J /P, Circ0otion Element Notes: 1. Nis son Road is not shown on the Circulation Element. It is shown here for access to 1-5 ramps. 2. Designations of roadways outside the city 0 limits are not given here. Urban Interchange on Edinger Avenue at Jamboree Road. le, n. N % *00 0 LEGEND Major (8 lanes) Major (6 lanes) Modified Major (6 lanes) Primary (4 lanes) Modified Primary (4 lanes' Secondary (4 or 2 lanes) Augmented Roadways 000000000 City Boundary eee 1 1 eee Planning Area Boundary —c— Collector (2 lanes) Divided Collector (2 lanes) TUSTTN GENERAL PLAN CTRCULATTON ELEMENT ARTERTAL T-TTGHWAY PLAN Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC TABLE C-5 ARTERIAL HIGHWAY PLAN Link Classification I Link Classification Armstrong/so Loop Rd N Secondary Holt s/o 17th Secondary Armstrong s/o Warner Secondary Holt s/o Irvine Blvd. Secondary Armstrong n/o Barranca Secondary BarTanca e/o Red Hill BarTanca w/o Von Karman BarTanca w/o Jamboree Bell e/o Red Hill Browning s/o Irvine Browning s/o Bryan Browning n/o Nisson Browning s/o Nissen Bryan e/o Newport Bryan w/o Red Hill Bryan w/o Browning Bryan w/o Tustin Ranch Bryan w/c, Myford Bryan w/o Jamboree Del Arno s/o Edinger East Connector s/o Edinger Edinger w/o Del Arno Edinger w/o Red Hill Edinger e/o Red Hill Edinger w/o Tustin Ranch Edinger c/o Tustin Ranch Edinger w/o Jamboree Edinger e/o Jamboree El Camino s/o 111 El Camino s/o Main El Camino e/c, Newport El Camino e/c, Red Hill El Camino c/o Browning El Camino c/o Tustin Ranch El Camino e/c, Myford 1�1 w/o Yorba V c/o Yorba 1s, w/o Prospect 1st w/o Newport Harvard n/o ICD Harvard s/o ICD Harvard n/o Warner Major Major Major Secondary Secondary Secondary Secondary Secondary Secondary Secondary Secondary Primary Primary Primary Secondary Secondary Major Major Major Major Major Major Major Collector Collector Secondary Secondary Secondary Secondary Primary Divided Collector Divided Collector Divided Collector Divided Collector Secondary Primary Primary Irvine w/c, Yorba Irvine w/o Prospect Irvine e/c, Prospect Irvine e/c, Holt Irvine e/c, Newport Irvine w/o Red Hill Irvine w/o Browning Irvine w/o Tustin Ranch Irvine e/c, Tustin Ranch Irvine w/c, Jamboree Jamboree n/o Tustin Ranch Rd. Jamboree s/o Tustin Ranch Road Jamboree s/o Portola Jamboree s/o Irvine Jamboree s/o Bryan Jamboree s/o El Camino Jamboree s/o Walnut Jamboree s/o Edinger Jamboree s/o Warner Loop Rd e/o Red Hill Loop Rd N e/o Armstrong Loop Rd w/o Tustin Ranch Loop Rd N e/o Tustin Ranch Loop Rd s/o Warner Loop Rd S e/o Tustin Ranch Loop Rd S e/o Armstrong Main w/o El Can-dno Real Main c/o El Camino Real Main c/o Prospect Main c/o Newport McFadden w/o Williams McFadden e/o Williams McFadden w/o Walnut McFadden w/o Newport Myford s/o Irvine Myford s/o Bryan Myford s/o El Camino Real Myford n/o Walnut Major (A) Major (A) Major Major Major (M, A) Major (M, A) Major (M, A) Major (A) Major Major Major Major Major Major (A) Major (A) Major (A) Major Major Major Secondary Secondary Secondary Secondary Secondary Secondary Secondary Divided Collector Divided Collector Divided Collector Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Secondary Secondary Secondary Secondary CITY OF TUSTIN CIRCULATION ELEMENT GENERALPLAN 32 JUNE 2018 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC TABLE C-5 ARTERIAL HIGHWAY PLAN Link Classification Link Classification Newport n/o Irvine Primary (A) Tustin n/o 1st Major Newport n/ o Holt Primary (A) Newport s/o Holt Primary (A) Tustin Ranch s/ o jamboree Major Newport s/o 1st Primary (A) Tustin Ranch n/ o La Colina Major Newport n/o Main Primary (A) Tustin Ranch s/o La Colina Major Newport n/o El Camino Real Primary (A) Tustin Ranch s/o Irvine Major Newport s/o El Camino Primary (A) Tustin Ranch s/o Bryan Major Newport s/o 1-5 Major(M) Tustin Ranch s/o El Cm Real Major Newport n/o McFadden Major(M) Tustin Ranch n/ o Walnut Major Newport s/o Walnut Major(M) Tustin Ranch n/ o Edinger Major Newport n/o Edinger Major Tustin Ranch s/o Edinger Major Newport s/o Edinger Major Tustin Ranch n/ o Warner Major Newport n/o Valencia Major Tustin Ranch s/o Warner Major Tustin Ranch n/o Barranca Major Old Irvine e/o Newport Secondary Valencia w/o Red Hill Primary(A) Portola w/o Jamboree Primary Walnut w/o Newport Primary Prospect s/o Santa Clara Secondary Walnut w/o Red Hill Primary Prospect s/o 17th Secondary Walnut w/o Browning Primary Prospect s/o Irvine Secondary Walnut w/o Tustin Ranch Primary Walnut w/o Myford Primary(A) Red Hill s/o Irvine Primary Warner w/o Red Hill Major Red Hill s/o Bryan Major Red Hill s/o El Camino Real Major Warner e/o Red Hill Major Red Hill n/o Nisson Major Warner e/o Armstrong Major Red Hill n/o Walnut Major Warner e/o Tustin Ranch Major Red Hill n/o Sycamore Major Warner e/o Loop Road Primary Red Hill n/o Edinger Major Red Hill s/o Edinger Major(A) West Connector s/o Edinger Secondary Red Hill s/o Valencia Major Red Hill s/o Warner Major Williams n/o McFadden Secondary Santa Clara w/o Yorba Secondary Yorba s/o Santa Clara Secondary Santa Clara w/o Prospect Secondary Yorba s/o 17th Secondary Yorba s/o Irvine Secondary 17th e/o SR-55 NB Ramps Major(A) 17th w/o Yorba N. Major(A) 17th w/o Prospect S. Major 17th w/o Prospect N. Major Sycamore w/o Newport Secondary(A) Sycamore e/o Newport Secondary Notes: (A) denotes augmented facility; (M) denotes modified section. CITY OF TUSTIN CIRCULATION ELEMENT GENERALPLAN 33 JUNE 2018 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Attachment "H" Arterial Highway Mileage Change Report Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC rD rD 3 > 0- 2-0- (D (D 1- 0- (D 0- 0 rD 0- 0� c') rD rD Qj rD rD rD -n 0 m U) (D 0', 70 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . c I . 0 a n 0�3 a Rot 0 0 0 h U) W > e-1, (D -h LO zT ei (D Q) LO > Ma UD (D zT Ma m z La (D (D 70 0 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Attachment "I" Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Reporting Form (OCTA APPENDIX 1) Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC M�)t OCTA (XGO APPENDIXI Local Tax Dollars at Work Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Certification Form Jurisdiction: City of Tustin Type of GENERAL FUND Transportation Expenditures: Please complete and attach supporting budget documentation for each line item listed below. MAINTENANCE Total Expenditure Engineering [100-40-12] - GF Allocated Budget $ 76,300.00 Streets [100-40-13] - GF Allocated Budget $ 450,400.00 Landscape [100-40-14] - GF Allocated Budget $ 1,727,100.00 1 Subtotal Maintenance $ 2,253,800.00 CONSTRUCTION Total Expenditure Main Street Improvements [GF - 189 & GF - 200] - Allocated Budget $ 2,330,000.00 Old Town Improvements $ 3,582,741.00 Neighborhood D South Phase 2 $ 2,000,000.00 Neighborhood G Phase 1 $ 3,312,154.00 Subtotal Construction $ 11,224,895.00 INDIRECT/OTHER Total Expenditure Department Admin $ 89,600.00 Subtotal Indirect/Other $ 89,600.00 Total General Fund Transportation Expenditures (Less Total MOE Exclusions) MOE Expenditures MOE Benchmark Requirement2 (Shortfall)/ Surplus $ 13,568,295.00 $ $ 13,568,295.00 $ 1,938,025.00 $ 11,630,2 Certification: I hereby certify that: X The City of Tustin is aware of the State Controller's "Guidelines Relating to Gas Tax Expenditures for Cities and Counties", which is a guide for determining MOE Expenditures for Measure M2 Eligibility purposes and; X The City of Tustin's MOE Certification Form is in compliance with direction provided in the State Controller's "Guidelines Relating to Gas Tax Expenditures for Cities and Counties" and; X The City of Tustin certifies that the budgeted MOE expenditures meet or exceed the fiscal year (FY) 2025-26 MOE benchmark requirement3. Finance Di rectorSig nature Jennifer King ZI C) Finance Director (Print Name) Date 'Funding sources include Measure M, federal, state, redevelopment, and bond financing. 2 Please refer to Exhibit 2 in the M2 Eligibility Guidelines for the City's MOE benchmark requirement. " Jurisdictions are encouraged to submit MOE eligible expenditures higher than their MOE benchmark, so that should certain expenses be ruled ineligible during an MOE audit, the local jurisdiction still has sufficient MOE expenditures to demonstrate continued achievement of the MOE benchmark. Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Jurisdiction: City of Tustin Type of GENERAL FUND Transportation Expenditures: Total Budget Budget 25/26 MAINTENANCE MOE Fund 100 Fund 189 Fund 200 40-12 Engineering 40-13 Streets 40-14 Landscape 40-15 Water Quality 40-16 Fleet Maintenance 40-17 Building Facilities/Maint Subtotal Maintenance 76,300 76,300 - 450,400 450,400 1,727,100 1,727,100 - - - - 2,253,800 2,253,800 MOE vs Actuals CONSTRUCTION 40087 Main Street Improvements 70254 Old Town Improvements 70256 Neighborhood D South Phase 2 70258 Neighborhood G Phase 1 2,330,000 1,600,000 730,000 3,582,741 3,582,741 2,000,000 2,000,000 3,312,154 3,312,154 Subtotal Construction 11,224,895 10,494,895 730,000 ADMINISTRATIVE/OTHER 40-10 Dept. Administrative Program Subtotal Administration and Other 89,600 89,600 89,600 89,600 Total General Fund Transportation Expenditures Less Total MOE Exclusions* MOE Expenditures MOE Benchmark Requirement (Shortfall)/Surplus Certification: I hereby certify that the City of Tustin has budgeted and will meet the Maintenance of Effort requirement for Fiscal Year 2025-26 Signature Title 13,568,295 2,343,400 10,494,895 730,000 13,568,295 2,343,400 10,494,895 1 (1,938,025)1 1 11,630,270 1 Date FM-2—C—a t—e g —or y� 15 15 15 15 13 15 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Public Works Engieering Division MOE Allocation Sum of Amount Column Labels Row Labels 40087 70023 70024 70246 70254 70255 70256 70258 70261 Grand Total L $8,558.52 $9,704.84 $33,015.19 $12,309.94 $25,041.86 $92.93 $54,701.96 $546.58 $143,971.82 130 S $451,147.10 $1,500.00 $452,647.10 139 S $3,114.00 $118,510.38 $217,430.44 $339,054.82 140 S $69,693.40 $69,693.40 189 S $287.17 $3,857,308.91 $69,827.93 $3,927,424.01 200 S $17,040.00 $3,364.50 $20,404.50 Grand Total $28,712.52 $579,362.32 $250,445.63 $12,309.94 $28,693.53 $1,592.93 $3,912,010.87 $69,827.93 $70,239.98 $4,953,195.65 40087 70023 70024 70246 70254 70255 70256 70258 70261 Grand Total Total Labor $8,558.52 $9,704.84 $33,015.19 $12,309.94 $25,041.86 $92.93 $54,701.96 $0.00 $546.58 $143,971.82 General Fund $7,236.14 $7,685.86 $0.00 $12,309.94 $25,041.86 $92.93 $54,701.96 $0.00 $546.58 $107,615.28 M2 Direct Labor $1,322.38 $2,018.98 $33,015.19 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $36,356.54 M2 Labor % 15.45% 20.80% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Project Desc. Main Street Improvements FY23/24 Major Pavement Maintenance FY24/25 Major Pavement Maintenance N D South Infrastrutcture Old Town Improvements Utility Undergrounding - Red Hill N D South Phase 2 Improvements Neighborhood G Infrastructure Red Hill Rehabilitation - Walnut -San Juan General Fund Engineering Labor hours for MOE Projects: $107,615.28 Total Engineering Division Salary & Benefits Costs: $2,339,580.00 % of Eng. Division Allocated towards MOE Projects: 4.60% General Fund Budgeted Engineering Salaries & Benefits: $1,658,084.75 Allocated Engineering MOE Maintenance: $76,300.00 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Fiscal Year 2025-2026 1 Not.. Staff Title T—Afloc. % Salary & Benefits 1$ Allocation Dew Carta Maintenance Supe"isor 1 11'�� jjjlfl� 1 '79 11S . Raul Sarche� Mainte ance Leadworker $117 17,593 A Charles Childress Sr. Mainten nce Worker 1 100% A66 176 a A William Navanno III Maintenance Worker 100% $91,546 1 $91,546 A Israel Preciado Maintenance Worker 50% 1 $110,876 1 $55,438 A $326,757 A. Since staff puts do— on their tinnesheets that they charge their time to Costc13, Costc14, Costcl7 and Costc58 then their time is a direct charge to MOE. B: The indirect allocation for Dave is based on a proportional number of employees that —rk on �treet-related maintenance .o.d, lh—m—d5mB�­ D.- Cana ..n.n.. �.p—r -FAd S— P-57-1-1-128 — — I WRA-- Total for IFY 2025 $114,146 $62,261.45 --E.Pk�— 0-9 61- -I— �1 57 — — o— Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Public Works Landscane Division MOE Allocation (100-40-141 Fiscal Year 2025-2026 GIL Account Description Vendor(s) Contract/Budget Alloc. % $ Allocation 100-40-14-6028 Landscape Maintenance Mariposa $2,187,500 34% $741,163 100-40-14-6132 Contract Tree Trimming Mariposa & West Coast Arborists $865,000 82% $707,864 100-40-14-6335 Electric SCE $90,000 12% $11,152 100-40-14-6350 Water City of Tustin & I RWD $686,000 16% $107,891 ,Street Related - Landscape Personnel Costs $159,039 1 $1,727,100 1 All of this is a direct charge. These amounts above are estimates but the City will use the actual amounts for the annual report Proiect Manaciement Extracts (Costc 13.14. & 17) Vendor# Vendor Name Type of Work/Service FY 2025 Budget IFY 2025 FY 2024 FY 2023 IFY 2022 FY 2021 Average % of Budget FY 2025 166 Tustin Water Service Water Utility $668,000 $48,974 $40,612 $53,799 $67,068 $52,148 $52,520 15.7% 374 Irvine Ranch Water Dist. Water Utility $56,086 $73,823 $122,392 $197,162 $159,656 $121,824 566 Southern California Edison Electric Utility $90,000 $11,152 $12,330 $14,885 $20,015 $19,742 $15,625 12.4% 697 West Coast Arborists Inc. Tree trimming/maint services $511,500 $418,581 $492,719 $561,616 $470,201 $360,864 $460,796 81.8% 86981Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. I Landscape service/maint $2,236,500 1 $757,765 1 $1,194,602 1 $1,480,184 1 $1,651,350 1 $1,533,397 1 $1,323,459 1 33.9%1 $1,292,558 $1,814,086 $2,232,875 $2,405,797 $2,125,807 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC MOE Capital Improvement Projects Funding Source 189 WAS Land Sale Proceeds Project Number 70262 Request Title Cornerstone 11 Infrastructure FY2026 $250,000.00 FY2027 70258 Neighborhood G Phase 1 $3,312,154.00 70257 Armstrong Avenue Pedestrian Bridge $3,920,000.00 70256 Neighborhood D South Phase 2 $2,000,000.00 70254 Old Town Improvements $3,582,741.00 40087 Main Street Improvements $1,600,000.00 Total 189 WAS Land Sale Proceeds $14,664,895.00 200 General Fund CIP 40087 Main Street Improvements $730,000.00 Total 200 General Fund CIP $730,000.00 I Totall $11,224,895.00 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC City of Tustin Basis for Allocation of Admin Program to MOE Calculation - General Fund/Fund 100 FY 25/26 Public Works Department Dept/Div Salaries & Benefits (1) % of Total (2) Salaries & Benefits Allocated (1) x (2) (3) MOE Salary & Benefits Programs (4) Total Allocated to MOE (4)/(3) Engineering 40-12 $1,658,085 4.60% $76,268 $76,268 Streets 40-13 $588,345 $0 $450,400 Landscape 40-14 $2,347,532 $0 $159,039 Water Quality 40-15 $207,561 3.51% $7,290 Fleet Maintenance 40-16 $597,887 10.12% $60,489 Building Facilities/Maint 40-17 $510,205 8.63% $44,048 Totals $5,909,615 $188,096 $685,707 11.60% (A) 100-40-10 Salaries & Benefits $771,989 Average MOE Program % (A) 11.60% Salaries & Benefits Allocated to MOE $89,600 Total Operating MOE Alloc: $775,307 Note: Percentage for Engineering is derived from MOE project labor worksheet L Percentage for Streets reflects an estimate of the amount of work directly related to MOE Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Attachment "J" City Mitigation Fee Program: TCA Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fee Program Rates for FY 25-26 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC San Joaquin Hills FoothililEastem Transportation Transportation Corridor Agency 40AIlailk Corridor Agency Transportation Corridor Agencies - MAJOR THOROUGHFARE AND BRIDGE FEE PROGRAM FY 2026 RATES EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2025 — JUNE 30, 2026 SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR AGENCY ZONE A: ZONE 13: Single Family $6,722/unit Multi -Family $3,915/unit Non -Residential $9.01/sq. ft. Single Family $5,909/unit Multi -Family $3,039/unit Non -Residential $6.65/sq. ft. FOOTHILUEASTERN TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR AGENCY ZONE A: ZONE B: Single Family $6,756/unit Multi -Family $3,943/unit Non -Residential $9.39/sq. ft. Single Family $4,806/unit Multi -Family $2,802/unit Non -Residential $5.44/sq. ft. On July 1 of each year, the fee rate schedule will increase by: San Joaquin Hills TCA 2.667% Foothill/Eastern TCA 2.206% 125 Pacifica, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92618-3304 a (949) 754-3400 Fox (949) 754-3467 TheTollRoods.com Members: Aliso Viejo - Anaheim - Costa Mesa - County of Orange - Dana Point Irvine - Laguna Hills - Laguna Niguel - Laguna Woods - Lake Forest Mission Viejo - Newport Beach - Orange - Rancho Santa Margarita Santa Ana - San Juan Capistrano - Tustin - Yorba Linda Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Attachment "K" Trans it/N on -Motorized Transportation Land Use Planning Strategies Letter Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Remembering what connects us. June 18, 2025 Ms. Charvalen Alacar Section Manager, Measure M - Local Program Orange County Transportation Authority 600 S. Main Street Orange, CA 92868 Subject: City of Tustin's General Plan Consistency Regarding Land Use Strategies Accommodating Transit and Non -Motorized Transportation Dear Ms. Alacar: As part of the OC Go (also known as the Renewed Measure M (M2)) Eligibility package, the City of Tustin is pleased to provide our land use strategies, which accommodate transit and non -motorized transportation. The City of Tustin's General Plan incorporates all of the following elements: Land Use, Housing, Conservation/Open Space/Recreation, Noise, Circulation, Public Safety, and a locally mandated element, Growth Management. In particular, it is the Circulation Element that incorporates the land use strategies to accommodate transit and non - motorized transportation. No changes have been made since last year's submittal. The Land Use Element identifies the present and planned land use activity; the general distribution and location of residential and non-residential land uses; and density and building intensity. The Land Use Element constitutes official City policy for the location of various land uses and provides guidance to ensure orderly growth and development. Transit and non -motorized transportation are addressed in this element in a broad manner with expanded detail covered in the subsequent elements. The following is a listing of the applicable Land Use Element goals, which are expanded upon in the Circulation Element: GOAL 1: Provide for a well-balanced land use pattern that accommodates existing and future needs for housing, commercial and industrial land, and community facilities and services, while maintaining a healthy, diversified economy adequate to provide future City services. GOAL 3: Ensure that new development is compatible with surrounding land uses in the community, the City's circulation network, availability of 300 Centennial. Way, Tustin, CA 92780 * 714-573-3000 * tustinca.org Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC public facilities, existing development constraints and the City's unique characteristics and resources. Policy 3.2 - Locate major commercial uses in areas that are easily accessible to major transportation facilities. GOAL 10: Improve and strengthen the Tustin Old Town/First Street area with a unique pedestrian environment and diverse mix of goods, services, and uses. GOAL 11: Policy 11.3 — Promote building forms that relate to the scale and character of surrounding development while also relating new development to pedestrian functions. The Circulation Element guides the development of the City's circulation system by providing adequate capacity for future land uses and provides for a safe, efficient, and adequate circulation system for the City. The element establishes a hierarchy of transportation routes with specific development standards described for each category of roadway. The following subjects are included in the Circulation Element: streets and highways, transportation corridors, transportation system management, transportation demand management, transit, rapid transit, railroads, paratransit (e.g. carpooling, vanpooling, and taxi service), bicycle, pedestrian facilities, commercial, general, and military airports. The following is a listing of the applicable Circulation Element goals and implementation measures: GOAL 1: Provide a system of streets that meets the needs of current and future inhabitants and facilitates the safe and efficient movement of people and goods throughout the City, consistent with the City's ability to finance and maintain such a system. Policy 1.1 - Develop and maintain a circulation system that is based upon and is in balance with the Land Use Element of the General Plan. Policy 1.11 - Encourage new development which facilitates transit services, provides for non -vehicular circulation, and minimizes vehicle miles traveled. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 300 Centenniat Way, Tustin, CA 92780 o 714-573-3000 e tustinca.org Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC GOAL 4: Maximize the efficiency of the circulation system through the use of transportation system management and demand management strategies. Policy 4.4 - Require that proposals for major new non-residential developments include submission of a Transportation Demand Management plan to the City, including monitoring and enforcement provisions. GOAL 5: Support development of a public transportation system that provides mobility to all City inhabitants and encourages use of public transportation as an alternative to automobile travel. Policy 5.2: Require new development to fund transit facilities, such as bus shelters and turn -outs, where deemed necessary to meet public needs arising in conjunction with development. Policy 5.5: Promote new development that is designed in a manner which facilitates provision or expansion of transit service, and provides non -automobile circulation within the development. Policy 5.6: Encourage developers to work with agencies providing transit service with the objective of maximizing the potential for transit use by residents and/or employees. GOAL 6: Increase the use of non -motorized modes of transportation. Policy 6.13: Maintain a City of Tustin Bikeway Plan (that complements and is coordinated with the County's Plan as well as neighborhood jurisdictions) which will identify existing and future routes within the City to accommodate such uses. Policy 6.14: Require new development to dedicate land and fund improvement of bicycle, pedestrian and equestrian facilities, where deemed necessary to meet public needs arising in conjunction with development. Implementation Measures are as follows: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 300 Centenniat Way, Tustin, CA 92780 o 714-573-3000 e tustinca.org Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC New Development: Require new development to dedicate land and fund improvement of bicycle, pedestrian and equestrian facilities, where deemed necessary to meet public needs arising in conjunction with development. Bus Service: The City works closely with the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to provide local and express bus service to the community. The City continued a cooperative effort with designs to enhance access to bus stops that are compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). • Bus Shelters and Bus Bench Program: The City has implemented a bus shelter and bus bench program and installs these facilities as opportunities become available for their implementation. • Bus Turnouts: The City reviews development plans and identifies locations for the installation of bus turnouts on arterial roadways. It also ensures bus turnouts are included where applicable on new roadway construction and widening. The City continues to coordinate the design and implementation of new bus turnout locations at Tustin Legacy with OCTA and the development community. Regional Hiking and Biking Trail System: The City supports and promotes the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists by complying with uniform standards and practices, including designation of bicycle lanes, off -road bicycle trails, proper signage, and adequate sidewalks, bicycle lanes, and off -road bicycle trail widths. Orange County Master Plan of Bikeways: The City supports and coordinates the development and maintenance of bikeways in conjunction with the Orange County Master Plan of County Bikeways. GOAL 7: Provide for well -designed and convenient parking facilities. Implementation Measures are as follows: Parking Facilities: Tustin encourages the efficient use of existing parking facilities, including provisions for shared use of facilities and other provisions to improve the effectiveness of City parking codes and ordinances. Additionally, the City provides for common parking facilities in the Old Town area to provide convenient access to public and private facilities. In cooperation with the City, OCTA constructed a parking structure at the Mwetrolink Commuter Rail Station to accommodate parking demands as Metrolink service expands. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 300 Centenniat Way, Tustin, CA 92780 o 714-573-3000 e tustinca.org Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Development Review and Parking Requirements: The City monitors development to ensure sufficient off-street parking for all land use decisions. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (714) 573-3157 or ktnquyen(@-tustinca.org. Sincerely, Kenny Ngu n, P.E. Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer Attachment: 1. City of Tustin — General Plan Excerpts CC: Michael Grisso, Director of Public Works DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 300 CentenniaL Way, Tustin, CA 92780 9 714-573-3000 * tustinca.org Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC CITY OF TUSTIN GENERAL PLAN Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC LAND USE ELEMENT Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC balance between the City's revenue generation needs and service provision responsibilities. GOAL 1: Provide for a well balanced land use pattern that accommodates existing and future needs for housing, commercial and industrial land, open space and community facilities and services, while maintaining a healthy, diversified economy adequate to provide future City services. Policy 1.1: Preserve the low -density quality of Tustin's existing single-family neighborhoods while permitting compatible multi -family development to meet regional housing needs where best suited from the standpoint of current development, accessibility, transportation and public facilities. Policy 1.2: Provide for and encourage the development of neighborhood -serving commercial uses in areas of Tustin presently underserved by such uses. Encourage the integration of retail or service con-unercial uses on the street level of office projects. Policy 1.3: Facilitate the development of vacant and underutilized freeway parcels with commercial uses where appropriate and compatible with surrounding uses to capitalize on their freeway access and visibility. Policy 1.4: Consider modification of present City boundaries in unincorporated areas within the City of Tustin's sphere where they are irregular and create inefficiencies. Policy 1.5: Encourage compatible and complementary infill of previously by-passed parcels in areas already predominately developed. Policy 1.6: Ensure an adequate supply of commercial and industrial land within the City of Tustin for potential commercial and industrial expansion and development. Policy 1.7: As part of the City's attraction to business and industry, provide adequate sites to house future employees. CITY OF TUSTIN LAND USE ELEMENT GENERALPLAN 13 NOVEMBER 2018 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Policy 1.8: Provide incentives to encourage lot consolidation and parcel assemblage to provide expanded opportunities for coordinated development and redevelopment. Policy 1.9: Provide development of light industrial and business park uses under strict performance development standards. Encourage industrial and business parks as the preferred method of accommodating industrial growth. Policy 1.10: Ensure that the distribution and intensity of land uses are consistent with the Land Use Plan and classification system. Policy 1.11: Where feasible, increase the amount and network of public and private open space and recreational facilities which will be adequate in size and location to be useable for active or passive recreation as well as for visual relief. Policy 1.12: Evaluate all future annexation proposals within the City's sphere of influence for their potential financial, social and environmental impacts on the City of Tustin. The analysis of financial impacts shall include preparation of a fiscal impact report which provides an analysis of impacts on operating costs and costs associated with needed short and long term capital improvements. Policy 1.13: Preserve the existing low density character of North Tustin single family zoned neighborhoods. GOAL 2: Ensure that future land use decisions are the result of sound and comprehensive planning. Policy 2.1: Consider all General Plan goals and policies, including those in other General Plan elements, in evaluating proposed development projects for General Plan consistency. Policy 2.2: Maintain consistency between the Land Use Element, Zoning Ordinances, and other City ordinances, regulations and standards. Policy 2.3: Endeavor to promote public interest in, and understanding of, the General Plan and regulations relating to it. CITY OF TUSTIN LAND USE ELEMENT GENERALPLAN 14 NOVEMBER 2018 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Policy 2.4: Encourage citizen participation in planning and development of land use programs. Policy 2.5: Foster inter -governmental cooperation and coordination in order to maximize the effectiveness of land use policies. Policy 2.6: Maintain consistency with the Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) for John Wayne Airport in terms of maximum allowable building height, noise levels, safety areas, and other applicable standards. COMPATIBLE AND COMPLEMENTARY DEVELOPMENT Intermixing of different land uses can result in incompatibilities attributable to differences in traffic levels, noise levels, physical scale, and hours of operation. Incompatibility can also occur when the characteristics of a specific land use do not match the physical characteristics of available land (such as intensive development in hillside areas). GOAL 3: Ensure that new development is compatible with surrounding land uses in the community, the City's circulation network, availability of public facilities, existing development constraints and the City's unique characteristics and resources. Policy 3.1: Coordinate and monitor the impact and intensity of land uses in adjacent jurisdictions on Tustin's transportation and circulation systems to provide for the efficient movement of people and goods with the least interference. Policy 3.2: Locate major commercial uses in areas that are easily accessible to major transportation facilities. Policy 3.3: Allow development clustering in hillside areas when this method will better preserve the natural terrain and open character of the City. Policy 3.4: In designing hillside development, give particular attention to maximizing view opportunities, minimizing dangers of geologic and soil hazards, minimizing adverse visual impact on CITY OF TUSTIN LAND USE ELEMENT GENERALPLAN 15 NOVEMBER 2018 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Policy 9.9: Site buildings and align roadways to maximize public visual exposure to the north -south Peters Canyon ridgeline, the redwood/cedar grove, the knoll and major tree stands. DEVELOPMENT CHARACTER IN OLD TOWN/FIRST STREET AREA The development character of Old Town and the First Street area can be significantly enhanced by greater integration of residential uses and thriving commercial uses and physical renovations to existing buildings and street frontages which promote a pedestrian orientation. GOAL 10: Improve and strengthen the Tustin Old TowrVFirst Street area with a unique pedestrian environment and diverse mix of goods, services, and uses. Policy 10.1: Improve the Old Town District's identity as the City's historical and architectural focus and its contribution to the City's economic base. Policy 10.2: Review and consider the possible development of residential uses in the Old Town area both as individual residential projects, and integrated above ground floor retail and office uses. Policy 10.3: Encourage outdoor pedestrian spaces, such as courtyards, arcades and open landscaped passages, to be integrated into new development. Encourage high -quality pedestrian -oriented building frontages which open onto these pedestrian spaces and public sidewalks. Policy 10.4: Develop and use signage to promote a district parking concept that emphasizes shared parking facilities. Promote improvements which will upgrade circulation and access in the Old Town District. Policy 10.5: Study the potential expansion of the Cultural Resources Overlay District north of First Street to Irvine Boulevard. Policy 10.6: Encourage the integration of retail or service commercial uses on the street level of office projects through flexibility in site development standards. CITY OF TUSTIN LAND USE ELEMENT GENERALPLAN 23 NOVEMBER 2018 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Policy 10.7: Encourage the consolidation of individual parcels/ consolidated site planning and parking and access along First Street and in Old Town through utilization of development incentives such as reduced parking, height bonus, lot coverage relaxation, allowance for secondary uses, fee waivers, and/or financial assistance in land acquisition and/or infrastructure improvements. Policy 10.8: Encourage rehabilitation of existing facades and signage to comply with the Downtown Commercial Core Specific Plan design criteria. Policy 10.9: Allow existing single family residential uses/ structures listed within the City's official historic survey to be preserved and used as a residence, or preserved and used as a commercial use consistent with the City's Cultural District Residential Design Guidelines and the Secretary of Interiors Standards for Rehabilitation. DEVELOPMENT CHARACTER IN THE PACIFIC CENTER EAST AREA The future image of the Pacific Center East area will consist of a more intensive and integrated business park environment. The area's distinct location adjacent to SR 55 creates a significant opportunity to capitalize on its freeway orientation to achieve regional recognition. GOAL 11: Provide for an integrated business park environment in the Pacific Center East Area which both capitalizes on market opportunities and is compatible with adjacent developed land uses. Policy 11.1: Provide a wide range of uses and intensities which meet the City's future needs for mixed land uses and for a variety of facilities and services in the project area, and which capitalize on visibility and access of freeway interchange locations. Policy 11.2: Create a cohesive architectural image and attractive streetscape through implementation of development standards and design guidelines to unify the area. Policy 11.3: Promote building forms that relate to the scale and character of surrounding development while also relating new development to pedestrian functions. CITY OF TUSTIN LAND USE ELEMENT GENERALPLAN 24 NOVEMBER 2018 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC CIRCULATION ELEMENT Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC CIRCULATION ELEMENT GOALS AND POLICIES The following goals and policies form the basis for providing a circulation system which adequately serves the development intensity anticipated in the Land Use Element. They are designed to reflect and support the Citywide goals of the General Plan, and acknowledge the changing economic and environmental conditions in the City and surrounding regions. LOCAL THOROUGHFARES AND TRANSPORTATION ROUTES A well -planned street system provides safe and convenient access to land use development in the City and serves the primary mobility needs of the community. To provide such a system, the Circulation Element includes a planned hierarchy of arterial roadways, each roadway serving a specific function and carrying a portion of the anticipated traffic demands. GOAL 1: Provide a system of streets that meets the needs of current and future inhabitants and facilitates the safe and efficient movement of people and goods throughout the City consistent with the City's ability to finance and maintain such a system. Policy 1.1: Develop and maintain a circulation system that is based upon and is in balance with the Land Use Element of the General Plan. Policy 1.2: Develop and implement circulation system standards for roadway and intersection classifications, right-of-way width, pavement width, design speed, warrant requirements, capacity, maximum grades and associated features such as medians and bicycle lanes or trails that are adjacent or off -road. Policy 1.3: Coordinate roadway improvements with applicable regional, state and federal transportation plans and proposals. Policy 1.4: Develop and implement thresholds and performance standards for acceptable levels of service. CITY OF TUSTIN CIRCULATION ELEMENT GENERALPLAN 10 JUNE 2018 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Policy 1.5: Develop a program to identify, monitor and make recommendations for improvements to roadways and intersections that are approaching, or have approached, unacceptable levels of service or experiencing higher than expected accident rates. Policy 1.6: Develop and improve the City's transportation network consistent with available funding; scheduling shall be coordinated with land use plans to ensure the orderly extension of facilities and to preserve a free -flowing circulation system. Policy 1.7: Provide for and work with responsible agencies regarding the safe and expeditious transport of hazardous materials. Policy 1.8: Limit driveway access on arterial streets to maintain a desired quality of flow. Policy 1.9: Design local and collector streets to discourage their use as alternate through routes to secondary, primary, and major streets. Policy 1.10: Require that proposals for major new developments include a future traffic impact analysis which identifies measures to mitigate any identified project impacts. Policy 1.11: Encourage new development which facilitates transit services, provides for non -vehicular circulation and minimizes vehicle miles traveled. Policy 1.12: Minimize pedestrian and vehicular conflicts through street design and well -marked pedestrian crossings. Policy 1.13: Minimize effects of transportation noise wherever possible so as to comply with the Noise Element. Policy 1.14: Enhance the important role that streetscapes play in defining the character of the City by expanding street planning and design procedure to include aesthetic and environmental concerns, as well as traffic considerations. Develop a circulation system which highlights environmental amenities and scenic areas. Policy 1.15: Ensure construction of existing roadways to planned widths, as new developments are constructed. CITY OF TUSTIN CIRCULATION ELEMENT GENERALPLAN 11 JUNE 2018 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Policy 1.16: Continue to require dedication of right-of-way and construction of required public improvements on streets adjacent to construction projects at the developer's expense. Policy 1.17: Direct existing through traffic from local streets to collector, secondary, and arterials to reduce traffic on local streets, improve neighborhood safety and environmental quality. Policy 1.18: Assist and develop safe school routes in conjunction with the Tustin Unified School District. GOAL 2: Provide for a truck circulation system that provides for the effective transport of commodities while minimizing the negative impacts throughout the City. Policy 2.1: Provide primary truck routes and describe such routes on selected arterial streets to minimize the impacts of truck traffic on residential areas. Policy 2.2: Provide appropriately designed and maintained roadways for the primary truck routes. Policy 2.3: Provide loading areas and accessways that are designed and located so as to avoid conflicts with efficient traffic circulation. Policy 2.4: Consider safety regulations addressing trucks hauling materials within the City. Policy 2.5: Discourage on -street loading and unloading of commercial and industrial products. INTERCITY AND REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION The Circulation Element is set in a regional context which recognizes the related transportation needs and planning activities of the surrounding County, Region, and State. GOAL 3: Support development of a network of regional transportation facilities which ensure the safe and efficient CITY OF TUSTIN CIRCULATION ELEMENT GENERALPLAN 12 JUNE 2018 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Demand Management (TDM) strategies. Together, these improve the efficiency of the transportation system and reduce vehicular demands, thereby reducing the impacts of future development. GOAL 4: Maximize the efficiency of the circulation system through the use of transportation system management and demand management strategies. Policy 4.1: Implement traffic signal coordination on arterial streets to the maximum extent practical, consistent with financial resources, integrate signal coordination efforts with those of adjacent jurisdictions, and implement other operational measures where possible to maximize the efficiency of the existing circulation system and to minimize delay and congestion. Policy 4.2: Implement intersection capacity improvements where feasible. Policy 4.3: Encourage the implementation of employer Transportation Demand Management (TDM) requirements, which were included in the Southern California Air Quality Management District's Regulation 2202 of the 1997 Air Quality Management Plan and as required by Proposition 111 as part of the Congestion Management Program (CMP) and participate in regional efforts to implement TDM requirements. Policy 4.4: Require that proposals for major new non-residential developments include submission of a TDM plan to the City, including monitoring and enforcement provisions. Policy 4.5: Encourage the development of additional regional public transportation services and support facilities including park -and - ride lots near the SR-55 and 1-5 freeways. Policy 4.6: Encourage the promotion of ridesharing through publicity and provision of information to the public. GOAL 5: Support development of a public transportation system that provides mobility to all City inhabitants and encourages use of public transportation as an alternative to automobile travel. CITY OF TUSTIN CIRCULATION ELEMENT GENERALPLAN 14 JUNE 2018 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Policy 5.1: Support the efforts of the appropriate transportation agencies to provide additional local and express bus service to the Tustin community, and to provide park -and -ride lots near the SR-55 and 1-5 freeways. Policy 5.2: Require new development to fund transit facilities, such as bus shelters and turn -outs, where deemed necessary to meet public needs arising in conjunction with development. Policy 5.3: Ensure accessibility of public transportation for elderly and disabled persons, consistent with City responsibilities for accessibility. Policy 5.4: Encourage employers to reduce vehicular trips by offering employee incentives, such as subsidized bus passes and vanpool/carpool programs. Policy 5.5: Promote new development that is designed in a manner which facilitates provision or expansion of transit service, and provides non -automobile circulation within the development. Policy 5.6: Encourage developers to work with agencies providing transit service with the objective of maximizing the potential for transit use by residents and/or employees. Policy 5.7: Promote the provision of safe transit stops and shelters. TRANSIT, BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN AND EQUESTRIAN FACILITIES Non -vehicular modes of travel serve certain mobility needs and also provide recreational opportunities. Where possible, the Element provides for these modes of travel by separate trails, walkways and bike lanes. GOAL 6: Increase the use of non -motorized modes of transportation. Policy 6.1: Promote the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists by adhering to uniform standards and practices, including designation CITY OF TUSTIN CIRCULATION ELEMENT GENERALPLAN 15 JUNE 2018 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC CITY OF TUSTIN GENERALPLAN of bicycle lanes, off -road bicycle trails, proper signage, and adequate sidewalk, bicycle lane, and off -road bicycle trail widths. Policy 6.2: Maintain existing pedestrian facilities and require new development to provide pedestrian walkways between developments, schools and public facilities. Policy 6.3: Ensure accessibility of pedestrian facilities to the elderly and disabled. Policy 6.4: Support and coordinate the development and maintenance of bikeways in conjunction with the County of Orange Master Plan of Countywide Bikeways to assure that local bicycle routes will be compatible with routes of neighboring jurisdictions. Policy 6.5: Require the provision of showers and an accessible and secure area for bicycle storage on certain size non-residential developments as required by the City's TDM ordinance. Policy 6.6: Develop programs that encourage the safe utilization of easements and/or rights -of -way along flood control channels, public utility rights -of -way, and street rights -of -way wherever possible for the use of bicycles and/or pedestrian/ equestrian trails. Policy 6.7: Ensure link -up of trails within the City to the regional trail system. Policy 6.8: Support retrofit installation of sidewalks in industrial districts and Planned Community Business Parks as development occurs. Policy 6.9: Support and coordinate the development and maintenance of bikeways and trails in conjunction with the master plans of the appropriate agencies. Policy 6.10: Encourage safe biking by supporting safety clinics/ courses sponsored by various local and state agencies. Policy 6.11: Consider the provision of unique transportation methods, such as shuttle buses from outlying parking areas, for special events. 16 CIRCULATION ELEMENT JUNE 2018 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC PARKING Policy 6.12: Provide for a non -vehicular circulation system that encourages bicycle transportation and pedestrian circulation. Policy 6.13: Maintain a City of Tustin Bikeway Plan (that complements and is coordinated with the County's Plan as well as neighborhood jurisdictions) which will identify existing and future routes within the City to accommodate such uses. Policy 6.14: Require new development to dedicate land and fund improvement of bicycle, pedestrian and equestrian facilities, where deemed necessary to meet public needs arising in conjunction with development. Adequate and convenient parking facilities are an important part of the transportation amenities provided by a City. The Circulation Element therefore contains policies which ensure the provision of such amenities. GOAL 7: Provide for well -designed and convenient parking facilities. Policy 7.1: Consolidate parking, where appropriate, to eliminate the number of ingress and egress points onto arterials. Policy 7.2: Provide sufficient off-street parking for all land uses. Policy 7.3: Encourage the efficient use of parking facilities, including provisions for shared use of facilities, smaller vehicles and other provisions to improve the effectiveness of City codes and ordinances. Policy 7.4: Reduce use of arterial streets for on -street parking in an effort to maximize traffic flow characteristics of roadways. CITY OF TUSTIN CIRCULATION ELEMENT GENERALPLAN 17 JUNE 2018 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC BIKEWAYS The existing bikeway system within the City of Tustin and the Planning Area is illustrated in Figure C-4. There is one Class I bike trail along Newport Avenue between El Camino Real and Irvine Boulevard, and several Class II lanes throughout the remainder of the City and Planning Area. The County Regional Trail (Class I) currently exists from Peters Canyon Road to jamboree Road. The network of bicycle routes is only partially established, and with few exceptions, most bicycles share street right-of-ways with automobiles. To provide adequate accommodations in the future, a City Bikeway Plan has been developed. Missing links in the existing system and constraints for future routes were considered with the resulting Bikeway Plan illustrated in Figure C-5. Table C-7 describes and surm-narizes classifications relating to the Plan. The future network is comprehensive with several new facilities and extensions to existing routes. A conscious effort was exerted to ensure the Bikeway Plan achieved a continuity of routes and trails that did not terminate except at logical locations such as schools or parks. A Class I trail is proposed along the Peters Canyon Wash on the eastern boundary of the City. This trail is part of the East Tustin and Lower Peters Canyon Specific Plans and will also provide facilities for pedestrians and equestrians. The trail also extends north of Tustin Ranch Road along Pioneer Way, then inland adjacent to the Cedar Grove Park site and hillside areas to the west providing access to Peters Canyon Regional Park. The trail is part of the regional trail network. CITY OF TUSTIN CIRCULATION ELEMENT GENERALPLAN 42 JUNE 2018 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC .11 KIMTH mL lo wu0a SOURCE. kA9r�-Fmjel AS909*1. InC. TUSTIN FigUre C-4 GENERAL PLAN Existing Dkeways UpdatEd Navemb-er 20,2012 CITY OF TUSTIN CIRCULATION ELEMENT GENERALPLAN 43 JUNE 2018 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC Ir NORTH not io scwe SOURCF-i Ausfin-Fousl Assodales, lnr. Us [c R-10 " K I GENERAL KAN - Fabruafy 22, 2W5 — CITY OF TUSTIN GENERALPLAN 44 Figure C-5 Master Bike -way Plan CIRCULATION ELEMENT JUNE 2018 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC the Tustin community and to provide Park and Ride lots near the freeways. Require new development to participate in transit amenities, such as bus shelters, turn -outs, landing pads and similar items. Coordinate roadway improvements with transit service so that where applicable, special features, such as bus turn -outs, can be provided in the improvement program. Responsible Agency/Department: Engineering Division, Community Development Funding Source: Developer exactions, Measure "M", Proposition 111 Time Frame: On -going Related Circulation Element Policies: 3.7, 3.8, 4.1-4.6, 5.1-5.7 BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN AND EQUESTRIAN FACILITIES 11. Alternative Transportation Modes: These components of the General Plan Circulation Element provide alternative modes of transportation (in the case of bicycle), and recreation -related facilities (in the case of bicycle, pedestrian, and equestrian). Implementing actions are as follows: 0 Provide uniform standards and practices for the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists by providing adequate sidewalks, bicycle lanes, and off -road bicycle trails and requiring dedication and improvement of these facilities where deemed necessary to meet public needs arising as a result of development. 0 Include pedestrian walkway standards as requirements on new development. 0 Coordinate the development and maintenance of bikeways with the work carried out by the County of Orange for the Master Plan of Countywide Bikeways. CITY OF TUSTIN CIRCULATION ELEMENT GENERALPLAN 55 JUNE 2018 Docusign Envelope ID: BAD3C41B-AA32-41EC-9COD-3637AD501 FCC PARKING 0 Encourage City-wide development to participate in transit amenities, such as bus shelters, turn -outs, and similar facilities. Responsible Agency/Department: Community Development, Public Works Funding Source: Developer exactions, Federal and State grants, City General Fund Time Frame: On -going Related Circulation Element Policies: 6.1-6.13 12. Sidewalks in Industrial Areas: Continue to study and implement, if feasible, the creation of an assessment district for sidewalk construction within each industrial area which would spread the cost of said sidewalk construction and administrative district costs over a multi -year payoff period or 10 or 20 years. Responsible Agency/Department: Public Works Department Funding Source: Assessment District Time Frame: 1993/1994 Related Circulation Element Policies: 1.12, 1.16, 6.1, 6.2 and 6.8 13. Parking Ordinance Study: The City shall complete a Parking Ordinance study which will include issues such as guest parking standards, shared use of parking facilities, parking for smaller vehicles and necessary changes to City codes and regulations. Responsible Agency/Department: Community Development Department Funding Source: City General Fund CITY OF TUSTIN CIRCULATION ELEMENT GENERALPLAN 56 JUNE 2018