HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 96-082 RESOLUTION NO. 96- 82
2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION
3 OF CERTAIN RECORDS
4 'The City Council of the City of Tustin hereby resolves as
follows:
5
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 34090 authorizes the head of
6 a city department to destroy any city record, document, instrument,
book or paper, under his or her charge, without making a copy
7 thereof, except for records affecting title to real property or liens
thereon, court records, records less than two years old, records
8 required to be kept by statute or ordinance, or resolutions of the
city council or other city boards or commissions, by resolution and
9 the written consent of the city attorney; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, upon request of the City Attorney of
the City of Tustin, desires Ito approve immediate destruction of
certain closed 'litigation records, documents or papers as listed
below; and
WHEREAS, the City Attorney has filed her written consent with
the Clerk of the Council of the City of Tustin and a copy of such
consent is attached hereto;
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council of the City
of Tustin, California, hereby approves the immediate destruction of
the records, documents and papers described below which, as of this
date, have been retained for a minimum of two (2) years:
(See Exhibit "A" attached hereto, and by this reference,
incorporated herein.)
49 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tustin on the .
20 15th day of July, 1996.
24 TRACY ~ LS WORLEY,
22
ATTEST:
23
24
PAMELA STOKER
25 CITY CLERK
27
28
MEMORANDUM
TO: LEJ
FROM: DEB
DATE: June 18, 1996
RE: LIST OF FILES TO CLOSE FOR CITY OF TUSTIN
Pursuant to your request please find listed below the list of files so you can present
them to the City Council for approval of their destruction.
Almond v. Tustin Kimberly Gundersen v. Tustin
Anderson v. Tustin Hamblin v. Tustin
Asher v. Tustin Hampson v. Tustin
Balderas v. Tustin Larry Head v. Tustin
Barragan v. Tustin Louise Hoesarich v. Tustin
Bauer v. Tustin Kenko v. Tustin
Beals v. Tustin Klemet v. Tustin
Bente v. Tustin Larkin/Bryan v. Tustin
Bernhart v. Tustin Howard Lear v. Tustin
Bloom v. Tustin Kenneth Lee v. Tustin
Boral Resources v. Tustin Levine v. Tustin
Devon G. Bowman v. Tustin Shirley Lewis v. Tustin
Boyko v. Tustin Helen Lindgren v. Tustin
Bragg v. Tustin Maria Lopez v. Tustin
Cameron v. Tustin Alex Martinez v. Tustin
Certainteed v. Tustin McKenzie v. Tustin
Collier v. Tustin Katherine Moore v. Tustin
Collins v. Tustin Murphy v. Tustin
Coykendall v. Tustin Nakahara v. Tustin
Day v. Tustin Nguyen v. Tustin
Heirs of James De La Riva v. Tustin , Moira Niehaus v. Tustin
Eckenrod v. Tustin Gertrude Page v. Tustin
Gordon &Leslie Eckerling v. Tustin Richard D. Page v. Tustin
Exxon v. Tustin Parkman v. Tustin
FSLIC (Farmers) v. Tustin R.D. Olson Construction v. Tustin
Ferchland v. Tustin Doris Reese/Lopez v. Tustin
Donald Fife v. Tustin Edward Rex v. Tustin
Fontaine v. Tustin
Foothill Comm. Assoc. v. Tustin Heirs of Paquita Said v. Tustin
Geosoils v. Tustin Singletary v. Tustin
EXHIBIT "A"
LEJ
June 18, 1996
Page 2
Dean Smith v. Tustin
State of California v. Tustin
Sullivan v. Tustin
Sully Miller v. Tustin
Tomlin v. Tustin
Torres v. Tustin
Transmix v. Tustin
Trench Corp. v. Tustin
Tustin Hills Environmental v. Tustin
UPS v. Tustin
Underground Sharing Spec. v. Tustin
Universal v. Tustin
Sondra Berry Young vo Tustin
Wyman v. Tustin
Zambrano v. Tustin
City of Tustin
RESOLUTION CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF TUSTIN )
RESOLUTION NO. 96-82
Pamela Stoker, City Clerk and ~x-officio Clerk of the City Council of the
City of Tustin, California, does'hereby certify that the whole'number of
the members of the City Council is five; that the above and foregoing
resolution was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council
held on the 15th day of July, 1996, by the following vote:
COUNCILMEMBER AYES: Worley, Thomas, Doyle, Potts
COUNCILMEMBER NOES: None
COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: None
COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: Saltarelli
P a~C ~