HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 07-31RESOLUTION NO. 07-31
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING THE
FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR TEN-
TATIVE TRACT MAP 17080 AND DESIGN REVIEW 06-
011, A PROPOSAL TO MERGE TWO PARCELS DEVEL-
OPED WITH 57 APARTMENT UNITS INTO ONE 4 -ACRE
SITE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW 75 -UNIT CONDO-
MINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 14421 "TO 14471 RED
HILL AVENUE
The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows:
I. The City Council finds and determines as follows:
A. The applicant (Sun -Cal Red Hill LLC) has requested to merge two proper-
ties currently developed with 57 apartment units into one 4 -acre site for
development of a new 75 -unit condominium project. The properties are
located at 14421 to 14471 Red Hill Avenue;
B. That the requested tentative tract map and design review are considered
a "project" subject to the terms of the California Environmental Quality Act
("CEQA") (Pub. Resources Code 921000 et. seq.);
C. That City staff prepared an Initial Study to evaluate the potential environ-
mental impacts associated with Tentative Tract Map 17080 and Design
Review 06-011 that concluded that with mitigation measures potential sig-
nificant impacts can be reduced to a level of insignificance and a draft
Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared;
D. That a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration was
published and the Negative Declaration and Initial Study were made
available for a 20 -day public review and comment period from February
16, 2007, to March 7, 2007, in compliance with Sections 15072 and
15105 of the State CEQA Guidelines;
E. A comment letter was received from Orange County Transit Authority
(OCTA). At this time, no public roadway construction would be required
due to the scope of the project and the recommended bus turnout was
noted for future road widening project for which additional environmental
documents would be prepared;
F. That the City Council is the final authority for the project and will consider
the MND prior to action on Tentative Tract Map 17080; and,
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 1 of 163
G. The Planning Commission considered the Initial Study and the Mitigated
Negative Declaration (MND) on March 13, 2007, and adopted the MND
with Resolution No. 4053.
II. The City Council hereby adopts Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for
Tentative Tract Map 17080 and Design Review 06-011, attached hereto as Exhibit A,
and adopts a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, attached hereto as Exhibit
B.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council held
on the 20th day of March, 2007.
LOU BONPV
Mayor
ATTEST:
Ted
PAMELA STOKER,
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS
CITY OF TUSTIN )
I, Pamela Stoker, City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin,
California, do hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council of
the City of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 07-31 was duly
passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, held on the 20th day
of March, 2007, by the following vote:
COUNCILMEMBER AYES:
COUNCILMEMBER NOES: None (0)
COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: None (0)
C NCILMEMBER ABSENT: None (0)
.,.
. N
PAMELA STOKER,
City Clerk
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 2 of 163
INITIAL STUDY
A. BACKGROUND
Project Title:
Lead Agency:
Lead Agency
Contact Person:
Project Location:
Project Sponsor's
Name and Address:
General Plan Designation:
Zoning Designation:
Project Description:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA 91780
(714) 573-3100
Red Hill Town Homes
City of Tustin
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, California 92780
Minoo Ashabi Phone: (714) 573-3126
14421-14471 Red Hill Avenue
SunCal- Red Hill LLC
c/o Southwind Realty Group
18301 Von Karman, Suite 710
Irvine, CA 92612
High Density Residential
Multiple Family Residential (R-3)
A request to demolish two existing apartment complexes containing 57 units on a
4 -acre site and redeveloping the site with 75 three story condominium units
Surrounding Uses:
North: residential and office use East: commercial
South: commercial West: residential
Other public agencies whose approval is required:
® Orange County Fire Authority ❑ City of Irvine
❑ Orange County Health Care Agency ❑ City of Santa Ana
❑ South Coast Air Quality Management ❑ Orange County
District EMA
❑ Other
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 3 of 163
B. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected b this project, involving Y p ro' > gat least one
impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist in Section D below.
ElLand Use and Planning
[:]Population and Housing
RGeological Problems
RWater
DAir Quality
ElTransportation &Circulation
[:]Biological Resources
❑Energy and Mineral Resources
C. DETERMINATION:
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
❑Hazards
F�Noise
OPublic Services
FlUtilities and Service
Systems
E]Aesthetics
E]Cultural Resources
FIRecreation
E]Mandatory Findings of
Significance
El I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant '
gn effect on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
® I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect '
J g on the environment, there will
not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet
have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will bere ared.
p p
❑ I find that the proposed project MAY havea significant effect ect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) g on the environment, but at least one
i
effect 1) has been adequately analyzed n an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards an
pp g d
2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached
sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated."
� g
An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must y
analyze only the effects that
remain to be addressed.
y
❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL
NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated
pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the
proposed project.
❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant
. p, .p J g t effect on the environment, there WILL
NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1 have been an
. g ) analyzed
adequately in an earlier NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and
Pp 2) have
been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier NEGATIVE DECLARATION includingv'0
revisions or
mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project.
Preparers Minoo Ashabi Title Associate Planner
l�2�(' Date .7••S -=dam
R�AMl�tli`�A.�[t�ack, Community Development Director
Page 4 of 163
I. AESTHETICS — Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not
limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings
within a state scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or
quality of the site and its surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining
whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant
environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the
California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment
Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of
Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts
on agriculture and farmland. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland
of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps
prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-
agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a
Williamson Act contract?
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which,
due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
III. AIR OUALITY: Where available, the significance
criteria established by the applicable air quality management
or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the
following determinations. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable
air quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially
to an existing or projected air quality violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -
attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air
quality standard (including releasing emissions, which exceed
quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number
of people?
0
Less Than
0
0
0
Significant
El
Z
Potentially
With
Less Than
�
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Impact
Incorporation
Impact
No Impact
❑
❑
❑
El
El
®
❑
0
0
0
0
0
0
El
Z
El
a
❑
�
El
El
0
11
0
0
Z
0
0 0 0 a
El El 0 El
O O Z ❑
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 5 of 163
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: - Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a
candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat
or other sensitive natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected
wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or
other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance?
fl Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or
other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation
plan?
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: - Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of
a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of
an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside of formal cemeteries?
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: - Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death
involving:
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 6 of 163
Less Than
Significant _
Potentially With Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact
El 1:1 1:1 0
El
ED
11
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the
most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map
issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of
Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction?
iv) Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or
that would become unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B
of the Uniform Building Code (2001), creating substantial
risks to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of
septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where
sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water?
VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS:
Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of
hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter
mile of an existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government
Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport, would the project result in
a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project
area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing
or working in the project area?
Less Than
Significant
Potentially With Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact
O O O �
❑ ❑ Resol ter' n No. 07-31Z_
age 7"Of 163
El
El
El
Z
El
El
El
0
O O O �
❑ ❑ Resol ter' n No. 07-31Z_
age 7"Of 163
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences
are intermixed with wildlands?
VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER OUALITY: — Would
the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would
be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local
groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-
existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not
support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits
have been granted)?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial
erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on -
or off-site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the
capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems
or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures
which would impede or redirect flood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death involving flooding as a result of the failure of a
levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
k) Potentially impact stormwater runoff from construction
activities?
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 8 of 163
El 1:1 1:1 0
1:1 11 E] 0
1:1 11 11 0
Less Than
O
�
Significant
El
Potentially
With
Less Than
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Impact
Incorporation
Impact No Impact
❑
1:1
1:1 0
El 1:1 1:1 0
1:1 11 E] 0
1:1 11 11 0
4
❑
O
�
El
0
0
0
0
El
13
El
0
D
0
0
0
4
❑
O
�
El
0
0
0
0
1) Potentially impact stormwater runoff from post -
construction activities?
m) Result in a potential for discharge of stormwater
pollutants from areas of material storage, vehicle or equipment
fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including
washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling or
storage, delivery areas, loading docks or other outdoor work
areas?
n) Result in a potential for discharge of stormwater to affect
the beneficial uses of the receiving waters?
o) Create the potential for significant changes in the flow
velocity or volume of stormwater runoff to cause
environmental harm?
p) Create significant increases in erosion of the project site
or surrounding areas?
IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING — Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan,
local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the
purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or
natural community conservation plan?
X. MINERAL RESOURCES — Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of value to the region and the residents
of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general
plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
XI. NOISE —
Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in
excess of standards established in the local general plan or
noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive
groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
1:1 El E] Z
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 9 of 163
Less Than
Significant
Potentially
With
Less Than
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Impact
Incorporation
Impact No Impact
❑
❑
® ❑
1:1 El E] Z
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 9 of 163
❑
o
�
o
El
El
1:1 El E] Z
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 9 of 163
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels
in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport, would the project expose
people residing or working in the project area to excessive
noise levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excess noise levels?
XII.POPULATION AND HOUSING — Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either
directly (for example, by proposing new homes. and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of
roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of new or physically
altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically
altered governmental facilities, the construction of which
could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public services:
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 10 of 163
Less Than
Significant
Potentially
With
Less Than
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Impact
Incorporation
Impact
No Impact
a
a
®
a
a
a
®
a
El
XIV. RECREATION —
a) Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require
the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which
might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC — Would the project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation
to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system
(i.e. result in a substantial increase in either the number of
vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or
congestion at intersections)?
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of
service standard established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either
an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results
in substantial safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g.
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses
(e.g., farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity?
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS —
1:1 1:1 0 E-]
Less Than
Significant
0
Potentially
With
Less Than
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Impact
Incorporation
Impact No Impact
1:1 1:1 0 E-]
Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? E3
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects? E3
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 11 of 163
0
F-1
ri
11
Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? E3
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects? E3
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 11 of 163
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or
expanded entitlements needed?
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in
addition to the provider's existing commitments?
0 Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity
to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of
a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects
of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the
effects of probable future projects)?
c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
S. C W MIN00'Acd Hill CondoskRal Hill Townhotncs- initial study.doc
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 12 of 163
Less Than
1:1
Significant
Potentially
With
Less Thad
Signlf cant
Mitigation
Significant
Impact
Incorporation
Impact No htipact
1:1
1:1
El 0
1:1
El
El
0
z
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 17080
DESIGN REVIEW 06-11
RED HILL TOWN HOMES
BACKGROUND
The property is located within the Multiple Family Residential (R-3) zoning district and High
Density Residential land use designation. The site is surrounded by commercial uses on the south
and east, an office building and residential uses on the north, and a residential neighborhood on
the west. The proposed site includes two parcels that are currently developed with two apartment
complexes including 57 units known as Whispering Woods and Tustin Terrace Apartments. The
Whispering Woods site is 1.87 acres and contains 27 units with two story buildings, and the Tustin
Terrace site is 2.14 acres and includes 30 one story apartments. All existing units at the site are
proposed to be demolished. To redevelop the site with 75 condominium units, a tentative tract map
and a design review application need to be approved for subdivision of the land and the site and
building designs. This analysis evaluates the environmental impacts of the proposed project for 75
units in comparison with the existing 57 unit apartment complex.
The site is designed to include seven 4-plex buildings, seven 5-plex buildings and two 6-plex
buildings designed as town homes with garage access through alleys. One main entrance is provided
to the site from Red Hill Avenue, and the buildings are proposed parallel to Walnut Avenue. A pool
and recreation area are provided across from the main entry. The proposed condominiums are three
stories with the exception of the units along the residential properties on the west that are designed
with two stories and a loft. The units include two bedrooms and a loft or three bedrooms and range
in size from 1,637 square feet to 1,997 square feet.
I. AESTHETICS
Items a, & b — No Impact.
The subject property is not located on a scenic vista. The property is a 4 -acre parcel
currently developed with two story and one story apartment buildings and is surrounded
by developed parcels. Significant landscaping is provided along Red Hill Avenue and
Walnut Avenue, most of which will be preserved until future road widening projects.
Additional trees and landscaping would be provided with emphasis at the corner and
project entry. The proposed project would not disturb any trees, rock outcroppings, or
historical buildings, and the site is not located on a State scenic highway.
Item c & d —Less than Significant Impact:
The project would involve construction of new three story residential buildings and
would change the visual character of the area. The existing apartments were developed in
the 1960s and appear as dated architecture; therefore, redevelopment of the site would
enhance the visual characteristics of the area with new and contemporary structures and
new landscaping. Since the site is adjacent to a residential neighborhood on the west,
separated with a narrow buffer, the applicant has placed the buildings ten feet from the
property line which is a five foot increase from the minimum side yard setback. Although
the project proposes three story structures to replace existing one story and two story
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 13 of 163
Red Hill Town Homes
TTM 17080
DR 06-011
Page 2
structures, the proposed buildings have been designed to be sensitive to the existing
neighboring residences. Specifically, units along the residential property line have been
designed at two stories with a loft that are five feet lower in height than other proposed
units on the site. To provide a green screen, significant landscaping in the form of up-
right trees is proposed on the west and north along the residential and commercial
properties. In addition, no balconies will be located on the west and the window openings
are smaller in size and carefully placed to minimize intrusion of privacy on the adjacent
existing residential properties. A shade and shadow study was provided comparing shade
and shadow effects on the adjacent properties with existing conditions and proposed
development during December at 9:00 a.m. and 12:00 a.m. when the longest shadows are
experienced (Exhibit 3). The study reflects the proposed height increase and new
landscaping along the westerly property line. Since the scope of the project meets the
City's multiple family zoning standards and additional measures to mitigate height and
aesthetic impacts associated with the new development has been incorporated, the project
is not expected to result in significant aesthetic impacts. With the proposed setback,
staggered building height, and design considerations, visual and shade impacts to the
adjacent properties will be reduced to a level of insignificance.
The project is designed to adhere to all of the City's development standards with respect
to setbacks, height, parking standards and landscaping guidelines and the City's Private
Street Improvement Standards.
The proposed condominium complex would generate new light sources with the
installation of new exterior lighting for streets, alleys, landscape areas, patios, and
parking areas. However, the new sources of light would not adversely affect day- or
night-time views in the area since the number of lights would be compatible with a
typical residential project and would be required to comply with the City's security code
standards. In addition, all lights would be required to be arranged so that no direct rays
would shine onto adjacent properties.
Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: Compliance with existing rules and regulations
is not mitigation under CEQA. Consequently, no mitigation is required.
Sources: Submitted Plans
Tustin City Code Section 8103(w)15'
Private Street Standards
Tustin Security Ordinance
Submitted Plans
Field Inspection
II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES
Items a, b & c — No Impact:
The project site is currently improved with residential buildings and surrounded by other
developed residential, commercial, and office buildings. The proposed project will have
no impacts on any farmland, nor will it conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 14 of 163
Red Hill Town Homes
TTM 17080
DR 06-011
Page 3
a Williamson Act contract. The proposed project will not result in the conversion of
farmland to a non-agricultural use.
Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: None Required
Sources: Tustin General Plan
Field Inspection
Submitted Plans
111. AIR QUALITY
Items a, b, c, d & e — Less Than Significant Impact:
The project will temporarily increase the amount of short-term emissions to the area due
to the proposed demolition, grading, and construction activities at the property. Since the
site is relatively flat, only minor grading will .be required. Redevelopment of the site
would result in 18 additional residential units that is well below the thresholds of
significance established by Tables 6-2 (operation thresholds) and 6-3 (construction
thresholds) of the Air Quality Management District's CEQA Air Quality Handbook,
which notes that construction of fewer than 297 condominium units is not considered a
significant impact. In addition, cumulative construction within the area does not exceed
the established thresholds. Less than significant short-term emissions associated with
demolition, grading, construction, and operation of the proposed project will comply with
the regulations of the South Coast Air Quality Management District and the City of
Tustin Grading Manual, which include requirements for dust control. As such, the
proposed project will not create a significant impact related to air quality.
Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: Compliance with existing rules and
regulations is not mitigation under CEQA. Consequently, no mitigation is required
Sources: South Coast Air Quality Management District Rules & Regulations
Air Quality Management District's CEQA Air Quality Handbook
City of Tustin Grading Manual
Project Application
Field Inspection
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Items a, b, c, d, e & f -- No Impact:
The project site is currently improved with residential buildings and surrounded by other
developed residential, commercial, and office buildings. The site is not inhabited by any
sensitive species of animals and would have no impacts on animal populations, diversity
of species, or migratory patterns. No wetlands exist within the project site. No impacts to
any unique, rare, or endangered species of plant or animal life identified in local or regional
plans, policies, or regulations by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service would occur as a result of this project.
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 15 of 163
Red Hill Town Homes
TTM 17080
DR 06-011
Page 4
Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: None Required
Sources: Field Inspection
Submitted Plans
Tustin General Plan
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES
Items a — No Impact:
The project site is currently improved with residential buildings built in the 1960s and
surrounded by other developed residential, commercial, and office buildings. The
property is not located in an area where any cultural or historic resources have been
identified on the site.
Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: None
Items b, c & d - Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation
The proposed project is redevelopment of an existing residential site and not located in an
area with undisturbed land. However, as a standard grading condition of approval, if
buried resources are found during grading within the project area, a qualif ed archaeologist
would need to assess the resource and recommend appropriate mitigation. The Native
American viewpoint would be considered during this process. With the mitigation
g
measures listed below, potential impacts to archeological resources would be reduced to
less than significant.
Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required:
• If buried resources are found during grading within the project area, a qualified
archaeologist would need to assess the site significance and perform the appropriate
mitigation. The Native American viewpoint shall be considered during this process.
This could include testing or data recovery. Native American consultation shall also
be initiated during this process.
Sources: Submitted Plans
Tustin General Plan
VI. GEOLOGY & SOILS
Items a -ii, a -iii, & b — Less Than Significant Impact:
The proposed buildings will be located within an area of the City that is known to contain
expansive soils which may subject people or structures to strong seismic ground shaking
and seismic -related ground failure including liquefaction. However, a soils report is
required to be submitted prior to issuance of building permits per the 2001 California
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 16 of 163
Red Hill Town Homes
TTM 17080
DR 06-011
Page 5
Building Code to demonstrate compliance with Chapter 18, which requires proper
excavation and fills for buildings, structures, foundations, and retaining structures, and
appropriate construction techniques to ensure seismic stability in sites depending on their
soils or geological concerns. No significant impact is anticipated since the project must
comply with the 2001 Uniform Building Code related to Chapter 18.
Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: Compliance with existing rules and
regulations is not mitigation under CEQA. Consequently, no mitigation is required
Sources: Tustin General Plan
Tustin Grading Manual
2001 California Building Code Chapter 16 and 18
Project Application
Field Evaluation
Items a -i, a -iv, c, d, & e — No Impact:
The project site is not located within an area identified as a fault zone on the Alquist-
Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map. However, a soils report is required to be submitted
prior to issuance of building permits per the 2001 California Building Codi; to
demonstrate compliance with Chapter 18, which requires proper excavation and fills for
buildings, structures, foundations, and retaining structures, and appropriate construction
techniques to ensure seismic stability in sites depending on their soils or geological
concerns. The project will be required to be engineered to withstand unstable soils,
possible landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, or collapse as they relate to the this
specific site. Since all new buildings in the City are required to operate on the existing
sewer system, the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems will not
be necessary.
Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: Compliance with existing rules and
regulations is not mitigation under CEQA. Consequently, no mitigation is required
Sources: Tustin General Plan
Tustin City Code
2001 California Building Code Chapter 16 and 18
California Seismic Hazard Zone Map, Tustin Quadrangle, January 17, 2001
Project Application
Field Evaluation
VII. HAZARDS & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Items a, b, c, d, e, f, g, and h — No Impact:
The proposed project involves construction of 75 condominium units. No storage or
transport of hazardous materials are anticipated from the proposed residential
development. The project would not result in exposure to hazardous substances other
than the possibility of household hazardous waste which residents could properly dispose
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 17 of 163
Red Hill Town Homes
TTM 17080
DR 06-011
Page 6
of at approved County drop-off locations. A residential project is not anticipated to store
or emit hazardous materials which could create a hazard to the adjacent properties,
school, or the general public if released into the environment. The scope and location of
the project has no potential to interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan. The site is in an urbanized area and has no potential to
expose people or structures to a significant risk due to wild land fires. All grading and
construction is subject to compliance with all applicable Uniform Building and Fire
Codes. As such, the project is not anticipated to result in any significant hazards.
Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: None Required
Sources: Submitted Plans
Tustin General Plan
Approved Fire Master Plan
Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: None Required
VIII. HYDROLOGY & WATER QUALITY
Items a, b, f, g, h, is i, and v — No Impact:
The project site is relatively flat, and the proposed project will continue to maintain a
relatively flat site with improved site drainage and additional landscaping. A significant
amount of stormwater received on-site will percolate into the soil where landscaping is
provided and remaining stormwater will be conveyed through a fossil filter prior to
entering a City stormdrain. City stromwater infrastructure is currently available to
accommodate storm water from the project. The applicant must provide a drainage and
hydrology report to the City and demonstrate that the private storm water drainage
system will be able to handle the capacity of any storm water directed into the system.
Best Management Practices are required to be implemented for construction activity to
deter water from flowing off-site. Best Management Practices will also be implemented
to ensure that, once the project is constructed, storm water leaving the site will be filtered
prior to entering the storm drain. As such, the project will not violate any water quality
standards or waste discharge requirements or degrade water quality in the area.
The project by nature would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a
lowering of the local groundwater table level. The project is located within Zone X
(areas of 0.2 percent annual chance flood), as mapped on a Flood Insurance Rate Map.
Accordingly, the project will be designed and graded with an appropriate drainage system
to avoid any potential flood hazards. The project site will not expose people or structures
to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death as a result of the failure of a levee or dam, or
by inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. Nor would the project increase significant
erosion at the project site or surrounding areas.
Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: Compliance with existing rules and
regulations is not mitigation under CEQA. Consequently, no mitigation is required.
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 18 of 163
Red Hill Town Homes
"TTM 17080
DR 06-011
Page 7
Sources: Field Verification
Submitted Plans
Tustin City Code 4900 et al
Federal Flood Insurance Rate Map 06059CO28 I H, February 18, 2004
Items c, d, e, k,1, m, n & o — Less Than Significant Impact:
The project site is relatively flat, and the proposed project will continue to maintain a
relatively flat site with improved site drainage, including drive aisles, curbs and gutters,
and additional landscaping. With new construction, there is the potential to impact
stormwater runoff from construction and post -construction activities with stormwater
pollutants from landscaped areas and trash enclosures. There is also the potential for the
discharge of stormwater that could affect the beneficial uses of the receiving waters and
changes in the flow velocity or volume. of storm water runoff. However, the project is
required to comply with the City's Water Quality Ordinance and most recently adopted
NPDES permit (Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Order R8-
2002-0010), thus reducing any potential impacts to a level of insignificance. Together,
these regulations minimize water pollution by regulating point sources that discharge
pollutants into local waters. As such, the project will not violate any water quality
standards or waste discharge requirements or degrade water quality in the area.
Mitigation Measures: Compliance with existing rules and regulations is not mitigation
under CEQA. Consequently, no mitigation is required
Compliance with existing rules and regulations is not mitigation under CEQA.
Consequently, no mitigation is required
Sources: Field Verification
Submitted Plans
Tustin City Code Section 4900 et al
Ix. LAND USE PLANNING
Items a, b & c — No Impact:
The property is designated by the General Plan Land Use Map as High Density
Residential and located within the Multiple Family Residential (R-3) zoning district. The
proposed residential density of 19 du/acres is consistent with the applicable land use and
zoning regulations.
If approved, the proposed project would increase the percentage of ownership housing
consistent with Goal 3 of the City's Housing Element, the project is accessible through
the City's current street system, and the project could be supported with existing
transportation and public facilities. The proposed project would not divide an established
community since it includes construction on an existing site that is already improved with
multiple -family residences. The proposed project is not located in a habitat conservation
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 19 of 163
Red Hill Town Homes
TTM 17080
DR 06-011
Page 8
plan or natural community conservation plan. The proposed project would not conflict
with any applicable conservation plan.
Mitigation Measures: None Required.
Sources: Submitted Plans
Tustin General Plan
Tustin Zoning Code
Tustin Zoning Map
X. MINERAL RESOURCES
Items a & b — No Impact:
The proposed project is not located on a mineral resource recovery site. The construction
of a condominium project on a lot which is improved with existing apartment buildings
will not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource.
Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: None Required
Sources: Submitted Plans
Tustin General Plan
XI. NOISE
Item a — Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation
The project site is located at the northwest corner of Walnut Avenue and Red Hill
Avenue, and therefore is exposed to significant traffic related noise. The City's General
Plan recognizes that residents adjacent to major and secondary arterials are typically
exposed to a CNEL over 65 dB. Table N-2 of the Tustin Noise Element identifies
potential conflicts between the land uses and the noise environment. Per Table N-2, most
of the project site falls within Zone A through Zone B with the exception of units along
Red Hill Avenue and Walnut Avenue which fall under Zone C. Zone A requires no
mitigation measures for noise while Zone B requires minor soundproofing as needed.
The City's noise ordinance requires a maximum 45 dB value for interior noise and 65 dB
for exterior noise. An acoustical study was submitted by the project proponent with
recommendations for exterior noise barriers for balconies along Walnut Avenue and Red
Hill Avenue and upgraded windows and doors to be incorporated in the building design
(Exhibit 1). The noise study indicates an existing 70.2 dB reading along the southeasterly
building line and 68.7 dB along the southwesterly building line, which concludes that the
buildings along Red Hill Avenue and Walnut Avenue must provide an A -weighted noise
reduction value of at least 26.1 dB to achieve a maximum interior 45 dB value.
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 20 of 163
Red Hill Town Homes
TTM 17080
DR 06-011
Page 9
The noise reduction technique recommended by the acoustical analysis would be
implemented and required as a condition of approval. With the mitigation measures
listed below, potential noise impact would be reduced to less than significant.
Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required:
• Roof ceiling construction shall be roofing on % inch plywood. Batt insulation
shall be provided in joist spaces and the interior ceiling shall be finished with one
layer of 5/8 inch gypsum board.
• All exterior walls shall be 2 x 4 studs at 16 inches on center with batt insulation
between studs. Exterior walls shall be plaster with 5/8 inch gypsum board on the
interior.
• All southeast and southwest facing windows and glass doors shall be glazed with
STC 32 glazing with either V4 inch laminated glass or dual pane assembly with %i
inch air space. In either case, a test report must be provided at the time of
installation to ensure compliance with the minimum requirements. The report
shall be prepared in an independent, accredited testing laboratory in accordance
with ASTM E-90.
• All entry doors shall be 1-3/4 inch solid core door with weather stripping seals on
the sides and top. No glazing shall be permitted for the entry doors.
• Since meeting the minimum levels of interior noise standard would require closed
windows and doors, the structures shall be equipped with ventilation or an air-
conditioning system to provide a habitable interior environment.
• Balconies six feet in depth along Walnut Avenue and first units along Red Hill
Avenue shall be designed with 42 inch high solid railings designed compatible
with the proposed architecture.
Sources: Submitted Plans
Tustin City Code 4611 et al
Tustin General Plan
Acoustical Study (Exhibit 1)
Items b, c & d— Less Than Significant Impact.
Although the grading and construction of the site may result in typical temporary
construction noise impacts, the Tustin Noise Ordinance only allows construction
activities to occur during the daytime on Monday through Saturday. The proposed
project will not create excessive ground vibrations, nor will it create a permanent increase
in the existing ambient noise levels beyond the City's established standards.
Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: Compliance with existing rules and
regulations is not mitigation under CEQA. Consequently, no mitigation is required.
Sources: Submitted Plans
Tustin City Code Section 4611 et al
Tustin General Plan
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 21 of 163
Red Hill Town Homes
TTM 17080
DR 06-011
Page 10
Item e & f — No Impact:
The site is not located within an airport land use plan or within two (2) miles of a public
or private airport/airstrip. The proposed project is three stories in height consistent with
the City's maximum height limit and similar to other structures in the vicinity.
Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: None Required
Sources: Submitted Plans
Tustin General Plan
Irvine Industrial Planned Community District Regulations
XII. POPULATION & HOUSING
Items a, b, and c — No Impact:
The project involves the proposed construction of a condominium project on a site that is
currently improved with apartment complexes including 57 units known as Whispering
Woods and Tustin Terrace Apartments. The proposed project would remove and replace the
existing 57 units and 18 additional units (total 75 units) that would not result in significant
population growth in the area.
The existing apartment units are rented at market rate (not considered as affordable units)
and the existing residents are on a month-to-month lease. While there will be
displacement of existing residents as a result of the proposed project, the displacement
would not be substantial nor necessitate the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere since the impact could be absorbed by the local rental market. The project is
privately financed and no public funds are involved that would trigger relocation pursuant
to state law. However, the applicant has submitted a Tenant Leasing and Relocation Plan
that indicates that a minimum 120 -day notice will be provided prior to vacation of the
property, tenants would be on a month-to-month lease basis and the last month's rent
would be waived, which should provide the tenants with adequate time and monetary
incentives to relocate.
Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: None Required
Sources: Submitted Plans
Tustin General Plan
XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES
Item a — Less Than Significant Impact:
The proposed project is in an existing urbanized area where fire and police protection are
currently provided. While police patrols to the area may be needed from time to time to
ensure safety, no new additional police protection would. be required as a result of the
proposed project. The Police Department has recommended mitigation measures to
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 22 of 163
Red Hill Town Homes
TTM 17080
DR 06-011
Page 11
reinforce safety and effectively patrol the area, which will be included as conditions of
approval. The project would utilize existing infrastructure and is not anticipated to
increase the need for new streets, public services, or infrastructure.
The proposed project is located within Tustin Unified School District (TUSD). The
proposed 18 additional units are not anticipated to have a significant rise in the number of
students served by local schools. The TUSD will receive its statutory school impact fees
per Senate Bill 50 from the residential development. As a condition of approval for the
project, the developer will be required to pay applicable school fees prior to issuance of
the building permit.
Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required:
• The pool access gates need to be equipped with a knox box for emergency access.
• Landscaping should be designed with surveillance opportunities for residents and
police personnel in patrol vehicles.
• Security devices such as double locking deadbolts, strike plates, with 1-1/2 inch
screws and pin locks on windows and sliders shall be installed minimizing the
potential for criminals to access the units.
Sources: Submitted Plans
Tustin City Code
XIV. RECREATION
Items a & b — No Impact:
The project would include a private community pool recreation area to benefit the
residents of the project. However, since the size of the recreation area does not comply
with the minimum criteria for parkland dedication, the project would be conditioned to
pay in lieu fees for parkland dedication in accordance with Section 9331 of the Tustin
City Code. The developer has indicated that they will pay in lieu fees to comply with
Section 9331 of the Tustin City Code.
While the residents of the project may use existing City parks, the increased use of these
parks would not be such that substantial deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated, nor does the project propose recreational facilities that would have an
adverse physical effect on the environment.
Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required:
• Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay park land in lieu fees
based on Tustin City Code Section 9331.d.3
Sources: Submitted Plans
Tustin City Code
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 23 of 163
Red Hill Town Homes
TTM 17080
DR 06-011
Page 12
XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC
Items a — Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporation:
A traffic study was submitted and reviewed by the City's Engineering Division(Exhibit
2). The study concluded that the proposed project is expected to generate approximately
pP Y
718 daily trips, which in comparison with the existing development, would be an increase
of 342 daily trips. This is a relatively significant increase in comparison with the
previously existing land use.
The more detailed (than daily trip comparisons) peak hour intersection analyses,
however, for future conditions with the Project show that no significant traffic impacts
would occur as a result of the Project. In addition, build -out (post -year 2020) evaluations
were included in the study. For these long range projections, the intersection of Red Hill/
Walnut is shown to have over capacity operations (if the current intersectioneometr is
g Y
maintained), but the Proj ect does not cause any significant traffic impacts, as defined by
City of Tustin policies. In addition, there are improvement projects anticipated to be
implemented at this intersection, to maintain acceptable operations for long range future
conditions.
Access to/from the site is provided at Red Hill Avenue which will be open to both
northbound and south bound traffic. The traffic analysis also considered on-site
circulation and determined that the 25 foot wide access. on Red Hill Avenue is adequate
to allow for one outbound• • q
lane and one inbound lane. For conditions at the completion of
the Project, the access is shown to maintain acceptable operations. Under the build -out
(post -year 2020) scenario, the left turn egress from the Project site would result in
significant Project impacts. A project condition of approval may require prohibiting this
movement under "longer range" conditions, as necessary, to maintain acceptable
operations at the Project driveway.
Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: Access to and from the site to Red
Hill Avenue should be available with completion of the project. The left turn egress from
the project site may be prohibited in the future if determined necessary b the '
. �y y City's
Traffic Engineer.
Sources: Submitted Plans
Tustin City Code
Traffic Impact Analysis (Exhibit 2)
Items b, c, d, e, f, and g — No Impact:
The project will not exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service
standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads
or hi g
highways. The proposed project will not induce substantial population org rowth
result in changes to air traffic patterns, or conflict with adopted policies, plans, orro ams
p �'
supporting alternative transportation such as bus turnouts or bicycle racks. TheJro'ect
p
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 24 of 163
Red Hill Town Homes
TTM 17080
DR 06-011
Page 13
includes sufficient parking on-site to comply with current parking requirements for the
proposed use. As such, no impacts to parking are anticipated.
Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: None Required
Sources: Submitted Plans
Tustin City Code
XVI. UTILITIES & SERVICE SYSTEMS
Items a, b, c, d, e, f & g — No Impact:
The proposed project will not exceed the requirements of the applicable Regional water
Quality Control Board or require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater
treatment facilities. The proposed project will utilize the existing sewer and storm drain
systems and thus will not require construction of a new storm water drainage facility or solid
waste facility. The project proponent would be required to submit a hydrology report to
ensure proper grading, drainage, and connection of planned sewer systems. The project: will
be served by the City's existing trash hauler contract, thus will not require a new trash
hauler. Adequate water supply from existing resources will be available to serve; the
proposed project.
Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: Compliance with existing rules and regulations
is not mitigation under CEQA. Consequently, no mitigation is required.
Sources: Submitted Plans
Tustin City Code
Tustin General Plan
XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Items a. b & c — No Impact:
The site is located in the multiple family residential (R-3) zoning district and currently
improved with 57 apartment units. The project includes redevelopment of the site with 75
condominium units. The proposed project design, construction, and operation will
comply with applicable City codes and regulations. The project, by nature of its location
and as designed, does not have the potential to: degrade the quality of the environment;
reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species; cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels; threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community; reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal; or, eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. The project
does not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage
of the long-term. It does not have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively
considerable or that would cause substantial adverse impacts on human beings.
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 25 of 163
Red Hill Town Homes
TTM 17080
DR 06-011
Page 14
Sources: Submitted Plans
Tustin General Plan
S:`Cdd'\MINOO`,Red Hill Condos\ND analysis-doc
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 26 of 163
Exhibit 1
Acoustical Analysis
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 27 of 163
Davy
&Associates, Inc.
Consultants in Acoustics
2627 Manhattan Beach Blvd., Suite 212 • Redondo Beach, CA 90278-1604 • Tel: 310-643-5161 • Fax: 310-643-5364 • Email:Da Assoc@aol
�'3' .can
ACOUSTICAL ANALYSIS
Redhill Avenue & Walnut Avenue
Tustin, California
FOR
Southwind Realty Group, LLC
Irvine, California
October, 2006
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 28 of 163
JN2006-44B
1.0 Introduction
At the direction of Southwind Realty Group, LLC, Davy & Associates, Inc. has
completed an acoustical analysis of the Redhill Avenue & Walnut Avenue project in
Tustin, California.
The California Administrative Code (Title 24) as enforced by the City of Tustin specifies
maximum allowable interior noise levels of CNEL 45 for all habitable spaces
in residential buildings where exterior noise from transportation sources exceeds
CNEL 60.
Section 2.0 of this report contains the results of measurements and calculations of the
future exterior noise environment at the site to determine compliance with these
requirements.
Section 3.0 of this report contains recommendations for complying with the
City of Tustin interior noise level requirements.
Section 4.0 of this report contains the requirements of the State Building Code
concerning ventilation.
2.0 Exterior and Future Acoustical Environment
Environmental noise levels were monitored at the site in Tustin, California on
April 6, 2006 between the hours of 3:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. The location of the site is
shown in Figure 1. Noise measurements were made at the southeast and southwest
building line.
Noise levels at the site are dominated by traffic on Red Hill Avenue to the southeast
and by traffic on Walnut Avenue to the southwest. No other significant sources of noise
were noted during the site visit.
Environmental noise levels were measured with a precision integrating LD 820 sound
level meter that had been calibrated with a B&K 4230 Acoustical Calibrator immediately
prior to use. The sound level meter measures and displays the equivalent noise level
(LEQ), as well as the maximum and the minimum noise levels during the measurement
period. A copy of the analysis of the acoustical data is attached to this report.
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 29 of 163
Figure I. Site Location
M
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 30 of 163
The data thus collected were analyzed to determine the CNEL level at the
measurement location. The CNEL value was determined by measuring the equivalent
noise level (LEQ) directly, and then calculating the equivalent noise level for each of the
other 23 hours in the day.' This CNEL approach has been utilized extensively. The
accuracy of this procedure has been established with automatic 24-hour measurements
at the same location. The procedure has accuracy
always been within acceptable Yp Y
limits. The results of the monitoring and calculations are summarized below in Table 1.
Table 1
Measured Ambient Noise Levels in dB
Location Peak Hour LEQ CNEL
SE Building Line 69.2 dB 70.2 dB
SW Building Line 67.7 68.7
Section 3501.(c) of the State Building Code states the following:
Worst-case noise levels either existing or future, shall be used as the basis for
determining compliance with this Section. Future noise levels shall be predicted
for period of at least 10 years from the time of building permit application.
CALTRANS, Division of Traffic Operations publishes an annual traffic volume book that
contains previous traffic trends. The 2000 traffic volumes on the California State
Highway System Book (the latest edition available) lists an average annual increase
of 2.2% per year in annual traffic volumes for the years 1994 through 1999. Assuming
that this annual growth of 2.2% would hold for this site, it was projected that traffic
volumes would increase by a factor 1.24 by the year 2016. This traffic volume increase
over the next 10 years would result in a 0.9 dB traffic noise increase. Therefore, the
projected future year noise level is summarized in Table 2.
Table 2
Exterior 2016 CNEL Value at the Site in dB
Location CNEL
SE Building Line 71.1 dB
SW Building Line 69.6
See, for example, "Insulation of Buildings Against Highway Noise," Bruce Davy and Steven Skale,
Federal Highway Administration FHWA-TS-77-202.
3 Resolution No. 07-31
Page 31 of 163
With an exterior noise level of CNEL 71.1, the building must provide an A -weighted
noise reduction value of at least 26.1 dB to achieve an interior CNEL 45 value.
Standard construction consisting of 2x4 studs with R-11 insulation, exterior stucco
interior gypboard, and standard glazing provides a minimum A -weighted noise reduction
of 20 dB.
If all southeast and southwest facing perimeter windows and glass doors are glazed
with STC 32 glazing, the noise reduction of the buildings will be a minimum of 30 dB.
This means that with the use of standard construction and STC 32 glazing in all
. g 9
southeast and southwest facing perimeter windows and glass doors, interior noise
levels should not exceed CNEL 45. Therefore, the Building comply IY with the
P
California Noise Insulation Standards as enforced by the City of Tustin.
STC 32 glazing can be provided with either 1/4" laminated glass or a dual pane
assembly with a 1/2" airspace. In either case, the glazing supplier should submit a test
report documenting the STC 32 rating. The test report should be prepared in an
independent, accredited testing laboratoryin accordance with ASTM E-9 .
0
3.0 Construction Recommendations
3.1 Roof ceiling construction will be roofing on 1/2" plywood. Batt insulation will be
installed in joist spaces. The ceilings will be one layer of 5/8"gYP board nailed
direct.
3.2 All exterior walls will be 2x4 studs 16" o.c. with Batt insulation in the aces.
Exteriorsstuds P
will be exterior plaster or stucco. The interiors will be 5/8" gypboard.
3.3 All southeast and southwest facing perimeter windows and glass doors will be
glazed with STC 32 glazing. STC 32 glazing can be provided with either 1/4"
laminated glass or a dual pane assembly with a 1/2" airspace. In either case, the
glazing supplier should submit a test report documenting the STC 32 rating. The
test report should be prepared in an independent, accredited testing laboratory in
accordance with ASTM E-90.
3.4 All other windows and glass doors may be standardlazin .
9 9
3.5 All entry doors should be 1-3/4" solid core doors with weather stripping in seals on
the sides and top. Glazing in entry doors should not be accepted.
4
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 32 of 163
4.0 Ventilation Requirements
The California Noise Insulation Standards (Title 24) states the following paragraph
concerning ventilation:
"If interior allowable noise levels are met by requiring that windows be
unopenable or closed, the design for the structure must also specify a ventilation
or air-conditioning system to provide a habitable interior environment. The
ventilation system must not compromise the dwelling unit or guest room noise
reduction."
With windows open, typical noise reduction values will be in the 12 dB range. This
means that a ventilation system must be provided for all habitable rooms. This can
normally be supplied with an FAU (forced air unit) with a summer switch. Outside air
intake must be in compliance with the Uniform Building Code.
5.0 Exterior Living Area Requirements
There will be balconies on the second floors of the buildings.
The City of Tustin has established criteria for exterior living space. Noise Levels in
exterior living space cannot exceed CNEL 65. To determine compliance with this
requirement, an analysis was completed for the balconies facing SW towards Walnut
Avenue and the balconies facing SE towards Red Hill Avenue.
The balconies in buildings 7 and 8 face Walnut Avenue. It was assumed that the
balconies would have solid railings consisting either of glass, plexiglass, wood or
stucco. A railing height of 42" was assumed for this analysis. This 42" railing will be
required for all 6 balconies in buildings 7 and 8.
The first row of units closest to Red Hill Avenue in units 1-6 and building 16 will also
require 42" high solid balcony railings. The balconies that are furthest away from Red
Hill Avenue in these buildings will not require solid railings.
There are no requirements for solid railings for the balconies in buildings 9-15.
�1
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 33 of 163
The results of this analysis for buildings facing Walnut Avenue and buildings facing
9
Red Hill Avenue are summarized in Table 4.
Table 4
Calculated CNEL Values in dB
For The 2"d Floor Balconies.
Orientation B do . CNEL
SW 7&8 - 62.7 dB
SE 1-6 & 16 60.7 dB
Based on this analysis, the four exterior living spaces will comply with the requirements
of the City of Tustin.
Bruce A. Davy, P.
I. N.C.E. Board Certified
Davy & Associates, Inc.
C01
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 34 of 163
SITE MONITORING NOISE ANALYSIS
JN2006-44B
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
TEST DATE:
START TIME:
END TIME:
EQUIPMENT USED:
TEMPERATURE:
RELATIVE HUMIDITY:
WIND:
LEQ:
69.2
LMAX:
90.1
LMI N:
55.1
CNEL:
70.2
LDN:
70.2
TUSTIN TOWNHOMES
SOUTHEAST BUILDING LINE
APRIL 6, 2006
3:00 P.M.
4:00 P.M.
LD 820 SLM
1/2" RANDOM INCIDENCE MIC
WINDSCREEN
B&K 4230 CALIBRATOR
TRIPOD
WIND SPEED INDICATOR
MICRONTA THERMOMETER/HYGROMETER
66°f
60%
0-2 mph
L90:
L50:
L25:
L8:
L2:
L1:
58.8
64.3
68.3
72.6
76.8
79.4
DAVY
& ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consultants in Acoustics
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 35 of 163
SITE MONITORING NOISE ANALYSIS
JN2006-44B
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
TEST DATE:
START TIME:
END TIME:
EQUIPMENT USED:
TEMPERATURE:
RELATIVE HUMIDITY:
WIND:
LEQ:
67.7
LMAX:
80.4
LMIN:
49.9
CNEL:
68.7
LDN:
67.7
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 36 of 163
TUSTIN TOWNHOMES
SOUTHWEST BUILDING LINE
APRIL 6, 2006
400 P.M.
5:00 P.M.
LD 820 SLM
1/2" RANDOM INCIDENCE MIC
WINDSCREEN
B&K 4230 CALIBRATOR
TRIPOD
WIND SPEED INDICATOR
MICRONTA THERMOMETER/HYGROMETER
65°f
60%
0-2 mph
L90:
53.4
L50:
60.1
L25:
67.6
L8:
73.0
L2:
76.5
L1:
77.8
DAVY
& ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consultants in Acoustics
Exhibit 2
Traffic Analysis
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 37 of 163
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 38 of 163
Traffic Study for a
Residential Project
in the City of Tustin
December 2006
RECEIVED
Or -C 18 2006
COMPhilNl'(Y DEVELOPMENT
�Y ✓
Prepared for:
Southwind Realty Group, LLC
Centerpoint
19722 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 240
Irvine, CA 92612
Prepared by:
CA rAA Katz, Okitsu & Associates
Traffic Engineers and Transportation Planners
17852 E. Seventeenth Street, Suite 102
Tustin, California 92780-2412
714/573-0317 Phone
714/573-9534 Fax
Project No: JA6539
V
Katz Okitsu & Associates
AA Planning and Engineering
17852 E. Seventeenth St.
December 15, 2006
Suite 102
Sincerely,
Tustin, CA
92780-2142
James Magstadt
714.573.0317
Southwind Realty Group, LLC
fax: 714.573-9534
Centerpoint
koaoc@katzokitsu.com
19722 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 240
www.katzokitsu.com
Irvine, CA 92612
Subject: Traffic Study for a Residential Project in the City of Tustin
Dear Mr. Magstadt:
Katz, Okitsu & Associates is pleased to present this revised traffic study report for a
proposed residential project in the City of Tustin. The project, known as "Red Hill
Townhomes", would be located along Red Hill Avenue north of Walnut Avenue and
consists of 75 condominiums on a 3.86 -acre site.
The traffic study addresses access and circulation issues, potential traffic impacts of
the project, and possible mitigation measures. The study has been prepared to meet
N the traffic stud requirements of the Cit of Tustin for the analysis of traffic impacts
Y a Y Y p
associated with the proposed development.
The report is being submitted to you for review and forwarding to the City of Tustin.
Please contact our office if you have any questions or comments about the report, or if
you need additional information to complete your submittal. If there are any
{ comments that require response or revisions, please notify our office as soon as
Los Angeles possible for prompt revision.
323.260.4703
fax: 323.260.4705
It has been a pleasure to prepare this study for Southwind Realty and the City of
Tustin.
Son Diego
619.683.2933
Sincerely,
fax: 619.683.7982
Son Bernardino
Rock Miller, P.E.
909.890.9693
fax. 909.890.9694
Principal
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 39 of 163
I. INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................1
2. PROJECT STUDY METHODOLOGY..........................................................................................4
STUDYTIMEFR.AMES.................................................................................................................................4
PROJECTSTUDY AREA .....................................................................................:........................................4
ALYSISMETHODOLOGIES.....................................................................................................................4
INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS.................................................................... a..*.** 00. s 000.0 .... 00 ...... a ..... a . 5
TRAFFICCOUNT DATA.............................................................................................................................. 5
FU'T'URE TRAFFIC VOLUMES ............................... ...................................... ............s....... s........ .... .... ........ a... 6
STANDARDSOF SIGNIFICANCE..................................................................................................................6
h
' 1
s
3. EXISTING CONDITIONS.............................................................................................................7
EXISTING CIRCULATION NETWORK..........................................................................................................7
t
PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE.......................................................................................7
PEDESTRIANTRAFFIC..............................................................................................................................11
N
0
4. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITHOUT PROJECT.......................................................12
FUTLRE TRAFFIC GROWTH.....................................................................................................................12
FuTuRE
INTERSECTION CONFIGURATION........................................................................................ a ....e.12
PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE NEAR TERM ............. ............................ ease ... 12
5. BUILDOUT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITHOUT PROJECT..................................................15
FUTURETRAFFIC GROWTH.....................................................................................................................15
FU'T'URE INTERSECTION CONFIGURATION...............................................................................................15
PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE — BUILDOUT.................................................................15
6. PROJECT RELATED TRAFFIC...................................................................................................19
PROJECTTREP GENERATION .. ......... 00.0004 0 0. 000. 0..4.... 0.00 ......mesa *00 0000 *ea.... 0.00 000 ... am *a... s masses, ... 0. 4 ... 4.004.00.00 ..... 9 ..... 19
PROJECTTRAFFIC....................................................................................................................................19
7. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT................................................................25
PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE.....................................................................................25
8. BUILDOUT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT...........................................................28
PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE.....................................................................................28
9. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANT IMPACT...................................................................... 31
NEAR—TERM FUTURE (2008)...................................................................................................................31
BUILDOUT(POST-2020)..........................................................................................................................32
Katz, Okitsu & Associates Cit of Tu
Traffic Engineers and Transyn►rariorr Planners y St1I1
Resolution No. 07-31 i Red HilllWalnut Residential Project Traffic Study
Page 40 of 163
A
P�
8. CIRCULATION AND ACCESS................................................................................................... 33
ACCESSROADS AND DRIVEWAYS...........................................................................................................33
PARKINGDISTRIBUTION..........................................................................................................................35
9. MITIGATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS...........................................................................36
10. CONCLUSIONS ........................... .. Ogg .............................. *see .. *seems *as ..... ease ... Goo . Owego too ................e 37
Katz, Okitsu & Associates City of Tustin
Traf%K Engineers and Transportation Planners
fi Red HilllWalnut Residential Prpjg4a'64 R&.d97 -31
Page 41 of 163
TABLE 1 — LEVELS OF SERVICE FOR INTERSECTIONS..................................................................................... 5
TABLE 2 — PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CONDITIONS, EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................. 11
TABLE 3 — PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CONDITIONS, FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT....................................0 12
TABLE 4 — PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CONDITIONS, BUILDOUT WITHOUT PROJECT ................................. 15
f
TABLE 5 — TRIP GENERATION RATES........................................................................................................... 21
ABLE 6 as PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATION.............................................................................:.................... 21
TABLE 7 - PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CONDITIONS, FUTURE WITH PROJECT ........................................... 25
{
TABLE 8 — PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CONDITIONS, BUILDOUT WITH PROJECT ....................................... 28
TABLE 9 - LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS /DETERMINATION OF IMPACTS, FU'T'URE CONDITIONS ............... 31
TABLE 10 - LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS /DETERMINATION OF IMPACTS, BUILDOUT CONDITIONS ......... 32
TABLE 11 — CITY PARKING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT ...................................... 35
Appendix A — Existing Traffic Counts
Appendix B — Intersection Level of Service Worksheets
Appendix C — Intersection Level of Service Concepts
Appendix D — Project Site Plan
Katz, Okitsu & Associates Cit of Tustin
Tiafj"a Engineers and TmnsportmioM Planners y
Resolution No. 07-31 iii Red HilllWalnut Residential Project Traffic Study
Page 42 of 163
FIGURE1 — PROJECT LOCATION
..................................................................................................................... 2
FIGURE2 — PROPOSED SITE PLAN...................................................................................................................
3
FIGURE 3 — EXISTING INTERSECTION GEOMETRY.................................................................. a ............... a .......
8
FIGURE 4 — EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES, AM PEAK HOUR ........................................................ a................
9
FIGURE 5 — EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES, PM PEAK HOUR .........................................•... a ..........................
10
FIGURE 6 — FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT, AM PEAK HOUR ........ a .. • ............................. •
13
FIGURE 7 — FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT, PM PEAK HOUR ...........................................
14
FIGURE 8 — BUILDOUT INTERSECTION GEOMETRY ......................... 0................................................... oases....
16
FIGURE 9 — BUILDOUT TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT, AM PEAK HOUR...................0................0.
17
FIGURE 10 — BUILDOUT TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT, PM PEAK HOUR......... a ...........................
18
FIGURE 11 — PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION...................................................................
20
;.
a............ a.................
FIGURE 12 — PROJECT TRIPS, AM PEAK HOUR............................................................................................
22
FIGURE 13 — PROJECT TRIPS, PM PEAK HOUR.... ..... 0 ... 0 ........... oo-osso sea ova
OUR........................................................................................... a
23
FIGURE 14 — FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH PROJECT, AM PEAK HOUR ..................... a........................•
26
FIGURE 15 — FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH PROJECT, PM PEAK HOUR ...............................................
27
FIGURE 16 — BUILDOUT TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH PROJECT, AM PEAK HOUR.... .............. ..........................
29
FIGURE 17 — BUILDOUT TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH PROJECT, PM PEAK HOUR ...........................................
30
TABLE 1 — LEVELS OF SERVICE FOR INTERSECTIONS..................................................................................... 5
TABLE 2 — PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CONDITIONS, EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................. 11
TABLE 3 — PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CONDITIONS, FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT....................................0 12
TABLE 4 — PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CONDITIONS, BUILDOUT WITHOUT PROJECT ................................. 15
f
TABLE 5 — TRIP GENERATION RATES........................................................................................................... 21
ABLE 6 as PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATION.............................................................................:.................... 21
TABLE 7 - PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CONDITIONS, FUTURE WITH PROJECT ........................................... 25
{
TABLE 8 — PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CONDITIONS, BUILDOUT WITH PROJECT ....................................... 28
TABLE 9 - LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS /DETERMINATION OF IMPACTS, FU'T'URE CONDITIONS ............... 31
TABLE 10 - LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS /DETERMINATION OF IMPACTS, BUILDOUT CONDITIONS ......... 32
TABLE 11 — CITY PARKING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT ...................................... 35
Appendix A — Existing Traffic Counts
Appendix B — Intersection Level of Service Worksheets
Appendix C — Intersection Level of Service Concepts
Appendix D — Project Site Plan
Katz, Okitsu & Associates Cit of Tustin
Tiafj"a Engineers and TmnsportmioM Planners y
Resolution No. 07-31 iii Red HilllWalnut Residential Project Traffic Study
Page 42 of 163
A
The subject of this traffic impact study is a proposed residential project known as "Red Hill
Townhomes", consisting of a 75 -unit townhome/condominium complex in the City of Tustin.
The proposed project is located on Red Hill Avenue north of Walnut Avenue. The developer of
the proposed project is Southwind Realty Group of Irvine, California. The project location is
shown in Figure 1 and the proposed site plan is shown in Figure 2
The project site is currently occupied by two apartment complexes: a 30 -unit complex known as
"Whispering Woods" and a 27 -unit complex known as "The Terrace".
The City is requesting a trip generation and distribution analysis to show the difference in trips
from the site due to the proposed development, an intersection traffic analysis for the intersection
of Red Hill Avenue and Walnut Avenue, and an analysis of the on-site circulation and access to
Red Hill Avenue. The study also documents parking distribution within the project site. The
analysis is intended to meet the requirements of the Cit of Tustin.
y q y
Katz, Okitsu & Associates
Traffic Engineers ant! Transportation Planners 1
City of Tustin
Red Hil!/Walnut Residential Project Trac Study
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 43 of 163
17th St
m�
�e
Ah St
1 st St
Main St�a �J5
a
McFadden Ave Project
Location i c
hA
S
Wa neer Ave Foyer
Dyer Rd Tustin US
Marine
Corps Air
Station
O
LEGEND
Project Location
Study Intersection
N
School
Major Street
Minor Street
Railroad Not to Scale
Katz, OkItsu & Associates City of Tustin Figure 1
mqA*"#*"g Red Hill / Walnut Residential Project TIS Vicinity Map
16
INMON
17,v:1
1
X-l!""17171111 own
Vp
a /A PT
IL
rAl
=1110 ww4w1immal"M "qq Amir p
WO MW� WA 0 A love, avis i J11111 0, A '0111, of
toll,
1 ,
T4
MCI
SPA
��
rim
�_-1
L moo,
'4
P wer= 9 r =11111M
ter. -� �..� II, �I I -v-.��.. �._��' ,
ir WN
`�: =ter '�'
Mqwlf�-- POW", --------
ME
IMM IMMIShis NMI
VAN
K7 MCI EVM IFOV61 NEW �1
..
It
how
all
IF
11
PON � i'
Ik
K3 all-, HIM
MIA
�iiiijir`7` ii��i��= � � � �� ir".:���l�'! 1
AM
oil
Red Hill Walnut Residential Pmiect TIS ResolufiprdAm�
This chapter documents the methodologies and assumptions used to conduct the analysis for the
proposed project. This section contains the following background information:
• Study timeframes
• Study area description
• Capacity analysis methodologies
Study Time frames
This report presents an analysis of the intersection operating conditions during the morning and
evening peak hours during the following anticipated timeframes:
'0 Existing Conditions ear 2006)
• Future Year 2008
• Buildout (Post -2020)
Project Study Area
The study area was determined through consultation with Cit of Tustin staff. The stud area
City y
consists of the following:
Red Hill Avenue at Walnut Avenue
Analysis Methodologies
y
This section presents a brief overview of traffic analysis concepts methodologies and is used in this
g p
t study. Street system operating conditions are typically described in terms of "level of service."
Level of service is a report -card scale used to indicate '
po c to the quality of traffic flow on roadway
segments and at intersections. Level of service (LOS) ranges from LOS A (free flow, little
congestion) to LOS F (forced flow, extreme congestion). A more detailed description escn tion o
p f the
concepts described in this section is provided in Appendix C of this document.
The local jurisdictions within the project area, including the City of Tustin, have determined that
Level of Service D is the minimum acceptable level of service for peak hour operation. Any
roadway segment operating at Level E or F is considered to be operating deficiently. An impact is
deemed significant when the level of service is E or F and the project causes an increase in V/C or
delay over the defined threshold. For further information on these significance thresholds see
Appendix C.
Katz, Okitsu & Associates City of Tustin
Traffic Engiarcis and Tinaspvndrion Pluancrs
4 Red Hill/Walnut Residential Project Traffic Study
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 46 of 163
Project Study Methodology
Intersection Capacity Analysis
The analysis of peak hour intersection conditions - was conducted using the TRAFFIX software
program developed by Dowling Associates. The following peak periods were selected for analysis:
• Weekday AM (peak hour between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM)
• Weekday PM (peak hour between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM)
r
Traffic conditions in Southern California are often evaluated during peak hours at intersections
using a methodology known as the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) technique. This is the
preferred analysis niethod for the City of Tustin. This analysis method is widely accepted and
essentially measures the amount of traffic signal "green" time required for the intersection. It is a
6 significant variation from the HCM method; however it produces results that are generally
similar. The City of Tustin generally requests that this method be used in the City, so all
1
signalized intersections were analyzed based on this method. Table 1 shows the relationship
g yz P
between Level of Service and the ICU Method volume/capacity criteria for signalized
intersections, and Level of Service and delay for unsignalized intersections.
P�,
Table 1
Levels of Service for Intersections
Level of Service
Signalized Intersection
Volume/Capacity
Ratio
Unsignalized
Intersection Control
Delay'
A
0.00-0.60
0-10
B
0.61-0.70
10-15
C
0.71-0.80
15-25
D
0.81-0.90
25-35
E
0.91-1.00
35-50
F
1.00 and up
50 or more
Note 1: Average delay in seconds/vehicle
Traffic fu Count Data
Existing daily and peak hour traffic volumes were supplied by Traffic Data Services of Santa Ana,
California in March, 2006. All traffic count data used in this study is compiled in Appendix A of
this report.
Katz, Okitsu & Associates City of Tustin
Tia f fa Engineers and TiaKsperiatan Planners
S Red Hill/Walnut Residential Project Traffic Study
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 47 of 163
Project Study Methodology
Future Traffic Volumes
Peak hour traffic volumes for Red Hill Avenue and Walnut Avenue under future near. term
conditions were forecast based on a 1% annual growth rate from existing conditions. Peak hour
volumes for buildout (Post -2020) conditions were based on traffic forecasts prepared for the
Tustin MCAS Tustin Legacy Study, when these volumes were higher than existing plus an annual
growth factor. When the existing volumes plus an annual growth factor were higher than the
MCAS forecasts, the existing plus growth factor volumes were used per City direction. The
Tustin MCAS Legacy traffic forecasts were provided by the City of Tustin. Project trips were
added to the background base for each scenario to determine the relative impact of the project.
7.2 Standards of Significance
The City of Tustin has determined that Level of Service D is the minimum acceptable level of
9e, service during peak hours at intersections. Any roadway segment operating at Level of Service E
1 or F is considered to be operating deficiently. An impact is deemed significant when the level of
service is E or F and the project causes an increase in the Volume/Capacity ratio of .01 or more
over the defined threshold. For further information on these significance thresholds see
Appendix C.
0."
Katz, Okitsu & Associates City of Tustin
Traffic Engineers and Tianspvnation Planners 6 Red Hill
iWalnut Residential Project Traffic Study
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 48 of 163
This section documents the existing conditions in the study area, including local land uses,
roadway geometry, and driveway locations. The discussion presented here is limited to specific
roadways in the project vicinity. The project location is on Red Hill Avenue north of Walnut
Avenue in the City of Tustin.
Existing Circulation Network
Streets in the project vicinity which could be affected by the proposed project include Red Hill
Avenue and Walnut Avenue. The existing roadway circulation network was shown previously in
Figures 1 and 2. Existing intersection geometry is shown in Figure 3.
Red Hill Avenue is a 44 -lane street on a northeast -southwest alignment located immediately to the
� east of and adjacent to the project site. The City has designated Red Hill Avenue as a north -south
roadway. The street has a signalized intersection with Walnut Avenue. The speed limit on R1�d
Hill Avenue is 35 mph. The intersection has left -turn pockets on all approaches. The existibig
signal phasing is protected/permissive for the east and west approaches (Walnut Avenue), and
protected for the north and south approaches (Red Hill Avenue). Land use along the street is
residential north of Walnut Avenue, with single- family homes located on the east side of the
street and apartments located on the west side of the street. A neighborhood
commercial/shopping center is located on the west side of the street south of Walnut Avenue.
Elementary and middle schools are located approximately '/4 mile south of the project site and !4
mile north of the project site. The traffic volume on the street is 23,800 vehicles per day.
Walnut Avenue is a 4 -lane divided arterial on a northwest -southeast alignment located immediately
to the south of and adjacent to the project site. The City has designated Walnut Avenue as an
east -west roadway. The street has a painted median with left -turn pockets, and a signalized
�r intersection with Red Hill Avenue. The speed limit on Walnut Avenue is 35 mph in the project
vicinity. Land use. along the street is residential on the north side of the street and
commercial/retail on the south side of the street west of Red Hill. East of Red Hill land use is
residential. The traffic volume on the street is 16,700 vehicles per day.
Regional circulation is provided by the I-5 Freeway approximately V2 mile to the north and the Sl: -
55 Freeway approximately % mile to the west of the project site.
Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service
Figure 4 illustrates the existing peak hour traffic volumes during the AM peak hour, while Figure 5
illustrates the existing; peak hour traffic volumes during the PM peak hour. Based on these
Katz, Okitsu & Associates City of Tustin
Traffa Enginccrs and TiaMspvrrataa Planners
7 Red Hill/Walnut Residential Project Traffic Study
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 49 of 163
LEGEND
N Project Location
• Study Intersection
School
""— Major Street
Minor Street
N
Railroad
Signalized Intersection
--�' Lane Geometry
Not to Scale
Katz, Okitsu & Associates
City of Tustin
Figure 3
so0u"�,(§fJo ne!"g
Red Hill / Walnut Residential Project TIS
Existing Geometries
Page 50 of 163
N
Not to Scale
EWAKatz, Okitsu & Associates City of Tustin Figure 4
Planning and Engineering I Red Hill / Walnut Residential Project TIS Existing TrafeMldlim C WeSW Hour
LEGEND
Project Location
•
Study Intersection
School
-
Major Street
Minor Street
-�--+-
Railroad
XXI
Turning Movement Volume
N
Not to Scale
EWAKatz, Okitsu & Associates City of Tustin Figure 4
Planning and Engineering I Red Hill / Walnut Residential Project TIS Existing TrafeMldlim C WeSW Hour
N
Not to Scale
Katz, Okitsu & Associates City of Tustin Figure 5
eMfflf8fiaWd."-e5!n9 Red Hill /Walnut Residential Project TIS Existing Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour
Page 52 of 163
LEGEND
Project Location
•
Study Intersection
School
-
Major Street
Minor Street
-+-+-
Railroad
XX
Turning Movement Volume
N
Not to Scale
Katz, Okitsu & Associates City of Tustin Figure 5
eMfflf8fiaWd."-e5!n9 Red Hill /Walnut Residential Project TIS Existing Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour
Page 52 of 163
P�
Existing Conditions
existing traffic volumes, level of service analyses were conducted for the study intersection. The
results of these analyses are summarized in Table 2 for the existing conditions. As shown in the
table, the intersection currently operates at Level of Service D or better under existing conditions.
Table 2
Peak Hour Intersection Conditions
Existing Conditions, Year 2006
Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
.,Nii
Volume/ Level -Of Volume/ Level Of
Capacity Service Capacity Service
Red Hill Avenue & Walnut Avenue .804 D .684 1 B
Pedestrian Traffic
Significant pedestrian traffic at the Red Hill/Walnut intersection was observed, both during the
peak hours and before and after school, particularly on the west leg of the intersection (Walnut).
Pedestrian volumes -were moderate, with about 20 pedestrians per hour crossing Red Hill and 30
per hour crossing Walnut during the AM peak hour, and about 45 per hour crossing Red Hill and
60 per hour crossing Walnut during the PM peak hour. During the afternoon school peak hour
(2:00 PM to 3:00 PM) there were about 30 pedestrians per hour crossing Red Hill and about 75 per
hour crossing Walnut. The majority of the pedestrians crossing Walnut in the afternoon peek
hour were school children crossing on the west leg.
Katz, Okitsu & Associates City of Tustin
Traffic Engineers and Transportation Planners
14 Red HiWWalnut Residential Project Trac Study
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 53 of 163
This section documents the future without project traffic conditions in the study area with
ambient growth added. The year 2008 was selected for analysis based on study requirements.
The project is scheduled for completion before the end of the year 2008.
Future Traffic Growth
Peak hour traffic volumes for the Red Hill Avenue/Walnut Avenue intersection under near-term
future (Year 2008) conditions were forecast based on a 1 % per year growth factor.
Future Intersection Con figuration
The traffic signal at Red Hill/Walnut will soon be converted from the current PPLT operation to
protected left -turn operation for eastbound and westbound Walnut Avenue. The lane
r
configuration of the intersection will also be changed, restriping westbound Walnut to provide-
dual
rovidedual left -turn lanes. These changes to lane geometry and signal phasing have been incorporated
into the analyses of future intersection conditions.
Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service — Future Near Terni
To simulate the near-term growth conditions for the year 2008, the peak hour volumes in Figures
4 and 5 were increased by a factor of 1% per year for two years. 'Figures 6 and 7 illustrate the
resulting AM and PM peak hour volumes, respectively.
Table 3 illustrates the future without project intersection level of service conditions. As shown in
the table, the intersection is expected to operate at Level of Service B or better under the future
without project condition for the year 2008.
Table 3
Peak Hour Intersection Conditions
Future Without Project Conditions, Year 2008
Katz, Okitsu & Associates
Traffic Engineers and Transporration Planners
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 54 of 163
City of Tustin
1.2 Red Hill/Walnut Residential Project Trac Study
�Katz, Okitsu &Associates City of Tustin
e6ljy{fffiaflcf"'��-eTi"g Red Hill /Walnut Residential Project TIS
Page 56 of 163
N
Not to Scale
Figure 7
Future Traffic Volumes Without Project, PM
LEGEND
Project Location
•
Study Intersection
iSchool
Major Street
Minor Street
-�--+
Railroad
Turning Movement Volume
�Katz, Okitsu &Associates City of Tustin
e6ljy{fffiaflcf"'��-eTi"g Red Hill /Walnut Residential Project TIS
Page 56 of 163
N
Not to Scale
Figure 7
Future Traffic Volumes Without Project, PM
This section documents the buildout without project traffic conditions in the study area. Post
2020 was selected for analysis based on information provided by the City from the MCAS Tustin
Legacy study.
Future Traffic Growth
Peak hour traffic volumes for the Red Hill Avenue/Walnut Avenue intersection under buildout
(Post -2020) conditions were forecast based on information from the MCAS Tustin Legacy study
and existing volumes plus a growth factor. The Legacy Study takes into account certain planned
roadway improvements to be completed by Year 2020. These improvements are included in all
Buildout scenario analyses. Post -2020 designated lanes are illustrated in Figure 8.
Future Intersection Con figuration
f .
The traffic signal at Red Hill/Walnut will soon be converted from the current PPLT operation to
protected left -turn operation for eastbound and westbound Walnut Avenue. The lane
configuration of the intersection will also be changed, restriping westbound Walnut to provide
dual left -turn lanes. Red Hill Avenue is planned to have a buildout configuration of 3 throuh
lanes in each direction. These changes to lane geometry and signal phasing have beim
incorporated into the analyses of buildout intersection conditions.
Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service -- Buildout
Buildout traffic volume forecasts for the Post -2020 conditions were provided by the City of Tustin
From the MCAS Tustin Legacy study. Existing volumes plus a growth factor were used when
higher than the Legilcy Study forecasts. Figures 9 and 10 illustrate the resulting AM and PM peak
hour volumes, respectively. Table 4 illustrates the buildout without project intersection level of
service conditions. As shown in the table, the intersection is expected to operate at Level -.:)f
Service E in the AM peak hour and Level of Service F in the PM peak hour under the buildout
without project condition.
Table 4
Peak Hour Intersection Conditions
Buildout Without Project Conditions Post 2020
Intersection I AM Peak Hour I PM Peak Hour l
Volume/ Level Of Volume/ Level Of
Capacity Service Capacity Service
Red Hill Avenue &Walnut Avenue .959 E 1 1.030 F
Katz, Okitsu & Associates City of Tustin
Traffic Engiorurs and Trrtnsivrialan Planners
15 Red Hill/Walnut Residential Project Trak Study
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 57 of 163
t
t'ri)
■ Project Location
• Study Intersection
iSchool
Major Street
Minor Street
Railroad N
Signalised Intersection
J6 Stop Sign
_0' Lane Geometry Not to Scale
K 9.0 u fates City of Tustin Figure g
n e g Red Hill / Walnut Residential Project TIS Buildout Geometries
.p
I
U�jzl
LEGEND
Project Location
• Study Intersection
School
Major Street
N
Minor Street
-�—+- Railroad
XX
Turning Movement Volume Not to Scale
Katz, Okitsu & Associates City of Tustin Figure 9
Planning and Engineering Red Hill / Walnut Residential Project TIS Buildout Traffic V , XIM
LEGEND
Project Location
• Study Intersection
School
— Major Street
N
Minor Street
—F—+- Railroad
Turning Movement Volume
Not to Scale
Katz, Okitsu & Associates
City of Tustin
Figure 10
? r )K 1z#7Cg'1Fg
Red Hill / Walnut Residential Project TIS
Buildout Traffic Volumes Without Project, PM
aae 60 of 163
The proposed project consists of 75 townhome/condominium units. This residential development
is expected to generate additional traffic volumes as documented below.
Project Trip Generation
Trip generation is a measure or forecast of the number of trips that begin or end at the project site.
All or part of these trips will result in traffic increases on the streets where they occur. Trakfic
generated is a function of the extent and type of development proposed for the site.
Trip generation is generally equal to the traffic volume expected at project driveways. The trip
.f generation rates are, equivalent to the number of trips that start or end (in and out) at the project
site, and are specific by land use for a given time period (i.e. AM peak hour). Trip generation rates
are expressed as a function of a given characteristic of the land use area (i.e. floor aresa, site area,
number of employees, or seating capacity). The rates are based on regression analysis, and fire
derived from field observations from as many sources as possible. At each site, trips in and out of
the site are counted, trip rate modifiers are identified and regression analysis is used to derive: a
"best fit" for a particular land use. An equation is developed which calculate an average trip
generation rate for the specific land use.
Fa
6
Project Traffic
fu
The trip generation for the proposed project consisting of 75 townhome/condominiurns is shown
in Table 5. The project trips summarized in these tables are based on trip generation rates
provided by ITE Trip Generation, 7' Edition with consideration of comparable trip generation
rates for similar uses in this region. This report is widely used in Southern California and
indicates the probable traffic generation rates for various land uses based on studies of existing
developments in comparable settings. City staff directed Katz, Okitsu & Associates to use single-
family detached housing trip generation rates for the proposed project due to the size of t ie
proposed units. Figure 11 illustrates the expected trip distribution for these project trigs.
Katz, Okitsu & Associates City of Tustin
Traffic Fngina rs amd Transporaaaion Planners 19 Red HilIlWalnut Residential Project Traffic Study
Y
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 61 of 163
t
LEGEND
Project Location
• Study Intersection
i School
N
r
Major Street
-' Minor Street
Railroad
Not to Scale
"Katz, Okitsu & Associates
City of Tustin Figure 11
961~196POY16*9
Page o
Red Hill / Walnut Residential Project TIS Project Tri Distribution
P
Land Use
Project Related Traffic
Table 5
Trip Generation Rates
Units Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Total I In I Out Total I In I Out
Low -Rise Apartments
ITE Code .2.2 1
DU 6.59 0.46 0.10 0.36 0.58 0.38 0.20
Single -Family Detached Housing' 0.3i'
DU 9.57 0.75 0.19 0.56 1.01 0.64
ITE Code .210
Notre 1: SFDU rate used for townhomes per City direction.
Existing Land Use Traffic
57 apartment units currently occupy the project site. These apartment units will be demolished
upon approval of the proposed project. The trip generation currently associated with the project
sitE: is also shown on Table 6. Figures 12 and 13 show the added trips expected as a result of tale
project less the existing use trips.
Table 6
Project Traffic Generation
Note 1: SFDU rate used for townhomes per direction from the City.
As shown in Table 6, the proposed project is expected to generate approximately 718 daily trips.
Of this amount, 56 .are expected to be in the AM peak hour, including 14 trips entering and 42
trips exiting the site. There are expected to be 76 trips during the PM peak hour, including 48
trips entering and 28 trips exiting the site.
Katz, Okitsu & Associates City of Tustin
Ti4ffic Engineers and Transpvrtation Planners 24 Red Hill
/Walnut Residential Project Traffic Study
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 63 of 163
LEGEND
Project Location
• Study Intersection
iSchool
Major Street
N
Minor Street
-+—+- Railroad
XXZ Turning Movement Volume
Not to Scale
Katz, Okitsu & Associates
City of Tustin
Figure 12
AleftiWW.10TIng
Red Hill / Walnut Residential Project TIS
Project Trips, AM Peak Hour
aae o
N
Not to Scale
Katz, Okitsu & Associates City of Tustin Figure 13 ILWA
Planning and Engineering Red Hill / Walnut Residential Project TIS Sipa, �� B�a�-lour
Page 65 of 16:3
Project Location
•
Study I ntersection
School
Major Street
Minor Street
+-+-
Railroad
XXZ
Turning Movement Volume
N
Not to Scale
Katz, Okitsu & Associates City of Tustin Figure 13 ILWA
Planning and Engineering Red Hill / Walnut Residential Project TIS Sipa, �� B�a�-lour
Page 65 of 16:3
N
Project Related Traffic
The project will have 718 vehicles per day going in and out onto Red Hill Avenue. This is an
increase of 342 vehicles per day above the existing land use. The resulting "NET Project Vehicle
Trips" are shown in Table 6. Adding 342 vehicles per day to a street that is currently serving
23,800 vehicles per day (Red Hill Avenue) is less than a 1.5% increase. This additional traffic will
have little impact on Red Hill Avenue.
Katz, Okitsu & Associates
Traffk Engineers and Trampnriarion Planners
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 66 of 163
City of Tustin
• .Z4 Red Hill/Walnut Residential Project Trac Study
This section documents the near-term future traffic conditions with the addition of project -
related traffic to the surrounding street system. It evaluates near term traffic conditions in the
study area with ambient growth (1% per year) and the proposed project added. The proposed
project completion date of 2008 was selected for analysis to be conservative.
Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service
j Table 7 summarizes the results of the level of service analyses for this scenario. As shown in the
table, the intersection of Red Hill at Walnut continues to operate at Level of Service B or better
with the addition of project -related traffic. Figures 14 and 15 illustrate the resulting AM and PM
peak hour volumes, respectively.
i4
' Table 7
Peak Hour Intersection Conditions
Future With Project Conditions, Year 2008
�i
Note 1: Seconds per vehicle average
Note 2: Delay is for poorest movement (left -turn from project driveway)
Katz, Okitsu & Associates City of Tustin
Traffic Fngiaurs anA Trarrspvnaticx Manners
25 Red Hill/walnut Residential Project Traffic Study
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 67 of 163
W8Kat2z, Okitsu & Associates City of Tustin
Jtfff8fiaWOE?ff "T,p9 Red Hill / Walnut Residential Project TIS
r1_ _ AA _r I,.„
rage 00 Or -1015
N
Not to Scale
Figure 14
Future Traffic Volumes With Project, AM
MI
LEGEND
Project Location
•
Study Intersection
iSchool
-
---
Major Street
Minor Street
--�---+-
Railroad
XXI
Turning Movement Volume
W8Kat2z, Okitsu & Associates City of Tustin
Jtfff8fiaWOE?ff "T,p9 Red Hill / Walnut Residential Project TIS
r1_ _ AA _r I,.„
rage 00 Or -1015
N
Not to Scale
Figure 14
Future Traffic Volumes With Project, AM
MI
'A
N
Project Location
•
Study Intersection
i
ydvol
Major Street
—
Minor Street
-F—f-
Railroad
XX
Turning Movement Volume
MrKatz, 4kitsu & Associates City of Tustin
Planning and Engineering Red Hill / Walnut Residential Project TIS
N
Not to Scale
Figure 15
Future Traff6%WkfliWVth On7oj' dt, PM
This section documents the buildout traffic conditions with the addition of project -related traffic
to the surrounding street system. It evaluates buildout traffic conditions in the study area with
traffic from the proposed project added. Buildout Post -2020 was selected for analysis based on
information received from the City for the MCAS Tustin Legacy study.
Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service
' Table 7 summarizes the results of the level of service analyses for this scenario. As shown in the
` table, the intersection of Red Hill at Walnut continues to operate at Level of Service E in the AM
peak hour and Level of Service F in the PM peak hour with the addition of project -related traffic.
Figures 16 and 17 illustrate the resulting AM and PM peak hour volumes, respectively.
s
Table 8
Peak Hour Intersection Conditions
Buildout With Project Conditions, Post 2020
mote t: aeconas per vetucle average
Note 2: Delay is for poorest movement (left -turn from project driveway)
Katz, Okitsu & Associates City of Tustin
Tiaffa EagiMurs and Transportation Planners
28 Red Hill/Walnut Residential Project Traffic Study
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 70 of 163
k'
0
Project Location
•
Study Intersection
S:hool
Major Street
—
Minor Street
--
-t—f-
Railroad
Turning Movement Volume
44rKatz, Okitsu & Associates City of Tustin
Planning and Engineering Red Hill / Walnut Residential Project TIS Buildout Traf9[49
N
Not to Scale
Figure 16
qJj 614, AM
F;
Katz, okitsu & Associates City of Tustin
Slarn1 tin�raig n 'We ' 9 Red Hill / Walnut Residential Project TIS
Page 72 of 163
N
Not to Scale
Figure 17
Buildout Traffic Volumes With Project, PM
LEGEND
Project Location
•
Study Intersection
School
--
Major Street
Minor Street
+- i
Railroad
XXI
Turning Movement Volume
Katz, okitsu & Associates City of Tustin
Slarn1 tin�raig n 'We ' 9 Red Hill / Walnut Residential Project TIS
Page 72 of 163
N
Not to Scale
Figure 17
Buildout Traffic Volumes With Project, PM
s
Traffic impacts are identified if the proposed project will result in a significant change in traffic
conditions on a roadway or intersection. A significant impact is normally defined when project
related traffic would cause level of service to deteriorate to below the minimum acceptable level
by a measurable amount. Impacts may also be significant if the location is already below the
minimum acceptable level and project related traffic causes a further decline.
The City of Tustin has identified Level of Service D as the minimum allowable service level during
peak hours at signalized intersections in the City. Most arriving traffic will clear the intersection
on the first allowable green cycle under this level of service. Any roadway segment operating at
Level of Service E or F is considered to be operating deficiently. An impact is deemed significant
when level of service is E -or F and the project causes an increase in the V/C ratio of 0.01 or mare
over the defined threshold. Mitigation measures should be considered when traffic conditions are
forecast to decline to poorer levels of service.
Near -Terns Future (2008)
The level of service analyses for the Near -Term Future (Year 2008) study scenarios determined
that level .of service will remain at Level B or better under both the "Future Without Project" and
"Future With Project" scenarios. The project will not create a significant impact at the study
intersections in the Future scenarios. Table 9 provides a comparison of the levels of service and
volume/capacity ratios of all study scenarios for the Future condition. Traffic impacts created by
the project can be evaluated by comparing the "Future Without Project" condition to the "Future
With Project" condition.
Table 9
Level of Service Analysis /Determination of Impacts
for Future Conditions
Note: LOS = Level of Serfice; V/C = Volume/Capacity; Delay = Seconds per vehicle average, poorest movement
Katz, Okitsu & Associates City of Tustin
Traffic Enginuis and Transportation Planners
31 Red Hill/Walnut Residential Project Trac Study
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 73 of 163
Determination of Significant Impact
Buildout (Post -2020)
The level of service analyses for the Buildout (Post 2020) study scenarios determined that level of
service will be at Level E in the AM peak hour and Level F in the PM peak hour under both the
"Buildout Without Project" and "Buildout With Project" scenarios. Although the intersection will
be operating at Level F under the buildout scenario, the project will not create a significant
impact at the study intersection. The project driveway will operate at Level of Service F under
buildout conditions.
The poor level of service at the project driveway is due to a relatively small number of vehicles
turning left from the driveway onto Red Hill. This condition can be tolerated or it can be
improved by prohibiting left turns from the project onto Red Hill, requiring right turns only.
Traffic conditions at the project driveway under buildout conditions may be adequate due }== p 1 y y q u to the
effect of platooning traffic from the nearby signalized intersection at Red Hill/Walnut. However
the City may want to consider mitigating the condition in the future by prohibiting the left turn
from the project driveway onto Red Hill.
P.
Table 10 provides a comparison of the levels of service and volume/capacity ratios of all study
scenarios for the Buildout condition. Traffic impacts created by the project can be evaluated by
comparing the "Buildout Without Project" condition to the "Buildout With Project," condition.
Table 10
Level of Service Analysis /Determination of Impacts
for Buildout Conditions
Intersection
IExisting
Buildout
Without
Project
Buildout
With
Proj ect
Increase,/
Decrease
Significant
Impact
ed Hill Ave. & Walnut Ave., AM Pk Hr
D / .804
E / .959
E / .961
.002
No
ed Hill Ave. & Walnut Ave., PM Pk Hr
B / .684
F / 1.030
F / 1.038
.008
No
Project Driveway, AM Peak Hour
N/A
N/A
F / 709.3
N/A
Yes
Froject Driveway, PM Peak Hour
N/A
N/A
F / 87.4
N/A
Yes
Note: LOS = Level of Service; V/C = Volume/Capacity; Delay = Seconds per vehicle average, poorest movement
Katz, Okitsu & Associates
Traffic Engineers and Transportation Planners
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 74 of 163
City of Tustin
32 Red Hill/Walnut Residential Project Trac Study
Access Roads and Driveways
The project is proposed to access Red Hill Avenue at one location near the north end of the project
site. This is the only site access for project entry. Currently the apartment complexes on the site
access Red Hill Avenue near the center of the project site and Walnut Avenue near the west
boundary of the project site. There will be no entry gates regulating access to this project. The
project site plan with existing street dimensions and recommended turn pocket configuration is
presented in Appendix D of this report.
The designated site: access on Red Hill Avenue will be accessible to both northbound and
southbound traffic on Red Hill. Analysis indicates that there is sufficient distance between the
project driveway and Walnut Avenue to allow both the existing southbound left -turn pocket at
Redhill/Walnut as miell as a northbound left -turn pocket at the project entrance. A southbound
left -turn pocket on Red Hill of 160 feet in length will be adequate to accommodate all traffic
expected to make this move during the peak hours under buildout conditions. This includes left -
turn traffic from the project.
A northbound left -turn pocket of 80 feet in length at the project driveway will be adequate to
accommodate project traffic during the peak hours. Allowing for a 90 -foot southbound transition
and a 90 -Foot northbound transition for the turn pockets the total length required would be 4:0.0
feet:. The distance available on Red Hill Avenue between the project driveway centerline and the
3 crosswalk limit line at Walnut Avenue is 450 feet. There is therefore more than adequate distance
available to accommodate both turn pockets.
The turn pockets can be separated from opposing traffic lanes with a painted median, and can be
configured "back to back" to maximize turn pocket vehicle storage capacity. The proposed turn
pockets with street dimensions are shown on the site plan in Appendix D of this report.
The proposed driveway has sight distance to comply with the Caltrans 7.5 second sight distance
criteria for a roadway speed of 40 mph or higher. The proposed Red Hill Avenue access roadway is
about 450 feet from the Red Hill/Walnut intersection and has sight distance over 600 feet to the
north and 500 feet tc the south.
Near-term future expected traffic volumes at Redhill/Walnut indicate that an eastbound left -turn
pocket .storage length., of 140 feet will be adequate to accommodate expected traffic volumes in tLe
near term, including project traffic. Buildout (post -2020) traffic volumes indicate however thea
increased capacity for the eastbound left movement will be required. If projected buildout
Katz, Okitsu & Associates City of Tustin
Trait Engineers and Transportation Planners
33 Red Hill/Walnut Residential Project Trac Study
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 75 of 163
P�,
U11
On -Site Circulation and Access
volumes occur, split -phase signal timing could be installed to accommodate the increase in traffic
volumes, allowing left turns from the adjacent through lane.
It should be noted that this signal will soon be converted from the current PPLT operation to
protected left- turn operation for eastbound and westbound Walnut Avenue at Red Hill Avenue.
The lane configuration of the intersection will also be changed, restriping westbound Walnut to
provide dual left -turn lanes.
The project site plan was reviewed for internal circulation. The site access roadway to Red Hill
Avenue is 25 feet in width. This is adequate to allow for one outbound lane and one inbound
lane. Parking must be prohibited on the north side of this roadway. The south side of the
roadway has parking 'cutouts" that allow for 3 visitor parking spaces on the south side while
maintaining the 25 -foot roadway width for the traffic lanes. Parking should be prohibited on all
other 25 -foot width project streets. Concern over 'dead end" drive aisles has been addressed
through a Waste Management Plan documented in the Design Review package.
Maximum outbound project traffic volume is expected to be 42 vehicles in the AM peak hour.
Approximately 40%, or 17 of these vehicles are expected to turn left from the project driveway.
This is only one vehicle every 3.5 minutes. The low expected volume of left turns indicates that a
separate left -turn pocket will not be required at the project entrance in the near-term future.
Level of service is indicated as Level D or better for the project entrance in the near-term future
with one inbound and one outbound lane and STOP sign control.
Projected traffic volumes under buildout conditions (from the MCAS Tustin Legacy study)
indicate Level of Service F for the project driveway with one inbound and one outbound lane. The
level of service reported is for a relatively small number of vehicles turning left from the driveway
onto Red Hill. The AM and PM peak conditions at this intersection are expected to be adequate
due to the effect of platooning traffic from the nearby signalized intersection at Red Hill/Walnut.
The condition can be mitigated in the future by prohibiting the left tum from the project
driveway onto Red Hill.
The interior street running roughly parallel with Red Hill Avenue is 36 feet in width, and is
therefore adequate for vehicles to pass each other and to allow for curbside parking on both sides
of the street. Parking should be prohibited on all other project streets except the south side of the
project entry roadway, as noted above. This restriction will allow adequate space for vehicles to
pass each other and emergency vehicle access.
ADA access is provided from the public right-of-way at the site's Red Hill Avenue entry to all of
the development's accessible units as well as the pool area. Curb ramps will be provided
Katz, Okitsu & Associates City of Tustin
TrafficEngineers and Transportation Planners
34 Red Hill/Walnut Residential Project Traffic Study
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 76 of 163
Ulm
On -Site Circulation and Access
throughout the development per City of Tustin Standard Drawings. Two handicap piarking stalls
are also provide near the development's private pool area. An ADA accessible path will also be
provided into the community from the Walnut Avenue pedestrian entry.
Parking Distribution
The City of Tustin has established parking space requirements for the multi -family residential
land use category (Tustin Municipal Code Chapter 9224 P -D, Section G7). The requirements
vary by number of units, and are shown for the proposed project in Table 11.
Table 1 i — City Parking Code Requirements for the Proposed Project
Red Hill Townhomes Project
Units
City Requirement
Project Requirement
[Residential
esident Spaces
2 Spaces per Unit
150 Spaces
isitor Spaces
1 Space per 4 Units
19 Spaces
Total Project
75 Units
169 Spaces
As shown in the table, the parking code requirement for the proposed project is a minimum of
two assigned covered parking spaces per unit, plus one visitor parking space for every 4 residential
units (Ord. No. 573, Sec. 2; Ord. No. 906, Sec. 2, 2-21-84).
The project provides 150 resident and 27 visitor parking spaces. The project parking supply is
therefore adequate for the use per City code. All parking stalls are accessible, and all parking areas
comply with accepted design standards for stall and aisle width. Parking is distributed relatively
evenly throughout the project.
Katz, Okitsu & Associates City of Tustin
Tiaffit Engineers and Transpvrratan Planners
35 Red HiWWalnut Residential Project Trac Study
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 77 of 163
Mitigation measures are required if approval and construction of the project will result in or
significantly increase unacceptable traffic conditions. They are also appropriate if cumulative
traffic conditions will result in an unsatisfactory level of service and the proposed development
contributes to these conditions significantly. Although the intersection of Red Hill Avenue and
` Walnut Avenue will operate at an unacceptable level of service under Buildout(Postp p 2020)
conditions, the project does not significantly contribute to these conditions.
The poor level of service at the project driveway under buildout conditions can be mitigated by
prohibiting the left turn from the project driveway onto Red Hill. Traffic exiting the project to
travel north on Red Hill would be required to make a U-turn at Walnut or use an alternate route.
Katz, Okitsu & Associates
Traffic Engin ers and Transportation PlanMcrs
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 78 of 163
City of Tustin
36 Red HiWWalnut Residential Project Traffic Study
The subject of this traffic study is a proposed residential project known as "Red Hill Townhomes",
consisting of a 75 -unit condominium/townhome complex in the City of Tustin. The proposed
project is located on Red Hill Avenue north of Walnut Avenue.
The City requested a trip generation analysis to show the difference in trips from the site due to
the proposed development, a level of service analysis for one study intersection, an analysis of on-
site circulation, and an analysis of access to Red Hill .Avenue and Walnut Avenue. Tl ie
intersection studied was Red Hill Avenue and Walnut Avenue.
Tho: results of the trip generation analysis showed that the project is expected to generate
4 :lx approximately 718 daily trips. Of this amount, 56 are expected to be in the AM peak hour,
VMS including 14 trips entering and 42 trips exiting the site. There are expected to be 76 -trips during
f
the PM peak hour, including 48 trips entering and 28 trips exiting the site.
The analysis showed, that the existing apartment complex on the site currently generates 376 daisy
trips, including 26 grips in the AM peak hour and 33 trips in the PM peak hour. These are tl ►e
existing use "trip credits".
The: net daily trips from the proposed project are the project -generated trips less the existing u e
"trip credits". The net daily trips due to the proposed project less the existing use trip credit a, -.e
therefore 342 daily trips, including 30 trips in the AM peak hour and 43 trips in the PM peak hour.
These are the traffic volume increases on Red Hill Avenue and Walnut Avenue that can be
expected as a result of the project.
The level of service analyses for the near-term future year (2008) conditions showed that the
'3
study intersection will operate at Level of Service B or better (good), including project trips,
during both the AM and PM peak hours. The analysis for buildout (post -2020) conditions showed
that the study intersection will operate at Level of Service F (fail) during the AM and PM peC-..k
hours. The project does not significantly contribute to this condition however.
The on-site circulation analysis showed that traffic conditions should be adequate and the
entrance/exit on Recd Hill should provide adequate width for one outbound and one inbound Ian!.
Level of service is indicated as Level D or better for the project entrance in the near-term future
with one inbound ar.d one outbound lane and STOP sign control.
1
Katz, Okitsu & Associates City of Tustin
TrA ft Engiaurs and Transportation Planners
37 Red HilIlWalnut Residential Project Traffic Study
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 79 of 163
Conclusions
Expected future traffic volumes at Walnut Avenue and Red Hill Avenue indicate that the
southbound left -turn pocket storage length required to accommodate the expected queue of
vehicles turning left from southbound Red Hill Avenue onto eastbound Walnut Avenue is 160
feet. The recommended northbound left -tum pocket storage length at the project driveway is 80
feet. Expected near-term future (2008) volumes indicate that aleft -turn pocket length of 140 feet
will be required for eastbound Walnut Avenue to northbound Red Hill Avenue. Buildout (post
2020) traffic volumes indicate that increased capacity for the eastbound left movement will be
required. If projected buildout volumes occur, split -phase signal timing could be installed to
accommodate the increase in traffic volumes, allowing left turns from the adjacent through lane.
The designated site access on Red Hill Avenue will be accessible to both northbound and
southbound traffic on Red Hill. Analysis indicates that there is sufficient distance between the
.t
project driveway and Walnut Avenue to allow both the existing southbound left -turn pocket at
Redhill/Walnut as well as a northbound left -turn pocket at the project entrance. Traffic
M conditions at the project driveway in the near-term future are adequate with this configuration.
Buildout conditions however indicate a poor level of service for traffic turning left onto Red Hill
from the project driveway with this configuration. This condition can be mitigated by
prohibiting the left turn from the project driveway onto Red Hill.
The traffic impact study for the proposed project will be submitted to the City of Tustin, who
{ will review the plan for compliance with applicable City standards. We anticipate that any minor
internal circulation issues will be addressed in conjunction with this review. Katz, Okitsu &
Associates recommends that the City find that the traffic impacts of the project have no adverse
effect on the surrounding street system for the future year.
Katz, Okitsu & Associates
Traffic Engineers and Transperratron Planners
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 80 of 163
City of Tustin
38 Red Hill/Walnut Residential Project Trac Study
r
N
Appendix A
Existing Traffic Counts
Katz, Okitsu & Associates
Traffic Engineers and Transportation Planners
City of Tustin
Red Hill/Walnut Residential Project Trac Study
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 81 of 163
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 82 of 163
TRAFFIC DATA
SERVICES, INC.
t#►l�rr�tr�irrii+►##wrr►►►►r#►rir#►t►##ttti►r►►►rri►r►r►r##r�►###rtr+it►tr►#r►ttrrrrlrrrr!l►ttrr
LOCATION
CODE C1519.111
r►►#ti►ir#r#!#*iii#i►#►
LOCATION RED HILL -BTW WALNUT/NISSON
VOLUMES FOR • TUESDAY 1/31/06
•+rrrr#�Rt+rr�rrilrtrritrr•
ANr►i#ir#�r!*lrrrr�►r#rtrrrrt
TIME
N6
so
♦rirt#rrr#iR�►►•#►►##�►ii►►�
PM •rrii4►i!#►4►tiil►iir►tlir
TOTAL
##R►fi►►rii!*►wrrst►rri#i►•►t►#r►►rtiiilrr►t�►##►i►rr►•►iir#iri►►r#tAtTIME
TOTAL
12:00 - 12:15
23
16►##►►►#.r►##tttt#
39
�ttrti►tR►iir►iei►iiiRt#t#r#►ioit
12:15 - 12:30
20
18
38
12:00 - 12:15
209
172
381
12:30 - 12:45
17
10
12:15 - 12:30
189
190
379
12:45 - 1:00
9 69
9 S3
�T
8 122
12:30 - 12:45
180
196
376
12:45 - 1:00
206 784
193 751
399 1535
1:00 • 1:15
12
7
19
1:15 - 1:30
10
10
20
1:00 - 1:15
186
197
383
1:30 - 1:45
14
9
23
1:15 . 1:30
183
191
374
1:45 - 2:00
8 64
S 31
13 �
1:30 - 1:45
164
197
361
1:45 - 2:00
216 749
159 744
375 1493
2:00 2:15
9
8
17
2:15 - 2:30
82:00
5
13
- 2:15
184
171
355
2:30 - 2:45 .
9
S
14
2:15 - 2:30
202
192
394
2:45 - 3:002
28
4 22
6 SO
2:30 • 2:45
224
190
414
2:45 - 3:00
296 904
174 727
468 1631
3:00 - 3:15
3:15 - 3:30
7
T
10
T
17
3:00 3 :1 5
232
173
405
3:30 - 3:45
12
6
14
18
3:15 - 3:30
278
188
666
3:45 - 4:00
T 33
9 32
16 6S
3:30 - 3:45
257
155
412
3:45 - 4:00
286 1053
158 674
444 1727
4:00 - 4:15
10
13
23
4:15 - 4:30
12
15
27
4:00 - 4:15
278
182
460
4:30 - 4:45
10
1e
28
4:15 - 4:30
267
160
4 2T
4:45 - 5:00
16 48
31 T7
4T 125
4:30 4:45
308
150
458
4:45 - 5:00
318 1171
184 676
502 1847
5:00 - 5:15
5:15 5:30
18
28
30
36
48
5:00 - 5:15
324
184
508
5:30 - 5:45
30
63
6 y
93
5:15 - 5:30
334
184
5:45 - 6:00.
48 126
101 230
149 354
5:30 5:45
5:65 6:00
296
184
480
288 1242
212 764
500 2006
6:00 6:15
6:15 - 6:30
56
SS
116
112
172
6:00 6:15
320
168
y88
6:30 • 6: 45
81
143
167
224
6:15 6:30
292
176
468
6:45 - 7:00
88 280
206 STT
294 857
6:30 • 6:45
6:45 7:00
286
230
160
446
1128
150 654
380 1782
7:00 - 7:15
7:15 - 7:30
112
142
238
280
350
7:00 - 7.1 5
196
122
318
7:30 • 7:45
191
323
422
514
7:15 - 7:30
158
121
279
T:4S 8:00
180 625
379 1220
559 1845
::
730 • 745
T,4S -
• 8.A0
156
124
119
2>5
634
104 .464
228 1100
?;
8:00 - 8:15
8:15 - 8:30
166
138
327
276
493
8:00 8:15
119
90
209
8:30 -8:45
126
263
414
39
8115 - 8:30
93
88
181
8:45 - 9:00
162 572
248 1114
390
0 1686
8:30 - BAS
8:65 9:00
84
74
94
178
370
87 359
161 729
9:00 - 9:1 S
9:15 - 9:30
136
120
241
196
377
9:00 - 9:15
71
94
165
9:30 - 9:45
122
181
316
303
9:15 - 9:30
74
60
134
9:45 - 10:0o
114 492
190 808
304 1300
9:30 • 9;45
9:45 - 10:00
56
72
128
54 255
64 290
118 545
10:00 - 10:15
120
176
296
10:15 10:30
131
Z6310:30109
10:00 • 10:15
53
56132
10:30 • 10:4s
114
158
272
10:1 S •
42
by
102
10:45 - 11: 00
126 491
136 602
262 1093
10:30 - 10:45
10:45 11:00
36
26
34
70
157
60 190
66 347
11:00 - 11:15
11:15 • 11:30'
158
154
144
302
11:00 • 11:15
34
32
11:30 - 11:45
169
1SS
170
309
11:15 - 11:30
22
31
66
53
11:45 • 12:00
192 673
157 626
339
3yq X299
11:30 • 11:45
27
26
53
itirrrr�r#r*t�##�rrr�s�rtrrr•wrr*rr�#r4•�rir�rAr�4�frsirtr►�wArrrr*rrrtr�rr�rl�r00�rr
24 107
12 101
36 208
TOTALS
3.479
51,392
88871
*ttr!•�#il4��rrr+trrr�rr+rirsr��r��•�r►rr�r
8,554
6,396 6
14, 950
ADT' S
•rr'*rrr�►t��r�ri4+►r►�tii�rrtArtr���itrti#irrtrtrl�ttrt�r�rr►��rtrr�►irritrtr!
12j033
•i#rrii►itli►t►#trrr►i#►i►!#lrrf+t#r•`►tAtrrrr#!•
11j788
23o&21
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 82 of 163
TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. LOCATION CODE C1519.147
••4itttriri♦lrrt•ti♦trtrww,►r.r.•rr•4irifriwlr.trrtrritw�trlrr.if.ir•rrrr*iiitr+••fir♦.r•r4trtlrrtr•twift.i#r4rtr•*tort
LOCATION - WALNUT-6TN RED
HILL/NEWPORT
VOLUMES FOR - TUESDAY 11/22/05
rr4�A•fiif•w.rrif•irr••it•ir
TIME
fift4►rirwrr
PM riitrirrtlfirt*rt•iirf.ti
ri4r4.4i•�Atf4�•A4i•••••••rrfift4fi•4«•iMNfii*iiftt•firw4riii•f
EO
we TOTAL .TIME E6 We TOTAL
••�t•ifi•itr•1frf4trtiiiif ltiii••t.rriitrttrttf
12:00 - 12:15
12:15 12:30
11
14
25
12:00 - 12:15
1204
1 8
irt4fi•i4
268
12:30 12:45
6
8
10
6
16
12:15 - 12:30
136
118
252
12:45 1:00
10 35
10 40
14
20 75
12:30 • 12:45
145
100
245
12:45 - 1:00
133 532
128 494
261 1026
1:00 - 1:15
1:15 - 1:30
9
4
S
16
1:00 - 1:15
118
105
223
i
1:30 - 1:45
7
12
6
16
1:15 1:30
130
110
240
1:45 • 2:00
3 23
9 32
13
12 SS
1:30 - 1:45
153
110
2 63
1:45 • 2:00
139 540
111 436
25500 976
2:00 - 2:15
2:15 - 2:30
6
1
3
9
2:00 2:15•
114
132
246
2:30 2:65
3
3
;
6
2:15 • 2:30
128
128
256
2:45 3:00
10 20
2 11
6
12 31
2:30 2:45
129
154
283
2:45 • 3:00
100 471
148 562
248 1033
3:00 - 3:15
3:15 - 3:30
3
4
S
e
3: W- 3:15
111
168
279
3:30 - 3:45
7
9
3
13
3:15 - 3•
.30
98
149
.247
3:45 - 4:00
16 30
2 19
10
18 49
3:30 - 3:45
3:45 - 4:00
104
128 441
180
205 702
284
333 1143
4:00 - 4:15
4:15 - 4:30
12
15
3
15
6:00 - 4:15
110
218
328
4:30 - `; 4S
1 s
4
8
19
4:15 - 6:30
116.
226
342
4:45 • 5:00
28 70
11 26
23
39 96
4:30 - 4:45
4:45 - 5:00
120
134 480
259
270 973
179
404 1453
5:00•- 5:15
5;15 - 5:30
26
33
11
37
5:00 - S-
.1S
126
269
395
5:30 - 5;45
TS
12
17
45
S:1S - 5:30
148
280
428
5:45 - 6:00
81 215
24 64
92
105 279
5:30 • 5:45
5:45 - 6.:00
176
168 618
270
258 1077
446
426 1695
6:00 - 6:15
6:15 6:30
6:30 - 6:65
76
94
140
28
34
104
128
6:00 - 6:15
6:15 6:30
138
138
282
234
420
3 72
62
182
6:45
137
.�,
6:45 • 7:00
183 693
66. 170
269 663
S 7:00
210
347
93 506
192 918
285 1424
7:00 - 7:15
7:15 - 7:30
174
206
78
252
7:00 • 7:15
96
162
258
�•
7:30 7:45
240
120
112
326
352
7:15 • 74-30
106
128
234
7:45 - 8:00
2S.4 876
142 452
396 1326
7: 30— - 7:45
7:45 - 8:00
80
112
192
96 378
85 487
181 865
8:00 - 8:15
8:15 - 13:30
192
174
128
320
8:00 - 8:15
70
72
142
8:30 - 8:45
153
110
100
286
253
8 :1 S - 3:30
66
70
136
8:45 5�:00
128 64 T
82 420
210 1067
8:30 - 8:4S
8:65 9:00
5�
60
124
�
250
53 255
103 SOS
9:00 • Sp: 15
9:15 - S►: 30
87
92
ST
144
9:00 - 9:15
59
58
117
9'30 - �' 4S
82
174
9:15 • 9:30 •
56
54
110
9:45 - 10:00
90 359
70 275
156
160 634
9:30 9:45
9:45 • 10:00
41
49
90
38 194
26 187
64 381
10:00 - 10:15
10:15 10; �
d6
"
7S
171
10:00 - 10:15
36
S3
89
10:30 - 10165
82
T
59
160
14:15 .• 10:30
32
42
74
10:45 - 11:00
85 316
82 303
141
167 619
10:30 10:65
23
36
59
10:45 - 11:00
123
3278
46 177
78 300
11:00 - 11:15
11:15 11:30
80
86120
68
148
11:00 - 11:15
19
32
S 1
11:30 • 11-45
104
138
206
11:15 - 11:30
12
28
.40
11:45 - 12:00
111 381
123 449
262
234 830
11:30 • 11:65
11:45
13
25
38
- 12:00A
i•i• .*r•w•••�•�•��•�•i•wrlrri.••«•r••iAri.•i••i••r••i«ir•r•••••i••«•r•4A•.•.iff i.ia•�t•i.rrf4.if..i..S.A8�►i�ti
.21 150
TOTALS
3,4632,261
724
4r-k•iri•••
S,
40585
6.366
10, 9S 1
ADT I S4
t••iiir•irrrrrii•i•ir••iii4irt•irr.f•i•rri••ii•iii•rrrrti•t•iri•irtirifr•t•it•itirfit8oO
LL
80627
r8riirir•ri • 46:6%5
a7-3
Resolution No.
Page 83
of 163
P_�
TRAFM DATA SElCVtC�- INC
SUMMARY OF VEHICULAR TURNING MOVEMENTS
NIS ST: RED HILL. AVE
6/W ST: WALNUT AVE
CITY: TUSTIN
FILENAME: 0351801
DATE: 3118106
DAY: WEDNESBAY
PEJi1K HOUR AT:
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
EASTUOUM
WESTBOUM
715 ASA
PERIOD
SEom
NL
HT
NR
SL
ST
SR
EL
ET
ER
WL
VVT
Wit
Total
LANES:
1
3
0
1
2
0
1
2
0
1
2
0
1:00 AM
10
67
43
23
189
11
18
81
45
60
55
26
628
1S Alin
21
129
66
23
282
8
35
109
78
74
92
27
915
30 AM
14
80
34
19
240
9
25
65
72
50
72
18
698
45 AM
53
104
32
31
261
18
31
107
77
67
107
16
904
8:00 AM
21
92
33
16
206
17
38
113
99
111
165
37
948
15 AM
9
84
31
10
152
7
11
55
44
53
40
19
515
30 AM
14
80
35
22
188
13
10
61
53
69
70
30
635
45 AICA
26
59
21
11
241
13
19
47
56
71
75
28
667
PEJi1K HOUR AT:
PHF: 0.91
715 ASA
VOLUMES•
109
405
154
91
968
52
129
394
302 4315
96
3465
FILENAME:
0361801P
DATE:
3123/W
DAY:
THURSDAY
BEGM
NOR
NL.
THBOUND
NT
HR
gourHeouND
SL.
ST
SR
EASTBOUND
M,
ET
ER
VAESTSOUND
WL WT
WR
Tata)
4:00 PM
57
260
35
19
139
20
39
70
24
75 195
37
970
15 PM
50
194
38
26
97
16
25
83
20
55 141
19
765
30 Pm
83
217
36
50
100
21
27
67
28
72 187
38
915
45 PIIS
47
242
38
28
97
21
32
86
21
64 180
29
862
5_-vo PM
88
278
38
30
88
22
.28
98
22
68 181
39
958
15 PM
65
272
48
33
140
33
29
102
33
56 170
32
1013
30 PM
60
238
+46
32
112
31
32
107
27
73 198
40
9%
45 PILI
55
276
39
33
131
24
29
91
21
55 150
33
937
PEAK MOM BEGM AT: PNF: 0.96
1700 Pm 3904
VOLUMES 248 1064 171 128 471 110 118 398 103 250 600 144
COMMENTS:
Resolution No. 07-31
7.R;�q W of 163 "NUT' 4CgAC VTVR -P1TJJVVT A7A7T%0%T J VVJ aT • TT Ann? iw v inn
�f
/ It
28. bd Hill & VAIMI: .
7mt-2= i� m lYtra� UVO 1
11l PR
PX x
MOOR
MOR
LM
C11PiCITY .
90L
V/C
VOL
V/C
HL
1
1700
60
.04*
150
.0�9
IN
3
5100
150
.04
1900
.43i
OR
0
0
120
.07
280
320
SIL
Z
3400
40
.01
10
.00
.2T
3
5100
2220
.49#
780
.17
MR
0
0
280
270
80
90
IRL
1
1700
160
.09
390
.23*
EBT
2
3400
390
.17*
280
.09
m
0
p
200
260
30
30
N8L
1
1700
200
•120
370
.22
�T
2
3400
470
.14
710
.21*
.20*
1
1700
M
.01
70
.04
Cly IAtend
Charm Inta valL MOMMOMMO -
.05*
.O5*
.0"
mm CIP=ff D LIMOS, .97 .92
Post - tin 3-
IK PR
OU
PK PR
MOR
Lim
CIPICM
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
UL
1
1700
50
.03*
150
.09
DT
3
5100
160
.05
1950
.45*
m
0
0
120
.07
320
SBL
2
3400
40
.01
20
.01*
SS?
3
5100
2330
451*
870
.19
68R
0
0
270
90
ZOL
1
1700
140
.08
410
.24*
IBT
2
3400
460
.21*
290
.09
Im
0
0
260
30
OL
1
1700
190
.11*
370
.22
NBT
2
3400
490
.14
670
.20*
m
1
1700
20
.01
70
.04
Charm Inta valL MOMMOMMO -
.O5*
.05�
C3P1C1" D'IIGISIlIOr .91 .95
Pott -2020 IBM hltli�edve 2
IK PR
OU
PK PR
MOR
L1RBS
C1PIIZI
VOL
V/C
VOL
Y/C
MEL
1
1700
50
.03*
130
.08
JO
3
5100
150
.04
1970
.45*
HR
0
0
140
.08
320
SIL
2
3400
30
.O1
10
.00
S8?
3
5100
2300
M
.lb
Sm
0
0
260
70
88L
1
1700
130
.08
400
.24*
Sit
2
3400
410
.19*
290
.09
Hm
0
0
220
30
WIL
1
1700
170
.10*
390
.23
WK
2
' 3400
470
.14
660
.19*
m
1
1700
20
.01
90
.05
Clce Intrel
.O5*
.05�
'r0 M C1PUM DTA UTIM
.81'
.93
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 85 of 163
TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC
(714) 541-2228
PEDESTRIAN COUNT
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 86 of 163
N/S ST:
ENV ST:
CITY:
Time
Period
Beginning
RED HILL AVE
WALNUT AVE
TUSTIN
N -LEG
CROSSED AT CORNER
S -LEG E -LEG W --LEG
FILENAME: 03616PIA
DATE: 3/15/06
DAY: WEDNESDAY
CROSSED MIDBLOCK
N -LEG S -LEG E -LEG W -LEG TOTAL
6:00 AM
:15 AM
:30 AM
:45 AM
7:00 AM
2
10
2
1
15
.15 AM
3
1
0
14
18
:30 AM
0
1
1
6
8
17.1
.45 AM
0
5
5
2
12
8:00 AM
1
1
1
5
8
:15 AM
1
3
5
8
17
:30 AM
1
6
6
2
155
:45 AM
2
4
3
7
1
9:00 AM
:15 AM
:30 AM
:45 AM
10:00 AM
:15 AM
:30 AM
:45 AM
11:00 AM
:15 AM
:30 AM
:45 AM
12:00 PM
:15 PM
.30 PM
:45 PM
COMMENTS:
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 86 of 163
r7
P,
61,
TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC.
(714) 541-2228
PEDESTRIAN COUNT
N/S ST: RED HILL AVE FILENAME: 03616P1 M
E/W ST: WALNUT AVE DATE: 3/15/06
CITY: TUSTIN DAY: WEDNESDAY
Time CROSSED AT CORNER CROSSED MIDBLOCK
Period
Beginning N -LEG S -LEG E -LEG W -LEG N-L.EG S -LEG E -LEG W -LEG TOTAL
9:00 AM
:15 AM
:30 AM
:45 AM
10:00 AM
:15 AM
:30 AM
:45 AM
11:00 AM
:15 AM
:30 AM
:45 ,AM
12:00 PM
:15 PM
• :30 PM
:45 PM
1:00 PM
1
5
3
17
26
:15 PM
1
3
0
5
:30 PM
2
4
1
11
18
8
:45 PM
2
4
0
2
8
2:00 PM
2
5
2
5
14
:15 PM
4
2
1
18
25
:30 PM
5
1
4
24
34
:45 PM
4
8
7
14
33
3:00 PM
7
3
8
10
28
:15 PM
3
8
6
4
21
:30 LPM
:45 PM
COMMENTS:
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 87 of 163
TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC.
(714) 541-2228
PEDESTRIAN COUNT
COMMENTS:
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 88 of 163
N/S ST:
RED HILL AVE
FILENAME:
03616P1 P
ENV ST:
WALNUT AVE
DATE;
3/15/06
CITY:
TUSTIN
DAY:
WEDNESDAY
Time
CROSSED AT CORNER
CROSSED MIDBLOCK
Period
Beginning
N -LEG
S -LEG
E -LEG W -LEG
N -LEG S -LEG E -LEG W -LEG
TOTAL
12:00 PM
Evt
:15 PM
:30 PM
:45 PM
'
1:00 PM
:15 PM
:30 PM
:45 PM
2:00 PM
:15 PM
:30 PM
:45 PM
3:00 PM
15 PM
:30 PM
:45 PM
4:00 PM
4
10
9
14
37
:15 PM
9
4
2
13
28
:30 PM
5
4
4
6
19
:45 PM
4
4
8
2
18
5:00 PM
:15 PM
1
3
7
0
13
1
6
27
5
:30 PM
3
3
2
9
17
„
:45 PM
6:00 PM
2
1
3
3
9
:15 PM
:30 PM
:45 PM
COMMENTS:
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 88 of 163
Appendix B
Intersection Level of Service Worksheets
Katz, Okitsu & Associates City of Tustin
Traffic FngiKurs and Trunsponatbn PlaMxcrs
Red Hill/Walnut Residential Project Traffic Study
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 89 of 163
T
CD
Q
0
(J►i
Zxisting AM ----Thu Isar 30, 2006 14:35:22Page 1-i
-----------------------
Thu Mar 30, 2006 14:35:22
JA6539 - 76 -Unit Residential Project TIS
Page 2-1
City Of Tustin
--------------••---------------
Existing AM
Scenario:
Scenario Report
Zxisting AM
Command:
Existing AM
Volume:
bcisting AM
Geometry:
xxisting
Impact lee:
Default impact tee
Trip Generation:
AN
Trip Distribution:
ALL
Pathat
Default Patha
Routes;
Default Routes
Configuration:
aistieg AM
Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Ki1TZ OXITSU, TUSTIN# CA
Existing AN
Thu Mar 30, 2006 14:35:22
Page 2-1
JA6S39
- 7S -Unit Residential Project TIS
- -
City of Tustin
-------•------•--•----------
lxisting AN
---------•------------------------------
Turning MOvelment Report
AM
Volume Northbound
Type Left Thsu Right
Southbound Bastbound
Left Thru Right
westbound
Total
Left Thru Right
Left Toru Right
Volume
N1 Red Hill 4 Walnut
Sao* 109 405 154
91 969 52 129 394 326
302 436
91
3465
Added 0 0 0
Total 109 405 154
O 0 0 0 0 0
91 969 52 129 394 326
0 0
302 436
0
98
0
3465
02 Driveway On Red Hill
Base 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0
0
Added 0 0 O
Total 0 0 0
0 0 O 0 0 O
0 0
0 0
0
0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0
0
•3 Driveway an Walnut
Base 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0
0
Added 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 O
0 0
O
p
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0
0
Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, C#
Rxiating AM Thu Mar 30, 2006 14:35:12 Page 4-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JASS39 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
bcisting AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ispact Analysis Report
Level Of Service
Intersection Base Future Change
Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in
IROS Veh C LOS Veh C
N 1 Red Hill i Walnut D xxxxx 0.904 D xxxxx 0.404 ♦ 0.000 WC
Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Darling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
V
�Q
CD
CO
N
0
W
( existing AN Thu Mar 30 2006 14:35:22
-----------•---•---JA6539
- 7S -Unit Residential Project TIS---------�--5-1---
City of Tustin
existing AM
--- -------------------------------------
Level Of Service Cowputation Report
ICU 1(1,024 as Cycle Length t) Method (Same Volo" Alternativs)
♦lfffffflff♦flf!!!�!!�!!!!!l�liA!♦fllflf!!f!!f!f!lfffffffff
llfff !lfff!!!1!!!!!!!
Intersection /1 Red Hill a Walnut
•fflflflfff!!!f!l�lfl�f!!!!!!!!f!!f!!!!flfftf!!!!!f!!f
!lf fff!l1�flff!!!!f 1lff!!f
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.404
Loss Time (sec): S (Y.R . 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh):
Optimal Cycle: 53 Level Of Service: D
!fl•!!ff!!fl�lf�flfffffffff!!!!!!!f!!!lfff A!!!!!f lfl!!lffffffflf
Street uame:
!!f !f lffflf !!!!!
Red Hill Ave Walnut Ave
Approach:
Movement:
Worth Bound South Bound seat 20un0 West Sound
L- T-
-- -I------II------'1------'I
R L- T - R L T R L- T R
Control:
Rights:
--------------
ProtectedProtectedprotected '
Protected
Min. Gres-:
Include Include Include
0 0 0
Lanes:
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0
--------------- 11 --------------- 1J ---------------
Volume module:
--------------- �
Same Vol:
Growth Adj:
109 405 1S4 91 969 52 129 394 326 302 436 91
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Sae:
109 405 154 91 969 S2 129 394 326 302 436 91
User Adj:
PHP Adj:
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHP Volume:
Reduct Vol:
109 405 154 91 969 52 129 394 326 302 436 94
0 0
Reduced Vol.
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
109 403 154 91 969 52 129 394 326 302 436 91
PCs Adj:
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
ML! Adj:
Final Vol.:
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
109 405 154 91 969 52 129 394 326 302 436 94
-----11---------------
-----------•--- ---------------�
----ratio- Flow Module:
Sat/Lane:
1700 1100 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
Adjustment:
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes:
Final Sat.:
1.00 2.17 0.13 1.00 1.10 O.iD 1.00 1.09 0.11 1.00 1.63 0.37
1700 �6lS 240S
------•-----
1700 3227 171 1700 1461 1539 1700 2776 624
-----•--------- ---------------11-------••------II
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat:
Crit Moves:
•!!!! N!f!N f!!•�!!f!l�lff!•ff�f!!�!l�lfflf•ff!•!♦!!fllf!!ff!!�lff�if!!!!!f
0.06 0.11 0.11 O.OS 0.30 0.30 0.04 0.21 0.21 0.11 0.14 0.16
•f!! ft1• !!�! ff!!'
lfff!
Traffix 7.7.1115 (C) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to q►TL pjaTSU, TUSTIN, CA
D
rte► -r...y �.�..�
Existing PH Thu Har 30, 2006 14:3S:46 Page 1-1
JAGS39 - 73 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Traffix 7.7.1115 (C) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU. TLSTIN, Ch
Cc � 0
CD =3
co Z
W O
O O
-- h —4
Q� w
"
Existing PH
gkistt+ !0"--------------------------------------------------------------------
scenario Report
Scenario:
Existing PH
Command:
Existing PH
volume:
Existing PH
Geometry:
Existing
Impact V-"-
Dofatult Impact Pee
Trip Generation:
PH
Trip Distribution:
ALL
Paths:
Default Paths
Routes:
Default Routes
Configuration:
Existing PH
Traffix 7.7.1115 (C) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU. TLSTIN, Ch
Cc � 0
CD =3
co Z
W O
O O
-- h —4
Q� w
"
Existing PH
Thu Mar 30. 2006 14:35:46
Paye 2-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JASS39
- 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Existing PH
Turnisg Havement Report
PH
volume Northbound
Southbound Bastbound
Westbound
Total
Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
Left Thru
Right
Volume
61 Red Hill i Walnut
same 24. 1064 171
126 471 110 110 396 103
250
699
144
3904
Added 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 O 0
0
0
0
0
Total 240 1064 171
126 471 110 116 390 103
250
699
144
3904
t2 Driveway on Red Hill
aa:d 4 u a
v 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
0
0
Added 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
0
0
Total 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 O 0
0
0
0
0
03 Driveway an Walnut
base 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
0
0
Added 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
0
0
Total 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
0
0
Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
misting PM Thu Mar 30, 2006 14:3S:46
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 4-1
J"539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
ftisting PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ispact Analysis Report
Level Of Service
Intersectian Base
Future Change
Del/ V/
Dei/ V/ in
LOS Veh C
LOS Veh C
S 1 Red Kill i walnut B xxuxx 0.664
B 3PU= 0.664 . 0.000 V/C
Traffix 7.7.1115 (C) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TIASTIm, Ch
axiating PM Thu Har 30, 2006 14135:46 Page 3-1
JAGS39 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
xxicting PH
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lsnrel Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(11069 as Cycle Length •) Method (ease Values Alternative)
AffffffffffAflffffAAAff1Alff1lf ffffAffAlfAAf Af AfAAfff Afffffffff lflAAflf Af Affffff
Intersection S1 Red Hill 4 Walnut
!!!flflffAAlffffffAAflflffAAAf AfAAf Af Afffff•ff!•f AfffffffffAffflffAfflfffAfAAAff
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.684
Los& Time (sec): 5 (Y.R - 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/vehl: X3CKXJn
Optimal Cycle: 36 Level Of Service: b
lffAlAffAAflf lfffffff lffffffffffffffffff Af ffAffAff lfffAfffffffffffffAfffffffffff
Street Mame: Red Hill Ave walnut Ave
Approach: North Bound South Bound east Bound Ment bound
Movement: L- T- R L- T- R L- T- R L- T- R
------------ I --------------- 11 ---------------
��-------- ,
C7ontrol: Protected Protected Protected �� protected-_ -�
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Orion: 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes, 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0
--------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module�
Base Vol: 248 1064 171 128 471 110 118 398 103 350 699 144
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial 5": 248 1064 '171 128 471 110 118 398 103 250 699 14t
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHP Volume: 248 1064 171 128 471 110 118 398 103 250 699 144
Reduct Vbl: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 248 1064 171 128 471 110 118 396 103 2SO 699 144
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MW Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vbl.. 248 1064 171 128 471 110 118 398 103 2S0 69! 144
------------I---------------i1--------------- --------------- ---------------�
Saturation flow Module:
Sat/Lsne: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes3 1.00 2.58 0.42 1.00 1.62 0.38 1.00 1.59 0.41 1.00 1.66 0.34
Final Sat.: 1700 4394 706 1700 2756 644 1700 2701 699 1700 2819 S81
------------I---------------11--------------- --------------- ---------------�
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Mat: O.iS 0.24 0.24 0.08 0.17 0.17 0.07 O.iS O.iS 0.15 0.25 0.2S
Crit Nov": +•** ffff f•ff :AA!
!f!f!flfffflf!lfAffflfflflffffAAtiffff!!llfffflAffflfflflfffflfflfflfffANfAflfA
Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
N
CD
O
C
n
CD =3
(c) Z
Cn O
0 (=)
� W
W �
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
11
Existing Plus AN Fri Dec 15, 2006 14:36:28 Page 2-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 Without project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Turning Movement Report
AM
Volume Northbound
Southbound
Eastbound
0) CD
Total
Type Left Thru Right
(Q 07
Existing Plus AN
Fri Dec 15, 2006 14:36:28 Page 1-1
CDO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Left
CO C
Volume
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
M O
Existing
City of Tustin
Plus
p 0
h-----------------------------------------------------------------
Reuse Alternative 1 Without Project
Z
O
Scenario Report
W
Scenario:
Existing Plup AN
O
Commands
Existing Plus AN
4
Volume:
Existing AN
W
Geometry:
Hearterm
—'
Impact Fee:
Default Impact Fee
0
Trip Generation:
AN
0
Trip Distribution:
ALL
0
Paths:
Default Paths
Total 111 413 157
Routes:
Default Routes
53
Configuration:
Existing Plus AN
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
11
Existing Plus AN Fri Dec 15, 2006 14:36:28 Page 2-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 Without project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Turning Movement Report
AM
Volume Northbound
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Total
Type Left Thru Right
Left
Thru Right
Left
Thru Right
Left
Thru Right
Volume
91 Red Hill 4 Walnut
Base 111 413 157
93
988
53
132
402
333
308
445
100
3534
Added 0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total 111 413 157
93
988
53
132
402
333
308
445
100
3534
#2 Driveway on Red Hill
Base 0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Added 0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total 0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
#3 Driveway on Walnut
Base 0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Added 0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total 0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
0
0
0
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
X
CD
0
cQ 0
CD =3
co Z
4 0
0 0
� W
W �
Existing Plus AN Fri Dec 15, 2006 14:36:28 Page 3-1
------------------------------------------------------------
JA6S39 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 Without Project
-----------------------------------------------------
Intersection Volume Report
Base Volume Alternative
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Weetbound
Node Intersection L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R
1 Red Hill a Wa 111 413 157 93 968 53 132 402 333 308 445 100
2 Driveway on R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0
3 Priw� ; y M G G u u v d 0
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
Existing Plus AN Fri Dec 15, 1006 14:36:28 Page 4-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 7S -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 Without Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Impact Analysis Report
Level Of Service
Intersection Base Future Change
Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in
LOS Veh C LOS Veh C
0 1 Red Hill a Walnut B xuxxx 0.678 B xnxxx 0.678 + 0.000 V/C
2 Driveway on Ret! Kill 0.0 0.000 0.0 0.000 t 0.000 D/V
3 Driveway on Walnut 0.0 0.000 0.0 0.000 + 0.000 D/V
Trafflx 7.8.0715 (C) 3nnc Odin, :`s scc, Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
T X Existing Plus AM Fri Dec 15 2006 14:36:28
0) Page 5 -1
-----------------------------------------------
CD O JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
OCfl E Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 Without Project
0' -------------------------------------------•------------------------------------
0 :3Threshold Report (Base Alternative)
W--L Z Threshold Criteria (Ops LOS (Plan LOS
(Delay >= 60.000]IV/C >• 1.0001
� Intersection
Movement LOS Delay V/C
W
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
Existing Plus AM Fri Dec 15, 2006 14:36:28 Page 6-1
------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
----------------Rxisting-Plus-Reuse-Alternative-l-Without-Project---------------
Threshold Report (Future Alternative)
Threshold Criteria (Ops LOS >_ *)(Plan LOS >_ *)
IDelay ),.- 60.0001(V/C >= 1.000)
Intersection Movement LOS Delay V/C
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
N
0
W
0
cQ 0
0 :3
co Z
CO 0
0 0
0) W
W --L
Existing Plus AM Fri Dec 15, 2006 14:36:28 Page 7-1
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 Without Project
----------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU Moss as Cycle Length 0) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
iwww!!*lwtwwwwlw!l4ii#wtlt4iwlwlwtlittltw•itwiwAiiwiilitA*!**i*A!!wlfiliwitwwiw!
Intersection #1 Red Hill Q Walnut
♦!!!liiwwwt•wwtw#•wwlwAAwlwlwwiwtwtttw!•w!t!t!#wti*t!t**********twwAiliAwwwwwwii
Cycle (sec)s 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X)x 0.678
Loss Time (sec) s 0 (Y+R-4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 71 Level Of Service: H
+rwwi!#ww#iww!#ww•wwwswwwww*w+►#wwtwwwwiitt#!litwti•*****w*w*****wwwiww*#Aww#wwwiw
Street Wants Red Hill Ave Walnut Ave
Approach: North Hound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L- T - R
------------ I ---------------11---------------11---------------11------------�
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 O 2 0 1 1 0
------------------------ ------------ ��---------------
Volume Module:�
Base Vol: 109 405 154 91 969 52 129 394 326 302 436 98
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02
Initial Bass 111 413 157 93 988 53 132 402 333 308 445 100
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adis 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PKF Volume: 111 413 157 93 988 53 132 402 333 306 445 100
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vols 111 413 157 93 988 53 132 402 333 306 445 100
PCR Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol.: 111 413 157 93 988 53 132 402 333 308 445 100
Saturation Flow Module:----- ---------------11--------------------�
Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.17 0.63 1.00 1.90 0.10 1.00 1.09 0.91 2.00 1.63 0.37
Final Sat.: 1700 3695 1405 1700 3227 173 1700 1861 1539 3400 2776 • 624
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------)
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Bats 0.07 0.11 0.11 0.05 0.31 0.31 0.08 0.22 0.22 0.09 0.16 0.16
Crit Moves: +*•* •!w! #Ai! !A#!
wlwiw***********A*******w*+**w#www#wwwllwiii#iwwwwiwlw#ww*Awiwwitt!!ttli!!!!tlwA
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
Existing Plus AM Fri Dec 15, 2006 14:36x28 Page 8-1
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 Without Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU Moss as Cycle Length •) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
wwiwwit###A##itiiwwlwit#iwwltli!#iilAwtAiwi#Awww#!t!!t!!!iw!!lwwiitwlwiwwwAiwww#
Intersection #1 Red Hill 6 Walnut
wwwA!!!•fit#Aii#!w!!#ltwilAAt!•AlfwtwwwwwAfiiwwwAwlwwww#wwwiw#wwwwwwwiwi!!#twiwA
Cycle (sec)& 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.678
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R•4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 71 Level Of Service: B
iwiitw#•i!i•!t!lwwiw#Aw•w•i#wwwwwrw•wwwwwwwwwwrwwwwwww#wwwwwwwwwwtwwwwwwwwwwwwwt
Street Name: Red Hill Ave Walnut Ave
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movements L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
Control:
------------
) Protected ---------------
I) Protected ---------------
I) Protected ---------------
II Protected I
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 O 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------�
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 109 405 154 91 969 52 129 394 326 302 436 98
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02
Initial Bse: 111 413 157 93 988 53 132 402 333 308 445 100
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVols 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 111 413 157 93 988 53 132 402 333 308 445 100
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Pity Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 111 413 157 93 968 53 132 402 333 308 44S 100
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 111 413 157 93 988 53 132 402 333 308 44S 100
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol.: 111 413 157 93 988 53 132 402 333 308 445 100
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------�
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.17 0.83 1.00 1.90 0.10 1.00 1.09 0.91 2.00 1.63 0.37
Final Sats 1700 3695 1405 1700 3227 173 1700 1861 1539 3400 2776 624
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------�
Capacity Analysis Modules
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.11 0.11 0.05 0.31 0.31 0.08 0.22 0.22 0.09 0.16 0.16
Crit Moves: ***• iww• wwwi wAwi
#i##wwi#wwwlwiwiliiwwwwwwww#wwwwwwwwwwwwwwww+wAwrwwAAiwlw#rwwiwwiwwiiAwAwwwilwww
Traffix 7.8.071S (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
CD
cc U) Existing Plus AM Fri Dec 15, 2006 14:36:28 Page 9-1
CDO --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-.L E JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
O '_•'': City of Tustin
O O Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 Without Project
O z Report
•--------------------
Level Of Service Computation Re rt
O 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
• ###w•##AA#rwwlwwAAwr#A#wAAAA#lwAw##lAAAAA##A#A##•#A!*##A*#AAAA•#A#AAA#AAA#wA#ASA
W O Intersection 82 Driveway on Red Hill
#IAAAAw#A##AAA#AA########AAA#AAAAw#A!A!#rAAAArrAA##!#Atw#####AAA###AAtA#r#A#lAtA
W Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service:
I 0.0)
� lwAArArlwwrrfwrwAAAwrw# 1wA!#wAIAAAAtAAArAA#AlAAA#A#AAA#Art#AAAAArAAAtA!#rArr#AAr
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
movements L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------�
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include include Include
Lanes: 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
-------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module, )
Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0
l-------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Critical GapModules�
Critical Gp: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FollowUpTim: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------�
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Potent Cap.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0
Move Cap.: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
:
') ---------------
" ---------------II -•--------
Laval Of Service Module�
2Nay95thQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move:
Movement: IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR'- RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SharedQueue: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0..0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shrd ConDel: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Shared LOS:
ApproachDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ApproachLOS:
AA•####•A####wAA►r##!A#AAAlrr4w#AAArtttrAttwA!#tt#}}♦##A##AA•A#!A !!AAltiwrAlr4A#
Note: Queue reported is the number of care per lane.
#}wlArriAr}AAwlAtrwA#AArAt}r#AlwflArrlA!lAAw#t/AtlA#AwwlAA#•AAAA#AAwAtt4#t!!##A#
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
Existing Plus AM Fri Dec 15, 2006 14:36:28 Page 10-1
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 Without Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
lAftAA!###i#!#A######AA•A}####AA#!AlAr#A##•AAw♦}♦A!##••AAAA#!AA#ArilwrAiwArArAw4
Intersection *2 Driveway on Red Hill
!w#Ar###1AAA#AArlAlAAAA#A1Al}#r!#rAr!#AAltwt#rAAwlAArA#AtA#r#t!w###A###A#}AltAA#
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: [ 0.01
w##Aw#!A#wlrwrlA#wAA♦wrrrwAlrrArwAwArrwlwlwAA•rwrrw+wwAwrwAwrAAwwwwwrtAlwArrrrwr
Approach: north Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movements L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------�
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------�
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Initial Bse $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FollowUpTim: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
------------ ----- ---- - ---------------
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Potent Cap.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Move Cap.: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------�
Level Of Service Module:
2Way95th0: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move:
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SharedQueue: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shrd ConDeI: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Shared LOS:
ApproachDol: 0..0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ApproachLOS:
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
X
CD
07
-� O
CD
O Z
O
O
O
-�,, -4
� W
W �
Existing Plus AM . Fri Dec 15, 2006 14:36:28 page 11-1
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
Cite GA' a .fiL.1u
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 Without project
--------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCH Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #3 Driveway on walnut
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Services ( 0.01
Approach: North Bound South Bound Bast Bound West Bound
Movements L - T - R L - T - R L - T- R L - T - R
------------ i--------------- �j--------------- II--------------- {{---------------I
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 O 1 1 0 2 0 O 0 0 1 1 0
------------{---------------{{---------------11--------------- ---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 0.00 o.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Initial Bae: 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------{---------------{---------------{{---------------{{---------------i
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FollowUpTim: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
------------ I --------------- ---------------11---------------i{---------------i
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Potent Cap.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Move Cap.: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
------------I---------------I{---------------11---------------I{---------------i
Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Dei: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Moves
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SharedQueue: o.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shrd ConDels 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Shared LOS:
ApproachDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ApproachLOS:
Notes Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc... License to KATY OYTTStt. 1"JeT.u. C.
Existing Plus AM Fri Dec 15, 2006 14:36:28 Page 12-1
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 Without Project
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCH Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #3 Driveway on walnut
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 worst Case Level Of Service: ( 0.01
Approach: North Bound South Bound Bast Bound West Bound
------------{---------------I{---------------11---------------{I---------------I
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
--------------{{---------------{{---------------{{--------------
Volume Module {
Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.00 o.00 o.00 o.00 o.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Initial Bass 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
initial Fut: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PAF Adjs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PHP Volume: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gps 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FollowUpTim: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
------------i--------------II---------------11---------------11--------------I
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Potent Cap.: 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Move Cap.: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Level of Service
11---------------H---------------11---------------I
e ce Module:
2Way95thQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Moves
Movement: IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SharedQueue: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shrd ConDel: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Shared LOS:
ApproachDels 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ApproachLOSs
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
1.raffix 7.6.0715 (c) 2006 bowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
a) CD
co Cn Existing Plus AM Fri Dec 15, 2006 14 06,28 Page 13-1
CDO --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-.L E JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
C:) = City of Tustin
N 0 Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 Without Project
0 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
h Z Base Queue Report (cars)
p--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
W 0 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
4 Node Intersection L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R
W
82 [21Way95thQJt 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
63 [2Way95thQJ3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
4a
Existing Plus AN Fri Dec 15, 2006 14:36s28 Page 14-1
-
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 without Project
-
Future Queue Report (cars)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound Southbound Bastbound Westbound
Node Intersection L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R
62 (2Way95thQJ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
93 [2Way95thQJt 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
X
CD
T O
0) C
CD 0
O Z
W O
O O
1 i
CF) W
W
Existing Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 14:36:22 Page 1-1
----------------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 Without Project
--------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------
Scenario Report
Scenario: Existing Plus PH
Coaaand: Existing Plus PH
Volume. axisLing FM
Geometry: Nearterm
Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee
Trip Generations PM
Trip Distribution: ALL
Paths: Default. Pa!=
Routes: Default Routes
Configuration: Existing Plus PH
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATL OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
Existing Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 14:36:22 Page 2-1
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 Without Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Turning Movement Report
PM
Volume Ncz.-th:.ound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total
Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume
61 Red Hill i Walnut
Base 253 1085 174 131 480 112 120 406 105 255 713 147 3982
Added 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 C G 0
Total 253 1085 174 131 480 112 120 406 105 255 713 147 3982
82 Driveway on Red Hill
Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
#3 Driveway on Walnut
Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Trzffir-r...C7:` %�.�_,+ ��... �1;ry Absoc. Lioenied to KATE OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
rvVV
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
Nxisting Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 14:36:22
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 4-1
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
CD
Impact Analysis Report
(Q C/)
Zxisting Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 14:36:22
Page 3-1
(D O
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Del/ V/ Del/ V/
-3. C
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
O =
O
City of Tustin
# 2 Driveway on Red Hill 0.0 0.000 0.0 0.000
.j�'
O=3
Rxisting Plus Reuse Alternative 1 without Project
------------------------- ----
+ 0.000 D/V
h Z
-----
Intersection Volume Report
--L O
C) '
Base Volume Alternative
-------------------------------------------------------
CWp
-------------------------
~
W
A.
Northbound Southbound 8astbound
Node Intersection L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L T -- R
--
Westbound
--
L -- T R
1 Red Hill 4 Wa 253 1085 174 131 480 112 120 406 105
255 713 147
2 Driveway on R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
3 Driveway on W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
Nxisting Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 14:36:22
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 4-1
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Rxisting Plus Reuse Alternative 1 without Project
-----
Impact Analysis Report
Level Of Service
Intersection Base Future
Change
Del/ V/ Del/ V/
in
LOS Veh C LOS Veh C
8 1 Red Hill i walnut B xxxxx 0.648 B xxxxx 0.648
+ 0.000 V/C
# 2 Driveway on Red Hill 0.0 0.000 0.0 0.000
+ 0.000 D/V
8 3 Driveway on Walnut 0.0 0.000 0.0 0.000
+ 0.000 D/V
Traffix 7.8.0715 (e) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
X
CD
0
-� O
CQ =�
CD 0
O Z
U1 O
O O
C� W
Existing Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 14:36:22 Page 5-1
---------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 without Project
----------------------------------------
Threshold Report (Base Alternative)
Threshold Criteria (Ops LOS >- *][Plan LOS >= *]
(Delay >• 60.0001 (V/C >- 1.000)
Intersection Movement LOS Delay V/C
Traff ix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU. TUSTIN, CA
Existing Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 14:36:22 Page 6-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 without Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Threshold Report (Future Alternative)
Threshold Criteria [Ops LOS >• *][Plan LOS >= *]
iueiay >- 60.o00)[V/C >- 1.0001
Intersection Movement LOS Delay V/C
7-i-0713 ic1 2u0o Uowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
Existing Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 14:36:22
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 6-1
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Zxisting Plus Reuse Alternative 1 Without Project
Level Of Service Computation Report
CD
co
Existing Plus PM ,
9 Fri Dec 15, 2006 14.36:22
Page 7-1
CDO
------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------
_, E
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R-4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh)s xxxxxx
O =
City of Tustin
B
;treetNames Red Hill Ave Walnut Ave
O O
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 Without Project
Nest Bound
Movements L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
I - II ------
O:3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
II ----- II
Controls Protected Protected Protected
--------------- )
Protected
-*+ Z
Level Of Service Computation Report
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
O
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length i) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
2 0 1
1 0
+wl+www+#wwwww!wwwww#!«wiwwwwlwwwlww#«w++++w+w«ww#wwwwwwlwwwww#wwwwfww++wwt+!www
I
W O
Intersection 01 Red Hill a Walnut
144
Growth Adje 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02
1.02 1.02
rw+wwwwwlw#liwtrwwwwwwww++#+++wwwwwli«wwwl+wrwwi+t+w+wwwwwwwr*rw*w+w+++www+lwrwlw
Initial Baas 253 1085 174 131 480 112 120 406 105
255 713
Gy
J
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X)
0.648
0
-�
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R•4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): X3000M
0
Initial Fut: 253 1085 174 131 480 112 120 406 105
Optimal Cycles 65 Level Of Services
147
B
1.00 1.00
•#www!++ww+wiw«#wiwwwwwwwwwwwwrwwwwwwwwwwwwwwiwwwwwwi4wwwwwwwwwwwww.*+++iww#ww!#
pulp Ad)• 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
Street Name: Red Hill Ave Walnut Ave
255 713
147
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound
West Bound
0
Movements L- T- R L- T- R L- T- R
--•---------------------------------II-i
L T-
R
PCB Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
---��--•------------II--
Control: Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include
Protected
MLF Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Include Include
Min. Green: O 0 0 0 0
Include
Final Vol.: 2S3 1085 174 131 480 112 120 406 105
II ---------------
0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0
--------------II---------------II---------------II---------------
0 0
2 0 1
0
1 0
Volume Modules
Sat/Lanes 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
)
1700
Base Vole 248 1064 171 128 471 110 118 398 103
Growth Adjs 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02
250 699
144
Lanes: 1.00 2.S8 0.42 1.00 1.62 0.38 1.00 1.59 0.41
1.02 1.02 1.02
Initial Bse: 253 1085 174 131 480 112 120 406 105
1.02 1.02
255 713
1.02
147
3400 2819
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PKF Adj: 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHP Volume: 2S3 1085 174 131 460
1.00 1.00
1.00
Crit Moves: +*++ wwwr «wrr
w+«w#www++#w#ww+wwwww«ww«rww«t#ww+«wi+««r*r+wirwww««««w«rwr#«««««!««+w+w+wwfw++w
112 120 406 10S
Reduct vols 0 0 0 0 0 0
2SS 713
147
0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 2S3 1085 174 131 480 112 120 406 105
0 0
25S 713
0
141
PCR Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol s 253 1085
1.00 1.00
1.00
174 131 460 112 120 406 105
25S 713
147
Saturation Flow Module:-----II---------------II-II---------------)
Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1700 1700
1700
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.S8 0.42 1.00 1.62 0.38 1.00 1.59 0.41
1.00 1.00
2.00 1.66
1.00
0.34
Final Sat.: 1700 4394 706 1700 2756 644 1700 2701 699
---II---------------II---------------+I---------------
3400 2819
581
Capacity Analysis Modules
I
vol/sat: 0.15 0.25 0.2s 0.08 0.17 0.17 0.07 0.15 0.15
Crit Moves: wwww wwlw ww!•
w!wlwwwwwtwiw«w+rwwwwww«+wwwwwwwtw««wwrwww+ir«!«wwwwwtfwi++w++www+lw+wl+w+w!!!rw«
0.08 0.25
w+w#
0.25
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
Existing Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 14:36:22
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 6-1
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Zxisting Plus Reuse Alternative 1 Without Project
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU Moss as Cycle Length 40 Method (Future Volume Alternative)
+w www#lwwwwwwwwwwww#wwwwwwwwwwwwww#wwwwwwwwwwws#wwr:#w#:#w«wwwrwwwrwww*w*wwrwrw«
Intersection #1 Red Hill 6 walnut
ww#wwww#www#wwwtwwlww#wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwiw«wr«wrwwl+4w#lwww#www#ww#w«++#!www#wwwww
Cycle (sec)s 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X):
0.648
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R-4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh)s xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 65 Level Of Service:
B
;treetNames Red Hill Ave Walnut Ave
Approach: North Bound South Bound Bast Bound
Nest Bound
Movements L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
I - II ------
L - T
- R
II ----- II
Controls Protected Protected Protected
--------------- )
Protected
Rights: Include Include Include
Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0
Lanes s 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0
--------------II---------------II---------------II---------------
2 0 1
1 0
Volume Module:
I
Base Vol: 248 1064 171 128 471 110 118 398 103
250 699
144
Growth Adje 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02
1.02 1.02
1.02
Initial Baas 253 1085 174 131 480 112 120 406 105
255 713
147
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0
PasserByVo1: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0
Initial Fut: 253 1085 174 131 480 112 120 406 105
255 713
147
User Adis 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
pulp Ad)• 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
PHF Volumes 2S3 1085 174 131 480 112 120 406 105
255 713
147
Reduct Vol: O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0
Reduced Vol: 2S3 1085 174 131 480 112 120 406 105
255 713
147
PCB Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
MLF Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
Final Vol.: 2S3 1085 174 131 480 112 120 406 105
II ---------------
255 713
147
Saturation Flow Modules----
II II
-----�
Sat/Lanes 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
1700 1700
1700
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.S8 0.42 1.00 1.62 0.38 1.00 1.59 0.41
2.00 1.66
0.34
Final Sats 1700 4394 706 1700 2756 644 1700 2701 699
------------ I --------------- II ---------
3400 2819
581
----II--------
Capacity Analysis Modules
Vol/Sats 0.1S 0.25 0.25 0.08 0.17 0.17 0.07 0.15 0.15
0.08 0.25
0.25
Crit Moves: +*++ wwwr «wrr
w+«w#www++#w#ww+wwwww«ww«rww«t#ww+«wi+««r*r+wirwww««««w«rwr#«««««!««+w+w+wwfw++w
«*««
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
X
CD
-D O
CD O 0
O Z
40
O O
� W
W �
Existing Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 14:36:23 Page 9-1
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 Without Project
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCH Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
!!#latttlafi##!##!!ta!!### !4####a•a#t#At#!ii#iiala##iAit!#i#i!#!!a!##Attti!!ii#!
Intersection #2 Driveway on Red Hill
!##lAtt#A#####aAi!lift*iiia#ia###!!t#!AtlfAt#aAtaAA*Alit###!##ani#t#a#!A#aaAitaa
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Services ( 0.01
ii#liana####i#a##aa#*##a##A#!alis#t1►iltaAa!!a#aa♦aaaAA#tai#a#!!ai##r!#alrila!#!a
Approach: North Bound South Bound Mast Bound West Bound
Movement s L - T - R L - T - R L- T - R L - T - R
------------ ------------------------------
II -
��-------------- il-•-------------I
Controls Stop Sign Stop Sign UncontrolledUncontrolled
Rights Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------i---------------11---------------11---------------11---
------------
Volume Module:I
Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Initial Bee: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PHF Adj, 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 '0.00 0.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------I---------------11---------------II
Critical Chap Modules
Critical Gpt 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FollowUpTio: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
------------ I--------------- 11 --------------- II---------------
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Potent Cap.& 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Move Cap.: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Volume/Cap: 0.00 o.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
------------I---------------t1---------------II
Level Of Service Modules
2Way95thQ& 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Have,
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SharedQueue: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shrd ConDels 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Shared LOss
ApproachDels 0.0 0.0 0.0
ApproachLOS: 0.0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
alas#aA#t#asA#aA##aa#slAilAli#AAA###A##A#A#A#!#tis#�
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OXITSU, TUSTIN. CA
Existing Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 14:36:23 Page 10-1
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Rxisting plus Reuse Alternative 1 Without Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCH Unsignalised Method (Future Volume Alternative)
!!###t##a##A#AiiiR#a#i!liiilAala##ttAA#!#aa!!Aa##f!#t!#RlAa#a!t#!#alt#AA#ttAtAtt
Intersection 92 Driveway on Red Hill
!!#!i!!#iii!!*i#i!!!Ai•#!#!!Ai##!##!at#attA##aa###aif!###alt#!A#At###ttttttt#t##
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: ( 0.01
####a!i#!#!!#4laaltliai.#ai##!t#!#!ii#t####!!f!!###!iilfiitiiilfia###iii#i#iii#ii
Approach& North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement : h - T - R L - T - a L - T - R L - T - R
------------1---------------II---------------II--------------- ---------------1
Controls Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lams: 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- ---------------II---------------II---------------I
Volume Modules
Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adjs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Initial axes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVols 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Puts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PHF Volumes 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol s 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Op: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FollowUpTims 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Capacity Module:------------11---------------II---------------II---------------I
Cnflict Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Potent Cap.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Move Cap.: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
---------------II- '-II---------------I
Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQs 0.0 0.0 0.0 0_.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Del& 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Moves
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.& 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SharedQueue& 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shrd ConDel: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Shared LOS&
ApproachDel& 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ApproachLOSs
Notes Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2005 Dowling Asec,:. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
�p
Existing Plus PM - Fri Dec 15, 2006 14:36:23
------------------ ------ ---------------------------------
Page
11-1
Existing Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 14:36:23 Page 11-2
cc Cn
CD 0
A 5 9 -
75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
--------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
--L E
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 Without Project
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 Without Project
0 :3Level
Of Service Computation Report
fwwwwffwwfwtwf:f*f*A+►fwwfwww#www#fffwffwwwAwwlfAw#wtww#fww*!*w#twf*#*wAwltlt#twf
z
1994 HCM Unsignalised
##!#t#!ww##AlwtA!!flwwf!!lfwffwwwflwf#ff!•f♦A##Aw#lAtflffflft.fffAAflflfwwAwwtwft
Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #3 Driveway on
Walnut
� O
Awww#wwwwwwrw#ffff#wltwAfw#Aw#tff#!ltffwfffflwwrwAAAAff#ffww#wwfwwtf#AwltA#!flfw
4
Average Delay (sec/veh)s
w!lwwfflflwfff:•fwwwfww#fwfww#wfltw+►wffwwlrwwtww!#wf*f!!#:wffww+twtwf:wftrwwwwwfw
0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service:
�
Approach: North Bound
South Bound Rant Bound
West Bound
Movment s L - T - R
------------ ---------------
L - T - R L - T - R
II---------------
L
- T
- R
Control: Stop Sign
Ila --------------II
Stop Sign Uncontrolled
--------------- 1
Uncontrolled
Rightss Include
Include Include
include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0
---------------------------II---------------
1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0
0
0 1
1 0
Volume Module
II ---------------
II --------------
I
Base Vol: 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
0
Growth Adj= 0.00 o.00 o.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
O
User Adj# 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0.0 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
PHF Adjs 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
O
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
0
Final Vol.: 0 0 0
------------
0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
0
Adjusted Volume Module:-----II---------------II--------•------I)
---------I
Grades 04
Oi 01
04r
& Cycle/Cares xxxx xxxx
xXxx Xxxx XXXX xxxx
8 Truck/Comb: xxxx xxxx
xxxx xxxX xxxx xxxx
xxxx
xxxx
xxxx
PCE Adj# 0.00 0.00 0:00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00
xxxx
0.00
0.00
CyCl/Car PCB: xxxx xxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxx
Trck/Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx
xxxx
xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX
xxxx
xxxx
Ad j vol .# 0 0 0
------------I---------------II---------------il
0 0 0 0 0 0
xxxx
0
xxxx
0
0
Critical Gap Module:
MoveUp Time: 1.0 1.0 1.0
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Crit Op Adjs 0.00 0.00 o.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Critical Gps 0.0 0.0 0.0
------------II---------------II---------------II---------------
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Capacity Module:
I
Cnf lict Vol: 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
0
Potent Cap.# 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
0
Adj Cap= 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Move Cap.: 1 1 1
------------I---------------II---------------II------------
1 1 1 1 1 1
1
1
1
Level Of Service Modules
Control Deli 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
LOS by Moves
Movements IT - LTR - RT
LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
LT -
LTR
- RT
Shared Cap.: 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
0
Shrd ConDels 1.0 1.0 1.0
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Shared LOS:
ApproachDel: 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
Traffix 7.9.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
Existing Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 14:36:23 Page 12-1
-- ------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIB
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 Without Project
-----------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 RCM Unrignalised Method (Future Volume Alternative)
1111!/l11w11#!1«1It1#«wrwlll•111«Iw1111111/«111«111lIr1«/«««««#111«/*«1!111.1111
Intersection #3 Driveway on Walnut
•!!1#w1111/#1lIRII/w#1#11111«11!11/ww«#!«wlwlww«11#111/«111l1/11•Iw/11«f11lflwlw
Average Delay (sec/veh)s 0.0 Worst Case Levet Of Service:
!##«#!«/r1«IRI#*!11111#1111#!11#411111tlIw111111tIw«««111«###♦I«1«•1111111111111
Approach: North Bound South Bound Bast Bound West Bound
Movements L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------------- --------------- ��---------------��---------------
Control, �
Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes s 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 O 0 0 1 1 0
------------
--------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module,�
Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 0.o0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
PasserByVols 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PRF Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PRY Volume: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0
Final Vol.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0
Adjusted volume Module:
Grade: 04 04 Of of
t Cycle/Care: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxXc xxxx
t Truck/Coubs xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxXac
PCE Adis 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Cycl/Car PCS: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
Trck/Cab PCS, xxxx xxxx xxxx X3= xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
Adj Vol.s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Critical Gap Module:
MoveUp Time: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Critical Gp: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
------------ I --------------- -------------
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Potent Cap.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Adj Caps 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Move Cap.: 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Level Of Service Module: ----II--------------- --------------- ---------------�
Control Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move:
Movements LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shrd ConDels 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Shared LOS:
ApproachDels 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
CDTraffix 7.3.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
O
T) E
CD
OZ
O
O
O
-+, -
-.L
0) W
W --,
Existing Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 14:36:23 Page 12-2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reese Alternative 1 Without Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IIfA//!11lw1111«#1111411###«/w11111l1#!!!!#1!#1111!!114!!*#!!!11!!!!!!1!!!!1!4!1
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
mm
V
(Q U) Existing Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 14:36s23
Page 13-1 Existing Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 14:36:23 Page 14-1
(D O------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------
--------------------------E JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
= City of Tustin City of Tustin
O O Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 Without Project Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 Without Project
O-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Z Base Queue Report (cars) Future Queue Report (cars)
0')O-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
W O Northbound Southbound Rastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Node Intersection L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R Node Intersection L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R
W
#2 (2Way95thQ): 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
$2 (2Way95thQ): 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
X
CD
CnO
OJ E
CQ
CD O
Z
-� O
0 0
rnw
Existing Plus AIM Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:20,17 Page 1-1
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
----------------------------------------------------------
Scenario Report
Scenarios
Existing Plus AN
Commands
Existing Plus AN
Volumes
Existing AN
Geometry:
Nerrte m,
Impact Fee:
Default Impact Fee
Trip Generation,
AN
Trip Distributions
ALL
Pathos
Default Paths
Routess
Default Route!
Configurations
Existing Plus AN
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to K#TZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
Existing Plus AN Fri Dec 1S, 2006 11:20:17 Page 2-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
txirting Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trip Generation Report
Forecast for AN
Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total t Of
# Subsone Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Total
------------------------------------- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- -----
1 81 -Unit Resi 1.00 Townhomes 8.00 22.00 8 22 30 100.0
sone 1 gubtotal ............................. 8 22 30 100.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL.................................0................ 8 22 30 100.0
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN. CA
-0 X
0) CDD
CQ U) Existing Plus AN Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:20:17 Page 3-1
CD0 ------------------------- -7- - ---------------------------------
5 -Unit Residential Project TIS
—' = - City of Tustin
N ----------------Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
O----------------------------------------------------------
Z Trip Distribution Report
O Percent Of Trips Townhouses
W O
4
To Gates
1 2 4 5 6
Zone----- ----- ----- ----- -----
I 15.0 15.0 5.0 10.0 55.0
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
Existing Plus AN
Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:20:17
---- -------------------------------
Page 4-1
JA6539
- 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
Turning Movement Report
AN
Volume
Northbound
Southbound Eastbound
Westbound
Total
Type
Left Thru Right
Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
Left
Thru Right
Volume
61 Red
Hill & Walnut
Base
111 413 157
93 988 53 132 402 333
308
445
100
3534
Added
1 0 0
5 2 2 4 1 1
0
1
0
17
Total
112 413 157
98 990 55 136 403 334
308
446
100
3551
92 Driveway on Red Hill
Base
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
0
0
Added
2 4 0
0 0 3 9 0 9
0
0
0
27
Total
2 4 0
0 0 3 9 0 9
0
0
0
27
#3 Driveway on Walnut
Base
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
0
0
Added
0 0 O
4 0 0 0 2 0
0
2
2
10
Total
0 0 0
4 0 0 0 2 0
0
2
2
10
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
X
CD
-� O
CD 0
.a Z
W O
C:)O
-�, -4
C) W
W -I
dor.•-:.: 404
Existing Plug AN Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:20:17 Page 5-1
------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Volume Report
Base Volume Alternative
-------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Mestbound
Node Intersection L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R
1 Red Hill a Wa 111 413 157 93 988 53 132 402 333 308 445 100
2 Driveway on R O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Driveway on W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN. CA
Existing Plus AN Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:20:17 Page 6-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Volume Report
Future Volume Alternative
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Node Intersection L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R
1 Red Hill a Wa 112 413 157 98 990 55 136 403 334 308 446 100
2 Driveway on R 2 4 0 0 0 3 9 0 9 0 0 0
3 Driveway on N 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
Y.NCD
co U) Existing Plus AM Fri Dec 15, 2006 11e20:17 Page 7-1
(D O --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-� C JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
-� = City of Tustin
O Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
O:3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
h Z Impact Analysis Report
0 Level Of Service
W O) Intersection Base Future Change
' Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in
W LOS Veh C LOS Veh C
# 1 Red Hill 4 Walnut B xxxxx 0.678 B xxxxx 0.681 + 0.002 V/C
6 2 Driveway on Red Hill 0.0 0.000 A 9.0 0.000 + 9.040 D/V
# 3 Driveway on Walnut 0.0 0.000 A 8.5 0.000 + 8.534 D/V
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KKTZ OXITSU, TUSTIN, CA
E]
Rxisting Plus AM Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:20:17 Page 8-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Threshold Report (Base Alternative)
Threshold Criteria (Ops LOS >- *)(Plan LOS >- *]
(Delay >- 60.0001(V/C 3,- 1.000)
Intersection Movement LOS Delay V/C
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
X
CD
W
0
C
CQ =�
CD 0
�Z
al 0.
0 O
� W
W �
Existing Plus AM Fri Dec 15, 2006.11:20:17 Page 9-1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
---------------------------------------------
Threshold Report (Future Alternative)
Threshold Criteria [Ops LOS >- *)[Plan LOS >- *)
[Delay >- 60.000) [V/C >- 1.000)
Intersection Movement LOS Delay V/C
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KhTE OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
Existing Plus AM Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:20:17 Page 10-1
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
AAft#ff#f!•f!#AAA!!AlfAAffl4l�lf#!#lAtf!*#!AA##AA!#lAAAAlfA!#AAAA#Af!##A#lAAAtfA
Intersection. #1 Red Hill 4 Walnut
lAft!#fAiflf#•flfA#•#liffflfAlf##AAA#fAfflAf•!##f#A###AAAA#fflflfAlflfAfflf!!#AA
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.678
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R-4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 71 Level Of Service: B
#AA!##A#AAA!##AA#AAA#######i#Af####A#Aff#AAf#A#•ff#fAfAlAfA#fff#A##♦Af##AtA#!#f#
Street Name: Red Hill Ave Walnut Ave
Approach: North sound South Bound Bast Bound West Bound
movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
----I------I'------1,------II------
Control:ProtectedProtectedProtectedProtected '
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes s 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0
------------I---------------11---------------11--------------- ---------------�
Volume Module:
Base vol: 109 405 154 91 969 52 129 394 326 302 436 98
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02
Initial Sze: 111 413 157 93 988 53 132 402 333 308 445 100
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 111 413 157 93 988 53 132 401 333 308 445 100
Reduct Vol: O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 111 413 157 93 988 53 132 402 333 308 445 100
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol s 111 413 157 93 988 53 132 402 333 308 445 100
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------�
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
Adjustments 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.17 0.83 1.00 1.90 0.10 1.00 1.09 0.91 2.00 1.63 0.37
Final Sat.: 1700 3695 1405 1700 3227 173 1700 1861 1539 3400 2776 624
-�i---------------��---------------��---------------��---------------
Capacity �
Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.11 0.11 0.05 0.31 0.31 0.08 0.22 0.22 0.09 0.16 0.16
Crit Movesf lAff #A!t A#Af A!#f
!A#f#AAAfA!!lffffA#AfAAftAAAAAlA#!!#fA#A!#f##f##A##A##A!##AAfff#####ffAi**AlAfA#
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN. CA
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
T
Existing Plus AM
Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:20:17
Page 11-1
Existing Plus AM Fri
Dec 15, 2006 11:20:17
Page
12-1
CO-------------------------
---------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(D p
- 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
JA6539 75
-Unit Residential Project TIS
E
City of Tustin
City of Tustin
=
p--------------------
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
-----------------------------------------------------------
Existing Plus
Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
p =3
0
-�+ z
ICU 1(Lose
------ --
Level Of Service Computation Report
as Cycle Length #) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of
Service Computation Report
-----------------
2000 HCH Unsignalized
Method (Base
Volume Alternative)
Intersection #1 Red Hill G walnut
W O
A# ##*##!###### #######!!##!A##A###A#!#AAAAAA#A#####AA#A#####!•AA###!#♦####A######
Intersection
MZ Driveway on Red Hill
~
W
Cycle (sec):
Loss Time (sec):
100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X):
0 (Y+R-4.0 sec) Average
0.681
•####!####A#A##Al#AAlAiA•#A#A#A#AAlAlAAA##AAAAA###!##AAAAAAAAAA#A#AA#A#AA##A!###
Average Delay
(sec/veh):
0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service:
(
0.01
Optimal Cycle:
AA!##AAAAAlAAAAA###A###AA###AAA##AAA#A#!A##!A#AAA##A###A#AA##AAA######A##!#!#!##
Delay (sec/veh):
71 Level Of Service:
XXX
B
A###AAAA♦##A###AR#!AA#A!#!#lAAA•#lAAf#A##A##A!A#A##A#####AAAA#•##AAAAAAAA##AAAA#
Approach:
North Bound
South Bound
Bast Bound
West Bound
Street Name:
Red Hill Ave Walnut Ave
Movement:
------------
L- T- R
---------------
L- T- R
---------------
L- T- R
L-
T-
R
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound hest Bound
Control:
Stop Sign
Stop Sign
---------------1j---------------1
Uncontrolled
Uncontrolled
Movement: L
- T - R L - T - R L - T - R L
- T - R
Rights:
Include
Include
Include
Include
------------ ---------------11---------------
Control: Protected
---------------11---------------
Protected Protected Protected
Lanes:
____________
0 1 1 0 0
_______________
0 0 1 1 0
---------------
0 0 11 0 0
0
0 0
0 0
Rights:
include Include Include
Include
Volume Module
__ _�'
-)
Min. Green: 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
Base Vol:
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0
0
0
Lanes: 1
-------•----I ---------------
0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0
--------------- ---------------
Growth Adj:
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Volume Module:
---------------
Initial ase:
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0
0
0
Base Vol: 109
405 154 91 969 52 129 394 326 302
436 98
User Adj:
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Growth Adj: 1.02
1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02
1.02 1.02
PHF Adj:
PHF Volume:
0.00 0.00 0.00
0
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Initial Bee: 111
413 157 93 988 53 131 402 333 308
445 100
Reduct Vol:
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
Added Vol: 1
0 0 5 2 2 4 1 1 O
1 0
Final Vol.:
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0
PasserByVol: 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
------------
_______________11____-_________
Initial Fut: 112
413 157 98 990 55 136 403 334 308
446 100
Critical Gap
Module:
11
11
1
User Adj: 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
Critical Op:
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
PHF Volumes 112
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
413 15 7 98 990 55 136 403 334 308
1.00 1.00
Follo UpTim:
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Reduct Vol: O
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
446 100
0 0
____________ I --------------- 11
Capacity Module:
--------------- 11_______________
Reduced Vol: 112
413 157 98 990 S5 136 403 334 308
446 100
Cnflict Vol:
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0
0
0
PCB Adj: 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
Potent Cap.:
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0
0
0
MLF Adj: 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
Move Cap.:
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1
1
1
Final Vol.: 112 413 157 98 990 55 136 403 334 308
-----11---------------11---------------11-------------
446 100
-)
Volume/Cap:
------------ I
0.00 0.00 0.00
---------------
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
1700 1700
+---------------
Level Of Service Module
2Way95thQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0
��---------------
0.0
��---------------
�
Adjustment: 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
Control Del:
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Lanes: 1.00
2.17 0.83 1.00 1.89 0.11 1.00 1.09 0.91 2.00
1.63 0.37
LOS by Move:
Final Sat.: 1700
------------I ---------------,
3695 1405 1700 3221 179 1700 1860 1540 3400
2777 623
Movement:
LT - LTR - RT
LT - LTR - RT
LT - LTR - RT
LT -
LTR
- RT
Capacity Analysis
--------------- --------------- ---------------
Module:
Shared Cap.:
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0
0
0
Vol/Sat: 0.07
0.11 0.11 0.06 0.31 0.31 0.08 0.22 0.22 0.09
0.16 0.16
SharedQueue:
Shrd ConDel:
0.0 0.0 0.0
1.0 1.0 1.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
1.0 1.0 1.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
1.0 1.0 1.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
1.0
Crit Moves: ++**
***+ ••*+ **++
Shared LOS:
AAAA#AAAAlA####AAAA#!A#A#####tit##A##A#+AAA###ifAA#AlAAAAA#AAA######AA#####A##A#
ApproachDeli
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
ApproachLOS:
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
X
CD
0
O
(O �
CD O 0
Z
-I O
0 0
�--4
a) w
W -X
Existing Plus AM Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:2.0:17 Page 13-1
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
-----------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
•!#r#r!##•!!!ww#!A••wwlw!#•i•*ww!!iw#lwww#•rwwww#!!!!w#w*AlrAAArlwrww•w•!#lwwwwA
Intersection 92 Driveway on Red Hill
lwiwwiwwA#w!•!!w###ww#r##A!lAAAlAAwlf#!w•wi•#wwwwlw*wwwtlA#*w#!lwAwwA!!#wAlAAAAA
Average Delay (sec/veh)s 6.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: At 9.01
lAAwwwAwlAAw!#!wwlAw!!wr!#!!##w#!#•#••##wrwAw!!wA•www!##*A**wwiiAw•#w#•w•##!w•ww
Approach: North Bound South Bound Bast Bound West Bound
Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------I---------------II--------------- ---------------II---------------I
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes a 0 1 1 O 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- il---------------I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.03 1.02 1.01 1.02
Initial Bee: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 2 4 0 0 0 3 9 0 9 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
Initial Fut: 2 4 0 0 0 3 9 0 9 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PKF Volumes 2 4 0 0 0 3 9 O 9 0 0 0
Reduct Vols 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 2 4 0 0 0 3 9 0 9 0 0 0
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp s 7.1 6.5 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx noocx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTix: 3.5 4.0 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
-------------II---------------II-------------- II---------------
Capacity ModuleI
Cnf l i ct Vol: 13 23 xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0 0 xxxx Xootxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.s 995 875 xxx= xxxx xxxx 900 900 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: 984 866 xxxxx xxxx xxxx 900 900 xxxx xxxx xxxx x33nac
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 0.01 XXXX xxxx xxxx xxxx X3=
Level of Service Module: ----II (I II---------------)
2Way95th0: Xxxx 0.0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx XXXXX xxxx xxscn xXcxx
Control Del : xxxxx 9.2 xxxxx xxx= xxxx xxxxx 9.0 xxxx XXXXX XXXXX XWK xxx�ac
LOS by Move: * A * w # ! A w w r w w
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT IT - LTA - RT
Shared Cap.: 921 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 900 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx XXXXX
SharedQueue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 0.0 xxxxx xxxx Xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xx'xxx
Shrd ConDel: 8.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 9.0 X== xxxx xxxxx XXX= xxxx Xoocxx
Shared LOS: A * * * # A w ! • • • A
ApproachDel s 9.0 9.0 Xo30=
ApproachLOSs A A . •
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITBU, TUSTIN, CA
Existing Plus AM Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:20,17 Page 16-1
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCH Unsignalized Method (Base volume Alternative)
#!!!!!!!!##!#wlwAwwlAwAAwAwAAwAAAAAwAAAA!#wlA.A!!!i!#!!!!!#!lwwwAlAwlwAlr!#!#!i#!
Intersection #3 Driveway on Walnut
!!##!!!!Aw♦wwAwAAlwrlAAw#A!!#!##!!#!w!w####!#fit!#w#twlw#!!!#!wAlAARlAwAwwwttA#!
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: [ 0.01
lwwwlwlfwlwlw#Aw•#!wr#wifrrr#rriii#i###r##ii#r•i•••iir!#i#rii!#i!###•rw#if#rlwr#
Approach: North Bound South Bound Bast Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T it L - T - R
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes : 0 0' 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
--------------II---------------II---------------II---------------
Volume Module:I
Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Initial Beat 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Critical Gap Modules
Critical Gp: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FollowUpTim: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Capacity Modules
Cnflict Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Potent Cap.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0
Move Cap.: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
------------ I ---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move:
Movement: IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SharedQueue: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shrd COnDel: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Shared LOS:
ApproachDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ApproachLOS:
Notes Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
r#i•w#!!♦w•www!liiiwr•riiilili!•••r#•#•##r#r!•r•lri�
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU. TUSTIN, CA
CD
CQ (n
Existing Plus AM Fri Dec 15, 2006 11s20s17 Page 15-1
CDO --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_a E JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
-� = City of Tustin
CO O Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
O:3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-h Z Level Of Service Computation Report
-.L O 2000 HCM Unsignalixed Method (Future Volume Alternative)
C) 1###!•AAA♦AA#AAA#AA!!#!A!•r•!A!#A!!!!A!!!!•!•#*aAA!•A#•A#*••}•A!•!A!•••##!••••A••
W
00 Intersection $3 Driveway on Walnut
' !•!!••!•!•A•A•*#AAA!•#!••#•AA!•AA#AAAA#•A#A###AA#to#••!•!•AAA!!AA#}••}♦#}#•AAA#A
W Average Delay (sec/veh): 3.4 Worst Case Level Of Service, A[ 8.5]
�� AlAAAAAAA######}}}####}}#A••!A!•!#AAA#AAA•tlAA!#•AA#lA4A!!•fltAlA##A•lAAA!!A•##!
Approach: North Bound South Bound east Bound Nest Bound
Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
---- ---Sc�-Sign---��---Stop-Sign---��--Vncon�rolled-��---------------
ControlsVncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
-------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
volume Modui::�
Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02
Initial Bee: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2
PasserByVols 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol-: 0 0 0 4 O 0 0 2 0 0 2 2
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx x30cxx
------------��------------- 11 --------------11 --------------
Capacity Module:)
Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 4 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap-: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1023 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxoom
Move Cap.s xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1023 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Caps xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx moa xxxx xxxx xxxx XXXX
---- ---------------11------------ --11-- ------------
Level Of Service Module,�
2Way95thQ s xxxx xxxx xx3ocx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx X23=
Control Del : xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.5 xxxx XX3= x' 23acx 300= x30otx xxxx 300=
LOS by Moves ! ! • A A ! A • • ! • !
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.s xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxx=
SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx Xxxxx xxxxx xxxx Xxxxx
Shrd ConDelsxxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: # +► • * • • • ! • # ! *
ApproachDels xxxxxx 8.5 x300xx
roachLOS : •O°�
a►PP A } •
#A•!••••!#•!!!A!•AA•AA#}}AA#A#AAAAA}AAAlAlAAA}!••!!!#•AAA!!!•!A•!!!A!!!lAAAAA}#}
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Existing Plus AN Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:20:17 Page 16-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base Queue Report (cars)
--------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Diode Intersection L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R
$2 [2Way95th0)s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
#3 [2Way95thQ]s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Traff ix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
Existing Plus AN Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:20117 Page 17-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Future Queue Report (cars)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Node intersection L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R
#2 [2Way95thQ]s 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxx 0.0 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
#3 (2Way95thQ] : xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.0 M= X)= xxxu Xmm xxxx X3= xxroc Xocxx
X
CD
Cl)
0 Traffix 7.6.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
(c =
CD 0
Z
coo
0 0
��
0)w
W�
O CD
CQ Cn
Existing Plus PM
Fri Dec 15, 1006 11:20:10
CD O
-----------------------------------•---------------------------------Page
-1-1---
—� C
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
IV =
City of Tustin
0
Existing
Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
O--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
h Z
Scenario Report
�O
Scenario:
Existing Plus PM
W O
Command:
Existing Plus PM
4
volumes
Existing PM
C
Geometry:
Nearterma
Impact Fee:
Default Impact Fee
Trip Generation:
PM
Trip Distributions
ALL
Paths,.
Default Paths
Routes&
Default Routes
Configuration:
Existing Plus PM
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN. CA
Existing Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:10:10 Page 2-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
Trip Generation Report
Forecast for PM
Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total 4 Of
# Subsone Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Total
------------------------------------- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- -----
-
1 81 -Unit Resi 1.00 Townhomes 26.00 17.00 26 17 43 100.0
Zone 1 Subtotal ............................. 26 17 43 100.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL.................................................. 26 17 43 100.0
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
X
CD
O
W E
CD
N Z
O
0 0
� w
w�
Existing Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:20:10 Page 3-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Witi
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Trip Distribution Report
Percent Of Trips Townhouses
To Gates
1 2 4 5 6
Zone ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
1 15.0 15.0 5.0 10.0 55.0
Tratfix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU. TUSTIN, C4
Rxisting Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:20:10 Page 4-1
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Turning Movement Report
PM
:':.1ivenve Martrbo i d Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total
Type Left Thru Right- Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume
#1 Red Hill s Walnut
Base 253 1085 174 131 460 112 120 406 105 255 713 147 3982
Added a n 0 4 2 2 6 1 1 0 4 0 26
Total 257 1085 174 135 482 114 128 407 106 255 717 147 4008
82 Driveway on Red Hill
Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added 7 3 0 0 0 11 7 0 7 0 0 0 35
Total 7 3 0 0 0 11 7 0 7 0 0 0 35
83 Driveway on Walnut
Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 0 0 2 8 20
Total 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 0 0 2 B 20
T=affir. ?.°.:?:5 na6 Ooulirg Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
CD
(Q Cn Existing Plus PH Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:10:10 Page 5-1
CDO --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
E JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
N = City of Tustin
N 0 Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
0=3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'h Z Intersection Volume Report
�O Base Volume Alternative
C) O --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~ Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
GJ Node Intersection L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R
1 Red Hill 4 Wa .253 1085 174 131 480 112 120 406 105 255 713 147
2 Driveway on R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Driveway On W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
+ rys• ii M� :Yin: •t!�
Existing Plus PH Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:20s10 Page 6-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse alternative 1 With Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Volume Report
Future Volume Alternative
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Node Intersection L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R
1 Red Hill 6 Wa 257 1085 174 135 482 114 128 407 106 255 717 147
2 Driveway on R 7 3 0 0 0 it 7 0 7 0 0 0
3 Driveway on W 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 0 0 2 8
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to S71TZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
X
CD
0
CQ =�
CD 0
N Z
W 0
0 0
a� w
Existing Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:20:10 Page 7-1
--------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
-------------------------------------------------------
Impact Analysis Report
Level Of Service
intersection Base Future Change
Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in
LOS Veh C LOS Veh C
6 1 Red Hill i Walnut B xxxxx 0.648 B xxXoxx 0.656 + 0.008 V/C
# 2 Driveway on Red Hill 0.0 0.000 A 9.0 0.000 + 9.049 D/V
# 3 Driveway on Walnut 0.0 0.000 A 0.6 0.000 + 0.000 D/V
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OXITSU, TUSTIN, CA
Existing Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:20:10 Page 8-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Threshold Report (Base Alternative)
Threshold Criteria (Ops LOS >- *)(Plan LOS >- *)
(Delay )P• 60.000)(V/C >a 1.000)
Intersection Movement LOS Delay V/C
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
0)CD
(a Cn Existing Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 11120:10 Page 9-1
CDO -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
_a C JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
N = City of Tustin
-Pl. O Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
O=3 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
'-'� Z Threshold Report (Future Alternative)
-� O
W O Threshold Criteria (Ops LOS >• *](Plan LOS >• •j
(Delay )1'• 60.0001 (V/C >• 1.000]
W Intersection Movement LOS Delay V/C
Existing Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:20:10 Page 10-1
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 4) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
##rtr#rAlrrAAAA!!lAAAArlAAAIAA!!!!r!r!♦AAAAAr•A!!tlArlAAA!!!!r##!!rrlrlrrlttt#!r
Intersection Red Hill 6 Walnut
lrrr•rrArArrrrtrr•rrrAArrrrrrrrrrr*rrrr#rrt##rrrr###r##rrr##trrrr##rr#t##rrr###•
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.646
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y♦R-4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 65 Level Of Service: B
rAri#•rrrrrirlrrrrrrrAirrr#rrr#t#r##r#t#r#rrrt#r#r##rrrr*!r##########tt######♦rr
Street Name: Red Hill Ave Walnut Ave
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11---------------�
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0
--------------11---------------11---------------11---------------
Volume Modules
�
Base Vol: 248 1064 171 128 471 110 118 398 103 250 699 144
Growth Adj3 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02
Initial Bae: 253 1085 174 131 480 112 120 406 105 255 713 147
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.410 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 253 1065 174 131 480 112 120 406 105 255 713 147
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol, 253 1085 174 131 480 112 120 406 105 255 713 147
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol.: 253 1085 174 131 480 112 120 40i JOS 255 713 147
---- 11 11--------------- --------------
Saturation Flow Module: �
Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.58 0.42 1.00 1.62 0.38 1.00 1.59 0.41 2.00 1.66 0.34
Final Sat.: 1700 4394 706 1700 2756 644 1700 2701 699 3400 2819 581
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------�
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.25 0.25 0.08 0.17 0.17 0.07 0.15 0.15 0.08 0.25 0.25
Crit Moves: ♦rrr rrr# ##r# #tt#
rrr##r*rrrr#rt#rr#r!r#r##ttr#rtr##irtk#r#rlttkrrr#rttrrrrr#!#rrlrr##A#t #!r######
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OYITSU, TUSTIN, CA Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
N
CD
Cn
-� O
E
CQ
CD
N Z
Ln O
O O
a) W
W ---�
Existing Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:20:10 Page 11-1
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
Cit- of actin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
----------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU Moss as Cycle Length 4) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
wrwwwwrw####!w##w!#www#rw!##fwr##!r###www#wflw#!w!#rwrfr#!r#!w##r!#!#!!#!#*#!wr!
Intersection #1 Red Hill 4 Walnut
r!w#!rr*r+rrr+►w!lrwwrrrrrwwrrr#!r!##w###!####!rlrrwrtrrrr rrrrsrr##1+wrwwlrwrrwrw
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.656
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R-4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): �ooac�oc
Optimal Cycles 66 Level Of Service: B
•w!#rwrlwwrr##wwrrwrr!##rr#!#ww#!r##r#w#wrtrrw#wrrrrrrrw#rrrrr#wwrwrwwwwwwwwwrr#
Stree . Kama: heck bill Ave Walnut Ave
Approach: North Bound South Bound Bast Bound West Bound
Movement:L- T- R L- T- R L- T- R L- T- R
------------I ---------------11-------------11---------------11------------•--�
Control: protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0
-------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
--lose Module:�
Base Vol: 24. 1064 171 128 471 110 118 398 103 250 699 144
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02
Initial Baez 253 1085 174 131 480 112 120 406 105 255 713 147
Added Vol: 4 0 0 4 2 2 8 1 1 0 4 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 257 1085 174 135 482 114 126 407 106 255 717 147
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 257 1085 174 135 482 114 128 407 106 255 717 147
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 257 1085 174 135 482 114 128 407 106 255 717 147
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol.: 257 1085 174 135 482 114 128 407 106 255 717 147
----- --------------- 'I ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:�
Sat/Lase: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.u0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.58 0.42 1.00 1.62 0.38 1.00 1.59 0.41 2.00 1.66 0.34
Final Sat.: 1700 4394 706 1700 2749 6S1 1700 2697 703 3400 2822 578
--- --------------- 11
Capacity Analysis Module:�
Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.25 0.25 0.08 0.18 0.18 0.08 0.15 0.15 0.08 0.2S 0.25
Crit Moves: ww#r r#wr ww## ww#w
#rrwr#!r#rrwwrw#wrww#w#rww#w#r!#wrr#r#+rrr#r!#rwr#!#rrwr+wrr+wwlrwwlwwr#wwr#wrrr
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU TUSTIN, CA
Existing Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:20:10 Page 12-1
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignali:ed Method (Base Volume Alternative)
wlwrlwww!#wrrw#r!lrrrrwtr#wrwww##!##ri#wwlr#rrwww#ww#ww!lwwwlwilwww#rwrwr##rw#w!
Intersection 67 Driveway on Red Hill
www###w#rwr#wrrrrw##lwrtr•www!##!r#wlrfrlf!#rtr#wrww#r#wrrrr##w#r#wr#wwwr#wwt##w
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: ( 0.01
#rw#rrrwwrwrr#wrwwwlwwr#rrw#rwwwwwwwwr#wrrrwwwwwwrwwwwrrwwwwwrw#rwwrrrrwrrwwwwww
Approach: North Bound South Bound Bast Bound West Bound
mov=tn t • L - T - -. :. T - =. L - T - R L - T - R
------------'---------------"---------------II---------------I'------ I
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------:--------------��---------------��---------------��---------------
Volume Module�
Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.00 o.00 o.00 o.0o 0.00 0.00 0.00
initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
l-------- --------------- --------------- --------•------
Critical GapModules�
Critical Gp: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FollowUpTim: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
------------ --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Modular�
Cnflict Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Potent Cap.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Move Cap.: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Volume/Capi 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-
-------------------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------�
Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move:
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SharedQueue: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shrd ConDel: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Shared LOS:
ApproachDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ApproachLos:
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
r#r###lrwwwrwwlrrlrlrrrwrrrwwrrrwrrrwwwrwrwwwwwwwrrr
Traffix :.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU. TUSTIN. CA
Existing Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:20:10 Page 14-1
6TA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HCM Unsignalised Method (Base Volume Alternative)
#!«A#A«!«!«AtA**!t«*«#**«!*«!«*««#•A!!t«*!#!#AA##A##Ati**«##i!#*#««#t##fit««!R*!
Intersection #3 Driveway on Walnut
««A«!tt«*«**#***#*#**##«**#tort*****##****tR#!**tt*«!*##*lAtAw##*#!#*#ARRrt#t*tt
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service:
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - RL - T - R
------------ I ---------------11---------------11----------- 11 --------
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
�
Volume Module:
Bass Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adjs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PHF Volume: O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- if --------------- ---------------I
Adjusted Volume Module:
Grade: Olt 06 04 0•
t Cycle/Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
t Truck/Cosh: xxxx Xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
PCE Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Cycl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 30= xxxx xxxx
Trck/Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
Adj Vol.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ ------------------------- --------------- ---------------�
Critical Gap Module:
MoveUp Time: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Crit Gp Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.00 o.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Critical Gp: 0.0 0.0 0.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------�
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Potent Cap.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Adj Cap: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Move Cap.: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
----II---------------��---------------II--------------
Level of Service Modula:
Control Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move:
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shrd ConDel: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Shared LOS:
ApproachDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TU IN, CA Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU. TUSTIN, CA
CD
(o
Existing Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:20:10
Page 13-1
(D O
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
,-L C
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential
Project TIS
N)=
City of Tustin
M O
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
O=3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-*+ Z
Level Of Service Computation
Report
O
2000 HCH Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
W O
Intersection
#2 Driveway on Red Hill
1
W
�
Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: A( 9.01
!##!****!♦!*«#A!*t«♦#*«tt«t!«!!##«A#«!*#«!##«!Ar«!A«««««ttt!«#!«t!!*At«*!•«!«#r«
Approach:
North Bound South Bound
Sant Bound West Bound
Movements
------------
L - T - R L - T - R
---------------
L - T - R L - T - R
Control:
---------------
Stop Sign Stop Sign
--------------- ---------------�
Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights:
Include Include
Include Include
Lanes:
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
--------------
0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
--------------- ��---------------��---------------
Volume Module:
�
Base Vol:
0 0 0 0 O 0
0 0 0 0 O 0
Growth Adj:
1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02
1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02
Initial Bse:
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol:
7 3 0 0 0 11
7 0 7 0 0 0
PasserByVol:
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 O 0 0
Initial Fut:
7 3 0 0 0 11
7 0 7 0 0 0
User Adj:
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj:
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume:
7 3 0 0 0 11
7 0 7 0 0 0
Reduct Vol:
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.:
7 3 0 0 0 11
7 0 7 0 0 0
Critical Gap
Module:
Critical Gp:
7.1 6.5 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.2
4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTia:
------------
3.5 4.0 xxxxx Xxxxx xxxx 3.3
--------------- ---------------
2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx X==
11
Capacity Module:
--------------- ---------------�
Cnfiict Vol:
1s 18 xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0
0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.:
1001 881 xxxxx xxxx xxxx 900
900 xxxx xxxx xxxx XXXXX
Move Cap.:
984 874 xxxxx xxxx xxxx 900
900 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap:
0.01 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01
0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
----��--------------- ��-----------•---��---------------
Level Of Service Module,
�
2Way95thQ:
xxxx 0.0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
0.0 xxxx Xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Control Del:xxxxx 9.1 xxxxx x3cKxx xxxx xxxxx
9.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move:
* A * �► * «
A « * * !
Movement:
IT - LTR - RT LT - LTA - RT
LT - LTR - RT LT - LTA - RT
Shared Cap.:
963 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 900
xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:
0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 0.0 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx X== xxxx xxxxx
Shrd ConDels
8.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 9.0 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS:
A • * ! « A
« • * ! « !
ApproachDel :
8.8 9.0
1000= X300=
ApproachLOS:
A A
« !
Note: Queue reported
is the number of cars per
lane.
Existing Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:20:10 Page 14-1
6TA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HCM Unsignalised Method (Base Volume Alternative)
#!«A#A«!«!«AtA**!t«*«#**«!*«!«*««#•A!!t«*!#!#AA##A##Ati**«##i!#*#««#t##fit««!R*!
Intersection #3 Driveway on Walnut
««A«!tt«*«**#***#*#**##«**#tort*****##****tR#!**tt*«!*##*lAtAw##*#!#*#ARRrt#t*tt
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service:
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - RL - T - R
------------ I ---------------11---------------11----------- 11 --------
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
�
Volume Module:
Bass Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adjs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PHF Volume: O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- if --------------- ---------------I
Adjusted Volume Module:
Grade: Olt 06 04 0•
t Cycle/Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
t Truck/Cosh: xxxx Xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
PCE Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Cycl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 30= xxxx xxxx
Trck/Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
Adj Vol.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ ------------------------- --------------- ---------------�
Critical Gap Module:
MoveUp Time: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Crit Gp Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.00 o.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Critical Gp: 0.0 0.0 0.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------�
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Potent Cap.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Adj Cap: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Move Cap.: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
----II---------------��---------------II--------------
Level of Service Modula:
Control Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move:
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shrd ConDel: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Shared LOS:
ApproachDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TU IN, CA Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU. TUSTIN, CA
X
CD
y
-� O
CO O�
CD �
N Z
4 O
Existing Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:20:10 page 14-2
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
----------------------------------------------------------
•w#ww•r*rw•rw•r*•rwwwrAwlwlrw•#!•rww••fwww#•www##rwi•##rfwww•#wA*#••!t#•wfrAAw#f
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
Rxisting Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 lls20:10 Page 15-1
JA6S39 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HCM Unsignalised Method (Future Volume Alternative)
a•••!••w!##•#rf•A#iffAr•f#fwwlrffArw!#!wr#f•##Aw##•rrf•••r#wr•r••ww•wwr•w•www•#•
Intersection B3 Driveway on Walnut
w#wf!!!A#!ltifffff#AiAAAA*A##!•w•#fr•w••fwww•f•♦www#rfwfwwr•Ar#r•rwf••r••#flfi!#
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: A
wAwwfwA•rwffArlfA•wAwA•!ww•wr#••w•!r•rwwwwr••rf•wwrr#lwwr##•Aw•r••wwrwrww•r••wr•
Approach: North Bound South Bound Bast Sound West Bound
Movements I. - T - R L - T - R L - T - R T - T - R
------------ i--------------- i i--------------- i i--- i i i
----•------- -------•-------
Control: Stop .Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------�
Volume Modules
Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 O 0 3 0 0 0 7 0 0 2 8
PasserByVol: 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial ruts 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 0 0 2 8
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 3 0 O 0 7 0 0 2 8
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 0 0 2 8
Adjusted Volume Module:
Grades Oi 0# 08 0#
8 Cycle/Carse xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxnx xxxx
t Truck/Coabs xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
PCS Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00
Cycl/Car PC$s xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xx3oc xxxx xxxx
Trck/Cob PCEs XXXX xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
Adj Vol.e 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 0 0 2 8
Critical Gap Modules
MoveUp Timesxxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Critical Gpaxxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------�
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxXc 13 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1039 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Adj Cape xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx X== xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap a xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1039 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
------------I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------�
Level Of Service Modules
Control Delexxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Moves • • • A # ! • • r • • •
Movements LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: r # # • w w # • • • • •
ApproachDels xxxxxx 3.5 0.0 0.0
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
i1I CD
CQ On
CD O
E
ONO O
O:3
--h Z
—' O
CA .
W O
4
W
Existing Plus PM Fri Dec 15 2006 11:20:10
--------------------------------------------------------------------pagel5
------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#!!A###AAAAA#!•!!!A!!!!AA###At#A#!#A##!#!A!!#A!#!#A!!!A!!AA!!AA!##!#!!A#t!A#!A!!
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
Existing Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 1120:11 Page 16-1
----
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
------------------------ --------------------
Base Queue Report (cars)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound Southbound Eastbound westbound
Node Intersection L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R
*2 (2May95thQIs 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
X
CD
-0 0
� .
CD O 0
N Z
co 0
0 0
� w
w�
Existing Plus PM Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:20:11 Page 17-1
--------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Existing Plus Reuse Alternative 1 With Project
-----
------------------------------------------------------------
Future Queue Report (cars)
---------------------------------------------------------
Northbound Southbound Rastbound Westbound
Node Intersection L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R
R2 [2Way95thQ]: 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxx 0.0 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
Traffix 7.6.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
V
O O
Post 2020 AN Alternative i e 1 Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:26:22 Page 1-1
tDO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
E
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
W =
City of Tustin
O O
Post 2020 AN Alternative 1 with Project
O:3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scenario Report
-� O
Scenario:
Post 2020 AN Alternative 1
O
W O
4
Command:
Post 2020 AN Alternative 1
i
Volume:
Post 2020 AN Alternative 1
W
Geometry:
Future
-,
Impact Fee:
Default Impact Fee
Trip Generation:
AN
Trip Distribution:
ALL
Paths:
Default Paths
Routes:
Default Routes
Configuration:
Post 2020 AN Alternative 1
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OXITSU, TUSTIN, CA
t
Post 2020 AN Alternative 1 Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:26:22 Page 2-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
-----Post 2020 AN Alternative 1 With Project
--------------- --------------------------------------------------------
Trip Generation Report
Forecast for AN
Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total 0 Of
S Subzone Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Total
------------------------------------- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- -----
1 81 -Unit Resi 1.00 Townhomes 8.00 22.00 8 22 30 100.0
Zone 1 Subtotal ............................. 8 22 30 100.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL.................................................. 8 22 30 100.0
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
X
CD
D7
T O
ivC
(C)
(D O 0
W Z
—� O
O
O
-+, -4
�W
W�
Post 2020 AN Alternative 1 Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:26:22 Page 3-1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Post 2020 AN Alternative 1 With Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Trip Distribution Report
Percent Of Trips Townhouses
To Gates
1 2 4 5 6
Zone ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
1 15.0 15.0 5.0 10.0 55.0
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
Post 2020 AN Alternative 1 Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:26:22 Page 4-1
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Post 2020 AN Alternative 1 With Project
------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------
Turning Movement Report
AN
V01-0Me Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total
Type Left Thru Right Left Thru flight Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume
#1 Red bill 4 Walnut
Base 125 466 177 105 2220 280 160 453 375 347 501 113 5321
Added ] 0 0 5 2 2 1 3 1 0 0 17
Total 126 466 177 110 2222 282 164 454 376 347 502 113 5339
#2 Driveway on Red Hill
Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added 2 4 0 0 0 3 9 0 9 0 0 0 27
Total 2 4 0 0 0 3 9 0 9 0 0 0 27
#3 Driveway on Walnut
Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 10
Total O 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 10
Traffir. 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN. CA
Post 2020 Art Alternative 1 Fri Dec 1S, 2006 11:26:23 Page 5-1
-------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Post 2020 AN Alternative 1 With Project
-------------------------------------
Intersection Volume Report
Base Volume Alternative
-----------------------------------------------------
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Node Intersection L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R
1 Red Hill a Wa 125 466 177 105 2220 280 160 453 375 347 501 113
2 Driveway on R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Driveway on W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
Post 2020 AN Alternative 1 Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:26:23 Page 6-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Post 2020 AN Alternative 1 With Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Volume Report
Future Volume Alternative
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Node Intersection L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R
1 Red Hill a Wa 126 466 177 110 2122 282 164 454 376 347 502 113
2 Driveway on R 2 4 0 0 0 3 9 0 9 0 0 0
3 Driveway on W 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN. CA
Post 2020 AM Alternative 1 Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:26:23 Page 7-1
----------------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Post 2020 AM Alternative 1 With Project
-----------------------------------------------------------
Impact Analysis Report
Level Of Service
Intersection Base Future Chance
Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in�
LOS Veh C LOS Veh C
# 1 Red Hill 4 Walnut S xxxxx 0.959 B xxxxx 0.961 + 0.002 V/C
# 2 Driveway on Red Hill 0.0 0.000 A 9.0 0.000 + 9.040 D/V
# 3 Driveway on Walnut 0.0 0.000 A 8.5 0.000 + 8.534 D/V
X
CD
O7
0 Traff ix 7.6.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to rATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN. CA
(o =
CD 0
w Z
w0
0 0
�y
0� w
Post 2020 AM Alternative 1 Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:26:23 Page 8-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Post 2020 AM Alternative 1 With Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Threshold Report (Base Alternative)
Threshold Criteria (Ops LOS >- *1 (Plan LOS >- +1
(Delay i= 60.0001 (V/C >S 1.0001
Intersection Movement LOS Delay V/C
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 1006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
CD
CO Cn
CD O
E
O
O =
Z
-.'o
CEJ p
1
GJ
Post 2020 AM Alternative 1 Fri Dec 15, 2006 ll126:23 Page 9-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Post 2020 AM Alternative 1 with Project
--
Threshold Report (Future Alternative)
Threshold Criteria (Ops LOS >- *)(Plan LOS >- *j
(Delay >- 60.o0o)(V/C >- 1.0001
Intersection
Movement LOS Delay V/C
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
Post 2020 AM Alternative 1 Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:26:23 Page 10-1
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Post 2020 AM Alternative 1 with Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU Moss as Cycle Length t) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
w##ww#w!w!w#!!f#!!#ww!!!!!!!w!!!#t!#!f!!!##!!#!!!•!R!!!!!!!##**#!#!#!#######*###
Intersection #1 Red Hill 6 walnut
#wrw#!!##!!#!!!#!*#i•!!!#!!A#w##*www!#**###w####!##w!!ww###wi!#w###•#####w###!!#
Cycle (sec)s 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.959
Loss Time (sec), 5 (Y+R-4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh), xXXX-XX
Optimal Cycle: 143 Level Of Service: B
#wwww#rww#w#+www#wwww#wwww#wwwwwwwww:wwwwwww#wwww#ww#rw##wwwww#wwwww#wwwwwwwwww#
Street Name: Red Hill Ave Walnut Ave
Approachs North Bound South Bound East Bound hest Bound
Movements L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11---------------�
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 2 0 1
------------
VolumeModule: --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11---------------
Base Vol: 12S 466 177 105 2220 280 160 453 375 347 501 113
Growth Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse, 125 466 177 105 2220 240 160 453 375 347 501 113
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volumes 12S 466 177 105 2220 290 160 453 375 347 501 113
Reduct Vols 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 125 466 177 105 2220 280 160 453 375 347 501 113
PCE Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol.: 125 466 177 105 2220 280 160 453 375 347 501 113
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- -----------------------------
Saturation Flow Module, I
Sat/Lane, 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes, 1.00 2.17 0.83 1.00 2.66 0.34 1.00 1.09 0.91 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1700 3696 1404 1700 4529 571 1700 1860 1540 3400 3400 1700
Capacity Analysis Modules--------------- 11
odulen---'f 'I ------ I' --•--- �
Vol/Sats 0.07 0.13 0.13 0.06 0.49 0.49 0.09 0.24 0.24 0.10 0.15 0.07
Crit Moves, !w!! www# www# #www
#ww#w#wlt#w!w##•!#w##w##taw####wwwww♦w*#wwww#####www####ww#ww#Rw##w#####w#######
Traffix 7.9.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
X
CD
T U)
V O
O C
CQ =
CD 0
W Z
CJl O
O
O
-1, -4
CY) W
W -.L
Post 2020 AM Alternative 1 Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:26:23 Page 11-1
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Post 2020 AM Alternative 1 With Project
-----------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length f) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
AAAAAA#AA«A!«iA«#wAt#«#AAw«A!«w#•A#AA«tArftw#A#AlAAlA!!*!wA#####�.##!#«#A!#A!A###
Intersection *1 Red Hill 6 Walnut
wr#«l�.rs*.«.••«###«AlwAw#Aw#A##!w#A#!#AAA#A!!«Ar#A!A#•Awwr##wwwAAw«#Aw«www##««#
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(Y): 0.961
Loss Time (sec) : S (Y+R-4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : �onoc�ot
Optimal Cycle: 147 Level Of Service: g
wra#!w«!♦#Aw##www#«A!«www«wAA###Ar#«####wAlArrwlww#wlrr:#wlwwAww#rw#Ar#«wwww#A#«
Street Wei : ::- '* *-; • . Walnut Ave
..0 .»aaY •r�i�
Approach: North Bound South Bound Zast Bound West Bound
Movements L - T - R L - T - R L T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------
-
Control: Protected Protected Protected (I Protected I
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0
Lanes. 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 2 0 1
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------•------ ---------------�
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 12S 466 177 10S 2220 280 160 453 375 347 S01 113
Growth Adj: 1.0o l.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial 65e: 125 466 177 10S 2220 280 160 453 375 347 SOI 113
Added VO1: 1 0 0 S 2 2 4 1 1 0 1 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 126 466 177 110 2222 282 164 434 376 347 S02 113
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 126 466 177 110 2222 182 164 4S4 376 347 502 113
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 126 466 177 110 2222 382 164 454 376 347 S02 113
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol.: 126 466 177 110 2222 282 164 4S4 376 347 S02 113
------------ i --------------- ---------------II
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
Adjustmec:: _.00 1.00 1.CC 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.17 0.83 1.00 2.66 0.34 1.00 1.09 0.91 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1700 3696 1404 1700 4526 S74 1700 1860 1540 3400 3400 1700
Capacity Analysis Module:--- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------�
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.13 0.13 0.06 0.49 0.49 0.10 0.24 0.24 0.10 0.15 0.07
Crit Moves: w##• AA«A #!w! ##!A
•#awA#r##«««AAAA#AAAlw4A#AAA«!A#!AA#««#A#Aw!«#!♦r«AA#•«Aww#«wwww#w«w!#w!w#wwA##«
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU. TUSTIN, CA
Post 2020 AM Alternative 1 Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:26:23 Page 12-1
JA6S39 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Post 2020 AM Alternative i With Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
##!#A#AA#!w#wA##wa#wwlwAAw#!ww«wwrww«!#wArw##A«#w!##!Aw####w!«Af#«#!A##AAr#wA#AA
Intersection $2 Driveway on Red bill
AA#a«#waw#.walww#wwA#wwww#www#wA####Ar«AAww#w«###AAA#AA!##A###wwww+##w•####wA«A!
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: ( 0.01
#r###wwr►#w##ww###A##A###A##w#########A SAA#w##w########Aww##A#s##ww#A##A««###r###
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound heat Bound
Movements L - T - R L• - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11---------------�
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11---------------
Volumtie Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Initial ese: 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PUF Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------�
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FollowUpTim: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
------------ --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Module:�
Cnflict Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Potent Cap.: O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Move Cap.: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
2Way95th0: 0.0 A.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move:
Movement: IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SharedQueue: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shrd ConDel: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Shared LOS:
ApproachDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ApproachLOS:
Mote: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
A##wr#!w«##!r#•wwAlwAwA#wfwwAAA#AA##f#wA#AAA«A##wrAA
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
_U X
Post 2020 AM Alternative 1 Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:26:23 Page 13-1
-------------------
� �
�) p
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Pro----------------•------------
Project TIS
E
City of Tustin
Post 2020 AM Alternative 1
with Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
:3
Level Of Service Computation Report
0 Z
2000 HCH Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
trrwlwwwrtwrwrwwtwtww#rtwrr##r##rtrtwrlw!♦rrwwwwwlw!!tt!#ww!!r#ltrr!lrrttrr#!#t#
Intersection
#2 Driveway on Red Hill
W p
r!#!*#rwr#rrwwwr!!!rwlwwrwrwwlrrtwtttwwlrrr####rutt#wwrrrwrw*rrtrtlwtrrrwwwttrwr
4
Average Delay (sec/veh): 6.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: A( 9.0)
rwwwwrw*ttrrww+wwrwrwlw#
Approach:
rrr*tw#ttrr*www+wwrwlwrwttttlttrwrwr##rlrrrlwwrwrr#wwwww
North Bound South Bound
Mast Bound West Bound
Movements
-
L - T - R L - T - R
� -,I
L - T - R L - T - R
Control:
-
Stop Sign Stop Sign I`
--
Uncontrolled Uncontrolled)
Rights:
Include Include
Include Include
Lanes:
0 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
-------------- ---------------
0 0 11 0 O 0 O 0 O 0
Volume Module.
--------------- --------------
Base Vol:
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj:
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse:
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol:
2 4 0 0 0 3
9 0 9 0 0 0
PasserByVol:
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut:
2 4 0 0 0 3
9 0 9 0 0 0
User Adj:
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj:
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume:
2 4 0 0 0 3
9 O 9 0 0 0
Reduct Vol:
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.:
2 4 0 0 0 3
9 0 9 0 0 0
Critical Gap
Module:
Critical Gp:
7.1 6.5 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.2
4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim:
------------
3.S 4.0 xxx= xxxxx xxxx 3.3
--------------- 11
2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xXXxx
--------------- 11
Capacity Module:
--------------- ---------------)
Cn f l i c t Vol:
23 23 xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0
0 X3(= x00cxx xxxx xxxx x30=
Potent Cap.:
99S 87S xxxxx xxxx xxxx 900
900 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.:
984 866 xxxxx xxxx xxxx 900
900 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxx=
Volume/Cap:
0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00
0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
----11---------------��---•-----------��---------------
Level Of Service Module:
�
2Way9SthQ:
xxxx 0.0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Control Del:xxxxx 9.2 xxxxx xxx= xxxx xxxxx
9.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move:
• A. ! r w !
A # • r r. w
Movement:
IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
LT - LTR - RT LT - LTA - RT
Shared Cap.:
933 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 900
xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:
0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 0.0 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd ConDel:
8.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 9.0 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS:
A ! # # ! A
# ! ! r # #
ApproachDel :
9.0 9.0
X300= X000=
ApproachLOS:
rwlrtwrw#wrrwwwtwrtrlw#wtltrwrrw#!!trlrwttrirwrrwlrlrwwwlwwtwrrrtrtwrtlttwtw#!##
A A
. w
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
Post 2020 AM Alternative 1 Fri Dec 1S, 2006 11:26:23 Page 14-1
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Post 2020 AN Alternative 1 With Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 RCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
trrrrlwrtr#r#tt!!w#!###t www!!rr#ttrrwr!#t#######t#r###!!###w####!###wr#rltrwwrwt
Intersection #3 Driveway on Walnut
lrrrwrwlwwr##wwrwwwwwwtrwwww#wwr♦rr+trwwwwwlwwlwttrwrrwwtwrwwttrwrtwrttrlwtttrr#
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: ( 0.o)
#twwwtittwrwrrrr#ttrtftrtf#flrftrrrwtwtwwrrrwwrrwwwwwrwwwrwwwwwwttwwwwwwwwwwwriw
Approach, North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movements L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------• --------------- --------------- --------------
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include include Include
Lanes : 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------�
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.0o 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PHF Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
--------------------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Critical GapModule,�
Critical Gp: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FollowUpTim: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Potent Cap.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Move Cap.: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
2Way9SthQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move:
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SharedQueue: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shrd ConDel: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Shared LOS:
ApproachDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ApproachLOS:
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
wwlw!ltlww#!#!!w!##twlww##!t!r#rsr#tltt!ltrwrwwrwrrr
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
X
CD
W
O
Cc
CD 0
WZ
40
0 (=)
� W
W -�
Post 2020 AM Alternative 1 Tue Dec 12, 2006 15:39:02 Page 13-1
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Post 2020 AM Alternative 1 With Project
--------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalised Method (Future Volume Alternative)
tt!#•ftttlt!•#!••t##t#•t!t!ltttlAlt!!tt!##t!•!tt!*•#••#t••••••f••••f••!!•!•t!!#!
Intersection 62 Driveway on Red Hill
♦tt#••#!!!!•ttttt!•+t•#t!lttltt!•••tt••#!t!t!!4!!!4!•t!!tt••1••!tt#•!•ltt/t•tAltt
Average Delay (sec/veh): 8.8 Worst Case Level Of Service: F(709.3)
•lttt•#•••t##•#••f•ttt!##t••!i•ttttttt#••tlt#t##!#••#•••••!t••tf•••ttt!!tt!!#•#it
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- -------- ----
Controls Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 1 '0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 3 739 0 0 2605 3 8 0 12 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 3 739 0 0 2605 3 8 0 12 0 0 0
Added Vol: 5 0 0 0 0 3 9 0 13 0 0 0
PasserByvol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Futi 8 739 0 0 2605 6 17 0 25 0 0 0
User Adis 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volumes 8 739 0 0 2605 6 17 O 25 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 8 739 0 0 2605 6 17 0 25 0 0 0
Critical Gap Modules
Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTime 2.2 xxxx xxxxu xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxx=
--------------------------- --------------- if --------------- II
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 2611 xxxx xxxxK xxxx xxxx xxxxx 2994 xxxx 1306 xxxx xxxx X00cxx
Potent Cap.: 167 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 11 xxxx 153 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.s 167 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 11 xxxx 153 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap: O.OS xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 1.S9 xxxx 0.16 xxxx xxxx xxxx
------------ I --------------- ---------------11---------------
Level Of Service Modules
2Way95thQ: 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxx= xxxx xxxx xxocxx
Control Del: 27.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx x000oc xxxxx xxxx X300oc XXX= xaocx XXX
W9 by Move: D • # • • # # # * • • •
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxx= xxxx 24 xXocxx xxxx xxxx XXXxX
SharedQueuesxxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 5.3 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd ConDel s xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxa0oc xxxxx 709 xxxmc Xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOSe • • • • +► # # F • • •
ApproachDel: xxxxxx X300= 709.3 Jo0ucxx
ApproachLOS: • • F #
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traff ix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OXITSU, TUSTIN, CA
Post 2020 AM Alternative 1 Tue Dec 12, 2006 15:39:02 Page 14-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
Citi of Tustin
Post 2020 AM Alternative 1 With Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base Queue Report (cars)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound. Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Node Intersection L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R
62 (2Way95thQl: 0.1 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 2.4 2.4 2.4 xxxx xxxx xxxx
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
�`�Ai%w � A7Aa.�.... •:z....:�1� c. .lhe�i,.Stiw`
CD
(Q U) Post 2020 AM Alternative 1 Fri Dec 15 2006 11:26:23 Page 17-1
(D O --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-L E JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential project TIS
W O City of Tustin
Post 2020 AN Alternative 1 With Project
p------------------------------------------------------
Z
Future Queue Report (care)
O--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
W O Northbound Southbound Rastbound Westbound
~ -- --
6 Node Intersection L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -• T R L T -- R
X12 (2Way95thQ]: 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxx 0.0 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
03 [2Way95thQ]: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
X
CD
-D O
(Q .
CD O 0
WZ
(O O
0 O
� W
W �
Post 2020 PM Alternative 1 Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:26:55 Page 1-1
Traff ix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN. CA
Post 2020 PM Alternative 1 Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:26:55 Page 2-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Post 2020 PM Alternative 1 With Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trip Generation Report
Forecast for PM
Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total 4 Of
# Sub:one Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Total
------------------------------------- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- -----
1 81 -Unit Resi 1.00 Townhomes 26.00 17.00 26 17 43 100.0
Zone 1 Subtotal ............................. 26 17 43 100.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL.................................................. 26 17 43 100.0
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Post 2020 PM Alternative 1 With Project
--------------------------------------------------------
Scenario Report
Scenario:
Post 2020 PM Alternative 1
Command:
Post 2020 PH Alternative 1
Volume:
post 2020 PM Alternative 1
Geometry:
Future
Impact Fee:
Default Impact Fee
Trip Generations
PM
Trip Distributions
ALL
Paths:
Routes
Default Routes
Configuration:
Post 2020 PM Alternative 1
Traff ix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN. CA
Post 2020 PM Alternative 1 Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:26:55 Page 2-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Post 2020 PM Alternative 1 With Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trip Generation Report
Forecast for PM
Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total 4 Of
# Sub:one Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Total
------------------------------------- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- -----
1 81 -Unit Resi 1.00 Townhomes 26.00 17.00 26 17 43 100.0
Zone 1 Subtotal ............................. 26 17 43 100.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL.................................................. 26 17 43 100.0
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
0) (ti
CQ 07 Post 2020 PM Alternative 1 Fri Dec 15 2006 11:26:55
CDO - ---------------------------------------------------------------------page-3-1---
IJA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
= City of Tustin
O 0 Post 2020 PM Alternative 1 With Project
0--------------------------------------------------------------
h Z Trip Distribution Report
-..x O
O Percent Of Trips Townhouses
WO
4 To Gates
W 1 2 4 5 6
Zone ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
1 15.0 15.0 5.0 10.0 55.0
Post 2020 PM Alternative 1 Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:26:55 Page 4-1
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post 2020 PM Alternative 1 With Project
Turning Movement Report
Ph
Volume
Northbound
Southbound Eastbound
Westbound
Total
Type
Left Thru Right
Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
Left
Thru Right
Volume
#1 Red
Hill 4 Walnut
Base
285 1900 280
147 760 126 390 458 118
370
804
166
5824
Added
4 0 0
4 2 2 a 1 1
0
4
0
26
Total
289 1900 280
151 782 128 398 459 119
370
808
166
5850
#2 Driveway on Red Hill
Base
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
0
0
Added
7 3 0
0 0 11 7 0 7
0
0
0
35
Total
7 3 0
0 O 11 7 0 7
0
0
0
35
#3 Driveway on Walnut
Base
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
0
0
Added
0 0 0
3 0 0 0 7 0
0
2
8
20
Total
0 0 0
3 0 0 0 7 0
0
2
8
20
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
X
CD
O
CO
CD 0
�Z
O
O p
CY) W
W --x
Post 2020 PH alternative 1 Fri Dec 15, 2006 11x26,55 Page 5-1
-----------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Post 2020 PH Alternative 1 With Project
-------------------------------------------------
Intersection Volume Report
Base Volume Alternative
--------------------------------------------------
Northbound Southbound Rastbound Westbound
Node Intersection L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R
1 Red Hill a Wa 285 1900 280 147 780 126 390 458 118 370 804 166
2 Driveway on R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
"ew=i ;.-z.w 1 � v v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
Ppst 2020 PH Alternative 1 Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:26:55 Page 6-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Post 2020 PH Alternative 1 With Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Volume Report
Future Volume Alternative
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound Southbound Rastbound Westbound
Node Intersection L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R
1 Red Hill R Wa 289 1900 280 151 782 128 398 459 119 370 808 166
2 Dri vewty cwt D 7 14 0 n n ii 7 0 7 0 5 0
3 Driveway on W 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 0 0 2 8
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
s
V
O O
Cn
Post 202 Alternative
0 PM f ave 1 Fri Dec 15, 2006 11x26,55
Page 7-1
CDO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
XJA6539
- 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
�► =
City of Tustin
N 0
O--------------------------------
Post 2020 PM Alternative 1 With Project
-----------•-------------
Z
Impact Analysis Report
O
Level Of Service
W 0
Intersection Base Future
Change
IDel/
V/ Del/ V/
in
LOS Veh C LOS Veh C
# 1 Red Hill a Walnut F xxxxx 1.030 F xxxxx 1.038
+ 0.008 V/C
# 2 Driveway on Red Hill 0.0 0.000 A 9.0 0.000
+ 9.049 D/V
# 3 Driveway on Walnut 0.0 0.000 A 8.6 0.000
+ 8.557 D/V
Post 2020 PM Alternative 1 Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:26,55 Page 8-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Post 2020 PM Alternative 1 With Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Threshold Report (Base Alternative)
Threshold Criteria [Ops LDS >- *][Plan LOS >- *1
(Delay >- 60.000J(V/C >- 1.0001
Intersection Movement IAS Delay V/C
# 1 Red Hill & Walnut NO TH XXXXXX 1.031
# 1 Red Hill R Walnut NB RT XXXXXX 1.031
# 1 Red Hill & Walnut SB LT XXXXXX 1.031
# 1 Red Hill 4 Walnut SS LT XXXXXX 1.031
# 1 Red Hill i Walnut WB Tai XXXXXX 1.031
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
N
CD
W
O
� .
CD O 0
Z
W O
C:)
O
-+, -4
CA W
W --%,
Post 1020 PH
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alternative 1
Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:26:55
Page 9-1
JA6539 -
75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Post 2020 PM Alternative 1 With Project
----------------------------------------------------------
Threshold Report (Future Alternative)
Threshold Criteria
(Ops LOS
>- *](Plan LOS >- *)
(Delay >-
60.0001 (V/C >- 1.0001
Intersection
Movement LOS
Delay V/C
0 1 Red Hill
i Walnut
Na TH
XXX3= 1.040
M 1 Red Hill
4 Walnut
NS RT
XXXXXX 1.040
* 1 Red Hill
4 Walnut
RB LT
XXID= 1.040
* 1 Red Hill
4 Walnut
SB LT
XXXXXX 1.040
0 1 Red Rill
4 Walnut
WB TH
XXX)= 1.040
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
Post 2020 PM Alternative 1 Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:26:55 Page 10-1
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tust'_^
Post 2020 PM Alternative 1 With Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length •) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
w#rrarwaar.trrrrw#r#*awr*wr*rrwRrwrw�*rrrrrr*r*#rrrwrrr#r**a*rr,r�wrrrwr##rrrr#r#r
Intersection O1 Red Hill S Walnut
♦rrrwrrrarrr#rrrwwrrrrrrrrrwr#rwr#rrw#rrrtrrrrwrwww##rrwwrwwrwwawrwwwwr#rww#waar
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap-(X): 1.030
Loss Time (sec)= 5 (Y+R-4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: F
•rwrwrrrwrrrrrwarrrwwwwrrrwrwaw♦rwrrwrrrwrwrrwrrwrarrwrrrw♦wrrrwwwawwrrrw#rrw#wr
Street Name: Red Hill Ave Walnut Ave
Approach: North Bound South Bound Bast Bound west Bound
Movements L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- 11---------------�
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 2 0 1
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11---------------�
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 285 1900 280 147 780 126 390 458 118 370 804 166
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Doe: 28S 1900 280 147 780 126 390 458 118 370 804 166
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 285 1900 280 147 780 126 390 458 118 370 804 166
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 285 1900 280 147 780 126 390 458 118 370 604 166
PCB Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol.: 28S 1900 280 147 780 126 390 458 118 370 804 166
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.61 0.39 1.00 2.58 0.42 1.00 1.59 0.41 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1700 4445 655 1700 4391 709 1700 2703 697 3400 3400 1700
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------�
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.17 0.43 0.43 0.09 0.18 0.18 0.23 0.17 0.17 0.11 0.24 0.10
Crit Moves: www• #rr# rrr# rrr#
♦arrrrwrrrrrrrwwrwrrrrw#rrwrrrrrrr#rrwrwa•rrrr•••••#w#rrrtrrawwww##ww#r#rrr#•rrw
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN. CA
(O CD Post 2020 PM Alternative 1 Fri Dec 15 2006 11:26:55
CDO --------------------------------------------------------------------Page-11-1---
E JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
� = City of Tustin
0 Post 2020 PM Alternative 1 With Project
0 =3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-++ Z Level Of Service Computation Report
�
p ICU Moss as Cycle Length 4) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
rr#r#r#ww###tr#t#wlwrlw#wlrtw#wt##ttt++#+ttwtwrltt###:#wwwrrwr###r#•w###########
W O Intersection 81 Red Hill 4 Walnut
♦#rrr#f##rwttwrwrr##wft##t!r#####w##w##rwr#tr###rtww!#!!########rrt#trtwf##!##tt
I
(� Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X)i 1.038
-� Loss Time (sec): 5 (Y+R-4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh)1 xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: F
w##r###t#twt#ttlww!!t!!r!!#lwwt##wr#tw#rtt#t#tw##wtt####r#twt#wwltt!###!w#!#t#!r
Street Name: Red Hill Ave Walnut Ave
Approach: North Bound South Bound Bast Bound West Bound
Movements L- T- R L- T- R L- T- R L- T- R
------------ I --------------- 1I --------------- 1J --------------- 11---------------�
Controls Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 O 1 1 0 2 0 2 0 1
--------------��--------------- ��--------------- �j---------------
Volume Module:�
Base Vol: 285 1900 280 147 780 126 390 458 118 370 804 166
Growth Adis 1.00 l.00 1.o0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 285 1900 280 147 780 126 390 458 118 370 804 166
Added Vol: 4 0 0 4 2 2 8 1 1 0 4 O
PasserByvols 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 289.1900 260 151 782 128 398 459 119 370 808 166
User Adis 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adis 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 289 1900 280 151 782 128 398 459 119 370 808 166
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 289 1900 280 151 782 128 398 459 119 370 808 166
PC2 Adis 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adis 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol.: 289 1900 280 151 782 128 398 459 119 370 808 166
-----'I I) i1---------------
Saturation Flow Module:�
Sat/Lanes 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanese 1.00 2.61 0.39 1.00 2.58 0.42 1.00 1.59 0.41 ,2.00 2.00 1.00
Ficial Sat.: 1700 4445 655 1700 4383 717 1700 2700 700 3400 3400 1700
--- Ij-------------- II --------------fl -----
Capacity Analysis Nodule=�
Vol/Sat: 0.17 0.43 0.43 0.09 0.18 0.18 0.23 0.17 0.17 0.11 0.24 0.10
Crit Moves: ++#+ ++++ t###
wtrw
+##•tw##r!#r#t###f##r#t#ltwttt#tt#tttttt♦tt##wtrlrr#w#!t*###twttrltw#t##wi4##w#t
Post 2020 PM Alternative 1 Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:26:55 Page 12-1
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Post 2020 PM Alternative 1 With Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCH Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
wr#t##rtr+t!!#rltttlt##tt!###tttltw#t!wltt#!!#tt#rww!!A#!#!t!#wwtwwtrt##tt#ttttw
Intersection *2 Driveway on Red Hill
#w#wt####twlww#!###r#+l++tt+##r###w!♦#!wt#wwtltr##tw######wr:##trr+t#w###w##ttrt
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: ( 0.01
##r#tt+tt#w•tr#r#rrr###rtr##r#r#trrw##w######rrw#rrr#w!##wr#w##rw#r##wr#rr##rr#w
Approach, North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Controlo Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes, 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 .11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
-------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module,�
Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adis 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Initial Roe: 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adis 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PHF Volume: O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------)
Critical Gap Modules
Critical Gp: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FollowUpTia: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------�
Capacity Modules
Cnflict Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Potent Cap.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Move Cap.: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------�
Level Of Service Module:
2Way95th0: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move:
Movements IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SharedQueue: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shrd ConDels 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Shared LOS:
ApproachDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ApproachLOS:
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
##tlww!#rrw###i«##r##fltt##tt##rw#rrttt•#r####tr###�
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
X
CD
O
CD O 0
Z
C1 O
O
O
--+� -4
C� GJ
W
Post 2020 PM Alternative 1 Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:26:55 Page 13-1
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Post 2020 PM Alternative 1 With Project
------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCH Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
AAAlAAAA#A#AltfAAfilAAAli!#AiAAiAiliiAilAAAliilAAlfAiliiAfii�AifiA!!RlitiiAitAAAA
Intersection #2 Driveway on Red Hill
AAiiAfiAAtAAAlAAAAtAii•iAiAiAAAiiili!liii#AA!lAitiifi!!AliAAlAAAiAAti!liiAAAiAii
Average Delay (sec/veh)s 7.2 Worst Case Level Of Services A[ 9.01
itAfii!liAiAAiA!#A#iAAiifAAtAAAfilAitfAAA#l•AAAtAAAi4AfAlAlAiiA!!A!♦AlfiAtiAiAii
Approach: Worth Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movements L - T - R L - T - R L - T- R L - T - R
------------ ---------
Controls Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include include
Lanes: 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------�
Volume Module:
Base Vols 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 7 3 0 0 0 11 7 0 7 0 0 0
PasserByVols 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 7 3 0 0 0 11 7 0 7 0 0 O
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PRY Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volumes 7 3 0 0 0 11 7 0 7 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.s 7 3 0 0 0 11 7 0 7 0 0 0
Critical Gap Modules
Critical Gp s 7.1 6.5 xxxaoc xxxxx xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxx= xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xwooc xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
--------------------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------�
Capacity Modules
Cnflict Volt 18 18 xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0 0 xxxx x300M xxxx xxxx xxXocx
Potent Cap.s 1002 881 xxxxx xxxx xxxx 900 900 xxxx XZXXX xxxx xxxx xxx=c
Move Cap . s 984 $74 xxxxx xxxx xxxx 900 900 xxxx 300ocx xxxx xxxx X==
Voluse/Cap: 0.01 0.00 xxxx x== xxxx 0.01 0.01 xxxx xxn xxxx xxxx xxxx
----11--------------- ----•---------- --------------
Level Of Service Module:�
2Way95thQs xxxx 0.0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxx=
Control Del:xxxxx 9.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 9.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: * A • A A # A • i A A i
Movements LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: 969 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 900 xxxx xxxx XXXXX xxxx xxxx xXcxx
SharedQueue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 0.0 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxx=
Shrd ConDels 8.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 9.0 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: A i • i A A • !
ApproachDel: 8.8 9.0 XJCK3= 3000=
ApproachL03: A A ! #
Notes Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN. CA
Post 2020 PM Alternative 1 Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:26:55 Page 14-1
JASS39 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Post 2020 PM Alternative 1 With Project
--------------------------------------7-----------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 KCM Unsignalised Method (Base Volume Alternative)
AAAAAi•AifilRiiiAAAiA AiiAfitiAAAAAiiii#i!lAAtAiiA♦iAiAiiAA4iilfAAA#AAlAlAAAAlAA!
Intersection #3 Driveway on Walnut
ltAAfAAiAlAAA*AiAAAAAAAAiiAiAtAAlAA!!Af#!AlAAAAiiAfAAlfitAflAAlAAlAAiAlilAfAiAAA
Average Delay (sec/veh)s 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: [ 0.01
#lliAAAAAlfAiAilAiAAAAAA•♦A!lAiAAlA#!!###!i!A!A!!!!A!!AA!!!#A#A!lAAAA#!!fA#!#A!!
Approach: Borth Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Controls
-- -Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights Include Include Include Include
Lanes : 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
------------ ---------------11--------------- --------------- ---------------�
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adjs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PHF Adjs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PHP Volume: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vols 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
---------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------�
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gps 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FollowUpTims 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
------------'--------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Module: )
Cnflict Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Potent Cap.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Move Cap.: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Volume/Caps 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-----------------��---------------��---------------��--------------
Level Of )
Service Modules
2Way95thQs 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Control Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move:
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SharedQueue: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shrd ConDel: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Shared LOSS
ApproachDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ApproachLOSs
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
AA#A##AAAIAAlAiiAlAi#AAlitAAiAiAi#!!!#!!lAAiilAiAAAi
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN. CA
CC) Cn
CD Post 2020 PM alternative 1 Tue Dec 12, 2006 15:40:55 Page 13-1
(D O --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IJA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
= City of Tustin
O O Post 2020 PM Alternative 1 With Project
O:3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
h z Level Of Service Computation Report
�
O 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
w*iw#R#i*#www##4#w*w!#ww,*ww*w******Rww*lwwAAAlw!*!Awllwwwww!#wwA*RwAAw*Aw*f#*ww
C+0 O Intersection #2 Driveway on Red Hill
wwlwwR!**#Rw*AwwwA!#AwAwwwAww!*!#!*##w!#w#*!•wAwww*www#wfAwAlw!!!w#wR#wwww#!w•A#
:
(� Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.8 Worst Case Level Of Service: F( 87.41
.� #*#!Aw**#*lwww#www#www*#wwR#wR!!lwwwww*!wlwRwwlww•!!rw#wwlw#!ww*!wR*w*##*ww*w!!w
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Hound
Movements L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ ---------------+--------------- --------------- --------------
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled stop sign Stop Sign -I
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
-------------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module�
Base Vol: 13 2456 0 0 1053 9 4 0 7 0 0 O
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 13 2456 0 0 1053 9 4 0 7 0 0 0
Added Vol: 15 0 0 0 0 11 7 0 10 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
initial Fut: 28 2456 O 0 1053 20 11 0 17 0 0 0
User Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 28 2456 0 0 1053 20 li 0 17 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 28 2456 0 0 1053 20 11 0 17 O 0 0
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
--------------- 11 --------------- ��-•----------- ---------------
Capacity Modules�
Cnflict Vol: 1073 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 2347 xxxx 537 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: 657 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 31 xxxx 494 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: 657 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 30 xxxx 494 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Caps 0.04 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxx3c xxxx 0.37 xxxx 0.03 xxxx xxxx xxxx
------------I --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- --------
-
Level Of Service Module: )
2Way95thQ: 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Control Del: 10.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xx30oc xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: B ! * ! * A * ! w * A w
Movement: IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 70 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 1.5 xxx= xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 81.4 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: ! * * w A A * F
.ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 87.4
ApproachLOS s • # �ocxxxx
F •
wwwfAAw#wi!!wR#w#w+#!w♦4*wwww#R#RwwRw#wR!#wA*lwRw*ww#lwwwlwlww#RAw#wwwR#w!w#wi*#
Notes Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Post 2020 PM Alternative 1 Tue Dec 12, 2006 15:40:56 Page 14-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Post 2020 PM Alternative 1 With Project
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base Queue Report (cars)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Node Intersection L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R
62 (2way95thQ]: 0.1 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.5 0.5 0.5 xxxx xxxx xxxx
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ ORITSU, TUSTIN, CA Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KATZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
X
CD
0
O
CQ `�
(D 0
.� Z
40
O O
h —4
� W
r2.
Post 2020 PM Alternative 1 Fri Dec 15 2006 11:26,55
---------------------------------------------------------------------=�-17-1---
JA6539 - 75 -Unit Residential Project TIS
City of Tustin
Post 2020 PM Alternative 1 With Project
------
Future Queue Report (cars)
--------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound southbound Eastbound Westbound
Node Intersection L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R
92 (2Way95thQ): 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxx 0.0 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxx ,Hoot xxxx xxxx
83 (2Way95thQ)r xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
Traffix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KRTZ OKITSU, TUSTIN, CA
A p di -k-
r y,C,i":*�'�,;..-.f...:'..-�'..�'�...d
Int's:+xor
,. s Y eft _ oc
IQ mOEM & Associates Ci of �'ustin
Tr tci rem �prd TraxsMij io-pkxxen
Red Hilflalrtut Residential Piafect Trak Study
Resolution No., 07-31
Page 148 of 163
THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
A project will normally have a significant adverse impact on traffic and circulation if it results in any of
the following conditions:
• An increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the
street system (i.e., results in a substantial increase in either the number of the vehicle trips, the
volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections); or,
• An increase in the level of service standard established by the Orange County Transportation
Authority for designated roads or highways.
• An increase in the number of the peak hour trips over and above a residential project in
conformance with the General Plan land use designation..
To understand how well a roadway or intersection is handling traffic, several concepts have been devised.
The first is a qualitative measure, referred to as Level of Service, which evaluates a roadway's operation
based on observations. A LOS "A" is an optimal traffic condition, while a LOS 'T' represents service
congestion. A second, more quantitative measure, referred to as Volume to Capacity Ratio (V/Q, is the
ratio of an intersecti(ni's or roadway's traffic volumes to its design capacity. The relationship between the
LOS and V/C Ratio 4-tre summarized below in Table C-1.
TABLE C-1
DEFINITIONS OF LEVEL OF SERVICE
Level of service Definitions
LOS
ICU Range (V/1C
Ratio)
Description
A
Less than 0.60
Free flowing traffic conditions, no congestion.
B
0.60 to less than 0.70
Generally free from congestion. All vehicles may clear signal
in a single cycle.
C
0.70 to less than 0.80
light congestion with occasional back-ups at critical
approaches.
D
0.80 to less than 0.90
Congestion at critical approaches.
E
0.90 to less than 1.0
Moderate to severe congestion during peak period.
Severe congestion.
F
1.00 or greater
Source: Blodgert/Baylosis Associates, 2000
Katz, Okitsu & Associates
Traffic Ergman and Transpwatwx PImmrs
City of Tustin
Red Hrl1/Walnut Residential Prkut �'i�t�c �tua�i
eso u i n o. 7-31
Page 149 of 163
DEFINITIONS OF LEVEL OF SERVICE
FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
(Source: City of Los Angeles Traffic Studies Policies and Procedures, November 1993)
Level of Volume/Capacity
Service Ratio Definition
A 0.000 - 0.600 EXCELLENT. No vehicle waits longer than one
Red light and no approach phase is fully used.
B 0.601- 0.700
VERY GOOD. An occasional approach phase is
PP
fully utilized; many drivers begin to feel somewhat
restricted within groups of vehicles.
C 0.701— 0.800
GOOD. may Occasionally, Y , drivers have to wait
through more than one red light; backups may
Y
develop behind turning vehicles.
D 0.801— 0.900
FAIR. Delays may be substantial during portions
of the rush hours, but enough lower volume periods
occur to permit clearing of developing lines,
preventing excessive backups.
E 0.901-1.00
POOR. Represents the most vehicles that
intersection approaches can accommodate; may be
long lines of waiting vehicles through several
signal cycles.
F Greater than 1.000
FAILURE. Backups from nearby intersections
or on cross streets may restrict or prevent
movement of vehicles out of the intersection
approaches. Tremendous delays with continuously
increasing queue lengths.
Katz, Okitsu & Associates
City of Tustin
Traft Engineers and Transportation Mannas
Red Hill/Walnut Residential Project Traffic Study
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 150 of 163
•
=
-
: :
r ,
s
r9jeco e an,
. r
{ r.
i
•
i
:
+
:
Y• S
' t
4 i
r
•
}
w
r • �
.'
s 1
f:
,1
Katz, OIdtsu ,Ms=iates
i
City of Tustin •
• Tic EAWwmyard Trmporratibn Pl�rcr::
•
• ..
� Red Hila�nut Resident" Pro ject Traffic Study
•
-
�
� Resolution No. 07-31
•
Page 151 of 163
r+
1
,
I
1
1
1a) CD
CQ Cot)
1 f
CD O
-
I
O11
�� Z
�' ls.
I .2' 1 r If.fi� _" _ r
1
1. _. .._ ...
= '�
_.t •- - -• - `r ___ ._. _-.:S
if -1 i ~ 1 •� 1.
F� _..... _ _._ ,_... , ....._.^ 1 --' '_' • --- ._ -'
'
�'4 t 1t
.L�--._
_..
-4 7111
LJ
� �•�...«r._ 1
'1' �
.� '� / ! -L (
7 � ' � 'r- �• . '�, i ;
�. �,
i irk , .'{--._ - ,�
' .
'�
I I I I � f r IS.� -.. f _ r-"-
lT .
j. � .�
_T•
l'•� � 'j'_ ---_t! •+� 11 -( -'1-. �^+..1 p wvn_-. --�� 1-_u (__.._ �
_ �:� ! �� r.r,r..ij rr t._'!'
t�
:'L._...-"
'
�••..
1 i'V (III I
� I Ii 1
( - 1
{ 11 _✓ - _•.!1 _
i : r_.. � —�
�._'i • I +.� 1
I' _.1-... �.o;l,
r_._ r•
•1 •',,_-.r- r._..e`•
r 1.
J �' r
'rt �--1-- 'J
._ ..
— ..,_.
a
1 ,FIS j� 1
� 1' ' I.j I
1
/
r r _ -..
;_ • ;
��_ ' _._::_.- !'-- �- ��---
+ -. -'•� _ =.-1._ 1i'. ; ; -.
#1_:�-
- �.�
..--`----_ � -~'•
''; i ' ; i
,'i � � � ' f
i.!
II :: ` • �«._-�; y -- =�
�'_ ! ►� ...
_ - = Y_.
-`... �-r
'
�- �..a: fes- __- ... 1 _�-. !-•--.� .I }^:. * `,
h��•..
t n7 _ F_t
1
1 ( 1pel 1 ' ! �:�. -_. �- .±
1
}:
, I ! 1
y3 . a . ' ' r"- �_ ! _
, ''I
1 r t r�
L
a _ __ .�-- <•
.' _ _ _' _
_
- _' _
--. _ . _
_
*i i i I y.� '_•
n
i }
rr
'� , .i
"�'f 1 1 i f i
`. �`
k; j r—'
r• _ -- -
"'�� �
�
`! �i�
1
� •� .l
�1 �
-1 ._. _- ._.� I
'L:.�- � •� f it }
,� I � •.�� Ir..} .-rn
' , ,�.. _ -. ._
f � :
1' i+.i:+ !2 _ _
=.p.. -4
.. �. �_�4 _ j1 ...�.»•Y__�� .:':�..r ..:j -.-A _ mil i. __�.: C�'.. _.1 ���.__:l�.i�.T_;��.T _-_.�. 1-�_'�. .. ;_.~, d' .�..�•LL:�'.YS ,_C _1'v�..w_r, 1�.. 't,
f �.. _-_._-�'
.._ .___
_.. _. _.._ _.. ._ ... ...-
�_-_.�_�__. - I.-.__�-..� _-._ ..-_.... .-.__.
r
_.. .._._. ._
.... _..-. -_- _...
...� �.._.._...- _. _
RED HILL AVENUE \ 0 30 120
I
1 �
15 60
",OF Katz, Okitsu do Associates
>ExistingConditions
I� -
,.a
09.07.2006
Conceptual Site Pian wid) Revised Townbomes
Rea Hill Town o
m e s KTGY PROLIP, AMC.
A a a N I IV a 6 7 U a a PLANNING
1
"v"� CALIFORNIA
08614I•l/i/ VAN tl.NI-.».TustinI CatiforniaowzmNAti
W
z
7� �J
F-
D
z
J
3t
1
I1 ' n ! �i '•�L.� --'If-• ----._ �._ _._ L- J _ -c.�-. __ 71 f .._ _ 1 - � -. t~ '� ` ___ ._.�.. �Y` f" t + ....._S'... .: ...._ :__. �
�' 1 � 1 1 � ' 1 � ! '. ._ , _ ` �^. • ',� � ; 1� I : ._ -'r � tNi � .... ►� g..-.:. .....i � 1 r1F } 1
I a! 4 � ,�� t� - ...-M i ._. -i ._ � ' � i--- � ., .. .. i ! -':j I � ! -•_i':- -- a� � � I -� A� � ; — t ,: t ! ;- 1
./ ► t , + I f ( A' N ! ! ' s �-- : • li
I I ( M �I;tt-- { -- �'. a�`. •• " r , -��.L-r•�.�+1-- '•y�i;�-- ,; `' E �- *. -i_Gt:-�: �14 �4+ ��+� : E r�:�.:r"Y•.... n��:�•; t �J ; •-`) ;
1 �' � (_ �� 1� 1 1 il•� ..._.• i• t _ T '.� f. � �\ •` `�/ �i. � ..:L:�Ci���._-.....i; �• �'• et 1 i i
t .i , {`�'j�'.----}'•'••-• _ - ••-�-`'Y• -._.. i �1- - 1.._Z 1 r- r_.? -+r'; -- -:r � �•M: � j,,.- r' _. .. � s,_.-_.. .�..�.. 1�.....�._ 11.._....:! 1
.. ( :t ! F_ �t ;1 t + � 1.� � . I .' � I '� ' i ; . (� �� • �. 'F � � fig ` � 1...-•"+.. _
fir•--.....�._...��» _..7 '+. _'�•�'t---- � 1
1 ��. j�.{ I •r � f�_.s::. _ p � ; I , �.—.� t_..� i � � �, � � j._ .$Ly..(! I � :. I � �': � � i ---^ � � 1'• J ��•�.
a � 1. _�. ' �. _._ _ ••-y� �;�-_.. a � . _ I _ r., l.___ �- 4t �: ____..:._._i � ! _..__i w � '1- � _..:_ _-..- 1 . j : •- � �}
L' .�: !a - �`!{j r�. i tet. 1 /7 -I, �• }' �. i 1 - ��j ^i r •IM "`I
_.' , �! 1 r �r i 1 r� 1 -- 11, •r t I �' i t Ar• ! 1 i r .— .. •1 4 1
� � � � 1: , = i �'� .. !'' ; � S j 1-` i ... I i la I.— ��. � �-;.r-._... r~� '1� - t ' '•ta., �• ; ; r i . t :.: �) !. I
-. ..T .�, .�._• Z7".. •i_ _ -` �a. — - - ,�.�...�. fgna'S. 1.T's^_.i.._ _ .. ...,..r.r �•a -_ '1 Wit` -_)__ , _ _.�:.a.. 1.•_-...� •c1 I
-
_
`_.._ ----. .... __..._r..____.- �-----•-----..._._.--. _..---......_ - _. ...... .tea"+ __ _.. ........ ..r,... _ ._ .. ... _._ .----
I
••, t1'/ I MIAMI.
a
o RED HILL AVENUE
a
Katz, Okitsu & Associates
lernative I
.+'O
9.P.2006
w0
0 0
�--4
1
0)w
w -..x
Conceptual Site Pian WIG Revised Town omes
B,eb Hit[ T 0 w n b o m e s
Tustin, California
0 30 120
15 60
KTGY GROUP, INC.
ANGNITRCTYwR PLANNING
1 1 6 X 6 L L a 0 Y
IA YINIL CALI/OANIA 08�14
CCI -anti /Ax It11i m "I•AI"
fro
ALL MINING f
Exhibit 3
Shade and Shadow Study
Resolution No. 07-3
Page 154 of 163
X
CD
C/)
0
C
q:)
0=
=3
C -n Z
U1 0
0
-4
SunCal - Red Hill, 0.1 C
KTC3Y NO. 20051051.00
Existing Shadow - December 21st -12:00 PM
SbaDow stubs
ReaHill Town Homes
Tustin, california
0
$Zi
KTGY GROUP.
T a a a L
&AL
rl
Al
0 0 0
�CD
cc Cn
cn 0
E
0) 0
0
-� z
�0
0•
W o
w
07
SunCal - Red HiN, LLC
KTGY NO. 20051061.00
Existing Shadow - December 21 st - 9:00 AM
Sbaaow stubN
RebHill Town Homes
Tustin, California
0
KTGY GROUP. 1140.
•4erltaCTVaa •LAMM$IN*
�a• I N a, a 1\ 1, (♦ A� 1 • • a a 1
IMM 11,114-2146 ♦an IMM
s �N•a1N
nua II;a sawlw w
10
CD
�0
cQ =
LID OM
���
V, Z
40
O O
T� ;
V/W
W "
SunCal - Red Hill, LLC
KTGY NO. 20061061.00
n 0
Proposed Shadow - December 21 st -12:00 PM
SbaDow stuV
ReaHiff Town Homes
Tustin, California
KTGY GROUP. 1»C.
•A�M11�_stY�� /t��MIN•
.�s IToo a wittwaL• •0Y to
16 • 1■/. i •l1/ •••1• •f•/ •
1060 *{/•9/0• pan IM"1 000-01"
110
IM CD
CQ Cn
CD 0
--.%. C
CO 0
0 :3
�h Z
-..x 0
C)
W C)
4
W
0
SunCal - Red Hill, LLC
KTGY NO. 20051051.00
11
Proposed Shadow - December 21 st - 9:00 AM
RebHill Town Homes
THstiry California
11
KTGY GFRO JP. 1«C.
•.OMIT{itY.. •►. ww,w.
1-1
721
Exhibit 4
OCTA Comment Letter and City Response
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 159 of 163
MAR -07-2007 17:02 OCTA 2FL PLANNING
7145605794
P.02/02
MR
OCTA
APPIL1ATED AGENCIES
Orange County
TranSN 018 ft
Lodi Tt,1115"POR: 661
Au"
&rete Auttro* kv
Free. way Emetgencxs
Consolidiitod TrdpmMliort
&NkV Agency
coag. 0sto) Management
Agency
Snft*0 Authority Ibr
Abndbned Vehickm
March 7, 2007
Minoo Ashabi, Associate Planner
Community Development Department
City of Tustin
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, California 92780
Subject: Initial Study for the Red Hilt Town Homes
4 es
Dear Ms. Ashabi:
The Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) has reviewed
the above mentioned document. The following comment is provided
for your consideration.
Tran it
OCTA currently has two bus routes, Route 66 on
Route 7 Walnut Avenue and
1 on Red Hill Avenue, that run adjacent to
project. 1 the proposed
p ject. Although OCTA does not nt) curreY have a stop in the project
limits
it is recommended that a bus turnout be laced o
p n the north
side of
Walnut Avenue, northwest of the Intersection of Walnut
Avenue and Red Hill Avenue. If a bus turnout were to b
this intersection,e placed at
OCTA would relocate the existing
opposing side o stop on the
0
pP g f Red Hill Avenue to the new location which
would
serve the surrounding area more efficiently.
v
If you have any questions regardingthis transmittal,
I, please contact
me at(714) 500-5883 or via e-mail at clarwood octa. net.
� If you have
specific questions related to Stops and Zones design,
at(714)� � Please contact
Bill BatorY 580* -5912 or via e-mail at bbator
Y@octa. net.
Sincerely,
4 :
Charles Larwood
Section Manager, Corridor Studies
C: Bill Batory, OCTA
Resolution No. 07-31 55o South MD1, �P 0w C4w'Y Tf�'''�°'014ffw -4utl or;�ty
et 0. scar° 14184 / OMW / Calr�ibmi� ssq )584 / �71415f►�-OCTA r�2871
Page 160 of 163 TOTAL P-02
March 8, 2007
OCTA
550 South Main Street
P.O. Box 14184,
Orange, CA 92863-1584
Attn: Charles Larwood
SUBJECT: COMMENT FOR RED HILL TOWN HOMES INITIAL STUDY
Dear Mr. Larwood,
Thank you for your comment received on March 7, 2007, regarding a recommended bus
turnout on the north side of Walnut Avenue, northwest of the Walnut Avenue and Rcd
Hill Avenue intersection.
As noted in the public notice, the proposed condominium project is scheduled for public
hearings at the March 13, 2007, Planning Commission meeting, and March 20, 2007,
City Council meeting. The project proposes the redevelopment of an existing apartment
complex with new condominium units by a private entity. Staff is recommending a ten
foot wide dedication along Red Hili Avenue and Walnut Avenue for future roadway
widening. While; the Red Hill Avenue widening would be considered in the near future,
the Walnut Avenue widening would require land acquisition and a long range plan. When
the plans for these widening projects move forward, we will be preparing additional
environmental documents and consider your recommendation for a bus turnout.
At this time, no public roadway construction would be required due to the scope of the
project.
Please contact me at 714/573-3126, if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Minoo Ashabi
Associate Planner
cc: Elizabeth Binsack
Dana Ogdon
Terry Lutz
Katy Lee
SACdd\MINOO\Red Hill Condos\OCTA response.doc
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 161 of 163
Exhibit B of Resolution No. 07-31
Mitigation Monitoring Report
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 162 of 163
Mitigation Monitoring Report
Exhibit B of Resolution No. 07-31
Tentative Tract Map 17080
Noise:
• Roof ceiling construction shall be roofing on 1/2 inch plywood. Batt insulation
shall be provided in joist spaces and the interior ceiling shall be finished with one
layer of 5/8 inch gypsum board.
• All exterior walls shall be 2 x 4 studs at 16 inches on center with batt insulation
between studs. Exterior walls shall be plaster with 5/8 inch gypsum board on the
interior.
• All southeast and southwest facing windows and glass doors shall be glazed with
STC 32 glazing with either 1/4 inch laminated glass or dual pane assembly with 1/2
inch air space. In either case, a test report must be provided at the time of
installation to ensure compliance with the minimum requirements. The report
shall be prepared in an independent, accredited testing laboratory in accordance
with ASTM E-90.
• All entry doors shall be 1-3/4 inch solid core door with weather stripping seals on
the sides and top. No glazing shall be permitted for the entry doors.
• Since meeting the minimum levels of interior noise standard would require closed
windows and doors, the structures shall be equipped with ventilation or an air-
conditioning system to provide a habitable interior environment.
• Balconies six feet in depth along Walnut Avenue and first units along Red Hill
Avenue shall be designed with 42 inch high solid railings designed compatible
with the proposed architecture.
Public Services:
• The pool access gates need to be equipped with a knox box for emergency access.
• Landscaping should be designed with surveillance opportunities for residents and
police personnel in patrol vehicles.
• Security devices such as double locking deadbolts, strike plates, with 1-1/2 inch
screws and pin locks on windows and sliders shall be- installed minimizing the
potential for criminals to access the units.
Traffic:
• Access - to and from the site to Red Hill Avenue should be available with
completion of the project. The left turn egress from the project site may be
prohibited in the future if determined necessary by the City's Traffic Engineer.
Resolution No. 07-31
Page 163 of 163