HomeMy WebLinkAbout03 Appeal/200 South A Street
ITEM #3
-tV 0
1-
"s'{
Report to the
Planning Commission
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PROPERTY
OWNER/APPLlCANTI
APPELLANT:
LOCATION:
GENERAL PLAN:
ZONING:
ENVIRONMENTAL
STATUS:
REQUEST:
FEBRUARY 12, 2007
APPEAL OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DESIGN REVIEW DECISION
MICHELLE YOUNG
200 SOUTH "A" STREET
TUSTIN, CA 92780
200 SOUTH "A" STREET
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1) WITH CULTURAL
RESOURCE (CR) OVERLAY DISTRICT
IF THE DECISION IS UPHELD, THE ACTION IS
STATUTORILY EXEMPT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15270
OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
(CEQA DOES NOT APPLY TO REJECTED PROJECTS).
IF THE DECISION IS REVERSED, THE PROJECT IS
CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT PURSUANT TO SECTION
15303 (CLASS 3 - CONSTRUCTION OF ACCESSORY
STRUCTURES, INCLUDING THEIR RESPECTIVE
BUILDING MATERIALS).
AN APPEAL OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR'S DECISION TO DISALLOW THE USE OF
FIBERCEMENT SIDING ON A DETACHED TWO CAR
GARAGE WITH SECOND STORY GAME ROOM THAT IS
CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION ON A PROPERTY
IMPROVED WITH AN "A"-RATED DWELLING IN THE
CULTURAL RESOURCE OVERLAY DISTRICT. THE
PROJECT WAS REQUESTED BY THE APPLICANT AND
APPROVED WITH REDWOOD SIDING BY ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR ACTION 05-007.
Planning Commission Report
Appeal of Community Development Director Decision
February 12, 2007
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4051 upholding the Community
Development Director's decision disallowing the use of fibercement siding on a
detached garage structure approved by Zoning Administrator Action 05-007.
BACKGROUND
The site is located at 200 South "A" Street and is surrounded by a single family residential
neighborhood (Attachment A - Location Map). The property maintains a general plan
designation of low density residential and a zoning district designation of single family
residential (R-1) in the Cultural Resource Overlay district.
The property is improved with a Colonial Revival dwelling constructed in 1907 that is
identified as an "A"-rated structure in the City of Tustin Historical Survey (Attachment B -
Property Survey). Structures listed on the Historical Survey are given ratings of "A"
through "0" with "A" rated structures being the most important in regard to biographical,
historical, or architectural significance. The existing dwelling is described by the Historical
Survey as the finest Colonial Revival home in Tustin based on very few modifications,
original architectural details, quality of materials used, excellent preserved condition, and
association with William Shatto, a carpenter who helped build many Tustin buildings. The
Historical survey states that the structure may be eligible for listing in the National Register
of Historic Places.
On May 9, 2005, the Zoning Administrator approved Conditional Use Permit 04-022 and
Design Review 04-020 for the construction of a 1,328 square foot accessory building that
includes a 764 square foot two-car garage below and a 564 square foot second story
consisting of a game room, two walk-in closets, and a bathroom (Attachment C -
Zoning Administrator Action and Project Plans). In approving the garage and game
room project, the Zoning Administrator considered the proposed new structure, the
existing dwelling, the site with respect to its location being located in the CR district, the
residential design guidelines for structures located in the CR district, and the
significance of the structure as described in the Tustin Historical Survey. The approved
plans proposed the use of redwood siding on the garage and game room structure to
match the existing dwelling.
On May 10, 2006, a building permit was issued for the project and substantial construction
was underway. In September 2006, Drew McCausland, the general contractor, submitted
a request on behalf of Ms. Young to use CertainTeed WeatherBoards™ Fibercement
Siding instead of the approved redwood siding on the proposed detached garage/game
room (Attachment D). In a letter dated September 15, 2006, (Attachment E -
Correspondence) staff denied the request since the use of fiber cement is not consistent
with the intent of the CR District findings and the residential design guidelines (See
Discussion section of the report for further information).
Planning Commission Report
Appeal of Community Development Director Decision
February 12, 2007
Page 3
to review the fibercement siding in detail. Following the meeting Ms. Young provided a
letter (Attachment E - Correspondence) requesting a variance to allow the use of
Certainteed WeatherBoards™ Fibercement Siding, In response, on January 17, 2007,
the Community Development Director denied the second request for the use of
fibercement siding and confirmed the previous decision allowing the use of redwood
siding on the garage and game room structure (Attachment E - Correspondence). On
January 23, 2007, Ms, Young filed an appeal of the Director's decision. Meanwhile, no
progress has been made in completing the detached garage since October 2006.
DISCUSSION
The project involves the construction of a 1,328 square foot accessory building that
includes a 764 square foot two-car garage below and a 564 square foot second story
consisting of a game room, two walk-in closets, and a bathroom. The detached garage
building is located behind the main structure at a height of 20 feet, which is 10 feet shorter
than the main structure, The structure has a 5 foot side yard setback from the south
property line, a 67 foot front yard setback, and an approximately 43 foot rear yard setback,
The structure also is 24 feet from the main residence,
The project is located in the Cultural Resources Overlay District. The existing home on the
site is designated as an "A" rated structure by the Tustin Historical Survey Report because
of its significance individually and to the District as a whole. When approving the project,
the Zoning Administrator specifically conditioned the project to ensure that the detached
garage exterior materials would match, protect, and preserve the existing historic
residence and the District as a whole (Condition 2,9 of Zoning Administrator Action 05-
007). Approval of ZA 05-007 was based partially on the applicant's plans indicating that
redwood siding would be used to match that used on the exterior of the residence.
In addition, prior to issuance of a building permit as required by the Zoning Code, the
project was granted a Certificate of Appropriateness which confirmed that the proposed
garage and game room structure complies with the intent of the CR District and follows
the Residential Design Guidelines for the Cultural Resources District.
Staff has thoroughly reviewed Ms. Young's appeal including the submitted brochures
and material boards for Certainteed WeatherBoards™ Fibercement Siding. While
fibercement may be a product of acceptable quality, staff does not believe that the
fibercement provided would be an appropriate substitute for the redwood siding
approved for the project in that:
. The existing historic home is improved with redwood siding. The Residential
Design Guidelines for projects located in the CR District indicate that new
accessory structures should be compatible with the style, quality, dimension,
texture, and color of materials used on an existing historic building to the greatest
extent possible. The Guidelines also indicate many of Tustin's architecturally
significant houses are clad in wood siding, and that the appearance of wood-
sided houses helps define the historic character of the District. In making the
Planning Commission Report
Appeal of Community Development Director Decision
February 12, 2007
Page 4
texture, and color of materials used on an existing historic building to the greatest
extent possible. The Guidelines also indicate many of Tustin's architecturally
significant houses are clad in wood siding, and that the appearance of wood-
sided houses helps define the historic character of the District. In making the
decision to approve the project, the Zoning Administrator carefully considered the
applicant's plans proposing the use of redwood siding and specifically
conditioned the project to match the existing home.
· The proposed substitute product would contradict the adopted Zoning
Administrator's findings; and,
· Tustin City Code (TCC) Section 9252f requires the issuance of a Certificate of
Appropriateness for construction of improvements in the CR district and TCC
9252h requires findings to be made for construction of improvements in the CR
district as follows:
(a) The proposed work must conform to the Municipal Code and design
standards which may be established from time to time by the Historic
Resource Committee.
The City has established Residential Design Guidelines for the Cultural
Resource District to "preserve, protect and enhance the existing historic
character and culturally significant structures within the Cultural
Resources District." The existing dwelling has a Colonial Revival
architectural style that exhibits typical character-defining features including
narrow clapboard siding which is identified in the Design Guidelines
(Attachment F - Excerpt from Residential Design Guidelines). Staff does
not feel that fibercement siding would be a superior character-defining
material to the wood siding used on the dwelling. The Residential Design
Guidelines specifically provide several examples of non-wood siding that
should be discouraged, including materials that may be similar to
fibercement. The Guidelines specifically identify wood siding as an
example of an appropriate feature. In addition, the "Additions and New
Accessory Buildings" section of the Guidelines state that the exterior
appearance of new accessory buildings should be compatible with the
style, quality, dimensions, and texture of materials on the existing historic
house. The section specifically emphasizes the importance of matching
the wood siding used on historic buildings. Staff believes that the
fibercement board dimensions and style would not maintain the beveled or
rounded edge characteristics or gradation in width typical of the wood
siding used on the residence.
(b) The proposed work must not adversely affect the character of the District
or any designated cultural resources within the District.
Planning Commission Report
Appeal of Community Development Director Decision
February 12, 2007
Page 5
Staff believes that the approval of fibercement siding for the project could
set a precedent requiring the City to approve it for use on other properties,
including properties designated on the City's Historical Survey. Again, the
Design Guidelines emphasize that the appearance of wood-sided houses
helps define the historical character of the District (Attachment F). If
fibercement siding were allowed, several properties could be subject to
inconsistent development with wood, fibercement siding or other materials
which could affect the character of the District or resources therein.
(c) The proposed work must be harmonious with existing surroundings. The
extent of harmony must be evaluated in terms of the appropriateness of
the materials, scale, size, height, placement, and use of any new building
or structure in relationship to existing buildings and structures and the
surrounding setting.
The Design Guidelines specifically state that "the exterior appearance of
additions and new accessory buildings should be compatible with the
style, quality, dimension, texture and color of materials on the existing
house" (Attachment F). Any departure from the use of wood siding as
used on the existing on-site dwelling and on survey-listed dwellings
throughout the District may damage the integrity of the District.
Based on the above findings, staff recommends that that the Planning Commission adopt
Resolution No. 4051 upholding the Community Director's Decision to disallow the
replacement of redwood siding with fibercement siding for the project.
Since filing the appeal, Ms. Young has indicated to staff that she may present alternate
materials to the Planning Commission at the appeal hearing. She also included
publications for James Hardie siding products with her appeal application (Attachment G -
Publications Submitted with Appeal). Since staff has not had the opportunity to review or
investigate the quality or appropriateness of the James Hardie siding or alternate
materials not yet submitted, it is recommended that the Planning Commission deny the
current appeal and remand any alternate material proposals received at the hearing to
the Community Development Department for review and action.
40~0
Chad Ortli
Associate Planner
a~Ln~L.7R~~
Elizabeth A. Binsack
Community Development Director
Attachments:
A. Location Map
B. Property Historical Survey
Planning Commission Report
Appeal of Community Development Director Decision
February 12, 2007
Page 6
C. Zoning Administrator Action and Project Plans
D. Proposed Siding Sample Boards (sample boards will be available at the
meeting)
E. Correspondence
F. Excerpts from Residential Design Guidelines
G. Publications Submitted With Appeal
H. Resolution No. 4051
S:ICddIPCREPORT\2007\APPEAL OF DIRECTOR DECISION 2 (SIDING).doc
ATTACHMENT A
LoeA nON MAP
LOCATION MAP
r"
LOCATION:
200 S. A Street
REQUEST:
An appeal of the Community
Development Director's decision to
disallow the use of Certainteed
Weatherboards™ Fibercement Siding
on a detached two (2) car garage with
second story game room that is
currently under construction on a
property improved with an A-rated
dwelling in the Cultural Resource
Overlay District. The project was
approved with redwood siding by
Zoning Administrator Action 05-007
0 2 ~ ~ 0
~ ~
120 '20
130 135 1J5A
140 ,..
PEPPER
160 '8' PARK
'0 '70
10 ~ 180
N
1O .
10
'0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ n
~
30
~o ".
~50 23$
.. ;c
58 230 2..
60
0 I/)
\10
.20 320 ..
'30 TUSTII
PRESBYTf.
,.. 3$0 CHURC
0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
. ~ . . ~ ~
MAIN STREET
, TiTTl ~ 1811 ~ f3Tilgl:ilI~I:;l1 0 ( ~ .---l
N
. .
ATTACHMENT B
PROPERTY HISTORICAL SURVEY
CJI'lI1{ OlF 'll'1lJSTHN lEIHS'll'OlIUCAll.. S1UR.VlBY
SOURCE:
E
RATING:
A
"
~:}j. .
~\j .
~.
. ~? .'
ADDRESS:
200 A ST (5.)
DATE:
1907
STYLE:
COLONIAL REVNAL
ALTERATIONS:
F
HISTORICAL DISTRICT:
N)
COMMENT:
DESCRIPTION:
A bel1cast hipped roof, ringed with carved exposed beam ends and centered with a gabled dormer, caps this two-story Colonial
Revival home. The gabled dOJ't11eI'. with carved barge board. is decorated with slant-cut wooden shingles and a multi-paned
window. The single-storied offset front porch feature. a shed-style roof with a bellcast pedimcnted gable over the main entrance.
Slant-cut wooden shingles and a delicate tracery of cutwork accent the gable. Narrow clapboard siding covers the exterior which is
divided between floors by a flared beltcourse and plain frieze. Pairs of round classical co1UDlIUI, resting on solid clapboard-clad
railings, support the porch roof. Sidelights flank: the natural wood front door, accented with a large pane of glass. A plate glass
window with a multi-paned transom above and narrow double-hung windows on each side occupies the aiea to the north of the
porch. A large double-hung window looks out onto the porch. A pair of multi-paned casement windows, which appear to have
replaced a pair of double-hung windows were probably added in the 1920's. On the north side is a high horizontal window, a door
in the foundation, and a double-hung window placed haIf-way between floors. This would indicate the location of the interior stair
landing and basement access. Double-hung windows are used throughout the rest of the house and a slanted bay window
embellishes the flISt floor of the south facade. A single-storied enclosed. porch on the back matches the rest of the house and is
reached by a sbort stairway sheltered by an added portico sopporlcd by chamfered posts and turned balusters. The high foundation
is now covered with used brick and a used brick planter bas been added in the front A hedge of pink old-fashioned rases and a
large lawn surround the house. This is one of the flDest Colonial Revival homes in Tustin.
SIGNIFICANCE:
William Lynch Shatto. who came to Tustin around 1879. built this house for his second wife, but large enough to provide for
boarders. Shatto was a Cll1JlCIller and helped to build many Tustin buildings, including the First Advent Christian Church, of which
he was a charter member. Martha Shatto. widow of Joseph Martin, was Shatto's third wife. She lived in the house until 1959.
Because this house is probably the rmcst Colonial Revival home in Tustin and is significant for its association with William
Shatto, it appears to be eligible for the National Register.
ATTACHMENT C
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ACTION AND PROJECT PLANS
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ACTION 05-007
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 04-022 AND DESIGN REVIEW 04-020
The Zoning Administrator of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows:
I. The Zoning Administrator finds and determines as follows:
A. That a proper application for Conditional Use Permit 04-022 and
Design Review 04-020 was filed by Michele C. Young to construct a
1,328 square foot accessory building with a 764 square foot two-car
garage, and a 564 square foot second story including a game
room, two (2) walk-in closets, and a bathroom at 200 S. A Street.
B. The proposed project is consistent with the policies of the General
Plan land use designation "Low Density Residential" which provides
for the development of single-family residences and accessory
structures. In addition, the project has been reviewed for consistency
with the Air Quality Sub-element of the City of Tustin General Plan
and has been determined to be consistent with the Air Quality Sub-
element. In addition, the property is zoned Single-Family Residential
(R-1) in which accessory buildings used as guest rooms, when no
cooking facilities are maintained, are permitted with the approval of a
Conditional Use Permit. Design Review is required for construction
of new structures, which includes review of the site plan and
elevations. The Community Development Director has deferred
consideration of the Design Review application to the Zoning
Administrator for concurrent review with the Conditional Use Permit
application.
C. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held on said
application on May 9, 2005, by the Zoning Administrator.
D. That establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use applied
for will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to
the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the
persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed
use, as evidenced by the following findings:
1) The use and design of the proposed accessory structure, as
conditioned, would not be detrimental to surrounding
properties in that the proposed structure will comply with all
applicable development standards of the R-1 zoning district;
and,
2) The use, as conditioned, would not be detrimental to
surrounding residents or properties since the use would be
limited to a garage, laundry room, and guest rooms which
are accessory to a single-family residence and will be used
by the residents in conjunction with the main residence.
The property owner would not be able to lease or rent the
accessory guest rooms without first complying with Tustin
Zoning Administrator Action 05-007
May 9, 2005
Page 2
City Code Section 9223a(7) for a second single-family
structure, including providing two (2) additional garage spaces.
E. That pursuant to Section 9272(c) of the Tustin City Code, the
Zoning Administrator finds that, as conditioned, the location, size,
architectural features, and general appearance of the proposed
structure will not impair the orderly and harmonious development of
the area, the present or future development therein, or the
occupancy as a whole in that the design of the accessory building
ensures that it will be accessory to the main residence by
appearing to be a garage structure. The first floor would be set
seven (7) feet behind the house, the second story set back an
additional twelve (12) feet, and the overall height would be six (6)
feet lower than the house. The placement of the building is
consistent with the predominant land use pattern in the area of
single-family residences with detached garages. In addition, the
design of the accessory building will be consistent with the features
of the Colonial Revival style architecture of the existing main
residence by matching the materials and colors, roof pitch, wood
siding, and gabled dormers on the second floor with slant-cut
wooden shingles and multi-paned windows. In making such
findings, the Zoning Administrator has considered at least the
following items:
1. Height, bulk, and area of buildings;
2. Setbacks and site planning;
3. Exterior materials and colors;
4. Type and pitch of roofs;
5. Size and spacing of windows, doors, and other openings;
6. Towers, chimneys, roof structures, flagpoles, radio and
television antennae;
7. Location, height, and standards of exterior illumination;
8. Landscaping, parking area design, and traffic circulation;
9. Location and appearance of equipment located outside an
enclosed structure;
10. Location and method of refuse storage;
11. Physical relationship of proposed structures to existing
structures in the neighborhood;
12. Appearance and design relationship of proposed structures to
existing structures and possible future structures in the
neighborhood and public thoroughfares;
13. Proposed signage; and,
14. Development guidelines and criteria as adopted by the City
Council.
Zoning Administrator Action 05-007
May 9. 2005
Page 3
F. This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15303,
Class 3, Title 14, Chapter 3, of the California Code of Regulations
(Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act).
II. The Zoning Administrator hereby approves Conditional Use Permit 04-022
and Design Review 04-020 authorizing the construct a 1,328 square foot
accessory building with a 764 square foot two-car garage, and a 564
square foot second story including a game room, two (2) walk-in closets,
and a bathroom at 200 S. A Street, subject to conditions contained in
Exhibit A and the Certificate of Appropriateness in Exhibit 8 attached hereto.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Zoning Administrator
held on the 9th day of May, 2005.
w~
ELOISE HARRIS
RECORDING SECRETARY
D-.- Pi~
DANA OGDON
ACTING ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF TUSTIN )
I, ELOISE HARRIS, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Recording Secretary of
the Zoning Administrator of the City of Tustin, California; that Zoning Administrator Action
No. 05-007 passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Zoning Administrator,
held on the gth day of May, 2005.
/~
~~
ELOISE HA RIS
Recording Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 04-022 AND DESIGN REVIEW 04-020
MAY 9, 2005
GENERAL
(1) 1.1 The proposed project shall substantially conform with the submitted plans for
the project date stamped May 9, 2005, on file with the Community
Development Department, except as herein modified, or as modified by the
Director of Community Development in accordance with this Exhibit. The
Director of Community Development may also approve minor modifications
to plans during plan check if such modifications are to be consistent with the
provisions of the Tustin City Code and other applicable codes.
(1) 1.2 Unless otherwise specified, the conditions contained in this Exhibit shall be
complied with as specified or prior to the issuance of any grading or building
permits for the project, subject to review and approval by the Community
Development Department.
(1) 1.3 The subject project approval shall become null and void unless permits for
the proposed project are issued and substantial construction is underway
within twelve (12) months of the date of this Exhibit. Time extensions may
be considered if a written request is received by the Community
Development Department within thirty (30) days prior to expiration.
(1) 1.4 Approval of Conditional Use Permit 04-022 and Design Review 04-020 is
contingent upon the applicant returning to the Community Development
Department a notarized "Agreement to Conditions Imposed" form and the
property owner signing and recording with the County Clerk-Recorder a
notarized "Notice of Discretionary Permit Approval and Conditions of
Approval" form. The forms shall be established by the Director of
Community Development, and evidence of recordation shall be provided to
the Community Development Department.
(1)
1.5 As a condition of approval of Conditional Use Permit 04-022 and Design
Review 04-020, the applicant shall agree, at its sole cost and expense, to
defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees,
agents, and consultants, from any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a
third-party against the City, its officers, agents, and employees, which seeks
to attack, set aside, challenge, void, or annul an approval of the City Council,
the Zoning Administrator, or any other decision-making body, including staff,
concerning this project. The City agrees to promptly notify the applicant of
any such claim or action filed against the City and to fully cooperate in the
defense of any such action. The City may, at its sole cost and expense, elect
to participate in defense of any such action under this condition.
SOURCE CODES
(1) STANDARD CONDITION
(2) CEQA MITIGATION
(3) UNIFORM BUILDING CODElS (7)
(4) DESIGN REVIEW
(5)
(6)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY REQUIREMENT
LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES
PC/CC POLICY
EXCEPTION
...
Zoning Administrator Action 05-007
May 9, 2005
Page 2
(1) 1.6 Any violation of any of the conditions imposed is subject to the payment of a
civil penalty of $100.00 for each violation, or such other amounts as the City
Council may establish by ordinance or resolution, and for each day the
violation exists, subject to the applicable notice, hearing, and appeal process
as established by the City Council by ordinance.
(1) 1.7 The applicant shall be responsible for costs associated with any necessary
code enforcement action, including attorneys fees, subject to the applicable
notice, hearing, and appeal process as established by the City Council by
ordinance.
(*) 1.8 Prior to issuance of any permit, a Parcel Merger shall be processed and
approved in accordance with the City of Tustin Subdivision Ordinance to
combine Lots 5 and 6 of Mrs. D.A. Lewis' addition to Tustin, as shown on a
Map, recorded in Book 4, Pages 218 and 219 of Miscellaneous Records of
Los Angeles, Califomia. Pursuant to TCC Section 9223a, an accessory
use cannot be constructed on a separate subdivided lot independent of a
single family home in the Single Family Residential District (R-1) zone.
Without merging Lots 5 and 6, the garage and guestroom would be
constructed on Lot 5, which is legally a separate lot from Lot 6.
BUILDING DIVISION
(C) 2.1 At the time of building permit application, the plans shall comply with the
most recently adopted codes. The City is currently using the 2001 California
Building Code (CBC), 2001 California Mechanical Code (CMC), 2001
California Plumbing Code (CPG), 2001 California Electrical Code (CEC),
California Title 24 Accessibility Regulations, City Ordinances, and State and
Federal laws and regulations.
(C) 2.2 Building plan check submittal shall include the following:
· Four (4) sets of construction plans, including drawings for mechanical,
plumbing, and electrical.
· Two (2) copies of structural calculations.
· Two (2) copies of Title 24 energy calculations.
· Elevations that include all proposed dimensions, materials, colors,
finishes, and partial outlines of adjacent buildings on-site and off-site
where applicable.
· Details for the proposed windows and doors.
· Roofing material shall be fire rated class "B" or better.
· Note on plans that no field changes shall be made without prior
approval from the Building Official and architect or engineer of record.
(C) 2.3 Water heaters shall not be installed in a closet or other confined space.
opening into a bedroom.
Zoning Administrator Action 05-007
May 9, 2005
Page 3
(C) 2.4 Escape and rescue windows shall be provided in all sleeping rooms per the
2001 California Building Code (Section 310.4).
(C) 2.5 Dwelling units shall be provided with heating facilities capable of maintaining
a temperature of 70 degrees at a point three (3) feet above the floor in all
habitable rooms per the 2001 California Building Code (Section 310.11).
(C) 2.6 All new glass doors and windows, in or adjacent to doors, shall be tempered
per 2001 California Building Code Section 2406.4.
(C) 2.7 Drainage, vegetation, driveway, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks shall comply
with the on-site private improvement standards pursuant to the
Construction Standards for Private Streets, Storm Drain and On-Site
Private Improvements.
(C) 2.8 No outdoor storage shall be permitted except as approved by the Tustin
Community Development Director.
(C) 2.9 Architectural treatments, exterior colors and finishes of the proposed
addition including exterior stucco and siding, doors/windows, and wood trim
shall match the existing house, including the wood siding, roof pitch,
orientation and material, and the window shape and style. Specifications at
building plan check submittal shall reflect material and color call-outs on all
elevations with applicable details and notes added. The accessory structure
shall maintain the same color scheme as the main residence unless
otherwise approved by the Community Development Director.
ENGINEERING
(C) 3.1 Any damage done to existing street improvements and utilities shall be
repaired before issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy.
(C) 3.2 Prior to any work in the public right-of-way, an Encroachment Permit shall be
obtained from, and applicable fees paid to, the Public Works Department.
USE RESTRICTIONS
***
4.1 Pursuant to Tustin City Code Section 9297, the minimum interior garage
space dimensions shall be not less than ten (10) feet in width by twenty (20)
feet in depth, clear and unobstructed for each space. All garage spaces on
the site shall be used for the parking of vehicles owned, operated, or
maintained by residents of the property.
***
4.2 Existing at the subject property is a single-family residence. This
residence is within the Single-Family Residential (R-1) zoning district
where single-family residences are permitted. Use of any portions of the
accessory building with guest rooms as a second unit or boarding house is
Zoning Administrator Action 05-007
May 9, 2005
Page 4
not permitted without prior approval of the City. Prior to the issuance of
building permits, the property owner shall execute and record a deed
restriction in a form acceptable to the Community Development Department
and City Attomey to ensure that no parts of the residence are used or leased
as a second unit. This deed restriction will need to be recorded with the
Office of the Orange County Recorder and shall be binding upon all future
owners or interested parties of the subject property.
FEES
(C) 5.1 Prior to issuance of any building permits, payment shall be made of all
applicable fees, including but not limited to, the following. Payment shall be
required based upon those rates in effect at the time of payment and are
subject to change.
a. Building plan check and permit fees to the Community Development
Department based on the most current schedule.
b. Payment of the Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 Sewer
Connection Fees will be required at the time a building permit is issued.
With credit for the existing four (4) bedroom single family unit, the current
fee due is $580.00.
c. Payment of the Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fees to the Tustin Public
Works Department is required at the time a building permit is issued.
The current fee is $1,731.00 for the new residential structure, as
applicable.
d. . School facilities fee of $2.14 per square foot or based upon the most
current schedule unless determined to be exempt by the Tustin Unified
School District.
e. Within forty-eight (48) hours of approval of the subject project, the
applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department, a
CASHIER'S CHECK payable to the County Clerk in the amount of forty-
three dollars ($43.00) to enable the City to file the appropriate
environmental documentation for the project. If within such forty-eight
(48) hour period that applicant has not delivered to the Community
Development Department the above-noted check, the statute of
limitations for any interested party to challenge the environmental
determination under the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act could be significantly lengthened.
'"'i)~i~?i~ -----' -
j"1-
I J.~~-> '):1-~
~ll~~.~~~~<i~ .."':."~:c ""'~2":~, .~.~~.: . ~~.~~,
. ""
~ 0 (0\ ~1[UI( 1~~
, ______ ",Ib', , .91- .~2 ~(dALl ]3tJ! . >
---- ~~.~.
I iJ: r-'~O~~'''C ."~.
I
I
~I
:il,
~
. ,
I
. I
'I'
~.
. ~ :
~;
~,
'1;
1\1
I
1\
00\
~,
to\
~.I
" ~"
,
I
,
\
,
I
I
I
,
I
~i
OOt I
I
\.
;Y,rv.
,~~
:'-:P6<:
I'~
<
-"- '~
.
0129
'),
.~../ 1;9_
Ol.~
001
).
',J. ~ 9,9
" .I.~
00,
. ''14
;J:. Q<.
<I. ~
. OOf
~
"
Or
Zr
0'
00
,.
~~
'00
J'~
.~""
"~:;::o-
"
..g
,0
/"~~q . ,/.l:lo'
...._... ..,__.,..__........._...__.....~....." ., H.tlIOK...,. .P~ '_' . ':8N01 fsi~:l 0, IlJ
___,______"""'---.....-.-=-.J.'--.. '
. ........__...."1 ,__".n' 1R1X3--.....". \- -. X --x---
1~,. I ! ~ I I
;: i. "]J~~~ ~~ ~~ i ~
~ ln~ :oq"'l...4
i '. 0 ~ i
I U'
I ~
~. ~~
Wll1eL~.iI.lti:J II V II V
~--. - ----- - - ,---- ,"'---
.r,~.b)'
~;. ' .
"
I.....
. '
: 'M'10(IUI''';~;'''
lllM loOHIS 15lX3 '6.... . .,'
,-" '
, . LU ~..
"">
',.
"~1-~
:/jrJ.
::t'+;
j~'
o~
, 0,
.+t~')
0:
'~~
O~
0,
-- ~
I:
~
I
q.,-',
('0...
., ,
."
:~
./
.
1,-
1'_ '. ~"
" ,.... - ..""c, ," ,,",: .
~1~.'~..11
t:::!'~' ~
t>" l~~~.'-;5t
~\o-'~d'.;; , [
l "" \J~t 6q
," ',F ~~ II
~~~' ~ oJ) ~
~ w~
e4~i
~1
~ ~-I
:r~
3J~3"1~~~ ('~ ~~Ix
~ <t>>'1
~-..::=:.x_ _ ~ _ _ ~~~ _.
RLlIOli
"_
v
..~
,
. )I:E!OQOOM 'lSIX]
.
,
.
~,
~
u
~~'
.~
00,
II
.-,.!1.
'@~
~ .
. .
.
9
~
'"
~
~
i.i
:'5
.;:;'1
~~
">--
3;
i~
.,e,
"'')
",0;.$':::
""
~
~ [
~:"
'~
"
"
,"
,
---I
.>
61-9'"
00,
-ib9:o:(R
\:
,
. .,". ,', ' ' .
. ..:.i.,.: .:',~;...'::.:~~~'~~~; ..'
'8lI1I 'oLIllXll
<oS'.... .
>"
_0;,\____ _
~.
'>
I
,
I
I('.()~
'flr"\',@
.;.9.
,
,
I I ~
I I '
I) ~
'~
I '
..~'"
~
G
.(.
~(;)',:
-.$'
'<0>
,
~,-
~-,~
_'E :'j ~
~~,.~ :'.
>..I "".,d>'K:..,.
~F ~o.l 0'6',\
,
o
'S5lll . JBIXlI
::i!';~\~ ~_,' fr,&-:,r::,O.~:I,r, ~__ :_:_'2 ~----- ~~--------_.__.--_._--'~
II '[Ol"~rn' ,', 'II;(~' ~='"~(f=~!$=(=;'lr,,',
IZI'HIr;ti(1l~rr~ .
. t. Ii!,
"'3~~ > ., --J r --- '-- -. ------------:--~_ :
r-', '~~CI"L=~~~;:~ I ! ----------~,1'- (~7-::
4. '. ,,111';::'c"':':=',.::::.~:::,.o:F I' ---Ll'
-, __",..,u.,. 'I'.. ',' I 1_'
, '~.:.'t_~ , '>' -~' ~ !~ ! '
. I ,"0" , 0 I., :\ Ole (;i\i~Aq: I '
'y/~':~r.I'~1'" (II)' I . i ~ 'N"L
.. -,-.1 p,W, '(:,
71';",I:'@'I!'IXYI"OSfs'(
_~L" ~1c: '
il'.' : ;.,' ':~~:ii}@ (~_3)
.- ---.:., '.?x,,6 0{.. .. 'l
· ";'~';-B ~ "~"M'Q~I~_~j~^~<: ~'J.JjJ
_'lx..J'ciL V{/iDIOA
IJ!HUiOA
'J~O' 1 I
---.- t - n--f, i
,.,.---r{~ -= ~:~- -'i -,. -- /lJL:.r'-1
, r cLe",- / I
,,' I '"', '~I 1.1 / I,
~i, i I
' I .... ~ -, .:.t~PtD 1,'_ I
1'- ~!J \'-ill,'o-- I
, I <,"it, '-
',I' ,Ii' . I 1'--' / /, '--' ._ .mh!'J'tibl
"i:'- ',["""""1 K'97'- j'- '--0:'''' ' ,/_~,_:,'l,_!.-, .{-.'.-f"I'.I!,-"_'r'-'l:'~l~"'i,'.
CC,,\ ,1,'1"', r -f /----~--_._---------.., --' , - -
I ! : 5,~'r'l '~J-!,' '_7
, fl~-----j,_ ~ I r-J._<. '--',I! !,.:).)
[,:JJ. .m'\; ~-.-~=. . "'- " I;::;) II I
i f,fJ>L'-c:!..______/ // ~.I""~ ',._.,!:~~ i.~.; 1.I~l,'.
II/,~;" Ilvl,~ II ( \~ '___" cLv;O !
I' I " I Y, I'
I ! ,-cow /r 'I I I 11 f~
I I, / II ' J i l.'~ I
I,::=,::=-_L-=.=======~ I -':r-f~--~--'; L_._...__, I
/ I . ..= i ~4 "Si:io'.L . .. ..,.." ,... .-", ,--------'-. '. I
II
,I
- \----- -- ----
,-
'..__ i;;T_ FLoo K OUN VV -I'. 0" ,
-- ~- -_~ _."_._"L!::..__~-,-.__'.L__~_,,_______
J, _
"~, ,---=-------:::-:------=:::::--:::::..::::::::-..
! ! '" I,!!t}"~
, "
9' "
~,t~-o
----~--~-"-- -_._-'-_._--~----~--,-- --,---
---3-~f_ 0 Ii --~-----_._..._..- ~_._-,.".~'-._~-_.
(B1h,q)
[~-{J
(~
'.I.;!'f~
. r r);J
D
~,
o
...v
OJ
5~fJ3.~tlf.o.will-
J41/afll)Ll'!$fl'r!P,'!ii!lQ
$laU.I:lG...~~~l1Oj.___
1
.
.
.
.
%
.
1L7';~i5(L-,h7L _d [0~f
, -- -'--- ---, - ....1-hf~,,,, 1.
',' "'J r;; Yi O^--' 7') -n
" " '81N'M 17
z ~
~" .
C .
I .
D~I
~') \\\
.
.
'"
! III ., .~I
If " 9
,I, v'IT''!
I /,' , , 'I
'==1= 1--,) cc 11
, 11i1r '
: I, ,I ) :'
::-~HI'-l~~~:I,1
'-'I I'll
,=ll=t!= :=-j,1
II ' ,
_l
r:: I; \1 ',"Ii \
, I, ,I, 'II
L' bJi,=C1\
,~ '1' i
" 'I I '[ '.
'I . I :,
L'~';"___,IJ, - '--~.i,
1'~r-1i :;1
I ',; 'I i :'1
db .di>"-~=d! II
j iIRI',: Iii
!:=J", , fc.-='1,,', '
I I , : :11
H ~=iii
1,1 I jll
H -, 'R"Iil
, I
,
,
,
.
1
;1.
7,
Ii t
,j.
" I
iT,
Ii
:1 )
Fl'1'
~I
~I
I' i!
, I'
t::! '
,[, i
~.,III
I, , 1
I _I
//'6-',,',
I
'!'.
~
II !
Ill,!
Iii II,I,!
Iii 'III
1!111/[i I!
I' ,'I' 1
I 'I
, i
: II
II
I
I
s
C>
..... T'
01
~I
JI
~
u.l
--\
\-U
t
~
I
"'- I
co '
\--=:'
~\
~I
-JI
ill,
!
:r:.i
I-I
~I
c)'
<I
i
I
I
i j I
i! I
, "
LLJ4
~i ~
I I
I
'f.
,
I
,
'~\
-
-'
r
\ ~ ; J
'\ '
\
~~
:':t'~};:
I
'"'"
: i
: ~ ~
j .'
. (-"j
I
'!
i
"
)i
Ii
i'
,
,
i
~
1
I
, -
~ Atl
-TI, I !
'I -I
~ I !
!
, /P
I
'I'
I 'I
iI" I
'I Ii,
I I~
ii .
It
II
I \ ~
;1 :__-1
I' ' i
'! '!
i "I
! '. 'I
! : I
".' i 'I
lil.~"."li'
III "__ __ I
~~- I
,
~i
0..l
)
~
,--:
i\n!
\.1J.:
'5
/
,
1:.;/
~
_. ,
.:s:..d.: ...~
:[J~i(~
~~~
~: -:.!~~
-l'~'~
..J'I;~i >:..,
-~ "if'!
.,~..::a ..:
~ -~ c--Ij
~~j~~
""'" ~c
~~~{:~
GH~~
'~
,
,
/
I ~L
:,1,
b:
I"
I
mil:
lll!ii
"I;,
r:! ': "
1'11:
liil ' ,
r~i] I I
,ilil i : I
,\ ~I,I:!;,
['\ I II ,
r--\ 11':11 i 'J" I
~:'u" ';!I J. I, ",_
_~--L, \If --
~,
I,
\
/
;/
!
L
"q~
Ih,
ill
, ,
- ;..::-t
' '-i
c,
,
, ,
Ill:
ill!
I
, '
, I
Iii' !
I I,.
ii'
'r':
"
~
,
co
!
I
~,
I
,
,
it
I: I i
:" I
i,1 I
I, :
I, I
I, I I
II 'II'
!! ! I ,
I ili 'll'l : i \\,
: I I ,,', ,'I
· i itH L _-:.._~_~ '~
u ~r: , : , 1'1' -';oj
1I111 i,! if: ~
I, !' II" '
rll i, i.: - L1~~~:
'/ 'J_ ".....
I~
/ (;J-,O{
C 0'1 /1 ,
;;/ OO;!;:/o
I
,
;'
/
I
!
J-
I
,0
/--
__;0'.:
!
,-~ ,- L~I
-,
'':j
I
'-
. 'J
-'
~
L_._
I~
o
Vii
,
I
.~~ I
61
'::"_"-] i
,
'.') I
.- I
\-5; ,- I ,
'U') I
-< c
o...'l. I
" ;'1
,
"
I,' I'
Iii: i ,
I,I! ',' \ \ i:,1 I; '1"
, I !" "'I . I I
:;, \! -" ! f
i ' ': i I, i ! I J \ ' I', ' '
[I f\ ,1,,', '\ I, II:
t I , \ I n II 'I; !
,I i'i \'1: I . Ti
I \ \ . I i \ ii1 II ~ \1:
1\11 ..." " I',' i,
" ,', I" '\
! I j! .,'!;: I' I,
1'111 , 'I ,j I
I ,\ \ j ;: ~ I 1i " ~'
i . , I,: " '
! .1 i i I i \ I 11\
I '\ "I III I
I : ; , !~ ,n
I :;: i I" "
\ '\ . \ i I \} :: 1\1
\' i I,
, 1 r
,\, t
. t! I,
'- I, \J'
,') 11 t'"
1.11 I
t . r: ~ I_
I . I' '14 :
\" I'! r
:: '" >
',. ,'" I'
'- ~. t ...j .
,. '.,' r: I;
ItT
1\
j ~
,
I
i
,
I
I
J
~
I
,
i
I
.
I I V;.
I
i
~
~ '
.V
~1
..w~
<:i
a21~
~
i!
I I
I' '\
I \
1\
,
I
~
~ ~ 'v ~
,~,~
, '^
' ....
3" ,Q
Qj'
'U', -.!l
~-' J~
Jt- \,:;
..
I! ! lil.\1 I'
"-I' ' . . I ~ ~
! l I \1 i I :, \ I: i II
~ .. ~ I oj ~, ..
. . 'I ;', "
i ,1 : j, ~ 1 ;
Ii \, :, 'I. I i I!
" ". i "
' "" 'I
I, : J ,I ~ l! i
; ! ~, '\. ~. ~ ;
. i , \, ;:,
! : \ \ I ~,
i: 'II \ \ ii,
: i II 'I! i
I" I ,
'1'1 i ::
I: '
, Iii
'\ Ii \
,.. \.
I'
Oi
- I
'"'<::.
0'
811
~\
tn
3
. "
~~,rl.l I.! ; j lTf[irl' Til:i,-~:1T: .
1111 .~, I r I \: !: ! , I
. W f:?: i '\1 it ! ! i
,) I \ \ \ ii, i :! \ III
I pI! 'i ." I I' ~
/ 1\\lil .(L~.- 'I
I ". ; It: \ \ \, .t [ :,',!'
I. , ;
,; Ii l.: I,
~'ITlllll!, "
. " , r I' I;
r : r: . ..... 't .'i.'
,; '~ . .1" , I '
1 I' ; "'
. .
_:-..... _~.L
I
.".'t' .. '.\
, .
"
,
'.
,
;~
j .
I" I
-.!>
I :; I
~ I
\ '\,)
i '
J
~
.s v
~' >>I
a' ~
~ ,~: ~
~,,^
~'. '"
. ,a:.
Cllj'
~I ' ....!)
j. ,;~
~'~
. ,~..!
I
-
, ,
'1 !. : ',[
I' ~,I
; , .
l
o
_\
I
I
i
,
I
,[
\
~
,<'.
C>
t::
~
W
-l
~
i
I
I
i
. I
I I
\.-:
<J)
.oo;c
ATTACHMENT D
PROPOSED SIDING
Proposed Unpainted Fibercement Siding
Approved Unpainted Redwood Siding
Proposed Painted Fibercement Siding
Approved Painted Redwood Siding
Side by Side Sample Boards
Left: Unpainted Fibercement Siding
Right: Unpainted Redwood Siding
Side by Side Sample Boards
Left: Painted Fibercement Siding
Right: Painted Redwood Siding
ATTACHMENT E
CORRESPONDENCE
Commur1i'v Deve!opment Departme;:t
September 1 5, 2006
City of Tustin
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92780
714.573.3100
Drew McCausland
McCausland Construction Company
P.O. Box 1769
Tustin, CA 92781
RE: REQUEST TO USE FIBER CEMENT SIDING INSTEAD OF REDWOOD SIDING FOR THE
PROPOSED DETACHED TWO (2) CAR GARAGE WITH SECOND STORY GAME ROOM
. AT 200 S. "An STREET, TUSTIN
Dear Mr. McCausland:
We received your request to utilize Fiber Cement siding instead of Redwood siding for the proposed
detached two (2) car garage with second story game room approved by the City's Zoning
Administrator through adoption of Zoning Administrator Action 05-007 on May 9, 2005 (Attachment 1).
In approving the project, the Zoning Administrator made a finding (Finding E) which indicates that the
design of the accessory building will be consistent with the features of the Colonial Revival style
architecture of the existing main residence by matching the materials and colors, roof pitch, wood
siding, and gabled dormers on the second floor with slant-cut wooden shingles and multi-paned
windows.
Substituting the proposed garage exterior material of Redwood siding with Fiber Cement siding while
the existing home is improved with Redwood siding would contradict with the adopted Zoning
Administrator's findings. In addition, the site is located within the City's Cultural Resources Historic
District which requires new improvements be harmonious in terms of appropriateness of materials,
scale, size, color in relationship with existing structure(s). Therefore, the request to use fiber cement
siding instead of redwood siding for the proposed new detached garage is hereby denied. If you wish
to appeal this decision, you may do so by filing an appeal to the Planning Commission in writing with
the Community Development Department stating the reason for said appeal and accompanied by an
appeal fee (to be reimbursed at the actual cost of processing the appeal) as established by City
Council Resolution 06-85.
If you should have any questions, please call me at 714-573-3115.
Sn:IY,
}JI.:'~
Senior Planner
C: Elizabeth A. Binsack, Community Development Director
Dana Ogdon, Assistant Director of Community Development
BJ Azarvand, Plan Checker
'i ',( :J~'.JUST!N"',~u",,'" planfllnqIl.M",.-Merno.\200 S A "''''''ll do<:
December 6, 2006
Dear Justina and Elizabeth,
Thank you again for meeting with us regarding my new garage construction. As you can see
from the brochures and the attached website, www.certainteed.com. fiber cement siding is very
attractive, used in very high-end homes and is designed to resemble wood siding. It is a wood
siding imitation without all the maintenance problems.
I am requesting to use fiber cement siding instead of wood siding because it is a superior product
but retains the look I want to achieve. It is fire proof and termite proof. It also comes with a
product guarantee from the manufacturer.
Fiber cement siding was developed about 18 years ago and has been increasingly becoming the
product of choice by builders throughout the US because of its durability and look. Several
companies market a version of the product. I plan to use lap siding from CertainTeed. a premier
US manufacture of building products.
Contrary to wood that needs nearly yearly repainting touch ups and care (dry rot and termite
damage), fiber cement has a projected life of25 years before repainting is necessary. Termites
will never be an issue. As Lisa Yargeau, Territory Manager for CertainTeed mentioned, it is
replacing wood siding throughout the US and it has been permitted in many historical areas of
Los Angeles County with building guidelines similar to Tustin.
I certainly appreciate the desire to maintain the look of Old Town Tustin's historical district. I
painstakingly have spent many hours in designing my garage to follow the intentions of the City.
I have lived here for 26 years because I like the environment, therefore I certainly would do
nothing to deviate from the look of the neighborhood. I wish some of my neighbors would do
half of what I am doing!
From a distance of five feet, no one could tell the difference between wood siding and fiber
cement siding. Since the garage is 50 feet away from the house and 75 feet back from the street,
the differences even further diminish. It certainly maintains the integrity of the Old Town
look-it just does not require the necessary upkeep.
Come walk with me through my neighborhood and observe the wood structures and see the
condition of the wood siding. Many homes are in disrepair, termite damaged and in desperate
need of painting. My garage will never have these issues with fiber cement siding. It will
still look new after several years.
I urge the City to recognize the benefits of these new products and how they can be used to
enhance and maintain the look of Old town Tustin. Perhaps you can encourage more
homeowners in the area to use them.
I encourage you to visit my home and view my property. When you see how my garage and
home sit on the property, you can get a realistic perspective of the negligible visual differences
of the siding choices will really be.
I realize I am requesting a variance to my current building permit in place. I hope you can now
see why I am requesting this variance.
As the homeowner who will need to maintain this home over the next several years, I want to
have so best possible product for maintenance and beauty.
Thank you,
,J
I
i
[',1 /'
/ "j:.r-' I J ~ C.
/.i' ;/'~,... c. ,,,..j
i
"'-"---'.
-:.../
'J
-.. ...-.._.._._._.....^---_.._--~- ..- . .-.-.-....-.---...-.-.--.
'<C'<'..".ft .N.""",",,_~'-"-' .~. c. "'.."....",.'"'..,,'C ',";"'._~"'4j"c"""'"",.w.,._.<<_"""",.,t,,,,.,,,,,,... ,.'
",.. ..i..,-'."._"..."..c_....""'._-"V."'I
.......... '
(-' ('If) r
: ) .:: r ~ ,'-1
J ",.;' '-,.1.\ ,
December 7,2006
. ,/j
'.\-.;- tl,' Y;
Michelle Young
200 South "A" Street
Tustin, CA 92780
~, .1' - '.~'~\J
'i" ') ,
", ) J ;';
RE: SECOND REQUEST TO USE FIBER CEMENT SIDING INSTEAD OF
REDWOOD SIDING FOR THE PROPOSED DETACHED TWO (2) CAR
GARAGE WITH SECOND STORY GAME ROOM AT 200 S. "A" STREET,
TUSTIN
Dear Ms. Young:
On September 15, 2006, the City sent you a letter informing you that your request to
use fiber cement siding instead of redwood siding for the newly constructed detached
garage was denied. During the week of November 20, 2006, you met with me and
Justina Willkom to discuss the matter and indicated that you will submit material
brochures to justify the request. On December 5, 2006, you, Drew McCausland,
Contractor, and Lisa Yargeau, Territory Manager for CertainTeed (manufacturer of fiber
cement siding), met with Justina Willkom and presented the City with manufacturer
brochures, pictures of other projects throughout California, and sample material boards.
On December 6, 2006, we received your letter which describes and explains your
intention further and substantiating your request to use fiber cement instead of redwood
siding for the new detached garage and game room.
The newly constructed detached two (2) car garage with second story game room was
approved by the City's Zoning Administrator through adoption of Zoning Administrator
Action 05-007 on May 9, 2005 (Attachment 1). In approving the project, the Zoning
Administrator made a finding (Finding E) which indicates that the design of the
accessory building shou.ld be consistent with the features of the Colonial Revival style
architecture of the existing main residence by matching the materials and colors, roof
pitch, wood siding, and gabled dormers on the second floor with slant-cut wooden
shingles and multi-paned windows.
We have reviewed the submitted letter, brochures, and material boards. As we
indicated in the previous letter, substituting the proposed garage exterior material of
Redwood siding with Fiber Cement siding while the existing home is improved with
Redwood siding would contradict the adopted Zoning Administrator's findings. In
addition, the site is located within the City's Cultural Resources Historic District which
requires new improvements be harmonious in terms of appropriateness of materials,
scale, size, and color in relationship with existing structure(s). Therefore, this second
request to use fiber cement siding instead of redwood siding for the proposed new
Young
200 S. "A" Street
Page 2 of 2
detached garage is hereby declined. If you wish to appeal this decision, you may do so
by filing an appeal to the Planning Commission in writing with the Community
Development Department stating the reason for said appeal and accompanied by an
appeal fee (to be reimbursed at the actual cost of processing the appeal) as established
by City Council Resolution 06-85.
If you should have any questions, please call Justina Willkom at 714-573-3115.
Sincerely,
....-1/1/
..', 7-.
, 'f ~. // ~
,'.1 -";u;;"e.tC
Elizabeth A. Binsack
Community Development Director
C: Dana Ogdon, Assistant Director of Community Development
Henry Huang, Building Official
Justina Willkom, Senior Planner
S:ICddI.,lUSTINA\o:umIlIl plannlng\LIIl.~u.no.I2DO S II sidlnQ2.doc
, ,- i~c" 'I~j '(\i~\' !-. ,~'I -':"/ :r (T'::ort r"\_:)n~ .-TIT ':.:.nt
..,.._."",;,~.",y '- ""~'-,......."',I ,_ ."....-l~....d!.- ..,,>,
January 17, 2007
- City of Justin
Michelle Young
200 South "A" Street
Tustin, CA 92780
-"if} c~' ':'~To:, ::i \,\' t"!
r .,~'in ' :; ~.:::-:-'~O
7 ~ ; i 7'3.;' '~l)
RE: DENIAL OF A REQUEST TO USE FIBER CEMENT SIDING INSTEAD OF
REDWOOD SIDING FOR THE PROPOSED DETACHED TWO (2) CAR
GARAGE WITH SECOND STORY GAME ROOM AT 200 S. "A" STREET,
TUSTIN
Dear Ms. Young:
This letter is sent to you re-affirming the City's denial of your request to use fiber cement
siding instead of redwood siding for the newly constructed detached garage (see
attached letter dated Deceml;ler 7,2006).
If you wish to appeal this decision, you may do so by filing an appeal to the Planning
Commission in writing with the Community Development Department stating the reason
for said appeal and accompanied by an appeal fee as established by City Council
Resolution 06-85 within seven (7) days from the date of this letter.
If you should have any questions, please call Justina Willkom at 714-573-3115.
Sincerely,
L~~{~~~~<~
Elizabeth A. Binsack
Community Development Director
C: Dana Ogdon, Assistant Director of Community Development
Henry Huang, Building Official
Justina Willkom, Senior Planner
SICddlJUSTINA\eumlllt p1lnnlnglLellws-M_I200 S A sdk1g3 doc
January 20, 2007
...' ._ .... .~. .'. ."- i--
:" .-{ '-;',""
t ,(~ C-I t.._ i ,f -, ;".j
;,j '"\ ''''''';7
" .f'~, '1 ,_
To: Planning Commission, City of Tustin
From; Michele Young, Homeowner, 200 South A Street Tustin, CA 92780
,~GMM1J:llTI iJLct:,;'>:1<'/!
W
RE: APPEAL to the denial to my request for substituting redwood siding with fiber cement
siding on my newly constructed detached garage at 200 South A Street.
REQUEST to use an alternate (Tustin approved) exterior siding material for my new detached
garage.
Backl!round:
I. The Construction Documents for my garage were approved in May 2005. Construction
began in April 2006.
2. While visiting New Orleans in June 2006, I discovered that the reconstruction of the wood
structures (residential and commercial) in the city's downtown historic area was being rebuilt
with fiber cement lap siding versus wood siding. Unless I was within 3 feet of the buildings
and carefully examined it, the siding appeared identical to wood lap siding.
3. I confirmed that New Orleans Historical Redevelopment Committee favored the fiber cement
siding because of it durability, lifetime guarantee, low maintenance costs and fire resistance
feature. Furthermore, it did not deter from the City's desire to maintain the hist.orical "wood
siding" appearance.
4. Through research, I found fiber cement siding has also been approved for use in several
historical districts throughout the US including Laguna Beach, California.
5. I decided fiber cement siding was the best choice for the siding on my new garage. Its low
maintenance costs, and fire and termite free composition was significant to me as a
homeowner. Also the product is environmentally friendly, as it does not require lumber.
6. McCausland Construction (my contractor) submitted a request to use fiber cement siding
instead of redwood in September 2006 per my request.
7. On September 15, 2006 my request was denied, citing the Zoning Administrator Action
prepared for my permit.
8. In November and December I resubmitted my request via meetings, mail, documentation
and samples. My request was refused again for the same reason: "Not conforming to the
submitted plans." I was told I needed to file a formal appeal if! wanted the Planning
Commission to reconsider my request.
...... -- ... ".-.
(-< ;- ~ -" '......
,Y <~ j
January 20, 2007
Page 2 of2
,~!~ '
"
';;Y;'lH. tiffi ;';." ,.~<,
9. This letter constitutes my formal appeal to modify my siding choice on my ~~ pi~ i~' .,'
have enclosed a check payable to Tustin for $175.00 (price quoted to me by Justina).
Discussion:
I understand the City's desire to maintain a Cultural Resources Historic District. I respect the
idea that improvements need to be harmonious in appearance in appropriateness of materials,
scale size, and color in relationship with my existing structure. My request conforms to these
criteria.
Over the years, the construction industry has developed new products that provide a substantial
improvement over 19th century building materials. Despite their material changes, they retain the
harmonious design to the historic period.
Vinyl windows, fiberglass asphalt shingles, and fireproof, metal garage doors are examples of
exterior materials that are permitted in Tustin's Cultural Resource Historic District. They are all
products that were not materials in the early 20th Century. They are approved products because
they do not conflict with the cultural intent of the District and are better quality.
~ Fiber cement siding is a relatively new product (18 years old), and its popularity is growing
rapidly due to its durability and inherent benefits (termite free, fire resistant, environmentally
friendly). It is an approved product for new constrnction in Tnstin.
Fire resistance and termite free features are extremelv important to California's
communities and their homeowners! Environment friendly is an added bonus.
Fiber cement is not an inexpensive option. It is priced similarly to wood siding. Its long-
term benefits are worth the initial cost.
My new garage is detached from my house and sits on my property 25 feet away from the house.
It is set back 50 feet from street. No one can distinguish the difference between the siding
materials on the two buildings. I am NOT modifying my home's siding-just my new garage.
There are already homes in my neighborhood that have used fiber cement products in remodeling
projects. I am not the first!
I invite the Planning Commission members to visually see a sample of fiber cement siding on my
garage and compare it to my current home's siding. You will see how similar it is to my home's
siding and how it does not deter from the cultural look of my property.
Conclusion and Request:
Permit me to modify my building plans to substitute fiber cement for redwood siding.
Sincerely,
/:/v/dvH
ATTACHMENT F
EXCERPTS FROM RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES
CJ)
I:l
.....l
~
Cf.l
.....l '"
-( ~
-
=: .z
:::J ..
<l>
b ~
I:l c::
E-< "2
...
:t .-
.....
U <l>
=: 0
-( ....
<l>
.....l -
tJ
-( ..
.... ....
E-< ..
-
z -
I:l U
Q
-
CJ)
;;J
:::::
u
-
~
-
0
:....,
CJ)
-
.,..
-
CJ)
z;
....
....
.f)
;;)
....
o-J
~
.......
:>
>:J
~
o-J
~
.......
z
o
o-J
o
u
.
-
..c:
-
.s:
Ul
~
o
"C
c::
.s:
f!
;J
- '"
tJ ....... :::
CO.~ __ ;:; c:: E
.S..c: -;;..:g::s
"Cu.. ;...OM"--
'I..l...t en _ 0...- 0 J..t
o Q)"t;i as .,... "'CtJ as
2"C"C<= ",lii;:CIl"C 9-
IT"\! <<: t..l as ~ ~ a 0.. Q.J a,,-
\",I (J as c: _ c: ..,... -l:j Q)
QJC::OS;;; ol-.t"-Z~cn~
P........oO .oCllS.S:::S-;;O;::
>, P..-;; P"p:: c:: 0 .. 0
1-0"- tJ as as t: s... ::: ........
0..c:__"C .,.,O^"'..P....
_;.......tJ~ ....",o.....<IJs...~_
"'oQj",.. ::l_-;;SOU::S
C'I "'...>o:"'.....VU.-CIlCllCO
QJ M 0 (1)= QJ QJ.._Qj 1-01_ s::
8 ~ S l:: ~ 1l "C g;::l E ~ ~~
.~ >, .. '" CIl.S: .- .. 0 _ s:; ~
"'""" -.JU) ='-1"'0 i>"::u ct) ~.U; ~
.....
t
. . .
.
.
\,
\
,
\
\
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
.....
.,
.,
.t;
V)
1:
"-
,.::::
N
.....
'"
~
<:::>
~
t-..
,.....
-
-
-
_.-
_.-
-
-.-.-
-
-
III
.!:!
E
<3
III
"Of:
~-=
.c::1ll
-'<
~"O
~~
'8s
tll,::
.c::
!!
~
"0
~
l:
III
S
"0
. ..~ :.
~.
0:. ;S
~
l:
.9
..
. III
:Q
D
~
III
E
[
'"
'6
'0
Cl
:I)
\:l
..::
>-
:..
tn
..::
<:
~
-<
;:J
....
t;
\:l
i-
-<
-<
...
U
~
-<
<:
"Q
o
"-
"0
~
Q
~
III
"-
..::
<:
~
'"
_ Ql '1:l
.S: 0 1-4 dE
-...... m d
C s::: ... '1:l u
OO<~...2
Uti) "''''
1:: .. U._
;;: '" e - -
Q) 0..-_ t:::"'2
....... E ~.9 >-..;
~o(ti ~.> g
Q)uS::;<1)C)::'"
.::: s:::< :>::::::iil
~ -;; "'d ~ (3- t::
Q::iQ)~~.:::'d
"'~"'Oo"'"
U) ~ o_,.c::;
reo~J-cO.....
...=~<-...!..U fI}
- Ql OJ
r-1;:1 $..0,->
.::: p ctS.n"U>
en 's c E '5 If)
~"-''''''',.,''"
i- c:>::: (J) bO_ C')
~K",]s::: ",~~1;;:~ ~ ~
......~......_ ~~~~ o~ ~ ~U)
]~:e~~~~~ue ~! ~ ~;:l~
_..._~~~~~ ~B~ Z~ =~~~~
_..... U)ClS~ .......-w ...... .-_......Den
....a...._Q) _u.. ~J-c en s:~-
"'2 ~E E ~~E]"E ",]..: g ~ >.~O'B ~
~CJctS<O~...=~_d~~d_O~ CJ"'d~
~..t:: c:: ~ > ~ 0...,-,-- \oW c:.: (j ~ ca -t: ,.0 "'O.z Q) (l)
--O-_~_O~O~ - ~ ,.- --
fJ) """ __ n; as Q) ..... p.,:.::: :::s _ - r/) -- ""0 - c --
-eJ-wuZ- Q)~_dddXQ)dMS::;-
~~Qj ::S-Vi .S Q)~ >.8.~ 0:: Q) - U) 0..:::.......
'=d~OU)""=c:.:u~...cn-- ~~Q)~co
., '" ",_ ~ .. '" bO~.sbo o~_
~~""~._-o~"'u~~Q)m=c::ZU)-cnuo
~o- _u 0 o---c.- (1)
....... us ...= ....... u QJ -- ~ :::: ~ bO""O .... Q)'::: ,- 0.....
~ -"t:10 ...."O.bt;Qj",oQ)..u;Q),.-.!:(jtnC
:s c::.....Q) cn-d -s::..o. >ZUll-cca:::s
_d~O~~""~o..U)U)du)""OUO~~~_ctS
_0 -- _ ,... Cl) d '-...... bO a... .... - ,.,...... '-",
c:: ~ ~ J:: ~,.!: be Q) u CI) CI) .- ca. 0 ,,",.- 1-c co
8~~~oo~=~~8~~O-;;:~~~:_5
~E~'~~~ ~--~~- o-~~
0)-- QJ- Q)uU)~~._-~v -'.........
~d~~~Q)~~=_o~o=~~~ec~
~ue"';;:6~s;;:<~eEu~~'1:l"'<u
:-<
-
Z
:.:J
Ci
-<
CIl
\:l
~
-
u
-
~
-
o
:..
tn
-
-
...
~
o
....
r;C'\
:>....
- 0
:>-
"0
::::::0
_c-
"'....
- -
::; ::l
o 0
'0.0
u..s
CIl
-
z
:-<
-
tn
;:J
f-o
')
:l
7'
~
~
.J
;J
:l
~
J
j
"'0 f:O~ 4.J ~~
c:: t:: ....... 0 ..I..J c::,-
r:Q)._-O :::o~ ~=
~-=~~- o;..._..c:o~"
o.....c::al:: "';:::~Gl~
.CO.. g..c~.9OJ-";::-
OJ "'\ ~ - 0 _ t.J _ ~ E--4 ..c
.. .z:: - c:: E "-- cc..::: - 0
~.l:!~.;a"'GlQ;.ba'" ....
QJ en ~ 0.. OJ -:5..c: ~ ;... o..""i:' 0..
... - 2 .~_~ ;::: 0 '" '" "'... .
.-ctS .....,......0 UQj.....c:"t;QJ-
~ ;... u s:: "l:j C1J .......""""'" ...... ._ ~ ~
...cu .-OJ --o~- '.....-
'" I:: = a:; ~ 0.- I:: o-o..o~--
OJ Q) < C1J :J ...... a:; z .... ~ _... "'0
..c t.O o.._~""O:::: >..:J QJ ~ QJ
.....Q) .."'ocu.... - cucu.....x
~.<: 1: <:: > '" -0 8...b (J 0...;::-=
~_.-cu~~~ ....OJ-==cv
o..QJa .QJcad~>,l;!d...o
'" <:: bO-o (J >.::: _ '" '" (J
<::.2 bO::: '" ~_._<.<:'" 0.9
-~c.t:> 'U- .......S2OJ
~"".,=QJO~C1J- ._....;...CI)
en 2 Q1 Cii c:: .... 1-.0 8 o...t:Q OJ as ~
.!::QJ"x:.::s:;oa a:;.-cuaJQJ
~-o "'..0 ~ ~ (J.9.<: S-o..o:::
7'
5
~
...
~
...
...
..l
...
~
~
...
'"
;J
:::
:l
7'
::l
...
~
)
~
~
~
,.
~
~
:l
')
:l
~
-.
-
0.. ~
... bO-o =;::l . -;::I
0::: ",' . -0 '" bO
~ jBaf "'>''''GlO-o.<: -o~6
_cu cncn"~CI)(JQJ~~,...o.....-::: ...c"'O"""-
~~~~OJ~QJd--=~~~Qj~~~
et.:I::3-0_::3U_>...OJ...... 0 U)-o 0..(1)
.... e cc 0";= td.~ o...z > :;j "'0 c::: "'0 ~ 0 he t:L. ~
~ >.~~(J0"~:::2(J2~a:;~0~"'~
~;..o <U~.!: COo ~<<s""o::: J-t..c: ctS ~...c"'O:J
~ ::'~ ~ oB ".~.:: E'" ,>. fa !; -;;; -0 bO-o .g S .9
;.... ........, s:; - i> CJ) t.O- ;> -0 s::: s::: "loIo '...
UI::~2~-~~:::2-o:::;::I"''''~!S'''~
.- ..... u _ -- tU QJ _ ..u..... CIJ C1J
. . -0..00 f!:.= ~ e ~ -0._ (J ",..0 ~ ~ '" ,>' ... .'"
.- 0 - U---QCU ~;::..C:_..
"'... "'-"'''''''~-'<:,>''' ~Gl '"
.~"O 0...~.9 ~ 0 i5.. -0 a g.. ~ ~ ~ c;;. ::: ::: ~ ~ ~
~o~-;.....oCJ)QJoc::'....~~u~:J_QJQJOJ
~O_OJOJ ~....o~J'I.c~c:>OJ=cc~
~~cc"'O-s:::u ~-'~.-u..c:o_- .-
=~~ ~","'~~~..o~d -=~~~bO
e:.obO .9~(Jb o~oo..!::~e.o<lfQ)~=r::
~CQ)~O~~~ ---~~-~0>(J-"'~
_ ...... "'" ..... -..., _ .... ._ H
._~Q)Q)--(J~~---~-~ o~~""'.-
-(I) -- eo u (J--~:"'c:-_<JJO
..::::--;> <<S <<s ce w 0 QJ QJ CU.-.-=: 0."'" ~ o..M..c--
C/) a ~ ~ ~ b~~.5..':.o..~ ~J::: a.~ ~~ ~~
~
Z~
~2
... '"
~ ...
..co~
~.;:: >.
'"
-",~..o
u ~
...... "'0 "'0
... ~
..a"'-
'" '"
>-. ..t:; :3
:EQJ(::i
::: u >
- '" ~
::J 'J:: Q)
... ::3
u",..o....:
o '"
."0 '" :::
-0",- 0
<:J l-o c:a._
-....- en
- '-l..t "'0 en
::J ..- CJ
en -a ::s........
::: J.,., 0 0
o ~ .- :...
U'''!:; Vi c..
i
; "
~ 0
~~
.s ..
12 .
~ Q.
" 0
<; ..
o '"
.0 C
g. ~
o .i
"
,
0;
.c
u
o
~
;c
-g "0
0;"
)
~
\
~
.... c- ~
.E ~ 0 == <If
tU bO=::~...c:
~~ ~E ~.....
0".-","0",0
_<1JS:;~ "i::'J::-
<::'<:0._",0::3'"
QJ-.J::t:::...;.;=cno
a.~-op. Gl~1:
~ bO 8 0 ~.<:..<: p.
we -eJ_.-"'O
._~>... ,-.....cu
...."0;> CJ 0 -.-:...
r::..- Q)..x- s....- >-.. t::
.sUl,- ~-o.......:
l-o"O=~Cf)O"'OCJr::
o 0 - .- "-..- :... .-
p.o.l9E-<...~p.p.'"
",>(J O~f!>-.p.
s:;;:;..~ci)1:cc -.....
:: bOO::.,g P..~ ~ 0
U) c ~.- x -... a:s 0......
0.- -~ .... en l-o 0 '"
..... ....,.....(1)0 0
E ~-5.z~~.;:: etu
evo.-teOCIJQJ ....
r=: J..o":::: QJ O...c: (U a ~
e- p.~ ~ ~E-<"O <:::.=
~-
(J l:
"C QJ
..0:::
= OJ
bO
a ...
:::.2
0",
om ("I")
~ QJ ..
(J bO '"
cnCC~
:a ~ ~
::: .-
QJ 0 :::
~ ..!:
..... = u
o c~
~ <:: ...
... 0
~cnr:
'" "
~E2
........QJt)
.. "'0 O_~QJ
'" 8- ~= ..0"0
<:.I:>., cuu<U....;""O::
~-~...:::<::u-'"
..:::: -'- ::JCU.___:::S
(I) 0 t'C t:: ..... ""'...... $..0 0"0
._ ,-1.........-taQJ....... QJ
:::",-::3 ;::I",-o.~.<:>
"'E~u~UP."'Cl"'o
Jro b.9:!u Q) ~~QJ ~E
......t:t)cn.:::..c QJ_:::QJ
o"'O:;.."tiQJ-CIJ..-z=t:1J..o
_ _ :... == ..... ..c - ........ ._ .,-
-- ~"'"::S-UlO",....
;.....dOCC.....O~OJ '"
_Q_t'CCIJ;U_ucn:..."'O~
....... d c.o'" (1) - -- ::s QJ 0 .....
~.~ ::: -.3 ::J gp ti QuO ~
u ;> :::s CI') 0 0'- - r: ;: r'
Xc:JQ~...c~c~:e ...'Z
<1JC:::ctSE-........::::CI')<1Jr-C(l3
"'_.-..... <::E-< "'"O~ 0'" .
~"':::o'" (J.- "'"0"0
-= _ J,..., (J _ ~ CI') ,u ttS '" '"
:::0 :'=bO:l .;::'" (J
...c 0 ~ >...- C 0 "'0 0 ~.S r:
-__cc._(1}O......CI')ca-
:;: 0 '" '" bO"O '" 0 "'.- ~ p.
>uu E'en'ViP:::~:2':: ~ ~
eo
c
.....
"'Cl
.....
CI)
"'Cl
o
o
~
--
- -_.- ..- q- ._---
'"
.s
..,
0;
"
o
~
'"
.s
u
o
~
'"
~
~
0"0
,~ _ C M <1J ~
..~... o<UU) U
<lIca I >cv .E::l
eo '" >-. 0 .<: "
.=.!:l.~ l:-oE-< '" -g '"
r--(I) ...o..QJ .'-ca
=Ui w bQlIl::::-o'Z
.~ ~ E.:: >-.> it g:, '" ~
r::ce"'O dnsfn::l
I:.Qr'CI)--r: .......aso
;:::o..w CI) S!-Z-::l~..c:
._CI),...--ctlOU
"'Oc::'Z~ ""OuOJ~
-ti) ...~._ ~ u_~,"O_
...... to 0 e.o_ OJ "'0 _ .. _
vr' ._-""""J-,,--
0.= <:: 5~ ~ ",.> 0
O"'OQ) ,t:;--t><1J
"'.0; > ~-ci x bO",::3
...- QJ..cQJ~t:t:-
to ~ .......... to-.- 0 t'tS
....-QJU) "'0_>
-.::1...... r: U) -_.... to cc
.u .;:::.- ra 1-0 bO U) tU _~ t:
",._I::<!J::3:::~(J...o>-'
_...o"O._V.-O '"
O"c::CI')......u~O-......-c
OJ ~ ~ ~ -~ Ci ~ ~.~ ~ ~_
p::: c:; s::; tnu u;> ct:,.C......
--
-
"'.....
'" ~
OJ-
> bO
'" ::3
'" $?
~'Z
o >-.
1::-
>.ce
'" ~
S .iio
:::.;::
::3 0
... '"
-
.
-
U)
(j
z
-
Q
...J
-
::l
l':l
>-
~
o
U)
U)
t:l
U
U
<:
~
t:l
Z
Q
Z
<:
CI)
z
o
-
t-<
-
Q
Q
<:
<I)
;:
o
"1:l
...
...
....
~
ra ~ ~
= '" :gi:cv
-- - 0-
CU 0.0_ t:.O~ 0 ""CS =
~.i:<<sS::OU'J~~
>O';::=S.......-O
"CV~gj Oi:cv
"'..._.....J:_ _
Q)'-~'" ........ <U >-..
tt)-etJ>..~--
:J""tj C:":::~=CI)
O:::'"Cjcv...-.....QJ
._-._-_cuo-
-~.......-caO'" -
tJ.J::CU3: M-<U::
'-CI)<U CV......Ns:;
OJ-. ta~"O::::::~ OJ
.......CD.......CUCUOJ
.~"o 'tn.S !>OS ~ s
-8...cuQ)Q)=<U
- <U-..c:u -
.s i: f;::~ E-<JS] ~
Ul>.~CV .o..<uo
i:::: i:.o r::;1;...... u
o '" 0"0 00"0"0
"0 J-.'"Cj-=~.o- Q)
.s~=g:ar::>g;l
>0,)---"'0-- -0
;::... bO~U; ctI :=.EUi..=
~
.g
,!i
:::
"
g
'"
b
o
~
"6
Q
~
ctl
....
o
o
Cl
-......
-.-
~
.- >.
tJ ~ ~=..;
.;::; ;g"Ocv.~:ll
.E o-:E<.J1-o
.Ul... .-:1 -- ~ Ui
CD> 0.....-
..c:.-:: Q)..c:: ctS fJ) QJ
<U..... 1-0 en 0... QJ ...t::
....oO"U)soJ'.....
0~~s8~g
~ ".I:: Q) eo:: en 0 s...
8 a::-'- ......c;......
u~"O 0 CV
---tf.)"O0 C1J_
v"o ....."O..c;.o
J-. s::-~ -.-
o._~ QJ.......~
-Ccv;::s-ciOio>
.8;uOJ8.!!<u
X cv.o >."
QJ <U _ -- 0....... CU
CI)'- a... J..t ct)
CV::J..c;uo >.
.....otJ~tJQJQJ
.-_.. =..c;..c;
t"""I_<u"O.___
ctl
......
<t:
....
....
c:J
....
<t:
~
CI) '"0 ~
r::_ ~
O::s:=:
-Zoca .9
'-..c: ::l~
;::l",o-oCV
V ~
<<S CI) oJ ... ~
........ b.O_ 0 0 .
o .5 ~o ...c ~
0)"0 Ul u !>O.o
u= OJ "0 c.;;
C ::s ~ s:::::: CU
~..o"""'<O.~~
ca >-,..c CU >< ......
OJ s... .-::: l-o QJ s::
0..0>:3 0) CV
o..cn;>- ......
caUl Q) x-:S x
CU_OJ <1J
I-lU..a-s:;
OU._ "'cUi
._ n1 - ~
1-0 CUOU'J-E
CV i: 0.._... - a::
~ EUla::
~~o~.~to
~~UE~QJ
- - llJ._ E -
t-<"'.Q"o -=
.....~t:: aJ b.O~"O~
~ONCC.~ ]=Z_"=
O).;;;<=: i:'O :a~o......
>-"N_.QJ_J-. S:;-UicccuO
cc--__-<Utntl3 ,...",
E CD.__.~..::: E u....... C:'Z_
~ ~ E2: go~" CV o~"O (5
--=QJ 0.. ~=Cf)cus::=
e.o.-ClJ.Cf) ,...IQ)-teU
<=:<:i:3] <u-ci.SX'~.8 ~ ~
:a ~ e to"O ~ 0..0 ~ ~ e.J C
.- E qJ :::: CV .... r::...... s::"O r:: 0
en ..cce,...,.::::I.._\JQJ_ U
..c;.- 0-"0 s::.... ::J"CV
"08 >.bOu ~ cv.... <u CV 0-"0
=.5 CJ"'O J-o CIJ r::~..c=:;,,:
'> tJ""C > Q) ... 0"- tn....... .; ....
.. <UX'''' '" Ul..n ~...."o"' 0.. 0)
cn .- ..., CI) ..., ~ ~
!>Ocv_..c; _ >.(l s:: c:::; Ul >-:::
r:: 0 ct1 cn(j ~_ QJ OJ u r::;>-
.-......r::"O......~uE~ Oce"';
C/)_.-r:;cd--_ ~...a..::::: ~
:3-.~cv E !>Ox:a> 0) u:2 <=:
r:::3...l:: r::CV Ul~Oo
OJ .~ 0 u.- r:: OJ' --ci ::3 l-o > N
,- ....... '"1""'1 - _ ", _'_
- '- (1J \J ~ == C!J >. OJ C!J Z '.. 1-...
>--..c;r::XE-~"'''-uo
;::""'O_CO:C!J -::::cn::ico:.:::_..::::
""
o
>,
~
....
......
....
..0
....
....
<t:
0..
;:::
...
o
U
-- .-
_.- .-
- -
-
o
to
"
"
:z:
.!
.g
o
Cl
I
1
"0
..
.!!
...
\
-
"
...
E
..
a
<.J
LO
""
I
earn t.o.-
-.... - <=: ...
"O.::CJoJo-l <lI~.uo
OJ.......cn._'"'""' 1-...0a1.=
Cl)O-.....oaJ-.z::~-:.a
r:: 8 o:a 0 ;g s:: fr"O
~QJ..="'OJ.-o QJ.....:J-.t'tS
U e eoC':3O'.9 S:!.~ J..o QJ
00_> _"0)_
o te.t:,;> QJ (l)......E"Oz
~ tt) u; <lJ' 0..:::....... a1'0; .-
'" cv - = >.- 0 c: _ ...
,-X ... Os;;;;-CJ
QJ - OJ QJ "'d J.-o Q. ..c
>- ..c""-QJ4.lU:>
te"-CJ-a1~J....ct$ ;:.
..::;-.=: s..,~ 0> 0-5.9........
. Oi> - ......0
CIlcn.......... ~ OJ 0
rn J..o a (!) J..o ~ Q) CI) C J..o
._t'tS _CJoE::sca
"CV",.Q"O __ ;:!>O
CV>''''<utii>'~"O r::_
-:e OJ_=:::: C OOUl C 0:'=-0
5..c.~ <<1> 0 c.::: m~.~~
~ 1-... u.- aJ.~ X 0
......0 J-. 'CJ r= c@a3(1)"'>.QJo
OJ - ...... ". > ~ 1-...
o>r.::o..., ..c:oCCOJ
I"'J :::: ..cO~,...'-..c(1)
'"'"' 0 _ s:: ~ u .. _ r:: ~ _...
-
- -
-
-
-
ATTACHMENT G
PUBLICA nONS SUBMITTED WITH APPEAL
"\":~'-'::~:
"<:'
....~ ~,'<
,,-"
----- '
/
"",,,,,,
,.,'
.-
~ . ' "
..'
------- .
--
------ "
.--
.....
--
-'--
--
--
....
II!"!'.
Composite siding vs. James Hardie siding
Choosing house siding from James Hardie makes sense. It provides low
maintenance, while resisting shrinking and swelling, so it holds paint much
longer than wood composite siding or engineered wood. No wonder it's
protecting over 3.5 million homes in North America alone.
Guaranteed for up
to 50
years, even in the
most
severe climates on
earth.
Resists shrinking
and swelling so
it holds paint
longer than wood.
Resistant to
termites
and other pests
known to cause
damage.
James Hardie
Wood Based
Sidin~
Rot caused by
severe
moisture exposure
IS a
common problem
in
composite siding.
Shrinks and swells
when
exposed to
moisture
which causes paint
to
crack and flake.
:
Wood Siding is
subject to decay
and pests.
http://www.jameshardie.com/homeowner/prodcomp/vhardboard.php
Weather Resistance
Paint Durability
-'"';";';-~-"<:;.'.....
~1f~~.::c'~~
,..,-~ ", ~--.-r,,, .."
~-}~
'.::'~%f~I'_~"~Y'!
Pest Resistance
- .
~
-.., - ---___.__1
Page I of I
RECEIVED
JAN 2 j 2007
COMMUNllY /JEW' I , '~"""
BY .u, lHCh,
--,..---....
1/22/2007
,
1("'"
'At' Z )"'-
J \ jl-.I
--
--..
A~\k";;:t'"
~-'III-
=- - I
'"
(' ;(,
,,;
.,.
.. "
.. .t-
\ 1
~.----
I.~~~.~~:
........ III. .. ~
.~~'~~
.._~----::~--====-~
---==-~-===-~--
--
~
0. !
~
!-
-- """'!
~
o\fi
IJ""!
m'"':
!":'!':
;::;
..,
"
~.
'-
The planned construction in large and construction processes.
remodeling projects is normally Airoom senior vice president Rick
time-consuming altd complex _ Ehrensaft says they were commissioned tQ.
enough, with8Ut ddditionar factors ham. extensively extend and refit an older house
peTing progress. Unearthing some major in a very traditional and staid community.
problem during construction is every The owners wanted a New England
renovator's nightmare. style home - something colonial and
So it was probably surprising to the homey, he says. They were very particu-
people of Lake Forest, IL, to hear that lar about their requirements and offered
design-build company Airoom wanted intricate design ideas. Inside, these can-
so fervently to use a particular product, it tributed to the large, new colonial-style
took its case to the local authority, despite kitchen, a new master suite and the reno-
the fact that it would hold up the design vation of the children's bedrooms and
T rendsideas.com/g ol34141info
bathrooms. As far as the extl'l'illi' II.'
concerned, the homeowners illll1lt'lli,II,'!
diOse ]alHes..Hardie's lap ~idili:'" \11 I ,II
play in Airoom's showroom.
"In Lake Forest, there wen' ...(Ii, I I''''',
lations about the conformity ()I .111]11' 'I' , I
and about how each hotlll' dill" 1,",1 II"
esthetic of the communilv," 1111"11 III
says. "As such, the honll'~'I\'rl"i111 1",,1
brick, wood or cedar shinglt' _"idill~'.
A supporter of Htl!"dipl.lld. I Ii. '
cement lap siding, Airooll1 I,ll",." I" I ,I
its case to those who nHlId ,1l,111'," II,
-.-
regulations. Because the local authority
members did not know the product, the
company took along a scale model of how
the home would appear and outlined the
product's history and characteristics.
It was not only its durability, insula-
tion properties and life-time guarantee
that caught the attention of board mem-
bers, but also its fire-rating - an important
factor in a heavily wooded community.
"Hardiplanklap siding was overwhelm-
ingly accepted by the board members. They
were all very impressed," Ehrensaft says.
Theprojectproceeded withHardiplank
lap siding pre-stained in a custom yellow
hlcnd ;nst~ll,=d on the 62CGsq ft house.
Wooden eaves, copper downpipes, period
style light fixtures and other colonial style
detailing complement the siding.
"The pre-staining process saves a lot of
time in the final preparation of the home,"
Ehrensaft says. "And, other contractors
were equally impressed at how easy it was
to work around."
Hardiplank lap siding resists rotting,
cracking, damage from rain, hail and
---
---
----
---
PrflCflding page: This home has been extended
from 3700sq It to 6200sq ft by Airoom Design II:
Build, tt includ3s ilfOeCOOd level!."d a complete refit
inside,
Facing ".9.: Hardiplan~ lap siding contributes to
the home's colonial look. Because it is made from
fiber cement, it does not succumb to the elements
as many wood products can, Lighting fixtures
kindly supplied by Artistic Lighting Designs.
Above: As there were only certain siding products
eccepted by the local authority, Airoom's first
challenge was to get the regulations changed.
See related information at Trendsldeas.com/gol3414/info
Above: On this home, pre-stained Hardiplank lap
siding was specified. It was a custom yellow blend
Rroduc;ed by James Hliudie. All pre-stained Jamf"l.
Hardie siding products are available with a 15-
year paint warranty. Since the regulation change,
Airoom Design 81 Build has used James Hardie
fiber cement products on many other homes in the
neighborhood.
Facing page: James Hardie also offers shingles,
panels, soffits and trim for exterior use - all with
the same properties 8S Hardiplank lap siding. There
is also Hardlbackere for use in wet areas inside, and
Hardipipee for civil work.
See related information at Trendsideas.com/go/3414/info
,'.
flying debris, and is non-combustible. It
can be color matched to any shade.
"AiJoori+-:,giYcs a ten-year- guarantee
on its work and a IS-year guarantee on all
structural components. The reason we rec-
ommend Hardiplank lap siding is because
it matches what we offer," Ehrensaft says.
Contact James Hardie Building
Products, phone (888) JHARDIE (542 7343),
fax (949) 3671294. Email:info@jameshardie.
com. Website: www.jameshardie.com. Or,
contact AiroOID, phone (847) 763 1100, fax
(847) 763 1101. Website: www.airoom.com.
jh - -, ""fE
----
-;......---~
. ~ ~ James Hardiee
~ ; I. Siding Products
. 26300 La Alamed",-SUile250
Mission Viejo, California, 92691
Telephone: 1-866-4-HARDIE
www.jameshardie.com
ATTACHMENT H
RESOLUTION NO. 4051
RESOLUTION NO. 4051
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TUSTIN, UPHOLDING THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S DECISION DISALLOWING
THE USE OF FIBERCEMENT SIDING ON THE
STRUCTURE APPROVED BY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
ACTION 05-007 AND LOCATED AT 200 SOUTH "An
STREET
The Planning Commission does hereby resolve as follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
A. That a proper request was submitted by Michelle Young, requesting to
appeal the Community Development Director's decision to disallow the
use of fibercement siding on a detached two (2) car garage with second
story game room that is currently under construction on a Single Family
Residential (R-1) zoned property improved with an A-Rated dwelling in the
Cultural Resource (CR) Overlay District located at 200 South "A" Street;
B. That the project was originally submitted with plans showing redwood
siding matching the siding used on the historic residence and the plans
were approved by Zoning Administrator Action 05-007;
C. That the Planning Commission has reviewed the submitted brochures and
material boards for Certainteed WeatherBoards™ Fibercement Siding;
D. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held for said
application on February 12, 2007, by the Planning Commission;
E. That the fibercement sample provided would not be an appropriate
substitute for the redwood siding approved for the project in that it does
not comply with the City's Certificate of Appropriateness findings required
for approval of improvements in the CR district as follows:
1. The proposed work does not conform to the Municipal Code and
design standards which may be established from time to time by
the Historic Resource Committee. Specifically, the proposal is not
consistent with the City's Residential Design Guidelines for the
Cultural Resource District intended to "preserve, protect and
enhance the existing historic character and culturally significant
structures within the Cultural Resources District." The existing
historic dwelling on the site is of Colonial Revival architectural style
and exhibits typical character-defining features including narrow
clapboard siding which is identified in the Design Guidelines. The
Exhibit A
Resolution No. 4051
Appeal of Community Development Director Decision
Page 2
proposed fibercement siding is not a superior character-defining
material feature to the wood siding used on the dwelling. The
proposal is not consistent with the "Additions and New Accessory
Buildings" section of the Guidelines which states that the exterior
appearance of new accessory buildings should be compatible with
the style, quality, dimensions, and texture of materials on the
existing house. The fibercement board dimensions and style would
not maintain beveled or rounded edge characteristics or gradation
in width exhibited by the wood siding on the historic residence.
2. The proposed work would adversely affect the character of the
District or designated cultural resources within the District.
The approval of fibercement siding for the project could set a
precedent requiring the City to approve it for use on other
properties, including properties designated on the City's Historical
Survey. The Design Guidelines note that the appearance of wood-
sided houses helps define the historical character of the District.
The inconsistent use of wood and fibercement siding at other
historic properties could affect the character of the District as a
whole.
3. The proposed work is not harmonious with the existing
surroundings. The project has been evaluated in terms of its
appropriateness of materials, scale, size, height, placement and
use of the new building or structure in relationship to existing
buildings and structures and the surrounding setting.
The project is also not consistent with the City's Design Guidelines
which state that "the exterior appearance of additions and new
accessory buildings should be compatible with the style, quality,
dimension, texture and color of materials on the existing house."
The proposed departure from the use of wood siding as used on
the existing on-site dwelling and on-survey listed dwellings
throughout the District, would fragment of the integrity of the
District.
F. This project is statutorily exempt pursuant to Section 15270 of the California
Code of Regulations (Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality
Act).
II. The Planning Commission hereby upholds the Community Director's Decision to
disallow the use of fibercement siding on the project approved by Zoning
Administrator Action 05-007 and located at 200 South "A" Street.
Exhibit A
Resolution No. 4051
Appeal of Community Development Director Decision
Page 3
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin at a regular
meeting on the 12th day of February, 2007.
BRETT FLOYD
Chairperson
ELIZABETH A. BINSACK
Planning Commission Secretary
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
City ofTustin )
I, Elizabeth A. Binsack, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Planning
Commission Secretary of the City of Tustin, California' that the Resolution No. 4051 was
duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held
on the 12th day of February, 2007.
ELIZABETH A. BINSACK
Planning Commission Secretary